EFTA01141381

Third and finally, the American public has become so cynical about government that 
many no longer think reform is possible. When asked if they believe government will do the 
right thing most of the time, fewer than 20 percent of Americans agree. Fifty years ago, when that 
question was first asked on standard surveys, more than 75 percent agreed. It's hard to get people 
worked up to change society or even to change a few laws when they don't believe government can 
possibly work. You'd have to believe in a giant conspiracy to think this was all the doing of the forces 
in America most resistant to positive social change. 
It's possible. of course, that they intentionally cut jobs and wages so much as to cow average workers, 
buried students under so much debt they'd never take to the streets, and made most Americans so 
cynical about government they wouldn't even try to for change. But it's more likely they merely 
allowed all this to unfold, like a giant wet blanket over the outrage and indignation most Americans 
feel but don't express. Change is coming anyway. We cannot abide an ever-greater share of the 
nation's income and wealth going to the top while median household incomes continue too drop, one 
out of five of our children living in dire poverty, and big money taking over our democracy. At some 
point, working people, students, and the broad public will have had enough. They will reclaim our 
economy and our democracy. This has been the central lesson of American history. Reform is less risky 
than revolution, but the longer we wait the more likely it will be the latter. 
****** 
The Biggest Stereotype Of Every State In 
America In 1 Map 
;;;Embedded image permalink 
As someone who grew up loving maps, I found a wonderful map on The Huffington Post created by 
Amazing Maps stereotyping all 50 U.S. states with on word. Thanks to the Twitter account 
@AmazingMaps, we now have an idea of how the Internet stereotypes all 50 U.S. states. When a 
search phrase like "Why is Illinois so..." is typed into Google, the search engine autocompletes the 
sentence with the word that people most commonly write in the search bar next. In this way, Google 
autocomplete may reveal the deeply held assumptions the public holds about a state. In the case of 
Illinois, the result was "corrupt." Clearly, the Rod Blagojevich scandal clearly has made an impact. 
@AmazingMaps found the autocompleted phrases for all 5o states. 
Apart from Ohio, which was dubbed "important" presumably because of its influence as a swing state 
in presidential elections, and Oregon ("good') or Colorado ('fit"), it's hard to call any of these results a 
compliment. Nebraska is apparently "boring." Georgia is "backwards." Pennsylvania is "haunted." 
Rents in California, New York, Hawaii, New Hampshire and Alaska mo have people thinking those 
states are too "expensive." A good few (South Carolina, Mississippi, Arkansas, Kentucky and West 
Virginia) were autocompleted as "poor." With Sarah Palin as a former Governor of Alaska, "expensive" 
would not be the first word that would come to my mind and labeling Georgia as "backwards" shows 
that the map is flawed, at least when it comes to Georgia. 
****** 
EFTA01141401

Mazda i-ELOOP Brake Energy Regeneration System 
Regenerative braking systems, which convert kinetic energy from a slowing car into electricity, are nothing new. 
However, until until now, they have been reserved for hybrid and electric vehicles. Now, Mazda has introduced 
the world's first regenerative braking system built for cars with a standard combustion engine, generating 
electricity that can be used for things like air conditioning and audio without burning extra fuel. 
If you use computer technology as comparison, the fact that automakers can claim with a straight face 
that a 3o miles per gallon car is fuel efficient is laughable if it wasn't so ridiculously sad. Think about 
it; an iPhone has more computing power than a top of the line IBM 360 main-frame computer (in a 
700 square foot computer room) 45 years ago. So a fuel efficiency that has gone from 10 mpg to 30 
mpg during the same period is beyond laughable. Using Intel co-founder Gordon E. Moore's 
maxim "Moore's Law" that the number of transistors on integrated circuits doubles approximately 
every two years. This prediction has proven to be accurate, in part because the law is now used in the 
semiconductor industry to guide long-term planning and to set targets for research and development. 
Today the capabilities of many digital electronic devices are strongly linked to Moore's law: processing 
speed, memory capacity, sensors and even the number and size of pixels in digital cameras. All of these 
are improving at roughly exponential rates as well. This exponential improvement has dramatically 
enhanced the impact of digital electronics in nearly every segment of the world economy. Moore's law 
describes a driving force of technological and social change in the late loth and early 21st centuries. 
The period is often quoted as 18 months because of Intel executive David House, who predicted that 
chip performance would double every 18 months (being a combination of the effect of more 
transistors and their being faster). 
The poster child for fuel efficiency today is Tesla Corporation and its battery operated electric cars, 
which are both sexy in addition to fuel efficient. With a EPA range of 265 miles on a single charge, 
acceleration of 0 to 6o in 5.4 seconds and a top speed of 125 mph both the Tesla Model S and Roadster 
EFTA01141402

