EFTA00188608

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 310-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2015 Page 27 of 
28 
Fiona° check your doeuntui lei when you teentve them Call us S you 
have any questions 
CHECK•IN - Muumum check-w time for domestic Molds to 60 
nonplus and lot kfietroolonni flights. 2 boo's. 
3 
fibCONFIFIMA I K)Ni - Russolitnithe use and Innuol nights nl least 
24 hours lot dornestim. and 72 hours let eilomational florasoffunabon 
is mandalur y In Ebtala. Canada. Mexico, Hamill and allinke national 
dastnatrons Fattenlouse any rusitivalionsmayreault Wautrimatic 
amnia:aline ul all continuing and rattan tetativaliour. 
4 
EiXCIIR SION AND imomen 'num. BARES 
most cksiAnmi hubs 
involve dett:di (LISP etbons A change in carner(s), Ii,yhllal. fintele)ot 
roufing(s) could firma in a carrier oamanding a lull late (Hewn 
agency of altlato,oteltdwitm baled, tiliataXt limy chaotic 
II your plans change eartwie, apply the sitkat of you.' tickuls toward 
o inlissued inn It Is not oncrissary to pteettaad a DOW ',Cate II a 
rotund in duo. obtain a toremi Irani lm auntie 
those betas, raglan and lams tau batted on coaled Weill, teat are 
le change without :Hike 
7. 
TICKETS- Concreted or unused Miens musiburolumesi lot proper 
autill to your account I osi, Morn° Or &alloyed lick015.011/51 WOW.,
104 until refund is recervoU from the issuing Career; nubjeCt In An 
Ladino Imposed sm virtu charge 
It 
110111 S en °surety c onlarnod on a guatanirrod payment basis II 
you cancel or change plans. phrase nobly your Itelut(&) within thu 
limo make, spodend by Mai hotel 
tAllirriACKAGE PRICESaro Subject lo changer without notice Ma 
tu currency fluctuations. IoM changes or Incroase in operational 
costa. In addition, greup torrilstertagin am noted nit n Minimum 
Number of passengers travelling. it Me number of pas:amours fails 
below the noninnon required. a Sti4Otatga way ho imposed oil all 
personation 
10 
1611,03 TAN 1 el If you what at an airline dram or passenger chock 
in corsair with your corifentral ticket and find Pal the Nano shows 
no reservation lot you -do no! Wane tho canning Char* your tickul. 
II rho Matta boy shows 'OK' lot Preflight inspection, lim airline rust 
accommodate you on Mal MOIL of 111bal is not possible, they rust 
pallet find you a substitute Mom orpay yuudwirudboarding coition 
striker. II necessary ask lo spook to a supetvisa. 
5 
G 
II 
We rteedin lee &de in eta- 1.tx:0551110 lees Ill tiw Wont of 
ream& t incell :lions is teOC:al 
cot 
12 
DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY • • ibis Travel Agency Is acting as a 
mere agunl for suppliers In selling travolaelalad services, or in 
accepting tozervallons or bookings for services Thal are not di• 
racily supplied by Ills linvol agency (such as air and ground 
Iranspoilallon, hololaccommodalluns, meals, loan, crulsesoriCa. 
This agency, tharefoto, shall not be responsible for breach 01 
contract orany intentional arta:elm-, actions or omlisions on part 
of such oupplion, which bison In any lo s s, damage, delay, or Injury 
to you or your navel companion or group morel:wit Unless the 
term 'guaranteed' Is spccifically slated In writing on your &kegs, 
Invoice. or reservntIon ilisterary, we do not guarantee any of such 
suppliers' roles, booliings.resatvations,conivielloste, schodulIng. 
et harnl 
of personal elIncb. travel spent shall nut be !capon. 
slide lot shy injuries, damages, or loner, caused to any traveler In 
connocilon with loner's! a:Dollies. social or labor unreal, rue• 
blanket or COIntraption 
Or difficulties, (Osmoses, local 
laws, Semitic conditions, criminal acts or abnormal conditions or 
develownonts, or any Whet actions, omissions, or conditions 
outside the Iravel agora'. control. Traveler assume° complete and 
full nosponsibliity kit, and hereby releases the agent from any duly 
Dl, checking and verifying any and all passport, visa, vaccination, 
or other entry requirements of each destination, and all safely or 
sonority condillonn at such destinations, during the length of Ian 
proposed travel. lot Information concerning possible dangers al 
International destinations, contact the Travel Advisory Section of 
lho U.S. Stoic Depurimonl. Ent mndleat Inlormallon, coil the Public 
Health Smote°. By ambarldne upon hls her travel, the traveler 
voluntarily assume, all risks involved In such travel, Whether 
*spectral or unexpected. lorveler it. hereby warned of such risks, 
and is advised to obtain appruptlida Insurance coverage against 
them. Traveler's retention 01 lick: I., reservations. or bookings 
rifler issuance shall constitute a consent to the above, and an 
°ottoman! on his her pad to convey the contents Introit" lo Nadia 
travel companions or group mondwro. 
13 
Proof of kkinlity 
niqu tad a,i inlarnalronal naval Wirhuirl prows 
litonlilosillonai pm. podium m.‘earwry war you will riot Ito pinion 
Ind la duped. 111c you, 
our Any to verity you. nocustory ;WO. 
Wu. STRONGLY HECOMMI-ND 
INSUHANCE. 
WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF AIRLINE BANKRUPTCIES. 
hopefully there will not bit any nano alikno txtrairuplrios, befit has to dui redounded dial th
y might or: us You 
1 know how they might alley rya 
d an stilton. Madams bellow M.y.11 is nut Obligated le carry you or 
rotund lithels Isperil huhu° Um bardouptcy. 
2 
MVO/ AVI lit. we red Niemen I In nitwit whals tin wanes wri.Ji nava 
dera.uoil bulletin:4i. Murray groan to n trawl agooi namedialuly 
becomes Ilia propertyIsidro airlines and we ern tomiluxl by laws to 
comply wah the ttidnotte. Onion. 
3 
II an 4WItilit tamtlain 
we r, it (night tontine aminco. kftel 
'enact:. Or Slog nettepl t y 
I; r aiilmes might retrefil passengers 
widest,. utedembinsian. 
m yiea Wadi DO: 0..VI/ASSIMOO. 
Lan 
dt:InUiNd ant. 
• 
4 
LAI lanwhilo hoe, lire 0n tr V 
'ft UM .01114111 UVatelatt fur putesell 
gel. to diatna then Ma- . e, 
so of au at bankruplovs 
IMPORTANT NOTICE 
this.gguricy fuel to. norefis hove endeavored to secure Ihu Iowan possiblo Sato, sulude° for your travel roquironvinla.b,e.ed an space evadable nu din ante 
ul bcokinu. accessible matexte of kdormalion, and knowleduu of agunls orwolved 
This agency cannot guar anion, L, WSW ul de Clillegul.ttran ideation llama, nail dig hie Inda Mad till idiot via be ate leWlett patentee inn el dopattutedato. 
Please contact nut amincy before daparlow if you wish to rechnek any newly introducedIwo, dint laity CINTOCIN)1111 With yOutt spaalic have( roquIrommas 
PLEASE. NOTE dui retention of Pawls, infervallons ur bookings after scums shall consIbute a.tceppen, of 
plUVLSOMI5 in itIV 
Milli
Iodate, as well as U1050 bailie and renditions set Huth 
tie annOunttorneinle end cinatirs m thebe Kenai:Ram, Guise el Cuomo 
EFTA00188688

