Valikko
Etusivu Tilaa päivän jae Raamattu Raamatun haku Huomisen uutiset Opetukset Ensyklopedia Kirjat Veroparatiisit Epstein Files YouTube Visio Suomi Ohje

Tämä on FBI:n tutkinta-asiakirja Epstein Files -aineistosta (FBI VOL00009). Teksti on purettu koneellisesti alkuperäisestä PDF-tiedostosta. Hae lisää asiakirjoja →

FBI VOL00009

EFTA00193954

651 sivua
Sivut 641–651 / 651
Sivu 641 / 651
U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
(561) 820-8711 
Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 
July 21, 2008 
VIA UNI  
TATES MAIL 
Ms. 
Re: 
Jeffrey EpsteinM 
: NOTIFICATION OF 
IDENTIFIED VICTIM 
Dear Ms. 
By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District 
of Florida provides you with the following notice. 
On June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as "Epstein) entered a plea 
of guilty to violations of Florida Statutes Sections 796.07 (felony solicitation of prostitution) 
and 796.03 (procurement of minors to engage in prostitution), in the 15th Judicial Circuit in 
and for Palm Beach County (Case Nos. 2006-cf-009454AXXXMB and 2008-cf-
009381AXXXMB) and was sentenced to a term. of twelve months' imprisonment to be 
followed by an additional six months' imprisonment, followed by twelve months of 
Community Control 1, with conditions of community confinement imposed by the Court. 
In light of the entry of the guilty plea and sentence, the United States has agreed to 
defer federal prosecution in favor of this state plea and sentence, subject to certain 
conditions. 
One such condition to which Epstein has agreed is the following: 
"Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of a violation of an offense 
enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same 
rights to proceed under Section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein 
had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes 
EFTA00194594
Sivu 642 / 651
lEn 
NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM 
JULY 21, 2008 
PAGE 2 OF 2 
of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's 
attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an 
Indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial 
authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining 
which evidentiary burdens if any a plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is 
the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position 
as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no 
less." 
Through this letter, this Office hereby provides Notice that you, MU 
are an 
individual whom the United States was prepared to name as a victim of an enumerated 
offense. 
Should you decide to file a claim against Jeffrey Epstein, his attorney, Jack 
Goldberger, asks that you have your attorney contact Mr. Goldberger at Atterbury Goldberger 
and Weiss, 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, (561) 
659-8300. 
Please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation can take part in or otherwise assist in civil litigation; however, if you do file a 
claim under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and Mr. Epstein denies that you are a victim of an enumerated 
offense, please provide written documentation of that denial to the undersigned. 
Thank you for all of your assistance during the course of this investigation and please 
accept the heartfelt regards of myself and Special Agents Kuyrkendall and Richards for your 
health and well-being. 
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
By: 
A. MARIE VILLAFARA 
ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY 
cc: 
Jack Goldberger, Esq. 
EFTA00194595
Sivu 643 / 651
U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 3340! 
(561) 820-8711 
Facsimile: (56!) 8204777 
July 21, 2008 
NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM 
NOTICE: IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 18, UNITED 
STATES CODE, SECTION 3509(d) AND FLORIDA LAW, 
THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT IS TO BE TREATED AS 
CONFIDENTIAL AND SHALL NOT BE DISCLOSED 
EXCEPT IN CONNECTION WITH A LEGAL 
PROCEEDING. 
EFTA00194596
Sivu 644 / 651
U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 
West Palm Beath, FL 33401 
(561) 820-8711 
Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 
July 21, 2008 
VIA UNITED S A 
MAIL 
Ms. 
Pentek 
Re: 
Jeffrey Epstein= Pentek: NOTIFICATION OF 
IDENTIFIED VICTIM 
Dear Ms. Pentek: 
By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District 
of Florida provides you with the following notice. 
On June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as "Epstein) entered a plea 
of guilty to violations of Florida Statutes Sections 796.07 (felony solicitation of prostitution) 
and 796.03 (procurement of minors to engage in prostitution), in the 15th Judicial Circuit in 
and for Palm Beach County (Case Nos. 2006-cf-009454AXXX1v1B and 2008-cf-
00938 1 AXXXMB) and was sentenced to a term of twelve months' imprisonment to be 
followed by an additional six months' imprisonment, followed by twelve months of 
Community Control 1, with conditions of community confinement imposed by the Court. 
