EFTA00193954

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: 
Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:42 PM 
To: 
Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: Memo to File 
Hi Alex -- Does this mean that we will be having another'call on Monday? 
A. Marie Villafaha 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 561 820-8777 
 
Original Message 
From: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) 
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:39 PM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: Fw: Memo to File 
Had a 3 min call today to schedule our monday call. Want to memorialize the 
following statement from jay. 
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld 
 
 Original Message  
From: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) 
To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) 
Sent: Thu Jan 03 12:01:04 2008 
Subject: Memo to File 
1/3/08 
"I may have made a mistake 6 months ago. Lana told us solicitation not 
registrable. It turns out that the actual offense charged it." 
Lefkowitz 
Tracking: 
2013 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-014517 
EFTA00194214

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) 
Sent: 
Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:40 PM 
To: 
Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Villatana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: Memo to File -- correction 
-- final word is "is", not "it" 
1/3/08 
"I may have made a mistake 6 months ago. Lana told us solicitation not 
registrable. It turns out that the actual offense charged is." 
• 
Lefkowitz 
 
Original Message 
From: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) 
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:39 PM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: Fw: Memo to File 
Had a 3 min call today to schedule our monday call. Want to memorialize the 
following statement from jay. 
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld 
 
 Original Message  
From: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) 
To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) 
Sent: Thu Jan 03 12:01:04 2008 
Subject: Memo to File 
1/3/08 
"I may have made a mistake 6 months ago. Lana told us solicitation not 
registrable. It turns out that the actual offense charged is." 
Lefkowitz 
2017 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-014518 
EFTA00194215

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) 
Sent: 
Thursday, January 03. 2008 12:39 PM 
To: 
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); VIliana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
Fw: Memo to File 
Had a 3 min call today to schedule our monday call. Want to memorialize the 
following statement from jay. 
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld 
 
 Original Message  
From: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) 
To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) 
Sent: Thu Jan 03 12:01:04 2008 
Subject: Memo to File 
1/3/08 
"I may have made a mistake 6 months ago. Lana told us solicitation not 
registrable. It turns out that the actual offense charged it." 
Lefkowitz 
2019 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-014519 
EFTA00194216

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Jack Goldberger figoldberger©agwpa.cornj 
Sent: 
Saturday, June 28, 2008 3:38 PM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: Notice of Non-Compliance 
Marie 
not a problem. 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) [mallto:Ann.Marle.C.Villafana@usdoj.gov] 
Sent: Sat 6/28/2008 11:31 AM 
To: Jack Goldberger 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); RBlack@RoyBlack.com 
Subject: Re: Notice of Non-Compliance 
Dear Jack: 
I have conferred with a state court practitioner who staled that there is nothing that prohibits you from agreeing to a consecutive six-
month sentence of incarceration followed by one year of community control as specified in the non-prosecution agreement. 
If you elect to proceed with the plea agreement as currently drafted, we ask that you insert the word "imprisoned" following the words 
"six months" in the second sentencing paragraph. 
Please confirm that this change is acceptable. Thank you. 
Marie 
 
Original Message 
From: Jack Goldberger <jgoldberger@agwpa.com> 
To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Cc: Jack Goldberger lgoldberger@agwpa.com> 
Sent: Sat Jun 28 08:49:55 2008 
Subject: RE: Notice of Non-Compliance 
Dear Ms Villafana, 
please allow this e-mail to confirm our telephone conference of 6:30 pm on June 27 wherein we discussed the Epstein plea agreement 
and we agreed that the Epstein state plea agreement was in compliance with the September 2007 non-prosecution agreement entered 
into between Mr. Epstein and the USAO for the Souhern District of Florida. 
Jack Goldberger 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)(mailto:Ann.Marie.C.Villafanaigusdoistovl 
Sent: Fri 6/27/2008 5:45 PM 
To: Jack Goldberger, Roy BLACK 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: Notice of Non-Compliance 
Dear Messrs. Goldberger and Black: 
Please see the attached Notification Letter. 
<<080627 Goldberger Black notification Itr.pdf>> 
768 
EFTA00194217