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 310-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2015 Page 28 of 
28 
Your Travel Check List 
General Ust: 
0 Tickets 
0 Passport 
Vaccination certificate 
0 Wallet 
0 Travelers theCks 
C Itinerary 
0 Reservations 
0 Phone numbers 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
0 
C 
K 
O 
0 
0 
0 
0 Fist Aid supplies 
0 Camera and film 
0 Clock 
0 Clothesline and clips 
C Comb 
0 Deodorant 
0 Needles and thread 
O Plastic bags 
0 Prescriptions (duplicates) 
O Safety pins 
O Soap, laundry and bath 
O Spot remover 
0 Suntan lotion 
0 Tooth brush 
O Tooth paste 
3 Umbrella 
0 Calling cards 
0 Business literature 
0 Pen and paper 
O Addresses and stamps 
0 Glasses 
0 Medicines 
0 Aspirin 
0 Sun glasses 
His Chock Ust: 
O Bathing trunks 
O Beach Jammu, 
0 Cuff links, tie clasp 
K Gloves 
O Handkerchiefs, scarves 
C Flat 
O Pajamas 
O Raincoat or topcoat 
O Robe 
O Scarf 
O Shriving supplies 
, 
0 Shins 
0 Shoes socks 
0 Slacks 
Slippers or thongs 
C Suits (ono dark for atoning) 
Ties 
▪ Underwear 
E 
C 
Her Cliadc List: 
0 Betts 
0 Blouses 
Coat 
Cosmetic Supplies 
Li Pier2e1 
, 
GI yes 
3 0:ti
ntgiag. rheas and travel 
0 Hole 
°jewelry 
t 
• 
oat gild boots 
• 
e or beach coat 
0 SStid, ha thaw:Fiefs 
%OM, dress and walking 
01 Shower cap 
0 Slippers, scuffs, or beach thongs 
K Sivim suit 
0 Sweaters 
O 
t 
C 
K 
C 
EFTA00188689

