EFTA01099834

Response to R4P #7 
Correspondence between BJE 
and US Government Regarding 
Epstein 
In BJE Possession 
EFTA01099834

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM 
Sument 30-?Aw Egneiticoi FLSD Diet 10/16/2008 
Page 1 of 2 
AND ASSOCIATES -
October 9, 2008 
AUSA 
United States Attorney's Office 
99 N.E. 4th Street 
Miami, Florida 33132 
Re: 
Jane Doe # and Jane Doe #2 v. United States of America 
Case No.: 
08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON 
Dear MI 
I am writing to call to your attention two potentially false statements that the Government 
made, albeit inadvertently, in a sworn declaration submitted to the Court in connection with the 
above-captioned case. I request that your office file a corrected declaration and accompanying 
explanation. 
mil
e first statement is found at page 3 to 4 of the July 911, 2008 declaration of 
There a provision in a plea agreement with Mr. Jeffrey Epstein is recounted. As we 
understand the Government's current position in this case, it is that this provision is not in fact 
part of the plea agreement in this case. If our understanding is correct, then 
has 
filed a false affidavit with the court, albeit inadvertently. We respectfully request that she file a 
new affidavit that corrects this false information, along with all other information relevant to 
understanding how the false information came to be provided to the court — and to the victims in 
this case. This correction should, in my view, include more details about how Epstein and his 
attorneys approved a submission of false information to the victims as you stated on Page 5, n.2 
in your October 8, 2008 filing "Respondent's Opposition to Victims' Motion to Unseal Non-
Prosecution Agreement" — presumably knowing that litigation surrounding the victims' rights 
issues was on-going and that such false information might be ultimately presented to the court. 
Such information is highly relevant to what remedy the victims might ultimately choose to seek 
for violations of their rights in this case. 
The second statement may or may not be false, but may need some clarification. At page 
4 of 
declaration, she states that "pin October 2007, shortly after the agreement was 
signed, four victims [including= were contacted and these provisions were discussed' 
(emphasis added). Similarly at page 5, the declaration states: "After 
had been notified of 
the terms of the agreement ....." (emphasis added). I write to inquire whether, in view of the fact 
that the provision noted above is not in fact (according to the Government's current view) part of 
the plea agreement, whether this was the provision that the government (inaccurately) discussed 
with the victims. Put another way, I am wondering whether the Government will now stipulate 
that it, at most, discussed with the victims a provision in the plea agreement that never was 
actually part of the plea agreement. 
EFTA01099835

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Sument 30-2 
Entered on FLSD et 
10/16/2008 
Page 2 of 2 
United States Attorney's Office 
October 9, 2008 
Page Two 
I continue to be interested in working out a joint stipulation of proposed facts in this case 
with the Government. If you would like to proceed in that direction, please give me a call. If, 
hovvever, the Government is not willing to work out a joint stipulation of facts, then I need to 
have the record be as clear as possible, and at a minimum would request that the Government 
correct the inaccurate information it has provided to the court and clarify precisely how such 
inaccurate information came to be made a part of the record and the extent to which Mr. Epstein, 
through his attorneys, was culpable. 
Sincerely, 
BEJsg 
Brad Edwards 
EFTA01099836

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM ilkument 3o-p A w ES ic 
FLSD Dirt 10/16/2008 
Page 1 of 2 
( -4?ezelegtiaell 
AND ASSOCIATES 
October 15, 2008 
AUSA 
United States Attorney's Office 
99 N.E. 4th Street 
Miami, Florida 33132 
Re: 
Jane Doe # and Jane Doe #2 v. United States of America 
Case No.: 
08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON 
Da 
I am writing to inquire about whether Mr. Epstein has violated his Non-Prosecution 
Agreement with the Government. 
As you know, the Government has repeatedly described the Non-Prosecution Agreement 
as guaranteeing to the victims of Epstein's sexual abuse at least $150,000 in civil damages. The 
Government has made these representations in reliance on a current provision in the U.S. Code —. 
18 U.S.C. § 2255(a) — which provides for an automatic amount of damages of at least $150,000. 
At the time that the Non-Prosecution Agreement was drafted and signed, that was the law that 
was in effect. 
In Epstein's latest filing in federal court, however, he takes the position that the pre-2006 
Amendments version of the law applies. See Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss, for More 
Definite Statement and To Strike Directed to Plaintiff Jane Doe's Complaint at 9, Jane Doe v. 
Jeffrey Epstein, No. 08-CIV-80893-Marra/Johnson (discussing § 2255 and stating that the 
"applicable version of the statute" is "pre-2006 Amendments"). The 2006 Amendments altered 
§ 2255(a), by increasing the presumed minimum damages from $50,000 to $150,000. See Pub. 
L. 109-248, Title VII, § 707(b), (c), July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 650. 
In light of Epstein's latest filing, I write to ask several questions: 
(1) Would you stipulate that you told me several times that Epstein had agreed to pay at 
least $150,000 to the identified victims of his abuse? 
(2) Did Epstein in fact agree to pay damages to the identified victims of his abuse at least 
$150,000? 
(3) Did the Government tell victims, either directly or through counsel, that Epstein had 
agreed to pay his victims at least $150,000? 
EFTA01099837