In light of the entry of the guilty plea and sentence, the United States has agreed to 
defer federal prosecution in favor of this state plea and sentence, subject to certain 
conditions. 
One such condition.to which Epstein has agreed is the following: 
"Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of a violation of an offense 
enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same 
rights to proceed under Section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein 
had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes 
EFTA00194597
Sivu 645 / 651
MS. 
PENTEK 
NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM 
JULY 21, 2008 
PAGE 2 OF 2 
of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's 
attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an 
Indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial 
authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining 
which evidentiary burdens if any a plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is 
the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position 
as they would have been Ead Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no 
less." 
Through this letter, this Office hereby provides Notice that you, 
Pentek, are an 
individual whom the United States was prepared to name as a victim of an enumerated 
offense. 
Should you decide to file a claim against Jeffrey Epstein, his attorney, Jack 
Goldberger, asks that you have your attorney contact Mr. Goldberger at Atterbury Goldberger 
and Weiss, 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, (561) 
659-8300. 
Please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation can take part in or otherwise assist in civil litigation; however, if you do file a -
claim under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and Mr. Epstein denies that you are a victim of an enumerated 
offense, please provide written documentation of that denial to the undersigned. 
Thank you for all of your assistance during the course of this investigation and please 
accept the heartfelt regards of myself and Special Agents Kuyrkendall and Richards for your 
health and well-being. 
IL ALEXANDER ACOSTA 
. 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
By: 
A. MARIE VILLAFARA 
ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY 
cc: 
Jack Goldberger, Esq. 
EFTA00194598
Sivu 646 / 651
U.S. Department of .Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
500 South Australian Ave.. Suite 400 
We.st Palm Beach, FL 3340! 
(561)820-8711 
Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 
July 21, 2008 . 
NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM 
NOTICE: IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 18, UNITED 
STATES CODE, SECTION 3509(d) AND FLORIDA LAW, 
THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT IS TO BE TREATED AS 
CONFIDENTIAL AND SHALL NOT BE DISCLOSED 
EXCEPT IN CONNECTION WITH A LEGAL 
PROCEEDING. 
EFTA00194599
Sivu 647 / 651
U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
500 South Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 3340! 
(561)8204711 
Facsimile: (561)820-8777 
July 21, 2008 
VIA  UNIFIED STAIES MAIL 
1111.16INS 
Re: 
Jeffrey Epstein 
NOTIFICATION OF 
IDENTIFIED VICTIM 
Dear Ms. 
By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District 
of Florida provides you with the following notice. 
Qn June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as "Epstein) entered a plea 
of guilty to violations of Florida Statutes Sections 796.07 (felony solicitation of prostitution) 
and 796.03 (procurement of minors to engage in prostitution), in the 15th Judicial Circuit in 
and for Palm Beach County (Case Nos. 2006-cf-009454A3OOCMB and 2008-cf-
009381/OOOCMB) and was sentenced to a term of twelve months' imprisonment to be 
followed by an additional six months' imprisonment, followed by twelve months of 
Community Control 1, with conditions of community confinement imposed by the Court. 
In light of the entry of the guilty plea and sentence, the United States has agreed to 
defer federal prosecution in favor of this state plea and sentence, subject to certain 
conditions. 
One such condition to which Epstein has agreed is the following: 
"Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of a violation of an offense 
enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same 
rights to proceed under Section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein 
had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes 
EFTA00194600
Sivu 648 / 651
MS 
NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM 
JULY 21,2008 
PAGE 2 OF 2 
of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's 
attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an 
Indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial 
authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining 
which evidentiary burdens if any a plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is 
the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position 
as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no 
less." 
Through this letter, this Office hereby provides Notice that youSEIMINI, 
are an individual whom the United States was prepared to name as a victim of an enumerated 
offense. 
Should you decide to file a claim against Jeffrey Epstein, his attorney, Jack 
Goldberger, asks that you have your attorney contact Mr. Goldberger at Atterbury Goldberger 
and Weiss, 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, (561) 
659-8300. 
