EFTA00193954

JAY P. LEFKOWFIZ, ESQ. 
, 2008 
PAGE 2 OF 5 
Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Mice Fisher. As you recall, you chose to forego an 
appeal to AAG Fisher, and instead pursued a negotiated resolution which, ultimately, resulted in the 
execution of the Agreement. 
The Negotiation Phase 
During negotiations, you tried to avoid a resolution that called for incarceration and 
registration as a sexual offender — both of which would be triggered by a successful federal 
prosecution. The SDFL believed and continues to believe that should this matter proceed to trial, 
your client would be convicted of the federal statutes identified in the Agreement. In order to achieve 
a global resolution, the SDFL indicated a willingness to compromise the length of incarceration; 
however, it remained adamant that Epstein register as a sex offender and that all victims identified 
during the investigation remain eligible for compensation. In order to achieve this result, the parties 
considered two alternatives, a plea to federal charges that limited Epstein's sentencing exposure, or, 
as suggested by you, a plea to state charges encompassing Epstein's conduct. Ultimately, the parties 
agreed to, inter alia, a plea to the state charges outlined in the Agreement, registration and a method 
of compensation. 
The Agreement 
The crux of the Agreement defers federal prosecution of Epstein for his sexual conduct 
involving those minor victims identified as of September 24, 2007, in exchange for a guilty plea to 
a state offense that requires registration as a sex offender; a sufficient term of imprisonment; and a 
method of compensation for the victims such that they would be placed in the same position as if 
Epstein had been convicted of one of the enumerated offenses set forth in Title 18, United States 
Code, Section 2255. Specifically, the Agreement mandates, inter alia, (1) a guilty plea in Palm 
Beach County Circuit Court to solicitation ofprostitution (FL Stat. Section 796.07) and procurement 
of minors to engage in prostitution (FL Stat. Section 796.03) (an offense that requires him to register 
as a sex offender); (2) a 30-month sentence including 18 months' incarceration in county jail; (3) a 
methodology to compensate the victims identified by the United States; (4) entry of the guilty plea 
and sentence no later than October 26, 2007; and (5) the start of the above-mentioned sentence no 
later than January 4, 2008. 
Furthermore, and significantly, Epstein agreed that he had the burden of ensuring compliance 
of the Agreement with the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office and the Judge of the 15`11
Judicial Circuit and "that the failure to do so will be a breach of the agreement" (emphasis added). 
Post-Execution of the Agreement 
Within weeks of the execution of the Agreement, you sought to delay the entry of Epstein's 
guilty plea and sentence. After the SDFL agreed to accommodate your request, counsel for Epstein 
began taking issue with the methodology ofcompensation, notification to the victims, and the issues 
EFTA00194234

JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. 
, 2008 
PAGE 3 OP 5 
that had been previously considered and rejected during negotiations, i.e., that the conduct does not 
require registration and the contemplated state and federal statutes have no applicability to the instant 
matter. 
A. 
Delay. 
The Agreement required that "Epstein shall use his best efforts to enter his guilty plea and 
be sentenced not later than October 26, 2007. The United States has no objection to Epstein self-
reporting to begin serving his sentence not later than January 4, 2008." Agreement, pages 4-5, 
paragraph 11 (emphasis added). After the Agreement was executed, the SDFL 'accommodated your 
request to extend the October 26th plea deadline to November 20t  based upon, what seemed to be, 
reasonable scheduling conflict issues.' By early November, you represented that the presiding state 
court judge would not "stagger the plea and sentencing as contemplated in the Agreement."Although 
the Agreement clearly did not contemplate a staggered "plea and sentencing," the SDFL again agreed 
to accommodate Epstein's request to appear in state court for plea and sentencing on January 4, 
2908.2
B. 
Method of Compensation and Notification. 
During this same time period, you and others, including the former Solicitor General of the 
United States Kenneth Starr, took issue with the implementation of the methodology of 
compensation (hereinafter "the 2255 provision")3 and the SDFL's intention to notify the victims 
under 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (you objected to victims being notified of time and place of Epstein's 
"Accordingly, I have now confirmed with Mr. Epstein's Florida counsel that the states 
attorney's office and the court will be available to have him enter his plea on November 20. So we will 
plan to proceed on one that date." October 18, 2007 email from Jay Lefkowitz to USA R. Alexander 
Acosta. 
On the same day, Mr. Lefkowitz confirmed with First Assistant Jeffrey II. Sloman that this 
postponement " will not affect when Epstein begins serving his sentence." 
2 Correspondence from Jay Lefkowitz to FAUSA Sloman dated November 8, 2007 ("the judge 
has invited the parties to appear for the plea and sentencing on January 46, we do not anticipate any delay 
beyond that date.") 
3 Prior to any issues arising concerning the implementation of the 2255 provision, the SDFL 
unilaterally agreed to assign its responsibility to select the attorney representative for the alleged victims 
to an independent third-party. This was done to avoid even the appearance of favoritism in the selection 
of the attorney representative. As a result, on October 29, 2007, the parties executed an Addendum 
wherein it was mutually agreed that former United States District Court Judge Edward B. 
would 
serve as the independent third-party. Judge 
selected the venerable law firm of Podhurst and 
Josefsberg to represent the approximately 34 alleged identified victims. 
EFTA00194235