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM 
•ument 30-3 
Entered on FLSD DSet 10/16/2008 
Page 2 of 2 
\USA 
United States Attorney's Office 
October 15, 2008 
Page Two 
(4) Is Epstein in compliance with his Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Government 
when he is now taking the legal position, through his attorneys, that he only has to 
pay the victims $50,000 damages under § 2255? 
Thank you for any clarification you can provide on these questions. 
Sincere 
BE/sg 
Brad Edwards 
cc: 
AUSA 
United States Attorney's Office 
500 South Australian Avenue 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 
EFTA01099838

AND 
ASSOCIATES 
July 17, 2008 
AUSA 
e 
tates ttorney s Office 
500 South Australian Avenue 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 
Re: 
Proposed Stipulated Facts for In Re Jane Doe 
Dear
l 
Thank you for your recent proposed stipulation of facts in this case. I believe that we 
have considerable common ground. At the same time, however, it appears to me that a few areas 
of potential disagreement are arising. In view of that, and to avoid any misunderstandings, I 
thought it might be useful to send a short letter outlining several requests and issues for 
resolution before I send you back my proposed stipulated facts. 
I. 
I am working with two other attorneys on this case — Jay Howell in Jacksonville, 
Florida, and Professor Paul Cassell in Salt Lake City, Utah. Because they were not in court for 
the hearing last Friday, they will need to review a transcript of the hearing before our legal team 
can agree to any stipulated facts. I have requested a transcript, but the preparation of it will 
apparently take several weeks. Do you have any way of expediting the preparation of the 
transcript by requesting it yourself? Also, as you know, my clients are indigent. As part of the 
Government's responsibility to use its "best efforts to see that crime victims are . . . accorded[] 
the rights" in the CVRA, 18 U.S.C. § 3771(c)(1), I was wondering whether the Government 
would'be willing to pay for the transcript. 
2. 
Your proposed stipulation indicates that in September 2007 the U.S. Attorney's 
Office reached an agreement with Epstein to resolve the case, which was then modified in 
October and December of that year. While this seems plausible, to stipulate to the facts, 1 would 
obviously need to see copies of those three agreements. Moreover, because the circumstances 
surrounding the initial agreement and its later modification are now the subject of litigation, my 
client is entitled to see them. See 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8) (victim's right to "be 
fairness"). In addition, your proposed stipulation states that: "On July 9, 2008, AUSA 
sent a victim notific 
to Jane Doe #1 via her attorney, Bradley Edwards, which is attached as 
Exhibit 6 to the 
Declaration. That notification contains a written explanation of the full 
terms of the agreement between Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office." I am puzzled by this 
proposed stipulation, as your July 9 letter explicitly noted that it was covering only some of the 
provisions in the agreement. Perhaps the fact that I have not yet received the agreement is all 
just an oversight on your part, and you had intended to give me the "full terms" of the plea 
agreement that was ultimately reached. In any event, the simplest way to proceed at this point is 
for the plea agreement — and the earlier versions -- to be provided to me so that I can review 
EFTA01099839