Dear Ms Villafana, 
please allow this e-mail to confirm our telephone conference of 6:30 pm on June 
27 wherein we discussed the Epstein plea agreement and we agreed that the Epstein 
state plea agreement was in compliance with the September 2007 non-prosecution 
agreement entered into between Mr. Epstein and the USAO for the Souhern District 
of Florida. 
Jack Goldberger 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) [mailto:Ann.Marie.C.Villafana@usdoj.gov] 
Sent: Fri 6/27/2008 5:45 PM 
To: Jack Goldberger; Roy BLACK 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: Notice of Non-Compliance 
Dear Messrs. Goldberger and Black: 
Please see the attached Notification Letter. 
«080627 Goldberger Black notification ltr.pdf» 
A. Marie Villafaha 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 561 820-8777 
767 
EFTA00194218

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: 
Wednesday, July 09, 20081:04 PM 
To: 
Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Cc: 
Kuyrkendall, E N. (FBI); Richards, Jason R. (FBI) 
Subject: 
Response to Goldberger Letter 
Here are my thoughts: 
I. Notification only by mail: For those girls who are currently not represented (or for whom we do not know of 
any representation), we intend to contact the victims by telephone to tell them of the resolution and to get mailing 
addresses to send the written notification or to determine if they have secured counsel to send it to them. For the 
girls who are represented, contact will be made by telephone followed by the mailing of the notification. I think a 
"live" thank you is the least that is required at this point and a "check in" to make sure that girls who need 
counseling are getting it. (FBI has already arranged counseling for several girls.) In any written response to Mr. 
Goldberger, I would simply ignore this request. 
2. Separate mailings: I have no objection to this change. The notice was drafted the way it was so that Epstein 
would only have to sign one document rather than 33. Since he isn't going to sign any, that change is fine with 
me. 
3. Notification limited to the information on the first page of the draft notification: In light of Epstein's refusal 
to sign the acknowledgement, I think some additional explanation is required. I will prepare that revision and 
send to you shortly. 
4. Eliminate the Acknowledgement portion: I have no objection to this. 
5. Supplement the notification with our previous statement that we are not vouching for the veracity of any 
claim: I would reject this request and, in our response to Goldberger, state that we have limited our list to those 
whom we were prepared to name in an indictment and, accordingly, we believe that there is proof beyond a 
reasonable doubt that each was a victim of Epstein's. 
6. Explain why the acknowledgement is required: In our response to Goldberger, I think we should explain that 
the acknowledgement language was meant to create a means for proving the existence of the agreement without 
having to provide copies of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, which contains a confidentiality clause. While I 
have no objection to revising the language, I think that Epstein's position will lead to litigation regarding the need 
to disclose the full agreement, which is contrary to the parties' interest in confidentiality. I agree that we cannot 
force him to sign the acknowledgement, but he must accept the consequences of that decision. 
7. Names of pro bono lawyers and information regarding their communications: I have already advised Mr. 
Goldberger that I will provide him with the names and contact information of attorneys who represent the victims, 
so I have no objection to that. I also have no objection to telling him that they were recommended by the Crime 
Victims Rights Advocacy Group based upon a referral from the Justice Department. Other than that, I have no 
intention of disclosing any "communications" that I had with them. 
I will take a crack at revising the victim notifications and drafting a response to Goldberger. Any other thoughts I should 
incorporate? 
A. Marie Yillafafia 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
561 209-1047 
Tracking: 
EFTA00194219

Recipient 
Road 
Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) 
Read: 7/9/2008 1:26 PM 
Siemer'. Jeff (USAFLS) 
Read: 7/9/2008 1:05 PM 
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Kuyrkendaff, E N. (FBI) 
Richards, Jason R. (FBI) 
2 
EFTA00194220

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Ann Marie Villafana (ann.marie.villafana@gmail.com] 
Sent: 
Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:07 PM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Begin forwarded message: 
My cell does not seem to work in main. Direct is 202 514 9412. I should have a second email acct running 
today also. 
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld 
 