are truly fuel efficient cars and a major breakthrough in fuel efficiency. Recognizing this and $4 a 
gallon prices, automakers around the world have jumped on the fuel efficiency bandwagon. Most fuel 
efficient cars rely on regenerative braking systems, which convert kinetic energy from a slowing car 
into electricity, are nothing new. However, until now, they have been reserved for hybrid and electric 
vehicles. Now, Mazda has introduced the world's first regenerative braking system built for cars with a 
standard combustion engine, generating electricity that can be used for things like air conditioning and 
audio without burning extra fuel. 
■ 1-ELOOP System Components 
Variable voltage alternator 
Responding to voltage level charges in the capacitor. 
the alternator automatically vanes its voltage 
(between 12V and 25V) in order to smoothly transfer 
electricity to the capacitor. 
Electric Double 
Layer Capacitor 
r-
12-V battery 
An electncity storage device similar to a battery. 
but it does not involve a chemical reaction. 
ATypa Display 
8 
bard:AP 
a 
e 
Fe 
FT El Ir
e
)40 
I 
i-ELOOP activation is indicated 
(on the Muni Information Display. MID). 
Energy flow in the i•ELOOP system 
is shown on the MID. indicabng the 
amount of regenerated energy and 
the charge remaining in the capacitor. 
Drivers tan choose between two 
visual displays. 
(Information displayed) 
0 Amount of regenerated energy 
0 Charge remaining in the capacitor 
DC/DC convertor 
0 Energy flow (charge/discharge) 
Converts the voltage of electricity 
from the capacitor (max. 25V) 
to 12V in order to supply power 
to electric components. 
But the new potential breakthrough is hydrogen technology — a car that runs on hydrogen gas, spits 
nothing but water vapor out the tailpipe, and can take you from Washington to New York City on a 
single tank. But after a long and bumpy road from futuristic concept car to real-world production 
vehicle, the first mass-produced hydrogen-powered cars will hit dealerships this spring in the United 
States, and they are on display this year in auto show across the country. The key much like with 
electric cars and access to charging stations, is access to hydrogen refueling stations. 
Manufacturers such as Toyota, Honda and Hyundai — the latter of which will soon begin selling its 
first hydrogen-powered vehicle in parts of California where fueling stations already exist — say this 
new propulsion system tackles the age-old pollution problems of standard gasoline engines without 
many of the limitations that have held back the market for battery-powered and other alternative fuel 
vehicles. On board the vehicles, hydrogen and oxygen are combined in a fuel cell, causing a chemical 
reaction that yields electricity to power the car. The only other byproduct is water, which comes out 
the tailpipe as steam — so, no greenhouse gases, just like the plug-in hybrids and electric cars already 
on the road today. And while some processes used to extract hydrogen for fuel usage do emit 
greenhouse gases, research has shown that the overall "well-to-wheel" carbon footprint is lower for 
hydrogen-powered cars than for electric plug-ins and other alternative fuel vehicles. 
Meanwhile, filling up at a hydrogen pump takes a few minutes, compared to several hours for even the 
fastest of electric charging stations. And fuel cells can be scaled to power trucks and sport utility 
EFTA01141403

vehicles, whereas experts say it is currently difficult to stack enough batteries to power cars much 
larger than a sedan. 
Most importantly, though, hydrogen-powered cars can travel upwards of 3oo miles on one tank, giving 
consumers the same range they have grown accustomed to with gas engines. Conversely, the market 
for plug-ins continues to be limited by the fact that all but the most expensive models can travel no 
more than 100 miles on a full charge. Indeed, as the area's network of electric charging stations has 
become denser, electric vehicle sales in the Washington region have ticked up from around 150 last 
year to more than 600 in the past 11 months, according to data from the Washington Area New Auto 
Dealers Association. Still, that represents less than half of 1 percent of all cars sold in the region during 
that period. "Drivers want larger cars, especially here in the United States, and they want to be able 
to drive further without refueling,"Mike O'Brien, Hyundai's vice president of corporate and product 
planning, said in an interview. "So while we think there will always be a place for battery-powered 
electrics in our fleet, they'll always be supplemental vehicles, not ones that can displace combustion 
engines." 
With so many advantages to hydrogen, why are we so much further down the road on an electric 
charging network than we are on hydrogen fueling stations? It comes down to federal funding and the 
current administration's evolving stance on hydrogen. During his first few years in office, then-
Energy Secretary Steven Chu openly questioned the viability of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, at one point 
stating that it would require several "miracles" to make that dream a reality, including better ways to 
produce and store hydrogen and more affordable fuel cells. Under his watch, the Energy Department 
cut by more than half its funding for fuel cell research, while at the same time pouring additional 
resources into cultivating an infrastructure of electric charging stations for plug-in vehicles. 
Not long afterward, Shell closed the only commercial hydrogen station in the District, located on 
Benning Road, along with another three pilots it had been built in New York. On the East Coast, it 
looked like the end of the road for hydrogen cars. Only three years later, though, Chu acknowledged 
that he had changed his mind about hydrogen, pointing to new techniques developed to extract 
hydrogen from natural gas as well as improvements and cost reductions in automotive technology. 
Toyota executives, for instance, say they have reduced the cost of hydrogen vehicles by 95 percent in 
the past decade, mostly by bringing down the size of the fuel cells and by finding new, less expensive 
materials with which to build the tanks. At that point, though, the United States had already fallen 
behind the likes of Japan, Germany, Sweden, South Korea and the United Kingdom, all of which have 
made considerable government investments in hydrogen infrastructure and already have dense 
refueling networks. 
Now in catch-up mode, and now under the watch of Obama's second-term Energy Secretary Ernest 
Moniz, the United States has started to invest more money back into hydrogen. In May, the agency 
launched H2USA, a public-private collaboration between fuel suppliers, automakers, government 
agencies and clean technology groups to coordinate research and map out a plan for a hydrogen 
infrastructure. "It's not the kind of problem the federal government is going to solve on its own, or 
that state governments or the industry are going to solve on their own; it really needs a team effort," 
David Danielson, head of the department's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, said at 
the auto show last week. He added that H2USA members will put forth several recommendations for 
the agency and other stakeholders in the next few months. 
EFTA01141404

