kathy thought the piece is being lauded as great investigative journalism so does your suggested pr group have the better contacts to place a story. on why itis not. . howeer to you point. to what end?
EMAIL THREAD
(No subject)
Senders: Jeffrey Epstein · Michael Wolff
Messages are sorted chronologically when every timestamp in the thread can be parsed; otherwise they appear in the archive's original order. Appearing in correspondence is not an indication of involvement in any crime. Source: Epstein Files archive (House Oversight Committee).
This thing as model journalism is one more element that could give it legs--so another danger. I don't think it's a question now of directly debunking this. That's going against virtue itself. What I'd like to do is game out everything, creating a structure for thinking this through. Definitely not a piecemeal response. Figure out where we want to be and where we can reasonably get and work backwards. Maybe we do agree to a big interview with you--Landon Thomas or something like that. But this has to be war gamed out. Obviously I can contribute, Kathy can, would be great to get SB input, but this needs a structure, that's why I think Hiltzig or somebody assembling a plan would be helpful. Even if in the end you decide to do nothing, at least you've come up with a structured way to think about it.
don't tweet this
do you think we highlight , that at the end of the day it was prositution. sex formoney. . a state crime. with state laws.
At this point I don’t think you can go legalistic. They’ve won the high ground—young, vulnerable, poor girls.
im aware. im thinking what would trump do
He never tries to explain. He denies, blames media, denigrates someone else.
Claims are ludicrous and self-serving, media is working with the other side’s lawyers, this is all about Donald Trump.
...all about Donald Trump, the real villain.