Original Message 
From: Ann Marie Villafana <ann.marie.villafanaegmail.com>
To: Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) <ALourie@usa.doi.gov>; Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) 
<ALourie@usa.doi.kov>• jeffrev.sloman@usdoi.gov leffrey.slomanQusdoi.gov>
Sent: Sun Sep 16 17:51:17 2007 
Subject: Epstein update 
Hi all -- After several hours, we are back to where we started. Mr. Epstein is now considering either pleading 
exclusively to state charges as per our original agreement, or pleading to one federal obstruction charge to be 
followed by one state 6-month charge. As for our hearing and grand jury appearances on Tuesday, Roy Black 
and I will call Judge Marra in the morning to postpone the hearing, and I have agreed to release the witnesses 
from appearing on Tuesday, with an agreement that, if I subpoena them to appear after the initial indictment is 
returned, I will receive no complaints about misuse of the grand jury. And 1 told Jay that September 25th is my 
indictment date, come hell or high water. Andy, can you call me tomorrow morning and just let me know 
where and how I can reach you? I am hoping that we can have a final agreement signed by Tuesday afternoon. 
Thank you. 
Ann Marie Villafana 
antunarie.vi I lafana@gmail.com 
Begin forwarded message: 
fir 
I spoke to him last night. Told him to try for consp on 6 month assault on plane but with a real victim. He is 
gonna send text later tonight. Give me a number I can reach you at 
--------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld 
2065 
EFTA00194221

----Original Message-----
From: Ann Marie Villafana <ann.marie.villafana@amail.com>
To: Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) <ALouriet@usa.doi.gov>; Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) <ALouricasa.doi,gov>
Sent: Sat Sep 15 15:08:07 2007 
Subject: Epstein 
Hi Andy -- Sorry to bother you, but Jay wants to try to get this wrapped up over the weekend, and I received an 
e-mail from Jeff that you are going to handle finalizing the negotiations. I received your e-mail about the 
assault on the airplane charge. That is the only 6-month offense that we could find. I have already tried to float 
a plea to two counts of a 12-month offense with a nonbinding recommendation of 20 months, and that has 
failed. Jay's response is to suggest a plea to one count of a 12-month offense, which I rejected. Our only other 
option is an ABA plea to a 371 conspiracy charge. I like that best but the U.S. Attorney likes that least. Can 
you give me some direction? Thanks. 
Ann Marie Villafana 
Maillafana(aamaii.COM 
Begin forwarded message: 
MCC 
This is an Automatic Response. As of September 17, 2007 1 am beginning a detail to the Department of Justice, 
Criminal Division, in Washington, D.C. Rolando Garcia is now in charge of the West Palm Beach Office of the 
U.S. Attorney's Office. I will be checking this email account periodically. If this is urgent, please call 
Rolando Garcia at 561 209-1010 or 561 820-8711. 
My number in Washington is 202 514-9412 
2066 
EFTA00194222

U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
500 S Australian Ave, Ste 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
(561) 820-8711 
Facsimile: (361) 820-8777 
September 17, 2008 
DELIVERY BY ELECTRONIC MAIL 
Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. 
Kirkland & Ellis LLP 
Citigroup Center 
153 East 53rd Street 
New York, New York 10022-4675 
Roy Black, Esq. 
Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf P.A. 
201 S. Biscayne Blvd, Suite 1300 
Miami, FL 33131 
Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. 
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 
One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400 
250 Australian Ave S. 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5015 
• Re: 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Dear Jay, Roy, and Jack: 
On today's date, our Office received an inquiry from State Attorney Barry Krischer 
related to the Non-Prosecution Agreement. In accordance with the terms of that Agreement, 
I am notifying you of this development. State Attorney Krischer has been contacted by 
counsel for the Palm Beach Daily News asking why the Non-Prosecution Agreement is under 
seal in order to determine whether to file suit asking that it be unsealed. I have informed 
State Attorney Krischer that the Agreement contains a confidentiality clause requiring us to 
provide Mr. Epstein's counsel with notice prior to making any disclosure (compulsory or 
otherwise). Since Mr. Epstein is a party to that criminal case, he has standing to contest any 
EFTA00194223

JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. 
ROY BLACK, ESQ. 
JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQ. 
SEPTEMBER 17, 2008 
PAGE 2 OF 2 
unsealing, while we do not. Accordingly, I ask that you confer with Mr. Krischer regarding 
how you would like to proceed with the matter. 
I also want to reiterate the concern I raised in my letter of August 15, 2008, that the 
complete Non-Prosecution Agreement, which includes the October Addendum, has not been 
filed with the Court in accordance with the Judge's order. Please advise that this issue has 
been resolved. 
Thank you for your attention to these matters. 
Sincerely, 
R. Alexander Acosta 
United States Attorney 
By: 
A. Marie Villafafia 
• 
Assistant United States Attorney 
cc: 
Barry Krischer, State Attorney 
Karen Atkinson, Chief, Northern Division 
EFTA00194224

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) <JSloman@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:22 AM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Lee, 
Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Cc: 
Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: State'. Jeffrey Epstein 
I have reviewed the Agreement. We have no obligation to seek its continued sealing. Per my conversation with Marie, 
she is going to notify Jack Goldberger that he has yet to file the remainder of the Agreement and that the unsealing issue 
is between him/Epstein and the SAO's office. 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:50 AM 
To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen 
(USAFLS) 
Cc: Garcia, Rolando LUSAFLS) 
Subject: FW: State I. Jeffrey Epstein 
Will it never end? Barry Krisher sent the e-mail below to Rolando this morning. Ilow would you like to handle 
this issue? 
A. Marie Villafana 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 561 820-8777 
From: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:48 AM 
To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: FW: State I. Jeffrey Epstein 
From: Barry Krischer [mailto:Bkrische@sa15.stateefLus] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:46 AM 
To: Garcia, Rolando LUSAFLS) 
Subject: FW: State I. Jeffrey Epstein 
Please advise how you would like us to proceed. The agreement referred to is the Federal Non-Prosecution agreement 
sealed in the file by the judge at the time of the Epstein plea. 
From: Lanna Belohlavek 
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:21 PM 
To: Barry Krischer 
Subject: FW: State'. Jeffrey Epstein 
25 
EFTA00194225

How to proceed? Lanna 
From: Bryce Albu [mailto:bryce@reederandreeder.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:52 PM 
To: Lanna Belohlavek 
Cc: Martin Reeder 
Subject: State ,' Jeffrey Epstein 
Ms. Belohlavek, 
We represent The Palm Beach Daily News. The newspaper recently discovered that a non-prosecution agreement (and 
an addendum thereto) was filed under seal pursuant to an agreed order entered in the above-referenced case. Because 
the records are sealed, we cannot assess the propriety of the decision to seal them or even whether the newspaper is 
interested in the information contained therein. I was hoping you would discuss with me the nature of the agreement and 
the basis for sealing it so that we can advise our client on whether it should pursue an order unsealing the 
agreement. Please call me at your earliest convenience. 
Very truly yours, 
C. Bryce Albu 
Reeder & Reeder P.A. 
250 S. Central Blvd., Suite 200 
Jupiter, FL 33458 
Direct Dial: (561) 575-9721 
Facsimile: (561) 575-9765 
bryce@reederandreeder.com 
26 
EFTA00194226

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Senior, Robert (USAFLS) <RSenior@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:25 AM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Lee, 
Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Cc: 
Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: State' Jeffrey Epstein 
Given the non-disclosure agreement, aren't we left with telling the SAO that we have agreed to not disclose so it 
wouldn't be proper for us to now agree that unsealing is appropriate. Ultimately, it's the SAO's call because they will get 
the Florida Public Records Act request and they were not a signatory to the agreement. We should also notify defense 
counsel so that they can take whatever actions they believe are appropriate. Wait till others have had a chance to 
weigh in on this issue. 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:50 AM 
To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen 
(USAFLS) 
Cc: Garcia, Rolando USAFLS) 
Subject: FW: State 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Will it never end? Barry Krisher sent the e-mail below to Rolando this morning. How would you like to handle 
this issue? 
A. Marie Villafana 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 561 820-8777 
From: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:48 AM 
To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: FW: State 
Jeffrey Epstein 
From: Barry Krischer [mailto:Bkrische@sa15.state.flus) 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:46 AM 
To: Garcia, Rolando USAFLS) 
Subject: FW: State I. Jeffrey Epstein 
Please advise how you would like us to proceed. The agreement referred to is the Federal Non-Prosecution agreement 
sealed in the file by the judge at the time of the Epstein plea. 
From: Lanna Belohlavek 
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:21 PM 
14 
EFTA00194227