AUSA 
United States Attorney's Office 
Page 2 
them with my clients. Of course, no possible harm to the Government can come from the release 
of the documents, as this criminal matter is now concluded — at least from the Government's 
perspective. 
3. 
I am wondering about your position on the confidentiality provision in the 
agreement. As I understand things from your proposed stipulation, in September 2007 you 
"reached" an agreement with Epstein's attorneys that "contained an express confidentiality 
provision." Are you taking the position that this "express" provision barred disclosure of the 
substance of the agreement to my clients? And, if so, would you stipulate that the FBI agents 
and your office complied with the provision up through June 30 when, I assume, the confidential 
provision expired as Epstein entered his guilty plea in open court? 
4. 
Your proposed stipulation indicates: 
On October 26, 2007, 
met in person with ane 
oe 
. 
Z e 
pecia Agents explained that the 
investigation had been resolved, that Epstein would plead guilty to state charges, 
he would be required to register as a sex offender for life, and he had made certain 
concessions related to the payment of damages to the victims, including Jane Doe 
#1. 
During this meeting, Jane Doe #1 did not raise any objections to the 
resolution of the matter. 
From the drafting of this proposed stipulation, it appears that you may be working from a Report 
of Interview with my client (i.e., an FBI 302). My client has a differing recollection of some 
aspects of that meeting. Of course, she did not take notes of the meeting. Therefore, I ask that 
you provide me (the relevant parts of) any report of this meeting as well as reports of any other 
meetings relevant to the matters at hand. 
I believe that my client is entitled to a copy of (the relevant parts of) the reports of 
interviews with her. Of course, a criminal defendant would be entitled to such documents. See 
Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(A) & (B). As an innocent victim in this matter, my client should be 
treated with at least the same consideration. See 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8) (victim's right to "be 
treated with fairness"). 
5. 
I am hoping that the Special Agents' and my client's recollections about one point 
of the October 26th meeting coincides: that she was never told that the agreement blocked all 
federal prosecution for the crimes at hand. Is a stipulation on that point agreeable? 
EFTA01099840

• 
AUSA 
United States Attorney's Office 
Page 3 
6. 
You mention your assistance in securing pro bono counsel for Jane Doe RI to help 
prevent harassment. I trust that you would be willing to stipulate that you did not mention the 
federal non-prosecution agreement to this counsel and that you did not mention that a plea 
agreement had already been reached. Professor Cassell has spoken to Meg Garvin, Esq., at the 
National Crime Victims' Law Institute, and that is her recollection of the events. 
7. 
I think that your proposed stipulation regarding my contact with the office is 
somewhat abbreviated. I wonder what you would think about the following: 
In mid-June 2008, Mr. Edwards contacted 
to inform her 
that he represented Jane Doe #1 and, later, Jane Doe #2. Mr. Edwards asked to 
meet to provide information about the federal crimes committed by Epstein, 
hoping to secure a significant federal indictment against Epstein. 
AUSA 
and Mr. Edwards discussed the possibility of federal charges being 
e . 
t the end of the call, 
asked Mr. Edwards to send any 
information that he wanted considered by the U.S. Attorney's Office in 
determining whether to file federal charges. 
Because of the confidentiality 
provision that existed in the plea agreement, Mr. Edwards was not informed that, 
in September 2007, the U.S. Attorney's Office had reached an agreement not to 
file federal charges. Mr. Edwards was also not informed that any resolution of the 
criminal matter was imminent. 
On July 3, 2008, Mr. Edwards sent to -a 
letter, a true and 
correct copy of which is attached. In the letter, Mr. Edwards indicated his desire 
that federal charges be filed against defendant Epstein. In particular, he wrote on 
behalf of his clients: "We urge the Attorney General and our United States 
Attorney to consider the fundamental import of the vigorous enforcement of our 
Federal laws. We urge you to move forward with the traditional indictments and 
criminal prosecution commensurate with the crimes Mr. Epstein has committed, 
and we further urge you to take the steps necessary to protect our children from 
this very dangerous sexual predator." When Mr. Edwards wrote this letter, he 
was still unaware that a non-prosecution agreement had been reached with 
Epstein. Mr. Edwards first learned of this fact on or after July 9, 2008, when the 
Government filed its responsive pleading to Jane Doe's emergency petition. That 
pleading was the first public mention of the non-prosecution agreement and the 
first disclosure to Mr. Edwards and his clients. 
8. 
I trust that you will agree that the Government had probable cause to file a 
multiple count federal indictment against Epstein, including an indictment chargin• crimes 
EFTA01099841

