EMAIL THREAD

A tax loophole for just Jeffrey Epstein?

6 messages

Senders: Andrew Friendly <11111111> · Larry Summers < > · Jeffrey Epstein

Messages are sorted chronologically when every timestamp in the thread can be parsed; otherwise they appear in the archive's original order. Appearing in correspondence is not an indication of involvement in any crime. Source: Epstein Files archive (House Oversight Committee).

MESSAGE 1 / 6

A tax loophole for just Jeffrey Epstein?

From: Andrew Friendly <11111111>

To: Lawrence Henry Summers < >

Date: December 2, 2017 at 7:29:07 AM EST

https://wwwfacebook.com/senatorsanders/videos/10156545332157908/

MESSAGE 2 / 6

Fwd: A tax loophole for just Jeffrey Epstein?

To: Lawrence Henry Summers < >

Date: December 2, 2017 at 8:16:13 AM EST

Did you see this

MESSAGE 3 / 6

Re: A tax loophole for just Jeffrey Epstein?

From: Larry Summers < >

Date: Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 9:23 AM

????

MESSAGE 4 / 6

Re: A tax loophole for just Jeffrey Epstein?

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]>

Date: Dec 2, 2017, at 9:29 AM

like the hunt for easter eggs. your friend andrew has so far only found one . and it was brighly colored:)

MESSAGE 5 / 6

Re: A tax loophole for just Jeffrey Epstein?

From: Larry Summers < >

Date: Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 9:30 AM

I don't know whether to laugh or cry

MESSAGE 6 / 6

Re: A tax loophole for just Jeffrey Epstein?

From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]]

To: Larry Summers

Date: 12/2/2017 2:36:15 PM

after DJT actually signs it. I'll point out the location of the other eggs much more creative - overall though, 
the writers were very sophisticated. they closed many many loopholes, and did it elegantly. example closing 
all the 1031 crazy transactions by merely inserting the word" real" in from of the word property very 
clever, or not redoing the paragraph but merely changing the penalty to zero. . or detailing related party 
definitions that had teeth. . they cant be faulted for not getting it right -100 percent :)

← Back to search