EFTA00184224

Casse€9333evARE0TE6149;411A Olcanaserbt2a81131ErEfatedaoh:ALPSISDcfitteke702N1522131,3 
dfC112 
13 
2. (a) The government admits that, after Epstein's attorneys learned of the notification 
that the government planned to provide to Jane Doe #2, who claimed that she was 
not a victim, Epstein's attorneys contacted the USAO and objected to the 
procedures for notification and the legal bases therefor. The government further 
admits that the USAO considered those objections when evaluating what 
notification to provide to victims. 
Except as otherwise admitted above, the 
government denies Request No. 2(a). 
(b) Admitted. 
(c) The government admits that, as a result of objections lodged by Epstein's 
attorneys, the government reevaluated the notifications that it had intended to 
provide to victims and, as a result of that reevaluation, the USAO altered the 
scope, nature, and timing of notifications that it had contemplated providing to 
victims. With regard to Jane Doe #2, the government further admits that, as a 
result of representations made by Jane Doe #2 that she was not a victim and 
objections lodged by Epstein's attorneys, the USAO stopped making notifications 
to Jane Doe #2. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies 
Request No. 2(c). 
(d) The government admits that, after the USAO received objections to victim 
notifications from Epstein's counsel and reevaluated its victim notification 
obligations, the USAO altered the language that was ultimately contained in the 
July 9, 2008 notification letter to Jane Doe #1 in care of Bradley Edwards. 
Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. 2(d). 
2 
EFTA00184444

026929333&agar/35614MM EITtawneabl23613.3ErEfetectiah:CLESISDOkete7021112021316Pan elf aft 
13 
(e) The government admits that, at least in part as a result of objections lodged by 
Epstein's lawyers to victim notifications, the USAO reevaluated its obligations to 
provide notifications to victims, and Jane Doe #1 was thus not told that the USAO 
had entered into a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein until after the 
agreement was signed. The government further admits that Jane Doe #2 was not 
told that the USAO had entered into a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein 
until after the agreement was signed, but denies that the USAO did not inform 
Jane Doe #2 as a result of any negotiations involving Epstein or any objections 
lodged by Epstein's lawyers; the USAO did not consider Jane Doe #2 a victim 
after she informed the USAO and the FBI that she was not a victim of any offense 
committed by Epstein, and, as a result, the USAO did not consider informing Jane 
Doe #2 about the non-prosecution agreement. Except as otherwise admitted 
above, the government denies Request No. 2(e). 
3. Denied. 
4. Denied. 
5. The government admits that, during the negotiations with Jeffrey Epstein regarding 
the non-prosecution agreement, at least one experienced attorney within the USAO 
subscribed to the position that the CVRA required notifications to the victims in this 
case and that position was communicated to Epstein's counsel. To the extent that 
Request No. 5 seeks admissions regarding the positions held by attorneys within the 
USAO that were not communicated to non-government personnel regarding whether 
or not the CVRA ultimately required notifications to the victims in this case, the 
government objects to Request No. 5 as violative of the deliberative process privilege. 
3 
EFTA00184445

CasseC€038e€M€0726141PAIIA littecumeett23.61131ErEferedachzitSESDakelte702011XCIMEPailigt fef (112 
13 
6. (a) Denied. 
(b) Denied. 
(c) Admitted. 
(d) Admitted. 
(e) Admitted to the extent that the reference to "Lillian Sanchez" was meant to refer 
to Lilly Ann Sanchez. 
(0 Admitted. 
(g) Admitted. 
7. The government admits that, on about January 10, 2008, when Jane Doe #1 and Jane 
Doe #2 were sent letters advising them that "this case is currently under 
investigation," the U.S. Attorney's Office had already signed a non-prosecution 
agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, but that, on that date, the non-prosecution agreement 
nonetheless remained in a state of some flux and was subject to being set aside as 
Epstein was challenging the propriety of the non-prosecution agreement and seeking 
further review from the Department of Justice. 
8. Denied. 
9. (a) The government admits that, at Epstein's insistence, the USAO agreed to a 
provision in the non-prosecution agreement that provided as follows: "The parties 
anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of any public record. If the 
United States receives a Freedom of Information Act request or any compulsory 
process commanding the disclosure of the agreement, it will provide notice to 
Epstein before making that disclosure." Except as otherwise admitted above, the 
government denies Request No. 9(a). 
4 
EFTA00184446