• 
AUSA 
United States Attorney's Office 
Page 4 
against Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2. In asking for this stipulation, I realize that you have taken 
the position that you would not have filed an indictment involving Jane Doe #2, presumably 
because you thought that you could not carry the Government's burden of proof beyond a 
reasonable doubt. At the same time, though, I trust you will concede that the evidence in that 
case was strong enough to pass the probable cause standard. 
9. 
Finally, in light of the fact that you have been sending letters to Jane Doe #2, 
which was obviously done because you believed her to be a "victim" in this case, and since she 
has been added in this matter as a victim, we would like some assurances that she will be 
protected, as the other victims have been, in your agreement with Mr. Epstein. 
Thank you very much for considering these issues and concerns. I look forward to 
working with you to reach a stipulation that covers as much common ground as possible in this 
case. If you think that further discussions might be helpful, I would like to try and set up a 
conference call with you and my co-counsel to discuss these issues further. 
Sincerel 
BE/sg 
Enclosure 
cc: 
AUSA 
mt 
tales Attorney's Office 
99 N.E. 4th Street 
Miami, Florida 33132 
EFTA01099842

LAW OFFICE --
(13' .7 a (I 
e. 'et 
• 
AND ASSOCIATES 
July 3, 2008 
AUSA 
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL 
m e 
a es ttorney s Office 
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 
500 South Australian Avenue 
7007 2680 0002 5519 8503 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 
Dear 
As you are aware, we represent several of the young girls that were victimized 
and abused by Jeffrey Epstein. While we are aware of his recent guilty plea and 
conviction in his State Court case, the sentence imposed in that case is grossly inadequate 
for a sexual predator of this magnitude. The information and evidence that has come to 
our attention in this matter leads to a grave concern that justice will not be served in this 
cause if Mr. Epstein is not aggressively prosecuted and appropriately punished. Based on 
our investigation and knowledge of this case, it is apparent that he has sexually abused 
more than 100 underage girls, and the evidence against him is overwhelmingly strong. 
As former Assistant State Attorneys with seven years' prosecution experience, we 
believe that the evidence against Mr. Epstein is both credible and deep and that he may 
be the most dangerous sexual predator of children that our country has ever seen. The 
evidence suggests, that for at least 4 years he was sexually abusing as many as three to 
four girls a day. It is inevitable that if he is not confined to prison, he will continue to 
manipulate and sexually abuse children and destroy more lives. He is a sexual addict that 
focused all of his free lime on sexually abusing children, and he uses his extraordinary 
wealth and power to lure in poor, underprivileged little girls and then also uses his wealth 
to shield himself from prosecution and liability. We are very concerned for the health 
and welfare of the girls he has already victimized, and concerned that if justice is not 
properly served now and he is not imprisoned for a very long time, he will get a free pass 
to sexually abuse children in the future. Future abuse and victimization is obvious to 
anyone who really reviews the evidence in this case, and future sexual abuse of minors is 
inevitable unless he is prosecuted, tried and appropriately sentenced. Money and power 
should not allow a man to make his own laws, and he has clearly received preferential 
treatment at every step up to this point. If he were a man of average wealth or the abused 
girls were from middle or upper class families, then this man would spend the rest of his 
life in prison. In a country of true, blind justice, those distinctions are irrelevant, and we 
really hope he does not prove the point that a man can commit heinous crimes against 
children and buy his way out of it. 
If the Department of Justice's recent commitment to the protection of our children 
from child molesters is to be more than rhetoric, then this is the time and the case where 
the Department must step forward. We urge the Attorney General and our 
EFTA01099843

• 
• 
AUSA 
United States Attorney's Office 
Page Two 
Attorney to consider the fundamental import of the vigorous enforcement of our Federal 
laws. We urge you to move forward with the traditional indictments and criminal 
prosecution commensurate with the crimes Mr, Epstein has committed, and we further 
urge you to take the steps necessary to protect Qur children from this very dangerous 
sexual perpetrator. We will help you to do this in any way possible to ensure that true 
Justice is served in this case. 
Sincerely, 
Brad Edwards, Esquire 
Jay Howell, Esquire 
EFTA01099844