JAY P. LEFICOWITZ, ESQ. 
, 2008 
PAGE 4 OF 5 
state court sentencing hearing). In response, the SDFL offered, in my opinion, numerous and various 
reasonable modifications and accommodations which ultimately resulted in United States Attorney 
R. Alexander Acosta's December 19, 2007 letter to Lilly Ann Sanchez. In that letter, the United 
States Attorney tried to eliminate all concerns which, quite frankly, the SDFL was not obligated to 
address, let alone consider. He proposed the following language regarding the 2255 provision: 
"Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of a violation of an offense enumerated in 
Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under 
Section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein been tried federally and convicted of an 
enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall 
provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in 
an Indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority 
interpreting this provision, including any authority determining which evidentiary burdens 
if any a plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these 
identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been 
convicted at trial. No more; no less." 
Regarding the issue of notice to the victims, USA Acosta proposed to notify them of the 
federal resolution as required by law; however, "[vi]e will defer to the discretion of the State 
Attorney regarding whether he wishes to provide victims with notice of the state proceedings, 
although we will provide him with the information necessary to do so if he wishes." As you know, 
you rejected these proposals as well. See December 26, 2007 correspondence from Jay Lefkowitz 
to USA Acosta. 
C. 
"Mr. Epstein Does Not Believe He Is Guilty Of The Federal Charges Enumerated 
Under Section 2255." 
At our December 14, 2007 meeting at the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami, counsel for 
Epstein announced, inter alia, that it was a "profound injustice" to require Epstein to register as a 
sex offender and reiterated that no federal crime, especially 18 U.S.C. Section 2422(b), had been 
committed since the statute is only violated if a telephone or means of interstate commerce is used 
to do the persuading or inducing. This particular attack on this statute had been previously raised and 
thoroughly considered and rejected by the SDFL and CEOS prior to the execution ofthe Agreement. 
You also argued that the facts were inapplicable to the contemplated state statutes and that Epstein 
should not have been allowed to have been induced into the Agreement because the facts were not 
what he understood them to be. It should be noted that the SDFL has never provided you with any 
evidence supporting its investigation. This is not, and has never been, an Alford plea situation (see 
North Carolina 
Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160 (1970)). Ultimately, you requested an 
independent review. 
Subsequent to the above-mentioned meeting, the SDFL received three letters from you and/or 
Mr. Starr which expanded on some of the themes announced in the December 14th meeting. 
EFTA00194236

JAY P. LEFKOWEIZ, ESQ. 
, 2008 
PAGE 5 OF 5 
Essentially, you portrayed the SDFL as trying to coerce a plea to unknown allegations and incoherent 
theories. On December 17, 2007, you decreed that Epstein's conduct did not meet the requirements 
of solicitation of minors to engage in prostitution (Fl. Stat. Section 796.03) one of the enumerated 
crimes Epstein had previously agreed to plead guilty to; that Epstein's conduct does not require 
registration under Florida law; and the State Attorney's Office does not believe the conduct is 
registrable. On December 21, 2007, you rejected the USA's proposed resolution of the 2255 
provision because you "strongly believe that the provable conduct of Mr. Epstein with respect to 
these individuals fails to satisfy the requisite elements of either 18 U.S.C. Section[s] 2422(b) ... or 
2423(b)." In your December 26, 2007 correspondence you stated that "we have reiterated in 
previous submissions that Mr. Epstein does not believe he is guilty of the federal charges enumerated 
under section 2255" and requiring "Mr. Epstein to in essence admit guilt, though he believes he did 
not commit the requisite offense." 
As the SDFL has reiterated time and time again, it does not want nor does it expect Epstein 
to plead guilty to a charge he does not believe he committed. As a result, we obliged your request 
for an independent de novo teview of the investigation and facilitated such a review at the highest 
levels of the Department of Justice. It is our understanding that that independent review is now 
complete and a determination has been made that there are no impediments to a federal prosecution 
by the SDFL. 
Conclusion 
Therefore, as I proposed in my email to you on February 25, 2008, you shall have until 
 