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 279 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2014 Page 1 of 13 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson 
JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 
1. 
UNITED STATES 
JANE DOE #3 AND JANE DOE #4'S MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 21 FOR 
JOINDER IN ACTION 
COME NOW Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doc #4 (also referred to as "the new victims"), by and 
through undersigned counsel, to tile this motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21 
to join this action, on the condition that they not re-litigate any issues already litigated by Jane 
Doe ill and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the current victims"). The new victims have 
suffered the same violations of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) as the 
current victims. Accordingly, they desire to join in this action to vindicate their rights as well. 
Because the new victims will not re-litigate any issues previously litigated by the current victims 
(and because they are represented by the same legal counsel as the current victims), the 
Government will not be prejudiced if the Court grants the motion. The Court may "at any time" 
add new parties to the action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 21. Accordingly, the Court should grant the 
'notion.
As minor victims of sexual offenses. Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4 desire to proceed by 
way of pseudonym for the same reasons that Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 proceeded in this 
EFTA00188690

1 
EFTA00188691

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 279 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2014 Page 2 of 13 
FACTUAL BACKGROUND 
As the Court is aware, more than six years ago, Jane Doe #1 filed the present action 
against the Government, alleging a violation of her rights under the CVRA, 18 U.S.C. § 3771. 
DEI. She alleged that Jeffrey Epstein had sexually abused her and that the United States had 
entered into a secret non-prosecution agreement (NPA) regarding those crimes in violation of her 
rights. At the first court hearing on the case, the Court allowed Jane Doe #2 to also join the 
action. Both Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 specifically argued that the government had failed to 
protect their CVRA rights (inter alia) to confer, to reasonable notice, and to be treated with 
fairness. In response, the Government argued that the CVRA rights did not apply to Jane Doe #1 
and Jane Doe #2 because no federal charges had ever been filed against Jeffrey Epstein. 
The Court has firmly rejected the United States' position. In a detailed ruling, the Court 
concluded that the CVRA extended rights to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 even though federal 
charges were never filed. DE 189. 
The Court explained that because the NPA barred 
prosecution of crimes committed against them by Epstein, they had "standing" to assert 
violations of the CVRA rights. Id. The Court deferred ruling on whether the two victims would 
be entitled to relief, pending development of a fuller evidentiary record. Id. 
Two other victims, who are in many respects similarly situated to the current victims, 
now wish to join this action. The new victims joining at this stage will not cause any delay and 
their joinder in this case is the most expeditious manner in which to pursue their rights. Because 
the background regarding their abuse is relevant to the Court's assessment of whether to allow 
them to join, their circumstances are recounted here briefly. 
fashion. Counsel for the new victims have made their true identities known to the Government. 
2 
EFTA00188692