caetasgameevggosmogai atoucureappantallErtfatedaphStP3LSDffloiteket702MaarlEPaficpeelf2 
13 
(b) Admitted. 
(c) Denied. 
(d) Denied. 
(e) The government admits that, during the period from September 24, 2007 through 
June 2008, the USAO did not notify Jane Doe #2 of the existence of the non-
prosecution agreement. The government further admits that, although FBI agents 
notified Jane Doe #1 of the existence and substance of the agreement at the 
request of the USAO on or about October 27, 2007, no employee of the USA() 
personally notified Jane Doe #1 of the existence of the non-prosecution agreement 
during the period from September 24, 2007 through June 2008. Except as 
otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. 9(e). 
10. (a) Admitted. Because Request No. 10 appears directed solely to the communica-
tions between FBI agents and Jane Doe #1 during their meeting on or about 
October 26, 2007, the government responses to Requests No. 10(b) through 10(g) 
address only that meeting. 
(b) The government admits that, on or about October 26, 2007, FBI agents explained 
to Jane Doe #1 that Epstein would plead guilty to state charges for procuring 
minors to engage in prostitution; that Epstein would be required to register as a 
sex offender; that Jane Doe #1 would be entitled to seek damages from Epstein; 
and that, if she desired, Jane Doe #1 would be entitled to use the services of an 
attorney at no expense to her in seeking those damages from Epstein. The 
government denies that the FBI agents explained that the state charges 
"involv[ed] another victim." 
5 
EFTA00184447

Gasse9SONeev8E0731161413AM IDocioneerlit23.EilBlErEiettedschtRIBISDdithellaZealEPaityg& df Cl2 
13 
(c) The government denies that the FBI agents did not explain to Jane Doc #1 that an 
agreement had already been signed; denies that the FBI agents did not explain to 
Jane Doe #1 that the agreement resolved the investigation of the federal case 
involving Jane Doe #1; and denies that the FBI agents did not explain to Jane Doe 
#1 other terms of that agreement 
Except as otherwise admitted above, the 
government denies Request No. 10(e). 
(d) Denied. 
(c) Denied. 
(f) Denied. 
(g) Denied. 
11. The government admits that, on or about November 28, 2007, A. 
V i I lafafta of 
the USAO sent a draft of a crime victim notification letter to Jay Lefkowitz, counsel 
for Jeffrey Epstein, and that the draft notification letter stated, in part: "I am writing 
to inform you that the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein has been completed, 
and Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office have reached an agreement 
containing the following terms . . . ." The government further admits that, in part as a 
result of objections lodged by Epstein's lawyers, the USAO reevaluated its 
obligations to provide notifications to victims, and, as a result of that reevaluation and 
other considerations and developments, the USAO never sent victims the draft 
notification letter that was sent to Jay Lefkowitz on or about November 28, 2007. 
Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. 11. 
12. The government admits that, prior to July 3, 2008, the USAO had already entered a 
binding non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. The government is without 
6 
EFTA00184448

GassaCeBeev8aTEMI4AVIA Cfitcaurnaht74E1131ErffititedziohoRIBISDatteliCet2917120816Pajagbadf2 
13 
knowledge of precisely when "Bradley J. Edwards was working on a letter to the U.S. 
Attorney's Office concerning the need to federally prosecute Epstein for sex offenses 
committed against Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2," and, accordingly, the government 
denies the assertion that Edwards worked on that letter on July 3, 2008. Except as 
otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. 12. 
13. (a) The government admits that, when Epstein pled guilty to state charges on June 30, 
2008, Jane Doe #2 had not been infonned by the USAO of the existence of the 
non-prosecution agreement. The government further admits that, although the 
USAO, through FBI agents, had notified Jane Doe #1 of the existence of the non-
prosecution agreement prior to Epstein's June 30, 2008 guilty plea, no employee 
of the USAO had personally notified Jane Doe #1 at that time of the existence of 
the non-prosecution agreement. 
Except as otherwise admitted above, the 
government denies Request No. 13(a). 
(b) The government denies that, by the time of Epstein's June 30, 2008 guilty plea, an 
attorney for the government working at the USAO had not already conferred with 
Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 about their opinions regarding how the federal 
investigation and potential prosecution of Epstein should proceed. 
The 
government admits that the USAO had not conferred with Jane Doe #2 about the 
non-prosecution agreement prior to Epstein's June 30, 2008 guilty plea. The 
government further admits that, although the USAO had communicated with Jane 
Doe #1 about the non-prosecution agreement through FBI agents prior to 
Epstein's June 30, 2008 guilty plea, no employee of the USAO had personally 
conferred with Jane Doe #1 about the non-prosecution agreement prior to 
7 
EFTA00184449