, to comply with all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement, including plea, sentence, 
and incarceration, as modified by the USA's December 19th letter to Ms. Sanchez. 
Sincerely, 
IL Alexander Acosta. 
United States Attorney 
By: 
Jeffrey H. Sloman 
First Assistant United States Attorney 
cc: 
R. Alexander Acosta 
United States Attorney 
A. Marie Villafana 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
EFTA00194237

zooSir 
,_cattviatfac..eauir 
L._____tei.) 
c__L-r-raled-__i_ti:_..bq4_reit.A. 
.„—_Ker_t
____Ta.Atiezi. Adak.  i.k...ekediat --
_
._. ___ 
-- - _Cta ptegAt 15  .2-ci LI -s9:5:3-4f 
__ 
A• 
caite_t_talci &cocks 
e4  e
___Iluntiladikshia_zt 
_Merl -ID csat 6Oa- . 
vt- Karen A._ 
neat 
Migititaa2. 
IT 61  Fry, 
4t. 
EFTA00194238

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Senior, Robert (USAFLS) <RSenior@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Wednesday, June 18, 2008 3:20 PM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black 
Nothing that I know of by way of final decision. 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:53 PM 
To: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) 
Cc: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black 
Karen and I spoke with Roy. Roy said that he had called because he had heard that Rolando had discussed the 
matter with Barry Krischer and Roy wanted to see if there was any way to wrap this up before July 7'h. Roy 
also said that he had seen a letter from Jeff Sloman that said that the matter of incarceration would be left to the 
State. (I am not certain what letter he is referring to, but I think Jeff wrote a letter about not taking a position on 
where Epstein would be incarcerated, not the length of time.) So, Roy wondered whether we would go away if 
Epstein took Barry's 60-day deal. 
Karen explained that Rolando had not had substantive discussions with Barry about the case and that all 
communication regarding the case is being handled by Karen and me. In response to the question of whether 
there was anything that could "make this go away," we said that our position is that if Epstein stops the process 
in Washington and pleads in accordance with the terms of the signed agreement, then we will perform pursuant 
to the agreement. Karen explained that if Epstein pleads to something else or gets sentenced to a lower amount, 
then we will consider that a breach of our agreement and we will proceed accordingly. 
On that note, has there been any word from Washington? 
Thank you. 
A. Marie Villafafia 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 561 820-8777 
3 
EFTA00194239

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) <Eloman@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Tuesday, June 3, 2008 10:40 AM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Cc: 
Campos, Cyndee (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
please review 
Attachments: 
2DAG060208.wpd 
EFTA00194240

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) 
Sent: 
Saturday, June 28, 2008 7:38 AM 
To: 
VilParana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Cc: 
Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
Re: Agreement 
I agree. Ask Jack to make that change. 
 