LAW 
• 
(./ 
(c/e/tgai 
• 
AND ASSOCIATES 
July 3, 2008 
AUSA 
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL 
United States Attorney's Office 
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 
500 South Australian Avenue 
7007 2680 0002 5519 8503 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 
Dear 
As you are aware, we represent several of the young girls that were victimized 
and abused by Jeffrey Epstein. While we are aware of his recent guilty plea and 
conviction in his State Court case, the sentence imposed in that case is grossly inadequate 
for a sexual predator of this magnitude. The information and evidence that has come to 
our attention in this matter leads to a grave concern that justice will not be served in this 
cause if Mr. Epstein is not aggressively prosecuted and appropriately punished. Based on 
our investigation and knowledge of this case, it is apparent that he has sexually abused 
more than 100 underage girls, and the evidence against him is overwhelmingly strong. 
As former Assistant State Attorneys with seven years' prosecution experience, we 
believe that the evidence against Mr. Epstein is both credible and deep and that he may 
be the most dangerous sexual predator of children that our country has ever seen. The 
evidence suggests that for at least 4 years he was sexually abusing as many as three to 
four girls a day. It is inevitable that if he is not confined to prison, he will continue to 
manipulate and sexually abuse children and destroy more lives. He is a sexual addict that 
focused all of his free time on sexually abusing children, and he uses his extraordinary 
wealth and power to lure in poor, underprivileged little girls and then also uses his wealth 
to shield himself from prosecution and liability. We are very concerned for the health 
and welfare of the girls he has already victimized, and concerned that if justice is not 
properly served now and he is not imprisoned for a very long time, he will get a free pass 
to sexually abuse children in the future. Future abuse and victimization is obvious to 
anyone who really reviews the evidence in this case, and future sexual abuse of minors is 
inevitable unless he is prosecuted, tried and appropriately sentenced. Money and power 
should not allow a man to make his own laws, and he has clearly received preferential 
treatment at every step up to this point. If he were a man of average wealth or the abused 
girls were from middle or upper class families, then this man would spend the rest of his 
life in prison. In a country of true, blind justice, those distinctions are irrelevant, and we 
really hope he does not prove the point that a man can commit heinous crimes against 
children and buy his way out of it. 
If the Department of Justice's recent commitment to the protection of our children 
from child molesters is to be more than rhetoric, then this is the time and the case where 
the Department must step forward. We 
es 
EFTA01099845

AUSA 
United States Attorney's Office 
Page Two 
Attorney to consider the fundamental import of the vigorous enforcement of our Federal 
laws. We urge you to move forward with the traditional indictments and criminal 
prosecution commensurate with the crimes Mr, Epstein has committed, and we further 
urge you to take the steps necessary to protect pur children from this very dangerous 
sexual perpetrator. We will help you to do this in any way possible to ensure that true 
Justice is served in this case. 
Sincerely, 
Brad Edwards, Esquire 
Jay Howell, Esquire 
EFTA01099846

07/09/2008 15:13 FAX 
USAO WPB CONFRM 
2102:2 
• 
U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
500 South Austral= Ave.. Suite 400 
Ittest Palm Beach. FL 33401 
June 7, 2007 
DELIVERY BY HAND 
Re: 
Crime Victims' and Witnesses' Rights 
Dear 
Pursuant to the Justice for All Act of 2004, as a victim and/or witness of a federal offense, 
ypu have a number of rights. Those rights are: 
(I) 
The right to be reasonably protected from the accused. 
(2) 
The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding 
involving the crime or of any release or escape of the accused: 
(3) 
The right not to be excluded from any public court proceeding, unless the court 
deterrnincs that your testimony may be materially altered if you are present for othei 
portions of a proceeding. 
(4) 
The right to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district court 
involving release, plea, or sentencing. 
(5) 
The reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the United States in the case. 
(6) 
The right to full and timely restitution as provided in law. 
(7) 
The righi to proceedings free from unreasonable delay. 
(8) 
The tight to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and 
ti 
Members of the U.S. Department of Justice and other federal investigative agencies, 
including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, must use their best efforts to make sure that these 
n is are rotected. If you have any concerns in this regard, please feel free to contact me at 
9 
om•the Federal Bureau of Investigation at 
You also• can contact the Justice Department's Office for Victims of Crime in 
hat Office has a website at www.ove.gov. 
privacy. 
Washington, D.C. at 
You can seek the advice of an attorney with respect to the right's listed above and: if you 
believe that the rights set forth above are being violated, you have the right to petition the Court for 
relief. 
EFTA01099847