To: Barry Krischer 
Subject: FW: State NI Jeffrey Epstein 
How to proceed? Lanna 
From: Bryce Albu [mailto:bryce@reederandreeder.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:52 PM 
To: Lanna Belohlavek 
Cc: Martin Reeder 
Subject: State 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Ms. Belohlavek, 
We represent The Palm Beach Daily News. The newspaper recently discovered that a non-prosecution agreement (and 
an addendum thereto) was filed under seal pursuant to an agreed order entered in the above-referenced case. Because 
the records are sealed, we cannot assess the propriety of the decision to seal them or even whether the newspaper is 
interested in the information contained therein. I was hoping you would discuss with me the nature of the agreement and 
the basis for sealing it so that we can advise our client on whether it should pursue an order unsealing the 
agreement. Please call me at your earliest convenience. 
Very truly yours, 
C. Bryce Albu 
Reeder & Reeder P.A. 
250 S. Central Blvd., Suite 200 
Jupiter, FL 33458 
Direct Dial: (561) 575-9721 
Facsimile: (561) 575-9765 
brvceAreederandreeder.com 
15 
EFTA00194228

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Senior, Robert (USAFLS) <RSenior@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:26 AM 
To: 
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Lee, 
Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Cc: 
Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: State 'Jeffrey Epstein 
Nothing like emails that cross in the wind. 
From: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:22 AM 
To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, 
Karen (USAFLS) 
Cc: Garcia, Rolando USAFLS) 
Subject: RE: State
 Jeffrey Epstein 
I have reviewed the Agreement. We have no obligation to seek its continued sealing. Per my conversation with Marie, 
she is going to notify Jack Goldberger that he has yet to file the remainder of the Agreement and that the unsealing issue 
is between him/Epstein and the SAO's office. 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:50 AM 
To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen 
(USAFLS) 
Cc: Garcia, Rolando cy SAFLS) 
Subject: FW: State 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Will it never end? Barry Krisher sent the e-mail below to Rolando this morning. How would you like to handle 
this issue? 
A. Marie Villafaila 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, Fl. 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 561 820-8777 
From: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:48 AM 
To: Villafana, Ann Nile C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: FW: State I. Jeffrey Epstein 
From: Barry Krischer [mailto:Bkrische@sa15.state.fLus] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:46 AM 
To: Garcia, Rolando USAFLS) 
Subject: FW: State I. Jeffrey Epstein 
16 
EFTA00194229

Please advise how you would like us to proceed. The agreement referred to is the Federal Non-Prosecution agreement 
sealed in the file by the judge at the time of the Epstein plea. 
From: Lanna Belohlavek 
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:21 PM 
To: Barry Krischer 
Subject: FW: State 1 Jeffrey Epstein 
How to proceed? Lanna 
— 
- - - 
From: Bryce Albu [mailto:bryce@reederandreeder.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:52 PM 
To: Lanna Belohlavek 
Cc: Martin Reedgr 
Subject: State 1 Jeffrey Epstein 
Ms. Belohlavek, 
We represent The Palm Beach Daily News. The newspaper recently discovered that a non-prosecution agreement (and 
an addendum thereto) was filed under seal pursuant to an agreed order entered in the above-referenced case. Because 
the records are sealed, we cannot assess the propriety of the decision to seal them or even whether the newspaper is 
interested in the information contained therein. I was hoping you would discuss with me the nature of the agreement and 
the basis for sealing it so that we can advise our client on whether it should pursue an order unsealing the 
agreement. Please call me at your earliest convenience. 
Very truly yours, 
C. Bryce Albu 
Reeder & Reeder P.A. 
250 S. Central Blvd., Suite 200 
Jupiter, FL 33458 
Direct Dial: (561) 575-9721 
Facsimile: (561) 575-9765 
bryceatreederandreeder.com 
17 
EFTA00194230