Maea9ClaSecoME073116141PAM FRI=Tomb 01131131E rEferteeeoh:RIBES D ettek 0702=0201. EP al!jacfr S(12 
13 
Epstein's guilty plea. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies 
Request No. 13(b). 
(c) Although the government was aware that Jane Doe #2 had been represented by 
counsel paid for by Epstein, the government is unaware of the extent of Epstein's 
defense attorneys' awareness of the USAO's communications with Jane Doe #1 
and Jane Doe #2 about the agreement, as described in the responses to Requests 
No. 13(a) and 13(b), and therefore can neither deny nor admit Request No. 13(c). 
Except as otherwise admitted above and in the responses to Requests No. 13(a) 
and 13(b), the government denies Request No. 13(c). 
(d) The government admits that Epstein's attorneys negotiated with the USAO for a 
provision in the non-prosecution agreement that ultimately provided as follows: 
"The parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of any public 
record. If the United States receives a Freedom of Information Act request or any 
compulsory process commanding the disclosure of the agreement, it will provide 
notice to Epstein before making that disclosure." Except as otherwise admitted 
above, the government denies Request No. 13(d). 
14. The government admits that, when Epstein was pleading guilty to the state charges 
discussed in the non-prosecution agreement, the USAO and Epstein's defense 
attorneys sought to keep the document memorializing the non-prosecution agreement 
confidential, but denies that they sought at that time to keep the existence of the non-
prosecution agreement confidential. 
Except as otherwise admitted above, the 
government denies Request No. 14. 
8 
EFTA00184450

Case 93116-ow-99735-1ICA/MI Dmmmm 2B1-131  ESlmaviathaE ESSODElciottaMMA2A1M6 Pie e lib 22 
13 
15. (a) The government admits that, while Bruce E. Reinhart was an Assistant U.S. 
Attorney, he learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein 
matter. 
(b) The government admits that, while Bruce E. Reinhart was an Assistant U.S. 
Attorney, he discussed the Epstein matter with another Assistant U.S. Attorney 
working on the Epstein matter. 
(c) Denied. 
16. Admitted. 
17. Admitted. 
18. (a) Denied. 
(b) Denied. 
19. To the extent that Request No. 19 is directed to the business or personal relationships 
of the 93 U.S. Attorneys and over 5,400 Assistant U.S. Attorneys serving across this 
country, or the countless individuals who have formerly served as U.S. Attorneys and 
Assistant U.S. Attorneys throughout this nation, the government objects to Request 
No. 19 as overly broad and burdensome and not calculated to lead to or involve 
information relevant to the instant matter. The government denies possessing or 
having any knowledge or information about a personal or business relationship 
between Jeffrey Epstein and either the U.S. Attorney or any Assistant U.S. Attorney 
serving in the Southern District of Florida. Except as otherwise admitted above, the 
government denies Request No. 19. 
20. Admitted. 
21. Denied. 
9 
EFTA00184451

game930B3cauff419732E644(.4O11 Illoonumffilt333B31 EaltirmaitletrnfRISEDEMRI4e/t0C92/139111M35 FRajje 
12 
22. (a) Admitted. 
(b) Admitted. 
(c) Admitted. 
23. The government admits that the non-prosecution agreement signed by the USAO and 
Jeffrey Epstein currently blocks the USAO from prosecuting sex offenses committed 
by Epstein against Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the Southern District of Florida 
from in or around 2001 through in or around September 2007, provided that those 
offenses are set out on pages I and 2 of the non-prosecution agreement, were the 
subject of the joint investigation by the FBI and the USAO, or arose from the federal 
grand jury investigation. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies 
Request No. 23. 
24. Admitted; Jeffrey Epstein provided valuable consideration to the federal government 
through the non-prosecution agreement he entered with the USAO. 
25. Denied. 
26. The government objects to Request No. 26 because it seeks information protected 
from disclosure by the law enforcement investigative privilege. 
10 
EFTA00184452