Please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation can take part in or otherwise assist in civil litigation; however, if you do file a 
claim under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and Mr. Epstein denies that you are a victim of an enumerated 
offense, please provide written documentation of that denial to the undersigned. 
Thank you for all of your assistance during the course of this investigation and please 
accept the heartfelt regards of myself and Special Agents Kuyrkendall and Richards for your 
health and well-being. 
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
By: 
A MARIE VILLAFAIJA 
ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY 
cc: 
Jack Goldberger, Esq. 
EFTA00194601
Sivu 649 / 651
March 20, 2011 
To whom it may concern: 
I served as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida from 2005 through 2009. Over the 
past weeks, I have read much regarding Mr. Jeffrey Epstein. Some appears true, some appears 
distorted. I thought it appropriate to provide some background, with two caveats: (i) under 
Justice Department guidelines, I cannot discuss privileged internal communications among 
Department attorneys and (ii) I no longer have access to the original documents, and as the 
matter is now nearly 4 years old, the precision of memory is reduced. 
The Epstein matter was originally presented to the Palm Beach County State Attorney. Palm 
Beach Police alleged that Epstein unlawfully hired underage high-school females to provide him 
sexually.lewd and erotic massages. Police sought felony charges that would have resulted in a 
term of imprisonment. According to press reports, however, in 2006 the State Attorney, in part 
due to concerns regarding the quality of the evidence, agreed to charge Epstein only with one 
count of aggravated assault with no intent to commit a felony. That charge would have resulted 
in no jail time, no requirement to register as a sexual offender and no restitution for the underage 
victims. 
Local police were dissatisfied with the State Attorney's conclusions, and requested a federal 
investigation. Federal authorities received the State's evidence and engaged in additional 
investigation. Prosecutors weighed the quality of the evidence and the likelihood for success at 
trial. With a federal case, there were two additional considerations. First, a federal criminal 
prosecution requires that the crime be more than local; it must have an interstate nexus. Second, 
as the matter was initially charged by the state, the federal responsibility is, to some extent, to 
back-stop state authorities to ensure that there is no miscarriage of justice, and not to also 
prosecute federally that which has already been charged at the state level. 
After considering the quality of the evidence and the additional considerations, prosecutors 
concluded that the state charge was insufficient. In early summer 2007, the prosecutors and 
agents in this case met with Mr. Epstein's attorney, Roy Black. Mr. Black is perhaps best known 
for his successful defense of William Kennedy Smith. The prosecutors presented Epstein a 
choice: plead to more serious state felony charges (that would result in 2 years' imprisonment, 
registration as a sexual offender, and restitution for the victims) or else prepare for a federal 
felony trial. 
What followed was a year-long assault on the prosecution and the prosecutors. I use the word 
assault intentionally, as the defense in this case was more aggressive than any which I, or the 
prosecutors in my office, had previously encountered. Mr. Epstein hired an army of legal 
superstars: Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz, former Judge and then Pepperdine Law Dean 
Kenneth Starr, former Deputy Assistant to the President and then Kirkland & Ellis Partner Jay 
Lefkowitz, and several others, including prosecutors who had formally worked in the U.& 
EFTA00194602
Sivu 650 / 651
Attorney's Office and in the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the Justice Department. 
Defense attorneys next requested a meeting with me to challenge the prosecution and the terms 
previously presented by the prosecutors in their meeting with Mr. Black. The prosecution team 
and I met with defense counsel in Fall 2007, and I reaffirmed the office's position: two years, 
registration and restitution, or trial. 
Over the next several months, the defense team presented argument after argument claiming that 
felony criminal proceedings against Epstein were unsupported by the evidence and lacked a basis 
in law, and that the office's insistence on jail-time was motivated by a zeal to overcharge a man 
merely because he is wealthy. They bolstered their arguments with legal opinions from well-
known legal experts. One member of the defense team warned me that the office's excess zeal in 
forcing a good man to serve time in jail might be the subject of a book if we continued to 
proceed with this matter. My office systematically considered and rejected each argument, and 
when we did, my office's decisions were appealed to Washington. As to the warning, I ignored 
it. 