fyi 
From: Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 6:32 PM 
To: 'Gerald Lefcourt' 
Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein 
I have your letter. I think we are on the same page, but to be sure I do want to clarify that we spoke the other week and 
I did say that if you want to meet with me again, I am ready to do so. The wording of your letter, however, suggests 
implicitly that I agreed to contact you before a decision is made to seek an indictment of Mr. Epstein. If that was your 
understanding, then please allow me to clarify. Our investigation is ongoing and if we decide to seek an indictment, we 
don't intend to call Mr. Epstein's representatives to let him know that. Of course, in the interim, if you would like to 
make a presentation to us, we are willing to listen. 
Along those lines, given the fact that we have already met once, with schedules being what they are, it makes sense for 
our criminal chief, Matt Menchel, to be included when you make another presentation, rather than working up the 
chain Incrementally. I realize you were being respectful in not attempting to leapfrog over me, which I appreciate. I 
will pass on your request to meet with the U.S. Attorney as well, but can't commit for him one way or another. When 
you have some dates in mind, let me know and I will try to set up a meeting in Miami. 
From: Gerald Lefcourt [mailto:GBL@lefcourtlaw.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 2:05 PM 
To: Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) 
Cc: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Lilly Ann Sanchez 
Subject: Jeffrey Epstein 
Andy, attached is a letter seeking meetings, as discussed with you, but with others 
attention. Could you email back so that I know you have received this letter? 
Gerald 8. Lefcourt 
Gerald 8. Lefcourt, P.C. 
148 E. 78th Street 
New York New York 10021 
Tel. 
Fax 
cibl(aPercourtlaw.com 
Tracking: 
2 
EFTA00194231

EFTA00194232

U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
First Assistant U.S. Attorney 
DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE 
Jay P. Leflcowitz, Esq. 
Kirkland & Ellis LLP 
Citigroup Center 
153 East 53rd Street 
New York, New York 10022-4675 
Re: 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Dear Mr. Leflcowitz, 
99 N.E. 4 Street 
Miami, FL 33132 
(305) 961-9100 
April , 2008 
On September 24, 2007, your client, Jeffrey Epstein, in consultation with Gerald Lefcourt, 
Esq. and Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq., as well as numerous other nationally-renowned lawyers, including 
but not limited to Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, former Independent Counsel and 
Solicitor General of the United States Kenneth Starr, just to name a few, entered into a Non-
Prosecution Agreement ("the Agreement') with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern 
District of Florida ("SDFL"). Although you and other members of the defense team have since 
claimed that the Agreement was the product of adhesion, the following facts demonstrate that 
Epstein knowingly and voluntarily entered into the Agreement in order to avoid a federal indictment 
regarding his sexual conduct involving minor victims. Despite the fact that by signing the 
Agreement, Epstein gave up the right to object to its provisions, the SDFL bent over backwards to 
exhaustively consider and re-consider your objections. Since these objections have finally been 
exhausted and Epstein has failed to comply with several conditions of the Agreement as set forth 
below, the SDFL hereby notifies you that unless you comply with all of the terms and conditions of 
the Agreement, including plea, sentence, and incarceration, as modified by the United States 
Attorney's December 19, 2007 letter to Ms. Sanchez by 
the SDFL will elect to terminate the 
Agreement. 
Background 
The Agreement was the product of months of negotiations. Specifically, you requested and 
received numerous meetings, at the highest levels of the SDFL and DOD's Child Exploitation and 
Obscenity Section (CEOS) concerning claims that (a) the investigation merely produced evidence 
of relatively innocuous sexual conduct with some minors who, unbeknownst to Epstein, 
misrepresented their ages; (b) the authorities investigating Epstein engaged in misconduct; (c) the 
contemplated federal statutes have no applicability to this matter; and (d) the federal authorities 
disregarded the fundamental policy against federal intervention with state criminal proceedings. 
After careful review, the SDFL ultimately rejected those claims. Subsequent to its decision, however, 
but before proceeding any further, the SDFL provided you with 30 days to appeal the decision to the 
EFTA00194233