EFTA00225672

(30) 
On or about January 14, 2005, Defendant 
placed a 
telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #3. 
D 
(31)
employees prepared a written telephone message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's 
review regarding a telephone call received from Jane Doe #3 that read: "I have a female 
for him." 
On or about January 29, 2005, one of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's 
Jane Does #4, #5, and #6 
(32) 
Raround the first half of 2004, Defendant 
led Jane 
Doe #4 and Jane Doe #5 to Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's bedroom at 358 El Brillo 
Way. 
(33) 
In or around the first half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN 
asked Jane Doe #4 about her age, and Jane Doe #4 responded with her true age. 
(34) 
In or around thirst half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN 
masturbated 
in 
the 
presence 
of Jane 
Doe 
#4, who was then 
a 
seventeen-year-old-girl, and Jane Doe #5, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl. 
(35) 
In or around the first half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN 
instructed Jane Doe #4, who was then a 
e nteen-year-old girl, to play with his 
nipples. 
F
(36) 
In or around the first half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN 
instructed Jane Doe #4, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl, to remove her 
clothing. 
12 
EFTA00225772

(22) 
On or about October 30, 2004, Defendant 
placed a 
telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #3. 
D (23)
In or around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed Jane Doe #3, 
who was then a sixteen- or seventeen-year-old girl, to straddle an adult female and to 
touch the adult female's breasts. 
(24) 
In or around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN placed a massaging 
device on the vagina of an adult female in the presence of Jane Doe #3, who was then a 
sixteen- or seven-year-old girl. 
(25) 
In or around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment of 
$200 to Jane Doe #3. 
(26) 
In or around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN instructed Jane Doe #3 
to rub his nipples. 
(27) 
In or around 2ADefendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN placed a massaging 
device on the vagina of Jane Doe #3, who was then a sixteen- or seventeen-year-old girl. 
(28) 
In or around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN asked Jane Doe #3 to 
recruit additional females to come to 358 El Brillo Way. 
(29) 
On or about November 8, 2004, one of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's 
employees prepared a written telephone mge for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's 
review regarding a telephone call received from Jane Doe #3 that read: "I have a female 
for him? 
11 
EFTA00225773

(13) In or around 2003, Defendant 
told Jane Doe #2 that 
Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN had asked 
to take nude photographs of Jane 
(14) In or around 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in the 
presence of Jane Doe #2, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. 
(15) In or around 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment of 
$200 to Jane Doe #2, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. 
(16) Raround 2003, Defendant 
placed a telephone call 
to a telephone used by Jane Doe #2 to make an appointment for Jane Doe #2 to travel to 
358 El Brillo Way. 
(17) 
On or about April 23, 2004, Defendant 
placed a 
telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #2. 
(18) On or about A 2, 2004, Defendant 
placed a 
telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #2. 
Jane Doe #3 
(19) In or around 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in the 
presence of Jane Doe #3, who was then a fifteen-year-old girl. 
(20) In or around 2003, DefendFJEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment 
of $200 to Jane Doe #3. 
(21) 
On or about October 26, 2004, Defendant 
placed a 
telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #3. 
10 
EFTA00225774

(6) 
In or around 2001, Defendant 
placed a telephone call 
to a telephone used by Jane Doe #2 to make an appointment for Jane Doe #2 to travel to 
D
I Brillo Way. 
(7) 
In or around 2001, JEFFREY EPSTEIN engaged in sexual 
intercourse with an unidentified female in the presence of Jane Doe #2, who was 
then a fourteen-year-old girl. 
(8) 
In or around 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid $300 to Jane Doe 
#2, who was thRourteen-year-old girl, for allowing an unidentified female to perform 
oral sex on Jane Doe #2 in EPSTEIN's presence. 
(9) 
On or about March 11, 2003, an employee of Defendant JEFFREY 
EPSTEIN prepared a written telephone message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's 
review regarding a telephone call received from Jane Doe #2. 
(10) 
In or around A Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN asked Jane Doe 
#2 if she had any younger friends who would be interested in engaging in similar 
activities with him. 
(II) 
In or around 2003, Defendant 
took nude photographs 
r
of Jane Doe #2, who was then a sixteen-year 
girl. 
(12) 
In or around 2003, Defendant 
RAH 
made a payment of $500 
to Jane Doe #2 in exchange for posing for nude photographs. 
9 
EFTA00225775