The defense strategy was not limited to legal issues. Defense counsel investigated individual 
prosecutors and their families, looking for personal peccadilloes that may provide a basis for 
disqualification. Disqualifying a prosecutor is an effective (though rarely used) strategy, as 
eliminating the individuals most familiar with the facts and thus most qualified to take a case to 
trial harms likelihood for success. Defense counsel tried to disqualify at least two prosecutors. I 
carefully reviewed, and then rejected, these arguments. 
Despite this army of attorneys, the office held firm to the terms first presented to Mr. Black in 
the original meeting. On June 30, 2008, after yet another last minute appeal to Washington D.C. 
was rejected, Epstein pled guilty in state court. He was to serve 18 months imprisonment, 
register as a sexual offender for life and provide restitution to the victims. 
Some may feel that the prosecution should have been tougher. Evidence that has come to light 
since 2007 may encourage that view. Many victims have since spoken out, filing detailed 
statements in civil cases seeking damages. Physical evidence has since been discovered. Had 
these additional statements and evidence been known, the outcome may have been different. But 
they were not known to us at the time. 
A prosecution decision must be based on admissible facts known at the time. In cases of this 
type, those are unusually difficult because victims are frightened and often decline to testify or if 
they do speak, they give contradictory statements. Our judgment in this case, based on the 
evidence known at the time, was that it was better to have a billionaire serve time in jail, register 
as a sex offender and pay his victims restitution than risk a trial with a reduced likelihood of 
success. I supported that judgment then, and based on the state of the law as it then stood and the 
evidence known at that time, I would support that judgment again. 
Epstein's treatment, while in state custody, likewise may encourage the view that the office 
should have been tougher. Epstein appears to have received highly unusual treatment while in 
jail. Although the terms of confinement in a state prison are a matter appropriately left to the 
EFTA00194603
Sivu 651 / 651
State of Florida, and not federal authorities, without doubt, the treatment that he received while 
in state custody undermined the purpose of a jail sentence. 
Some may also believe that the prosecution should have been tougher in retaliation for the 
defense's tactics. The defense, arguably, often failed to negotiate in good faith. They would 
obtain concessions as part of a negotiation and agree to proceed, only to change their minds, and 
appeal the office's position to Washington. The investigations into the family lives of individual 
prosecutors were, in my opinion, uncalled for, as were the accusations of bias and / or 
misconduct against individual prosecutors. At times, some prosecutors felt that we should just 
go to trial, and at times I felt that frustration myself. What was right in the first meeting, 
however, remained right irrespective of defense tactics. Individuals have a constitutional right to 
a defense. The aggressive exercise of that right should not be punished, nor should a defense 
counsel's exercise of their right to appeal a U.S. Attorney to Washington, D.C. Prosecutors must 
be careful not to allow frustration and anger with defense counsel to influence their judgment. 
After the plea, I recall receiving several phone calls. One was from the FBI Special Agent-In-
Charge. He called to offer congratulations. He had been at many of the meetings regarding this 
case. He was aware of the tactics of the defense, and he called to praise our prosecutors for 
holding firm against the likes of Messrs. Black, Dershowitz, Lefkowitz and Starr. It was a proud 
moment. I also received calls or communications from Messrs. Dershowitz, Lefkowitz and 
Starr. I had known all three individuals previously, from my time in law school and at Kirkland 
& Ellis in the mid 90s. They all sought to make peace. I agreed to talk and meet with each of 
them after Epstein pled guilty, as I think it important that prosecutors battle defense attorneys in 
a case and then move on. I have tried, yet I confess that has been difficult to do fully in this case. 
The bottom line is this: Mr. Jeffrey Epstein, a billionaire, served time in jail and is now a 
registered sex offender. He has been required to pay his victims restitution, though restitution 
clearly cannot compensate for the crime. And we know much more today about his crimes 
because the victims have come forward to speak out. Some may disagree with the prosecutorial 
judgments made in this case, but those individuals are not the ones who at the time reviewed the 
evidence available for trial and assessed the likelihood of success. 
Respectfully, 
IL Alexander Acosta 
Former U.S. Attorney 
Sothem District of Florida 
EFTA00194604
Sivut 641–651 / 651