 Original Message  
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) 
Sent: Fri Jun 27 21:28:46 2008 
Subject: Agreement 
Hi Jeff - Hadn't heard back, so I figured this would be easiest way to 
communicate. 
I got a call back from Jack Goldberger, incensed that I was somehow accusing him 
of trying to get out of the agreement. I was taken aback because the response 
was completely out of line with the questions I was asking. From my dealings 
with Jack, this just made me more suspicious than I was originally. 
Anyhow, Jack said that "this was the only way to do the consecutive jail time." 
And he "swore" that Epstein would be in custody 24-hours-a-day during the 
community confinement portion of the sentence. He also insisted that Epstein had 
been charged with a substantive procurement offense, not attempt. 
He did, however, let it slip that Epstein would not be at the jail, he would be 
at the stockade out on the fairgrounds (a low security "camp"). Since we 
specifically discussed this at the meeting with Barry Krisher months ago that 
Epstein would be at the Gun Club facility (the jail), this certainly violates the 
spirit of the agreement, if not the letter. 
I talked to 
Millian, who used to be with the Palm Beach County State 
Attorney's Office before joining our office. She said, first, that it was 
extremely strange to call it the "Palm Beach County Detention Center," rather 
than the jail, but I explained that I thought Epstein's people were trying to 
make us believe he was going to the jail even though he wasn't and this was their 
way to "finesse" the situation. 
also explained that the normal way for the plea agreement to read is a 
consecutive term of six months imprisonment to be followed by one year of 
community control - in other words, Goldberger's statement that this was the 
"only way" to do the consecutive sentence is false. I did find a statute that 
says that if two sentences are imposed consecutively that result in a sentence of 
greater than one year, the judge is supposed to send the defendant to a state 
prison rather than a county facility, so that may be why they are wording it this 
way. 
also said that typically the term "community control" means home 
775 
EFTA00194241

confinement, and she has never seen imprisonment used as a condition of 
"community control." She has seen such a condition in connection with a sentence 
of probation, but not community control. 
Also, she and I did a state guideline calculation for Epstein's plea, and, if 
done correctly, he should be looking at 51 months. The only way that Lanna could 
avoid that calculation is if she tells the judge that there was no sexual 
contact. That, of course, would be completely false. 
In short, something smells very bad. My suggestion is to ask that we ask them to 
add one word to the second sentencing paragraph of the plea agreement with the 
state, as follows: the Defendant is sentenced to 18 months Community Control 1 
(one). As a special condition of this Community Control, the Defendant must 
serve the first 6 months INCARCERATED [or IMPRISONED] in the Palm Beach County 
Detention Facility . . . 
If they object to this small change - which according to Goldberger is intended 
by the language already there - then we will know that something is extremely 
fishy. 
What do you think? 
A. Marie Villafana 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 561 820-8777 
776 
EFTA00194242

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Sent: 
Friday, June 27, 2008 3:03 PM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: Still nothing from Roy 
I would 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 2:50 PM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: Still nothing from Roy 
Should I fax a letter reminding them again of their obligation to show it to us before it is entered into and 
provide them with notice that we will consider it a material breach if we don't receive appropriate time to 
review and comment? 
A. Marie Villafafia 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 561 820-8777 
784 
EFTA00194243

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) 
Sent: 
Friday, June 27, 2008 2:53 PM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
Re: Still nothing from Roy 
Yes 
 
 Original Message  
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Sent: Fri Jun 27 14:50:26 2008 
Subject: Still nothing from Roy 
Should I fax a letter reminding them again of their obligation to show it to us 
before it is entered into and provide them with notice that we will consider it a 
material breach if we don't receive appropriate time to review and comment? 
A. Marie Villafaha 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 561 820-8777 
785 
EFTA00194244

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: 
Friday, June 27, 2008 2:35 PM 
To: 
Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: Corrected third supplement to pros memo 
Works for me. Do you want me to FedEx a pretty new package? 
We should know by 9:30 on Monday morning what is up. I will ask the grand jury 
coordinator to put us on for Tuesday mid-morning, instead of first thing. 
A. Marie Villafaha 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 561 820-8777 
 
Original Message 
From: Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 2:31 PM 
To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: Re: Corrected third supplement to pros memo 
If I reserved all of monday to finalize, would that work ? 
 
 Original Message  
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
To: Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Sent: Fri Jun 27 14:23:33 2008 
Subject: Corrected third supplement to pros memo 
Hi Bob - Here it is. My assistant, Shawn Ball, is going to send you the 
corrected penalty sheets. Nothing else changes. 
Thanks. 
«Third Supplement Pros Memo 2-13-08 corrected 6-27-08.wpd» 
A. Marie Villafaha 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 561 820-8777 
Tracking: 
788 
EFTA00194245

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: 
Friday, June 27, 2008 2:24 PM 
To: 
Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: 
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
Corrected third supplement to pros memo 
Ili Bob — Here it is. My assistant, Shawn Ball, is going to send you the corrected penalty sheets. Nothing else 
changes. 
Thanks. 
Third 
!ment Pros Memc 
A. Marie Villafana 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 561 820-8777 
Tracking: 
790 
EFTA00194246