07/09/2008 15:14 FAX 
USAO WPB CONFRM 
S 
JUNE 7. 2007 
PAGE 2 
In addition to these rights, you are entitled to counseling and medical services, and protection 
from intimidation and harassment. If the Court determines that you arc a victim, you also may be 
entitled to restitution from the perpetrator. A list of counseling and medical service providers can 
be provided to you, if you 
d 
amity is subjected to any intimidation or 
harassment, please contact 
or myself immediately. It is possible that 
someone working on behalf of the targets of the investigation may contact you. Such contact does 
not violalektise law?. However, if you are contacted, you have the choice of speaking to that person 
or refusin ted 
nd feel that you are being threatened or harassed, then please 
' 'contact 
or myself. 
You alscr are entitled to notification of upcoming case events. At this time, your case is under 
investigation) If anyone is charged in connection with the investigation, you will be notified. 
By: 
cc: 
Sincerely, 
R. Alexander Acosta 
United States Attorney 
Assistant United States Attorney 
ff 
EFTA01099848

07/09/2008 15:14 FAX 
Dear 
USAO WPB CONFRM 
• 
U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
SOO South Australian Ave., Suite 400 
West Palm 
Re: 
Crime Victims' and Witnesses' Rights 
August l I, 2006 
Pursuant to the Justice for All Act of 2004, as a victim and/or witness of a federal offense, 
you have a number of rights. Those rights are: 
(I) 
The right to be reasonably protected from the accused. 
(2) 
The right to. reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding 
involving the crime or of any release or escape of the accused. 
(3) 
The right not to be excluded from any public court proceeding, unless the court 
determines that your testimony may be materially altered if you are present for other 
portions of a proceeding. 
(4) 
The right to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district court 
involving release, plea, or sentencing. 
(5) 
The reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the United States in the case. 
(6) 
The right to full and timely restitution as provided. in law. 
(7) 
The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay. 
(8) 
The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and 
privacy. 
(.( 
Members of the U.S. Departtent of Justice and other federal investigative agencies, 
including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, must use their best efforts to make sure that these 
rights are rotected. If ou have an concerns in this regard, please feel free to contact me a 
r 
firom the Federal Bureau of Investigation a 
• 
ou a so can contac 
e ustice 
epaerhnent's Office for Victims of Crime in 
Washington, D.C. at 
That Office has a website at www.ovc.gov. 
You can seek the advice of an attorney with respect to the rights:listed above and, if you 
believe that the rights set forth above are being violated, you have the right to petition the Court for 
relief. 
@024 
EFTA01099849

07/09/2008 15:14 FAX 
USAO WPB CONFRM 
Q025 
• 
AUGUST II, 2006 
PAGE 2 
In addition to these rights, you arc entitled to counseling and medical services, and pi
from intimidation and harassment. If the Court determines that you are a victim, you Ain 
entitled to restitution from the perpetrator. A list of counseling and medical service pro% hit 
be provided to you, if you so desire. If you or your family is subjected to any intimit 
• • 
harassment, please contac
ir myself immediately. It is po:.s,l,;,• r, 
someone working on behalf of the targets of the investigation may contact you. Such con! 
not violate the law. However, if you are contacted, you have the choice of speaking to duo p 
or refusin to do so. If ou refuse and feel that you are being threatened or harassed, dlr..; id 
contact 
or myself. 
You also are entitled to notification of upcoming case events. At this time, your CT: . 
investigation. If anyone is charged in connection with the investigation, you will be noii: 
By: 
cc: 
Sincerely, 
R. Alexander Acosta 
United States Attorney 
Assistant United States Attorney 
f f 
EFTA01099850

