MESSAGE 1 / 3
Re: Follow up
From: Kathy Ruemmler
Date: Saturday, 27 February 2016
Unsatisfactory
EMAIL THREAD
Follow up
Senders: Kathy Ruemmler · Stephen J." "Immelt · Jeffrey Epstein
Messages are sorted chronologically when every timestamp in the thread can be parsed; otherwise they appear in the archive's original order. Appearing in correspondence is not an indication of involvement in any crime. Source: Epstein Files archive (House Oversight Committee).
MESSAGE 2 / 3
RE: Follow up
From: "Immelt, Stephen J."
To: "Kathy Ruemmler"
Date: February 27, 2016 at 10:30:17 AM MST
Kathy We will of course do this in whatever sequence makes sense for you. It goes without saying that any move would need to make economic sense. My assumption has been that your comp would fall outside of our "bell curve", but that is not an issue for us as long as the potential contribution also falls outside. You would not be the only partner outside the curve, and I am comfortable with expanding that group for people who can genuinely move the needle while embracing the culture that makes us who we are. One benefit of having Michael in the mix is that he can provide a global perspective, and he would be important for explaining the case outside the US if we moved forward. Just let me know when and how you want to speak next. Best, Steve
MESSAGE 3 / 3
Re: Follow up
- ask him for a financial proposal . Subject to Mutually acceptable conditions