(e) 
It was further a part of the conspiracy that Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN 
would pay minor females to engage in lewd conduct with Defendant 
to satistyndant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's prurient interests. 
Overt Acts 
30. 
In furtherance of this conspiracy and to effect the objects thereof, there was 
committed by at least one of the co-conspirators herein, at least one of the following overt acts, 
among others, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere: 
R 
Jane Does #1 and #2 
(1) 
In or around the beginning of 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN 
engaged in sexual activity with Jane Doe #1, who was then a seventeen-year-old 
girl, in the presence of Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl. 
(2) 
In or around 2001, Defendant 
led Jane Doe #2 from the 
kitchen of 358 El Brillo WayAtairs to Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's bedroom at 
358 El Brillo Way. 
(3) 
In or around 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in the 
presence of Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl. 
(4) 
In or around 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN asked Jane Doe 
#2, who was then fourteen years' old, to pitch his nipples while he masturbated. 
(5) 
In or around 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment 
of $300 to Jane Doe #2. 
8 
EFTA00225776

29. 
The manner and means by which the Defendants and other participants sought to 
accomplish the purpose and object of the conspiracy included the following: 
(a) 
It was part of the conspiracy that Defendants 
" 
, and other participants 
would contact minor females via the use of cellular and other telephones to arrange appointments 
for minor females to travel to 358 El Brillo Way and the New York residence to allow Defendant 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN to engage in lewd conduct with them. 
(b) 
I 
as further a part of the conspiracy that Defendants JEFFREY 
EPSTEIN, 
and 
• 
and other participants would make payments to, or cause payments to be made 
to, minor females in exchange for engaging in lewd conduct. 
(c) 
It was further a part of the conspiracy that Defendants JEFFREY 
EPSTEIN, 
AD
1A 
and other 
participants would ask females to recruit other minor females to engage in lewd conduct with 
Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN. 
(d) 
It was further a part of the conspiracy that Defendants JEFFREY 
EPSTEIN, 
and other 
F
participants would make payments to, or cause p 
ents to be made to, the recruiters for 
bringing additional minor females to 358 El Brillo Way and the New York residence to engage 
in lewd conduct with Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN. 
7 
EFTA00225777

COUNT 1 
(Conspiracy: 18 U.S.C. § 371) 
Paragraphs 1 through 25 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated 
by refe 
as though fully set forth herein. 
27. 
From at least as early as 2001, the exact date being unknown to the Grand Jury, 
through in or around October 2005, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, 
and elsewhere, the Defendants, 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
R
DRIANA ROSS, aAc/a " 
did knowingly and willfully combine, conspire, confederate and agree with each other 
and with others known and unknown to commit an offense against the United States, that 
is, to use a facility or means of ingrate or foreign commerce to knowingly persuade, 
induce, and entice individuals who had not attained the age of 18 years to engage in 
prostitution, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422(h). 
Purpose and Object of the Conspiracy 
28. 
It was the purpose and object of the conspiracy to procure females under the age 
of 18 to travel to 358 El Brillo Way and the New Fic residence so that JEFFREY EPSTEIN 
could, in exchange for money, engage in lewd conduct with those minor females in order to 
satisfy JEFFREY EPSTEIN's prurient interests. 
Manner and Means 
6 
EFTA00225778

23. 
During the period of her involvement with the Defendants, Jane Doe #10 attended 
Lake Worth High School in Palm Beach County. 
D
During the period of her involvement with the Defendants, Jane Doe #11 attended 
the Professional Performing Arts School, a public high school, located in New York, New York. 
25. 
During the period of her involvement with the Defendants, Jane Doe #13 attended 
John I. Leonard High School in Palm Beach County. 
R 
A 
F 
5 
EFTA00225779

of any act involving sexual activity in the presence of a victim who is less than 16 years of age, 
commits lewd or lascivious exhibition," which is a felony of the second degree. 
I) 
Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 800.04(2), InJeither the victim's lack of 
chastity nor the victim's consent is a defense to the crimes proscribed by [Section 800.04]." 
15. 
Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 800.04(3), "[t]he perpetrator's ignorance of 
the victim's age, the victim's misrepresentation of his or her age, or the perpetrator's bona fide 
belief of the victim's age cannot be raised as a defense in a prosecution under [Section 800.04]." 
R
16. 
Pursuant Florida Statutes Section 800.02, a "person who commits any unnatural 
and lascivious act with another person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree." 
17. 
Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN was over the age of 24 and did not have any 
medical license. 
18. 
During the period of her involvement with the Defendants, Jane Doe #4 attended 
Wellington High School and Palm Bekentral High School in Palm Beach County. 
19. 
During the period of her involvement with the Defendants, Jane Doe #5 attended 
Wellington High School in Palm Beach County. 
20. 
During the period of their involvement with the Defendants, Jane Does # 6, 8 and 
12 attended Palm Beach Central High School in Palm Beach County. 
21. 
During the period of her involveFt with the Defendants, Jane Doe #7 
attended William T. Dwyer High School in Palm Beach County. 
22. 
During the periods of their involvement with the Defendants, Jane Does # 9, 14, 
15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 attended Royal Palm Beach High School in Palm Beach County. 
4 
EFTA00225780