oThmE9301B3awaREV73IBliggl nimunterttaEM311 ErttmmtlornFRISIDIIRmilettGYAI9JODa 
13 
"'Sur 'Waif 
Respectfully submitted, 
WIFREDO A. 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
By: 
Is Dexter A. Lee 
Dexter A. Lee 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Florida Bar No. 0936693 
99 N.E. 4th Street 
Miami, Florida 33132 
Tel: (305) 961-9320; Fax: (305) 530-7139 
Email: 
A. 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Florida Bar No. 0018255 
500 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach FL 33401 
Tel: 
Fax: 
Email: 
Eduardo I. Sanchez 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Florida Bar No. 877875 
99 N.E. 4th Street 
Miami, Florida 33132 
Tel: (305) 961-9057; Fax: (305) 536-4676 
Email: eduardo.i.sanchez@usdoj.gov 
Attorneys for United States 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing United States' Response to 
Petitioners' First Request for Admissions to the Government was served via CM/ECF on this 
19th day of July, 2013, on the parties and counsel appearing on the attached service list. 
/s Dexter A. Lee 
Assistant United States Attorney 
11 
EFTA00184453

Glme 9)083 cam8320731B WiSOPI ffeanumeritt326[13311 EthlbsactlomFFILSIDUD3gaikeitIMEOM26 
13 
1723odf 
SERVICE LIST 
Jane Does 1 and 2i United States, 
Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN 
United States District Court, Southern District of Florida 
Brad Edwards, Esq., 
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, 
Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 
(954) 524-2820 
Fax: (954) 524-2822 
E-mail: brad®pathtojustice.com 
Paul G. Cassell 
S.J. Quinney College of Law at the 
University of Utah 
332 S. 1400 E. 
Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 
(801) 585-5202 
Fax: (801) 585-6833 
E-mail: casselp®law.utah.edu 
Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 
Roy Black, Esq. 
Jackie Perczek, Esq. 
Black, Srebnick, Komspan & 
201 South Biscayne Boulevard, 
(305 371-6421 
Fax: 
E-mail: 
Martin G. Weinberg 
MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. 
20 Park Plaza 
Suite 1000 
Boston, MA 02116 
Office: (617) 227-3700 
Fax: (617) 338-9538 
Email: owlmgw®att.net 
Jay P. Leflcowitz 
Kirkland &Ellis, LLP 
601 Lexington Avenue 
New York NY 10022 
Fax: 
Email: 
12 
EFTA00184454

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-32 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 7 
EXHIBIT 
32 
EFTA00184455

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-32 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 7 
JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE 
CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT AND REQUEST FOR A HEARING ON APPROPRIATE 
REMEDIES 
CASE NO: 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson 
!i
p
f
EXHIBIT B 
EFTA00184456

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-32 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 3 of 7 
FD-302(Rey.104.95) 
-1-
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 
Date of transcription 
08/14/2007
was interviewed in West Palm Beach, 
Florida, relfreingm agrelleral investigation involving the sexual 
exploitation of minors. After being advised of the identity of,the 
interviewing agents and the nature of the interview, igliprovided 
the following information: 
In 2003 or 2004 — 
was introduced to JEFFREY EPSTEIN 
for the purpose of providing him with personal massages. arag was 
approached at a party by a female she believed was named 
She described the female as havin 
r 
hair and taller. The 
female was later identified as 
. 
told 
alle and alb's friend, isima.moimmma that they could make money by 
providing massages to EPSTEIN. a 
told S
 that she could 
provide the massages with her clothes on or off. Aagb, who was 
fifteen years old, believed that she was close to turning sixteen 
when she first met EPSTEIN. However, during *ties first contact 
with EPSTEIN, she told him that she had just turned eighteen. 
and I ',traveled to EPSTEIN's residence in Palm 
Beach by taxi. 
was regnant at the time. Once at the 
residence, 
took W 
upstairs. EPSTEIN entered the room 
wearin only a ro e. Once EPSTEIN had removed the robe, both 
and .6118 provided EPSTEIN with a massage. Both 
and 
had removed their clothing and remained only in their 
underwear. EPSTEIN asked IMMINEMMIto leave. Once alone with 
 