EFTA00188693

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 279 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2014 Page 3 of 13 
Jane Doe #3's Circumstances 
As with Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #3 was repeatedly sexually abused by 
Epstein. The Government then concealed from Jane Doe #3 the existence of its NPA from Jane 
Doe #3, in violation of her rights under the CVRA. If allowed to join this action, Jane Doe #3 
would prove the following: 
In 1999, Jane Doe #3 was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell, one of the main women 
whom Epstein used to procure under-aged girls for sexual activities and a primary co-conspirator 
in his sexual abuse and sex trafficking scheme. In fact, it became known to the government that 
Maxwell herself regularly participated in Epstein's sexual exploitation of minors, including Jane 
Doe #3. Maxwell persuaded Jane Doe #3 (who was then fifteen years old) to come to Epstein's 
mansion in a fashion very similar to the manner in which Epstein and his other co-conspirators 
coerced dozens of other children (including Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2). When Jane Doe #3 
began giving Epstein a "massage," Epstein and Maxwell turned it into a sexual encounter, as 
they had done with many other victims. Epstein then became enamored with Jane Doe #3, and 
with the assistance of Maxwell converted her into what is commonly referred to as a "sex slave." 
Epstein kept Jane Doe #3 as his sex slave from about 1999 through 2002, when she managed to 
escape to a foreign country and hide out from Epstein and his co-conspirators for years. From 
1999 through 2002, Epstein frequently sexually abused Jane Doe #3, not only in West Palm 
Beach, but also in New York, New Mexico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, in international airspace on 
his Epstein's private planes, and elsewhere. 
Epstein also sexually trafficked the then-minor Jane Doe, making her available for sex to 
politically-connected and financially-powerful people. Epstein's purposes in "lending" Jane Doe 
3 
EFTA00188694

EFTA00188695

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 279 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2014 Page 4 of 13 
(along with other young girls) to such powerful people were to ingratiate himself with them for 
business, personal, political, and financial gain, as well as to obtain potential blackmail 
information. 
One such powerful individual that Epstein forced then-minor Jane Doe #3 to have sexual 
relations with was former Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, a close friend of Epstein's 
and well-known criminal defense attorney. Epstein required Jane Doe #3 to have sexual 
relations with Dershowitz on numerous occasions while she was a minor, not only in Florida but 
also on private planes, in New York, New Mexico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. In addition to 
being a participant in the abuse of Jane Doe #3 and other minors, Deshowitz was an eye-witness 
to the sexual abuse of many other minors by Epstein and several of Epstein's co-conspirators. 
Dershowitz would later play a significant role in negotiating the NPA on Epstein's behalf. 
Indeed, Dershowitz helped negotiate an agreement that provided immunity from federal 
prosecution in the Southern District of' Florida not only to Epstein, but also to "any potential co-
conspirators of Epstein." NPA at 5. Thus, Dcrshowitz helped negotiate an agreement with a 
provision that provided protection for himself against criminal prosecution in Florida for 
sexually abusing Jane Doe #3. Because this broad immunity would have been controversial if 
disclosed, Dershowitz (along with other members of Epstein's defense team) and the 
Government tried to keep the immunity provision secret from all of Epstein's victims and the 
general public, even though such secrecy violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act. 
Ghislaine Maxwell was another person in Epstein's inner circle and a co-conspirator in 
Epstein's sexual abuse. She was someone who consequently also appreciated the immunity 
granted by the NPA for the crimes she committed in Florida. In addition to participating in the 
4 
EFTA00188696