of the second degree." For purposes of "this section, 'sexual activity' means oral, anal, or 
vaginal penetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another; however, sexual 
activityla not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose." Florida Statutes 
Section 794.021 states that "ignorance of the age [of the victim] is no defense," and that 
neither "misrepresentation of age by [the victim] nor a bona fide belief that such person is 
over the specified age [shall] be a defense." 
11. 
Pursuant to Florida Statutes Sections 800.04(5Xa) and 800.04(5Xc)(2), an 
adult "who intentio 
touches in a lewd or lascivious manner the breasts, genitals, 
genital area, or buttocks, or the clothing covering them, of a person less than 16 years of 
age, or forces or entices a person under 16 years of age to so touch the perpetrator, 
commits lewd or lascivious molestation," which is a felony of the second degree if the 
victim is 12 years of age or older bAs than 16 years of age. 
12. 
Pursuant to Florida Statutes Sections 800.04(6)(a) and 800.04(6)(b), an adult 
"who [i]ntentionally touches a person under 16 years of age in a lewd or lascivious manner or 
[s]olicits a person under 16 years of age to commit a lewd or lascivious act commits lewd or 
lascivious conduct," which is a felony of the second degree. 
13. 
Pursuant to Florida Statutes SectioF00.04(7)(a) and 800.04(7)(c), an adult 
"who: (I) [i]ntentionally masturbates; (2) [i]ntentionally exposes the genitals in a lewd or 
lascivious manner; or (3) [i]ntentionally commits any other sexual act that does not involve 
actual physical or sexual contact with the victim, including, but not limited to . . . the simulation 
3 
EFTA00225781

2. 
Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN employed L.G. to perform, among other things, 
services as a personal assistant. 
1) 
Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and 
paid T.M., H.R., and 
A.F. to perform, among other things, recruiting services. 
4. 
Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at 358 El Brillo Way, 
Palm Beach, Florida, in the Southern District of Florida (hereinafter referred to as '358 El Brillo 
Way"). 
5. 
DefendaRFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at 9 East 71st Street, 
New York, New York (hereinafter referred to as "the New York residence"). 
6. 
Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN was the principal owner of JEGE, INC., a 
Delaware corporation. 
JEGE, INC.'s sole business activities related to the operation and 
ownership of a Boeing 727-31 aircraft bearing tail number N908JE. 
7. 
Defendant JEFFREY 
STEIN served as president, sole director, and sole 
shareholder of JEGE, INC., and had the power to direct all of its operations. 
8. 
Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN was the principal owner of Hyperion Air, Inc., a 
Delaware corporation. Hyperion Air, Inc.'s sole business activities related to the operation and 
ownership of a Gulfstream G-1159B aircraft bearing tail number N909JE. 
F
9. 
Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN se 
as president, sole director, and sole 
shareholder of Hyperion Air, Inc., and had the power to direct all of its operations. 
10. 
Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 794.05, a "person 24 years of age or 
older who engages in sexual activity with a person 16 or 17 years of age commits a felony 
2 
EFTA00225782

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
D 
Case No: 
18 U.S.C. § 371 
18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)(1) 
18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)(2) 
18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) 
18 U.S.C. § 2423(e) 
18 U.S.C. § 2423(d) 
18 U.S.C. § 2423(b) 
UNITED STATES RAMERICA 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
and 
• 
Defendants. 
A 
INDICTMENT 
The Grand Jury charges that: 
BACKGROUND 
At all times relevant to this Indictment: 
1. 
Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN employed defendants 
" and 
to perform, among 
other things, services as personal assistants. 
T 
EXHIBIT B-30 
EFTA00225783

A. 
Villafaria, Esq. 
December 9, 2009 
Page 3 
our part would constitute a breach of the NPA. So the Rothstein lawyers, once 
again, are using the power of the federal government to perpetrate and further 
their fraud. And the expense of litigating these cases has been extreme. For 
example, Bob Josefsberg, who I do not believe was aware of the Rothstein crimes, 
is now demanding over $2 million in legal fees. 
As a lawsuit brought by some of the investors' claims, Rothstein and his 
partner Edwards used Jeffrey Epstein as bait. The litigation strategy, media 
pronouncements, and investigatory initiatives of Rothstein and Edwards were 
calculated to support Rothstein's deceptions rather than to advance the position 
of his clients. I bring these facts to your attention so that if you had contact with 
Edwards or those associated with him in the past concerning Mr. Epstein, you 
consider not continuing communications with any of them in the future. 
I would like a short conference with you in person to talk about Mr. 
Epstein's progress through the state criminal justice system, to discuss several 
outstanding issues that I want to make sure you have accurate information about, 
and, from my perspective, most importantly, so that I can provide Mr. Epstein 
with proper counsel going forward. If you email me some dates when you are 
available this month, we can schedule a short meeting in your office hopefully 
before the year ends. 
Roy Black 
RB/wg 
Enclosure 
Black, Srebnick. Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 
EFTA00225784