EPSTEIN began to masturbate. 
was uncomfortable. 
After 
EPSTEIN climaxed the massage was over. m.:Mlibelieved that Nee 
had mentioned EPSTEIN might masturbate during the massage but she 
was still very surprised when he masturbated. EPSTEIN paid
11.11 
$200.00. EPSTEIN did not touch 
during that massage. :mop 
departed EPSTEIN's residence with two men that worked for EPSTEIN. 
They drove OMMIMPto a Shell Gas Station located near Okeechobee 
Boulevard and the Florida Turnpike. 
Prior to departing the residence, Melliprovided her 
telephone number to one of EPSTEIN's assistants, OUNNOMMS 
(PHONETIC). 
all) described her as a very pretty Hispanic female in 
her early twenties, with long brown hair, and approximately 5'5" to 
5 16" tall. elistated that 
. another of EPSTEIN'S 
assistants, or EPSTEIN would usually contact her. 
would 
telephone and ask if she was available or if she had any other 
Inyesdpoonon 
08/07/2007 
a, West Palm Beach, Florida 
Reg 31E-MM-108062 
Dare dimmed 08/07/2007 
by 
This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your army: 
it and its contents art not to be distributed outside !IOW agency. 
EFTA00184457

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-32 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 4 of 7 
90.302e (Rev. 10-6-95) 
31E-MI4-108062 
Continuation of FD-302 of 
I 
 
 On  08/07/2007  ,Page  
2 
• 
girls she could bring. When EPSTEIN telephoned, he usually asked 
for=224to come over. According toig= EPSTEIN's house 
telephone number began with the digits 655. She would call 
sometimes and leave a message. MEMMDstated that when they 
telephoned her they would inform her of when they would be coming 
back to town and if she might have anyone new. 
did not 
believe that EPSTEIN ever really liked her. 
Otraveled to the EPSTEIN's residence during 2003 and 
2004 over twenty five times mm.SIMObelieved that she provided 
EPSTEIN with approximately 10-15 massages. EPSTEIN initially 
started out touching WIENS@ breasts but gradually the massages 
became more sexual. EPSTEIN would instruct aeon how and what to 
do during the massages. He would request Willa to rub his chest and 
nipples. 
',stated that on approximately two occasions, EPSTEIN 
asked that 
'remove her underwear and provide the massage nude. 
complied. MEMOIstated that EPSTEIN would make her feel that 
she had the option to do what she wanted. 
During one massage,Ite stated that she had been.giving 
EPSTEIN a massage for approximately 30-40 minutes when instead of 
EPSTEIN turning over to masturbate, EPSTEIN brought another female 
into the massage area. is•WAIDIdeecribed the female as a beautiful 
blonde girl, a "Cameron Diaz" type, 19 years of age, bright blue 
eyes, and speaking with an accent. EPSTEIN hadiallstraddle the 
female on the massage table. EPSTEIN wanted
 to touch the 
females breast. According to WOW EPSTEIN "pleasured" the female 
whilemnimPwas straddled on top of the female. mallistated she 
could hear what she believed to be a vibrator: mmUllsaid for 
EPSTEIN it was all about pleasuring the female. After the female 
climaxed, EPSTEIN patted maon the shoulder and she removed 
herself from the table. The female got up from the table and went 
into the spa/sauna. EPSTEIN commented to REEpthat in a few 
minutes the female would realize what had just happened to her. 
received $200.00. 
.Apadvised the interviewing agents that EPSTEIN had 
used a back massager on her vagina. EPSTEIN asked her first if he 
could use the massager on her. mosestated that she had held her 
breath when EPSTEIN used the back massager on her. =m4istated 
that at no time during any of the massages had EPSTEIN caused her 
to climax. 
During another massage, 
lbelieved by this time she 
was seventeen, EPSTEIN placed his hand on 
vagina, touching 
EFTA00184458

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-32 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 5 of 7 
, ' FD-302a (Rev. 104-95) 
331-MM-108062 
Continuation of FD-302 of 
 