07/09/2008 1S:14 FAX 
• 
USAO WPB CONFITM 
• 
Z026 
,OA 
0J4 
r.oc
, wi 
U.S. Department of Justice 
Federal Bureau of Investigation 
FBI - West Palm Beach 
Suite 500 
505 South Reeler Drive 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
January 10, 2008 
Re: Case Number:
Deal. 
This case is currently under Investigation. This can be a lengthy process and we request your 
continued patience while we conduct a thorough Investigation. 
As a crime victim, you have the following rights under 18 United States Code §37/1: (1) The right to 
be reasonably protected from the accused: (2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and tirnety notice of any 
pubilo court proceeding, or any parole proceeding, involving the crime or of any release or escape of the 
accused; (3) The right not to be excluded from any such public court proceeding, unless the court, after 
receiving clew and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim would be materially altered If 
the victim heard other testimony at that proceeding; (4) The right to be reasonably heard at any public 
proceeding in the district court Involving release, plea, sentencing, or any parole proceectrig; (5) The, 
reasonable right to confer with the attorney (or the Government In the case; (8) The right to full and timely 
restitution as provided In taw: (7) The right to proceedrngs free frarn unreasonable delay; (a) The right to be 
treated with fairness end with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy. 
We will make our best efforts to ensure you art accorded the rights described. Most of these rights 
portaIn to events occurring after the arrest or indictment of an individual for the crime, and It wilt become the 
responsibility of the prosecuting United Slates Attorney's Ottlee to ensure you are accorded those rights. You 
may also seek the edvice of a private attorney with respect to these rights. 
The Victim Notification System (VNS) is designed to provide you wt area informafion regarding the 
case as it proceeds through the criminal Justice system. You may obtain current information a 
on the beemot al WWW.Notty.LISDOJ.GOV or from the VNS Call Center at 1 
Ill
In addle° 
e o 
e your
lendiu change your decision about participation In the 
notification program. If you update your informatbn to Include a current email address VNS w 
' 
• 
a following Vain) Identification Number 
and 
anytime you contact the Call Center and 
rs me you log on to 
your last name (or business name) as currently contained in VMS. The name you should enter I 
on en me 
n a 
nion, the first time you acorn:a 
VNS Internet site, you will be proms. 
enter 
EFTA01099851

07/09/2008 15:14 PAX 
USAO WPM CONFRM 
2027 
-• 
• 
. 0J ,  V f 
it you have additional questions which involve this matter, please contact the office listed above. When 
you call, please provide the file number located at the top of this letter. Please remember, your participaton 
in the notification pan of this program is voluntary. In order to continue to receive notifications, it is your 
responsibility to keep your contact information current. 
Sincerely, 
m Specfalie
EFTA01099852

07/08/2008 15:15 F 
USA° WPB CONFAB 
qh 028 
• 
JCL coo OJDA 
r.04 , Of 
January 10,200B 
James Eisenberg 
One Cleerlake Center Ste 704 Australian South 
West Palm Beach. Fl 33401 
Dear James Eisenberg: 
U-S. Department of Justice 
Federal. Bureau of Investigation 
FBI - West Palm Beath 
Suite 500 
505 South Raider Drive 
West a 
ch Ft. 334 1 
You have requested to receive notifications for 
This case is currenUy under Investigation. This can be a lengthy process and we request your 
continued patience while we conduct a thorough investigation. 
Asa crime victim, you have the following rights under te United States Code § 3771: (I) The right to 
be reasonably protected from the accused; (2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any 
public court proceeding, or any parole proceeding, Involving the crime or of any release or escape of the 
accused; (1) The right not to be excluded from any such public court proceeding. unless the court, after • 
receiving clear and convinesig evidence, determines that testimony by the victim would be ma0erialy altered if 
the victim heard other testimony et that proceeding: (4) The right to be reasonably heard at any public 
proceeding In the district court invohing release, plea, sentencing, or any parole proceeding; (5) The 
reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government in the case; (6) The right to hail and timely 
restitution as provided in law; (7) The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay: (8) The right to be 
treated with fairness and with rasped for the vicIlm's dignify and privacy. 
We will make our beat efforts to ensure you are accorded the rights described. Most of these rights 
pertain to evenly occurring after the arrest or Indictment of an individual for the crime, and It will become the 
responsibility of the prosecuting United States Attorney's Office to ensure you are accorded those rights. You 
may also seek the advice of a privets attorney with respect to these rights. 
The Victim NotlficallOn System (VNS) is designed to provide you with direct information regarding the 
case as It proceeds through the criminal justice system. YoU may obtain current 
on the IM 
enter at 
In addition, you may use the Cal 
e 
or ntemet to update your contact information and/or change your decision about participation in the 
notification program. If you update your information to Include a current email address, VNS 
information to that address. You will need the folowing Victkn Identification Number (VIN) 
anytime you contact the Call Center end the first time you log on to 
you access the VNS Internet site, you will be prompted to enter 
your last name (or business name) as currently contained in VNS. The name you should enter is 
EFTA01099853