ROY BLACK 
HOWARD M. SREBNICK 
Scan' A. KORNSPAN 
LARRY A. STUMPF. 
MARIA NEYRA 
JACKIE PERCZEK 
MARK A.J. SHAPIRO 
JARED LOPEZ 
BLACK 
SREBNICK 
KORNSPAN 
& STUMPF 
=PA.= 
December 9, 2009 
A. 
Villafafia, Esq. 
Assistant United States Attorney 
United States Attorney's Office 
Southern District of Florida 
500 South Australian Avenue 
Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 
RE: Jeffrey Epstein 
Dear 
JESSICA FONSECA-NADER 
KATHLEEN P. PHILLIPS 
AARON ANTHON 
MARCOS BEATON, JR. 
MATTHEW P. O'BRIEN 
JENIPER J. SOULIKIAS 
NOAH FOX 
E-Mail: RBlack@RoyBlack.com 
You emailed me a letter on November 2, asking whether Jeffrey Epstein's 
place of employment remained constant. It has. I reviewed a Google map to 
confirm that the distance between that place of employment and the location 
where he was stopped by Palm Beach Police is less than 3 miles (and that the 
location where he was walking was on a direct route to his place of work). 
It has taken us a while to respond to your letter because other matters have 
consumed our time and effort. Over the past five weeks, the massive billion-dollar 
conspiracy created and run by Scott Rothstein has been exposed. On Monday, 
Mr. Epstein filed a state civil RICO lawsuit charging Rothstein, his partner Brad 
Edwards, and others with tortuous and fraudulent abuses of process that resulted 
in serious injury to Mr. Epstein. A copy of the Complaint is enclosed with this 
letter. 
ou 
sr 
know, Rothstein's firm represents 
and 
Wilde, 
three of the plaintiffs who have rou t civil actions against Mr. 
Epstein. The Rothstein firm was a criminal enterprise that used the litigation 
against Mr. Epstein to lure investors into its billion-dollar ponzi scheme. We 
believe that Rothstein and his co-conspirators used the government's criminal 
investigation as a means to perpetrate and further their fraud. For example: 
201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 • Miami. Florida 33131 • Phone: 
Fax: a 
• www.RoyBlack.com 
EFTA00225785

West side of an existing concrete seawall and the northerly extension thereof 
as shown on the Adair & Brady, Inc., drawing IS-1298, dated March 25, 1981, 
and bounded on the East by the shoreline as shown on the plat of El Bravo 
Park, and bounded on the North and South by the Westerly extensions of the 
Sfokt and South lines respectively of Lot 40, containing 0.07 acres, more or 
Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1594(b). 
A TRUE BILL. 
FOREPERSON 
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
A. 
VILLAFARA 
ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
54 
EFTA00225786

(e) 
difficulty; 
has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without 
it is theiiiiegt of the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 2253(o), 
to seek forfeiture of any other property of said defendant up to the value of the above 
forfeitable property. 
Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 2253. 
FORFEITURE 3 
Upon convictidn'of any of the violations alleged in Counts 2-11 of this indictment, 
the defendants, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, 
, a/k/a "Adrian 
Mucinska," and NADIA MARCINK0VA, shall forfeit to the United States any property, real 
or personal, that was used or intended to be used to commit or to facilitate the commission 
of such violation; and any propertl,:;real or personal, constituting or derived from any 
proceeds that such person obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of such violation, 
including but not limited to the following: 
a. 
A parcel of land located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida 
33480, including all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments, and easements found 
therein or thereon, and more particularly described as: 
Being all of Lot 40 and the West 24.3 feet of Lot 39, El Bravo Park, as 
recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 9, in the records of Palm Beach County, Florida 
and 
BEING that portion lying West of Lot 40, El Bravo Park, in Section 27, 
Township 43 South, Range 43 East, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 9, Public 
Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, being bounded kin' the West by the 
53 
EFTA00225787