 .On  08/07/2007  Pate 
clitoris. 
'?was 
uncomfortable and told him to stop. 
EPSTEIN complied. MMRAM"stated that the incident freaked her out. 
NIIMPstated that EPSTEIN was upset because she was upset. --"' 
never return to the residence. 
'stated that she did not deal 
with EPSTEIN anymore after that incident. 
EPSTEIN gave both -each 
a book entitled 
"Massage for Dummies". They received the books on the same visit. 
EPSTEIN also commented how strong ' 
s hands were when it came to 
her providing his massages. 
On another occasion, 
'mentioned to EPSTEIN that she 
was looking at a car, a Toyota Corolla. EPSTEIN provided 
$600.00 - $700.00. 
---lstated that EPSTEIN gave her the money 
after the incident with the other female. 
According tolaill EPSTEIN would ask her to bring him 
other girls. a:. 
who started dancing at strip clubs when she was 
16, brought girls from the club as well as from other sources. 
WILD stated she brought girls from fifteen years of age to twenty-
five years of age. jappostated that EPSTEIN would get frustrated 
with her if she did not have new females for him. On one instance, 
EPSTEIN hung up on her because she could not provide him with 
anyone new. ais
 stated that EPSTEIN's preference was short, 
little, white girls. iaIllpstated that EPSTEIN was upset when one 
of the other girls brought a black girl. Ii
llstated that EPSTEIN 
did not want black girls or girls with tatoos.
IlMe stated that one of the girls she stayed with on 
occasion, at 
also started providing EPSTEIN with 
massages. A telephone number for VOMMIftwas WINMUMINMEOW. W 
said that her family resides in 
, Florida, possibly 
S
--- also stayed with 
during this same 
time period. However,
 never went to EPSTEIN'S house or 
provided him with massages. 
has a Yacht Club address. 
Another girl that 
had taken to EPSTEIN's residence 
was LOMMIN0Last Name Unknown' 
According to 
EPSTEIN 
liked ISMOMMOLNU a lot. impsaid that she was never a favorite of
EPSTEIN. EPSTEIN offeredam$300.00 to bring_ialb 
MEMIllwas a couple years younger than 
)elieveo tnat sne 
was either 16 or 17 when she first went to EPSTEIN's residence. 
ne.m...said that 
went 2-3 times but that she did not want 
any part of it after that. ---a "neves she could identify 
Lf she saw her photograpu. 
also stated that 
at 
EFTA00184459

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-32 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 6 of 7 
. FD-302s (Rev. 10-6-95) 
31E-MM-108062 
Continuation of FD-302 of 
4 
 
 .on  08/07/2007  .Page 
one time attended 
HIGH SCHOOL. 
'also 
believed that they had met through a group of friends while 
attending 
- a dropout prevention school. 
--,mentioned another girl by the name of Ca 
smille EPSTEIN distinguished the two "MS 
by referring to 
mane worked at an ice cream 
shop. W._
Istated that she did not likeMEMO, and that 
was a storyteller and a bad liar. 
 
stated thet.iiiiMMOMOnever 
really wanted to go to EPSTEIN's residence but she went anyway. 
ttttttt~
-1.1said that she had not taken a good look at EPSTEIN's 
penis. 
--Sexplained that it seemed like he would always try and 
hide his penis. Ilia stated that EPSTEIN never asked her for sex. 
HOMMOstarted dancing when she was sixteen at IMINNIII" 
MINIIMMOIMb The owner, SS 
let her dance. 
'has also 
worked at daIMPie 
located 0 
' 
Boynton 
Beach, Florida. 
used illegal drugs during the years she provided 
EPSTEIN with massages. 
'said that EPSTEIN tried to provide her 
with advice regarding controlled substances. 
-
-
stated that she met with EPSTEIN's attorneys, IIMp, 
a 
ana a unidentified female(UF), at the ALE HOUSE RESTAURANT. 
Willipmet with them after she contacted 
who confirmed that 
they were really working for EPSTEIN. 
*stated that mommmealso 
balked of her twin boys and stated that she was living in 
Manhattan. OPEREPfound out that Sand 
the OF are employed by 
illnielS. 
They asked a lot of questions. They 
specifically asked about LIMNS  and a 
---11reiterated 
her dislike for Tall 
mmINO0also informed the interviewing agents that she had 
spoken to —ishe 
believed before the fourth of July. 
told — 
at she had met with investigators and that they nad 
videoed her. 
numbers: 
pconfirmed her association to the following telephone 
Old cellular number - (III) 
Possibly an old cellular number - (III) 
telephone number - 
EFTA00184460

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-32 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 7 of 7 
, 
FD-302a (Rev. 10-640 
31E-MM-108062 
Cootinuation of PD-302 of 
• 
• 
 
.O0O8/O7/2OO7  JEW  
S 
fr
et 
EFTA00184461

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-33 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 4 
EXHIBIT 
33 
EFTA00184462

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-33 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 4 
JANE DOE 01 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE 
CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT AND REQUEST FOR A HEARING ON APPROPRIATE 
REMEDIES 
CASE NO: 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson 
EXHIBIT H 
EFTA00184463