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Vitlafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: 
Friday, June 27, 2008 12:41 PM 
To: 
Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) 
Cc: 
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
Final Indictment 
Ili Bob — I Jere is the final final. I removed the New York girl and added a new Florida girl (Jane Doe #11). I 
also cut the number of flights in the overt acts to just those charged in the travel counts of the indictment. Pros 
Memo addendum is coming soon. 
El 
080627 final 
dictment withou. 
A. Marie Villafaila 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 561 820-8777 
Tracking: 
793 
EFTA00194247

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: 
Friday, June 27, 2008 11:02 AM 
To: 
Kuyrkendall, E N. (FBI); Richards, Jason R. (FBI) 
Subject: 
Travel Dates 
Hi guys — I am going to re-add the following travel counts: 
8/6/04 Alex and 
8/19/04 Alex 
, and 
10/29/04 
, and 
2/21/05 
3/31/05 
and 
Does that sound alright? 
A. Marie Vi!Walla 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 561 820-8777 
796 
EFTA00194248

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) <JSloman@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Wednesday, May 28, 2008 9:37 AM 
To: 
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: Epstein 
Rolando, 
Please fill me in. 
Jeff 
-----Original Message----
From: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 9:21 AM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: RE: Epstein 
This was info that Rolando got from Barry, the state attorney, but he was waiting for an email to confirm. I am much to lowly to have 
communications with the "star" team. 
--Original Message---
From: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3:09 PM 
To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: RE: Epstein 
Marie/Karen, 
No one has contacted anyone in Miami. Please copy me and Bob on all communications. Thanks, 
Jeff 
----Original Message----
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: Epstein 
Hi jell. Karen sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was 
supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. 
Please keep me posted. Thanks. 
2 
EFTA00194249

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) <JSIoman@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Thursday, May 29, 2008 9:29 AM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: 
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Kuyrkendall, E N. (MM) (FBI); Richards, Jason R. (MM) (FBI) 
Subject: 
RE: Epstein 
No telling how long the DAG's office will take to decide. Tuesday is off. 
----Original Message----
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 9:03 AM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Kuyrkendall, EN. (FBI); Richards, Jason R. (FBI) 
Subject: Epstein 
Hi Jeff and Bob. I received Jeffs e-mail stating that the DAG agreed to meet with epstein's people. Does this mean that Tuesday is 
off? 1 need to let the gj coordinator know. 
Also, I am sure that you remember- in. She was the person whom we initially classified as a victim until epstein's attorneys 
complained. Well, nesbitt halliard 
a girl who was 14 or 15 when she first went to epstein's house who reports that epstein 
told her that he had sex with 
probably would have been 15 or 16 when this conversation occurred.) The girl also reports 
that she told epstein her true age and epstein told her that he doesn't care about age. 
I know that epstein's people will, no doubt, continue to tell the dag and others that epstein didn't know about the girls' ages so I 
thought you should know. 
Please let me know about tuesday so I don't needlessly spoil nesbitt's sunday. And, any chance the case was dimmed with the ag 
when he was in town? 
Thanks. 
3 
EFTA00194250

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) <JSIoman@usa.doj.gon 
Sent: 
Monday, June 2, 2008 4:25 PM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
draft letter to DAG 
Attachments: 
DAG060208.wpd 
EFTA00194251

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Senior, Robert (USAFLS) <RSenior@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3:25 PM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) 
Cc: 
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: Epstein 
Marie, are you back ? We need to spend some time together on the indictment. I was planning on Monday because I thought you 
were back that day but if you're already back let me know. By the way, Jeff and Alex have been very clear that we are not negotiating 
with this guy any more in any way. 
Thx. Bob 
-----Original Message----
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject Epstein 
Hi jeff. Karen sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was 
supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. 
Please keep me posted. Thanks. 
1 
EFTA00194252

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) <KAtkinson@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Wednesday, May 28, 2008 9:21 AM 
To: 
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: Epstein 
This was info that Rolando got from Barry, the state attorney, but he was waiting for an email to confirm. I am much to lowly to have 
communications with the "star" team. 
 
Original Message 
From: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3:09 PM 
To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: RE: Epstein 
Marie/Karen, 
No one has contacted anyone in Miami. Please copy me and Bob on all communications. Thanks, 
Jeff 
 
Original Message 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFI,S); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: Epstein 
Hi jeff. Karen sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was 
supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. 
Please keep me posted. Thanks. 
1 
EFTA00194253