offense; and any property, real or personal, used or intended to be used to commit or to 
promote the commission of such offense, including but not limited to the following: 
a. 
A parcel of land located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida 
33480, including all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments, and easements found 
therein or thereon, and more particularly described as: 
Being all of Lot 40 and the West 24.3 feet of Lot 39, El Bravo Park, as 
recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 9, in the records of Palm Beach County, Florida 
and 
BEING that portion lying West of Lot 40, El Bravo Park, in Section 27, 
Township 43 South, Range 43 East, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 9, Public 
Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, being bounded on the West by the 
West side of an existing concrete seawall and the northerly extension thereof 
as shown on the Adair & Brady, Inc., drawing IS-1298, dated March 25, 1981, 
and bounded on the East by the shoreline as shown on the plat of El Bravo 
Park, and bounded on the North and South by the Westerly extensions of the 
North and South lines respectively of Lot 40, containing 0.07 acres, more or 
less. 
I 
Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 2253. 
If any of the forfeitable property described in the forfeiture section of this indictment, 
as a result of any act or omission of the defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska," and NADIA Ea 
(a) 
cannot be located upon the exercise-of due diligence; 
(b) 
has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third person; 
(c) 
has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court; 
(d) 
has been substantially diminished in value; or 
52 
EFTA00225788

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461; Title 18, United States Code, 
Section 981(a)(1)(C); and Title 21, United States Code, Section 853. 
If the property described above as being subject to forfeiture, as a result of any act or 
omission of the defendants, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH 
a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska," and 
(1) 
cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; 
(2) 
has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with a third person; 
(3) 
has bectiiilaced beyond the jurisdiction of the Court; 
(4) 
has been substantially diminished in value; or 
(5) 
has been commingled with other property which cannot be subdivided without 
difficulty; 
it is the intent of the United States, putsuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), 
to seek forfeiture of any other property of the defendants up to the value of the above 
forfeitable property. 
All pursuant to Title 28 United States Code, Section 2461; Title 18, United States 
Code, Section 98I(a)(1)(C); and Title 21 United States Code, Section 853. 
FORFEITURE 2 
Upon conviction of any of the violations alleged in Counts 12-29 of this indictment, 
the defendants, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
a/k/a "Adriana 
Mucinska," and NADIA MARCINKOVA, shall forfeit to the United States any property, real 
or personal, constituting or traceable to gross profits or other proceeds obtained from such 
51 
EFTA00225789

Defendant(s) listed below traveled in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in 
illicit sexual conduct as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2423(f), with a person under 18 years of age, 
that is, the person(s) listed in each count below: 
Count 
Date(s) 
Minor(s) Involved 
Defendant(s) 
26 
7/16/2004 
Jane Doe #7 
Jane Doe #8 
Jane Doe #9 
Jane Doe #10 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN 
NADIA MARCINKOVA 
27 
3/31/200;5 
Jane Doe #14 
Jane Doe #15 
Jane Doe #16 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN 
ADRI
llasIAIM, 
a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska" 
28 
9/18/2005 
Jane Doe #16 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN 
a/k/a "Adriana Mucuiska" 
29 
9/29/05 
Jae Doe #16 
_ 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN 
SARAH 
ADRIAN'', 
a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska" 
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2423(b) and 2. 
FORFEITURE 1 
- . 
Upon conviction of the violation alleged ineount 1 of this indictment, the defendants, 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska," and 
shall forfeit to the United States any property, real or personal, 
which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the violation. 
50 
EFTA00225790

did knowingly and willfully conspire with each other and with others lmown and unknown 
to travel in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct, as 
defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2423(f), with another person, in violation of Title 18, United States 
Cod; Section 2423(b); all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423(e). 
COUNT 25 
(Facilitation of Unlawful Travel of Another: 18 U.S.C. § 2423(d)) 
61. 
Paragraphs 1 through 25 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by 
reference as though Eitily set forth herein. 
62. 
From at least as early as in or about 2001 through in or around October 2005, 
the exact dates being unknown to the Grand Jury, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern 
District of Florida, and elsewhere, the Defendant, 
SARAH KELLEN, 
did, for the purpose of commercial advAntage or private financial gain, arrange and facilitate 
the travel of a person, that is Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, knowing that such person was 
traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct, as 
defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2423(f); in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423(d). 
COUNTS 26 THROkIJGH 29 
(Travel to Engage in Illicit Sexual CA:induct: 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b)) 
63. 
Paragraphs 1 through 25 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by 
reference as though fully set forth herein. 
64. 
On or about the dates enumerated as to each count listed below, from a place 
outside the Southern District of Florida to a place inside the SoutiOrh District of Florida, the 
49 
EFTA00225791