EFTA00188697

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 279 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2014 Page 5 of 13 
sexual abuse of Jane Doe #3 and others, Maxwell also took numerous sexually explicit pictures 
of underage girls involved in sexual activities, including Jane Doe #3. She shared these 
photographs (which constituted child pornography under applicable federal laws) with Epstein. 
The Government is apparently aware of, and in certain instances possesses some of these 
photographs. 
Perhaps even more important to her role in Epstein's sexual abuse ring, Maxwell had 
direct connections to other powerful individuals with whom she could connect Epstein. For 
instance, one such powerful individual Epstein forced Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with 
was a member of the British Royal Family, Prince Andrew (a/k/a Duke of York). Jane Doe #3 
was forced to have sexual relations with this Prince when she was a minor in three separate 
geographical locations: in London (at Ghislaine Maxwell's apartment), in New York, and on 
Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands (in an orgy with numerous other under-aged 
girls). Epstein instructed Jane Doe #3 that she was to give the Prince whatever he demanded and 
required Jane Doe #3 to report back to him on the details of the sexual abuse. Maxwell 
facilitated Prince Andrew's acts of sexual abuse by acting as a "madame" for Epstein, thereby 
assisting in internationally trafficking Jane Doe #3 (and numerous other young girls) for sexual 
purposes. 
Another person in Epstein's inner circle of friends (who becomes apparent with almost 
no investigative effort) is Jean Luc Brunel. Epstein sexually trafficked Jane Doe #3 to Jean Luc 
Brunel many times. Brunel was another of Epstein's closest friends and a regular traveling 
companion, who had many contacts with young girls throughout the world. Brunel has been a 
model scout for various modeling agencies for many years and apparently was able to get U.S. 
5 
EFTA00188698

EFTA00188699

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 279 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2014 Page 6 of 13 
passports for young girls to "work" as models. He would bring young girls (ranging to ages as 
young as twelve) to the United States for sexual purposes and farm them out to his friends, 
especially Epstein. Brunel would offer the girls "modeling" jobs. Many of the girls came from 
poor countries or impoverished backgrounds, and he lured them in with a promise of making 
good money. Epstein forced Jane Doe #3 to observe him, Brunel and Maxwell engage in illegal 
sexual acts with dozens of underage girls. Epstein also forced Jane Doe #3 to have sex with 
Brunel on numerous occasions, at places including Epstein's mansion in West Palm Beach, Little 
St. James Island in the U.S. Virgin Islands (many including orgies that were comprised of other 
underage girls), New York City, New Mexico, Paris, the south of France, and California. 
Epstein also trafficked Jane Doe #3 for sexual purposes to many other powerful men, 
including numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign 
presidents, a well-known Prime Minister, and other world leaders. Epstein required Jane Doe #3 
to describe the events that she had with these men so that he could potentially blackmail them. 
The Government was well aware of Jane Doe #3 when it was negotiating the NPA, as it 
listed her as a victim in the attachment to the NPA. Moreover, even a rudimentary investigation 
of Jane Doe #3's relationship to Epstein would have revealed the fact that she had been 
trafficked throughout the United States and internationally for sexual purposes. Nonetheless, the 
Government secretly negotiated a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein precluding any 
Federal prosecution in the Southern District of Florida of Epstein and his co-conspirators. As 
with Jane Doe #1, and Jane Doe #2, the Government concealed the non-prosecution agreement 
from Jane Doe #3 — all in violation of her rights under the CVRA — to avoid Jane Doe #3 from 
raising powerful objections to the NPA that would have shed tremendous public light on Epstein 
6 
EFTA00188700

EFTA00188701

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 279 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2014 Page 7 of 13 
and other powerful individuals and that would likely have been prevented it from being 
concluded in the secretive manner in which it was. 
Jane Doe #4's Circumstances 
If permitted to join this action, Jane Doe #4 would allege, and could prove at trial, that 
she has CVRA claims similar to those advanced by Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, based on the 
following: 
As with the other Jane Does, Jane Doe #4 was repeatedly sexually abused by Epstein. In 
or around the summer of 2002, Jane Doe #4, an economically poor and vulnerable sixteen-year-
old child, was told by another one of Epstein's underage minor sex abuse victims, that she could 
make $300 cash by giving an old man a massage on Palm Beach. An acquaintance of Jane Doe 
#4 (also a minor sexual abuse victim of Epstein) telephoned Epstein and scheduled Jane Doe #4 
to go to Epstein's house to give him a massage. During that call, Epstein himself got on the 
phone (a means of interstate communication) with Jane Doe #4, asking her personally to come to 
his mansion in Palm Beach. 
Jane Doc #4 then went to Epstein's mansion and was escorted upstairs to Epstein's large 
bathroom by one of Epstein's assistants. Shortly thereafter Jeffrey Epstein emerged and lay face 
down on the table and told Jane Doe #4 to start massaging him. Epstein asked Jane Doe #3 her 
age and she told him she had recently turned sixteen. Epstein subsequently committed illegal 
sexual acts against Jane Doe #4 on many occasions. 
Epstein used a means of interstate communication (i.e., a cell phone) to arrange for these 
sexual encounters. Epstein also frequently travelled in interstate commerce (i.e., on his personal 
jet) for purposes of illegally sexually abusing Jane Doe #4. 
7 
EFTA00188702

EFTA00188703

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 279 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2014 Page 8 of 13 
The acts Epstein committed against Jane Doe #4, constituted numerous federal sex 
offenses, some of which do not carry a statute of limitations and thus are not time-barred. See 18 
U.S.C. § 3283. And these offenses were the kinds of offenses that the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation (FBI) and U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida were pursuing 
in 2007. So far as Jane Doe #4 is aware, the U.S. Attorney's Office made no serious effort to 
locate her. Instead, after identifying approximately forty separate underage sexually abused 
victims, and apparently preparing a 53-page federal indictment and with full awareness of the 
existence of many victims like Jane Doe #4 — unidentified and not interviewed — it entered into a 
non-prosecution agreement barring prosecution of Epstein's federal crimes against these victims. 
This is contrary to the Government's normal approach in prosecuting federal sex offenses. It 
also violated Jane Doe #4's rights under the CVRA, including the fact that she had a 
"reasonable" right to confer with the U.S. Attorney's Office before they entered into an 
agreement with a sex offender barring prosecution of him for the crimes he committed against 
her. 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(5). 
MOTION FOR JOINDER 
Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4 now both move to join this action filed by Jane Doe #1 and 
Jane Doe #2, pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 21 provides that 
"[o]n motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add . . . a party." Rule 21 
"grants the court broad discretion to permit a change in the parties at any stage of a litigation." 
Ford'. Air Line Pilots Ass'n Intl, 268 F. Supp. 2d 271, 295 (E.D.N.Y. 2003) (internal quotation 
omitted). The new victims should be allowed to join the current victims in this action under Rule 
21. 
8 
EFTA00188704

EFTA00188705

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 279 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2014 Page 9 of 13 
The new victims will establish at trial that the Government violated their CVRA rights in 
the same way as it violated the rights of the other victims. The new victims' participation in this 
case is important because it appears that the Government intends to raise a factual defense that 
somehow it did keep Jane Doe ill and Jane Doe #2 properly informed of what was happening in 
the criminal prosecution. Of course, if four victims all testify consistently that they were not 
properly informed by the Government (as we believe they will), that provides a stronger case for 
a CVRA violation. 
In addition, Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4's participation is relevant to a defense the 
Court has allowed the Government to raise. The Court has previously ruled that the victims' 
request for rescission of the NPA "implicates a fact-sensitive equitable defense which must be 
considered in the historical factual context of the entire interface between Epstein, the relevant 
prosecutorial authorities and the federal offense victims — including an assessment of the 
allegation of a deliberate conspiracy between Epstein and federal prosecutors to keep the victims 
in the dark on the pendency of negotiations between Epstein and federal authorities until well 
after the fact and presentation of the non-prosecution agreement to them as alai, accompli." DE 
189 at 12 n.6 (emphasis added). Jane Doe #3's and Jane Doe #4's participation in this case will 
help to show what the "entire interface" was between the Government and the victims and thus 
to respond to the Government's estoppel arguments as well as other defenses that it appears to be 
preparing to raise. See, e.g., DE 62 (52-page response from the Government to the victim's 
summary judgment motion, raising numerous factually-based and other arguments against the 
victim's position). 
9 
EFTA00188706

EFTA00188707