Moniz, said the department is taking a close look at steps that have been taken at the state level in 
California, where, sparked by public investments under former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) and 
accelerated by legislation signed by Gov. Jerry Brown (D), a cluster of nine hydrogen stations have 
sprouted around Los Angeles. Over the next decade, the state will invest an additional $200 million to 
reach 100 stations by 2024. Money for the program comes from vehicle registration fees, meaning 
drivers are footing much of the bill for the infrastructure. Some private stakeholders, such as Toyota, 
which is planning on bringing its first hydrogen-powered car to the United States starting next year, 
have taken steps to speed up the process. The company partnered with the University of California, 
Irvine to fund research to determine how far apart to build hydrogen stations to make refueling 
practical for the largest number of potential buyers. 
If they want to sell the cars on the East Coast, some say carmakers will need to make those same 
investments here. "The first companies to sell a hydrogen fuel cell car are going to have to do some 
work like Nissan did with the Leaf," said Joe Taylor, training director at Ducats Automotive Group, a 
privately owned collection of more than 20 local dealerships. "That was the first mass-produced all-
electric car, and before they did it, they worked with other groups to help build the start of an 
infrastructure and put charging stations in some of their dealerships." While automakers say they 
are willing to invest in research, they are unlikely to dive much further into the fuel production and gas 
station business, even if it means waiting longer for the infrastructure they need to start selling 
hydrogen cars in new markets. 
Who would have to step up? Instead, the onus will likely fall on existing hydrogen producers, 
technology firms and other investors. A small Connecticut-based company called SunHydro, for 
example, has started planting the first seeds in the Northeast, building its first hydrogen fueling station 
in central Connecticut in 2010 and recently starting construction on another just outside of Boston. 
Hydrogen is generated on site at both stations using energy from solar panels on the roof to electrolyze 
water. Purchased a few years ago by Tom Sullivan, who made his fortune with Toano, Va.-based 
hardwood flooring company Lumber Liquidators, SunHydro initially planned to build a chain of 
stations that would allow hydrogen cars to travel from Maine to Miami. 
However, Sullivan said he later realized that building a central hub of stations was a more practical 
path for hydrogen cars, and he hopes to start with a dense network around Boston. Once in place, if 
hydrogen cars start selling in the Northeast, the network would likely sprout satellite stations that he 
thinks would spread quickly to New York, and then down to Washington. In order for hydrogen cars 
to be a real option in this area, though, Sullivan estimates we would need at least a dozen stations in 
the region. And without cars to fill up at his existing pumps up north, he says there is little incentive to 
move forward, as each station costs a couple million dollars to build and needs roughly 100 vehicles 
locally to make it economically viable. 
"We need more cars to make it worthwhile, that's the bottom line," he said. Meanwhile, Hyundai, 
Toyota and Honda representatives all say they are eager to bring their cars to market on this side of the 
country — just as soon as they see hydrogen stations sprout on the East Coast. It leaves both sides at a 
stalemate, waiting for the other to jump first. Some are hoping that's where the H2USA partnership 
will step in with funding or other incentives to get the early stages of a fueling network off the ground. 
"In California, they provided a walking bridge across the river for investors during this period where 
there are not yet enough hydrogen cars on the road," O'Brien said. "It would be great to see that 
model expanded or duplicated at the state or federal level." 
EFTA01141405

When will this all happen? With a little more push from elected officials, carmakers and fuel 
producers say they could have hydrogen-powered vehicles rolling out of dealerships in this region in as 
little as three or four years. It's not going to happen overnight, but it will happen," Sullivan said. 
think, realistically, we are a few years away from seeing hydrogen-powered cars in this region." 
I would like to end this week's readings with the Bill Moyers Essay: When Congressmen Deny 
Climate Change and Evolution - The Republicans are either right out of the Dark Ages or they 
are so owned by special or religious interests that they are willing to deny that it is raining in the 
middle of a hurricane. No place is this any more evident with the issue of Climate Change. Every 
publishing climate scientist in the world agrees that global warming is man-made, as does every 
scientific body in the world that deals with climate change. There has been no debate about global 
warming and its terrible threat to humanity in the scientific world for years. And the solution, 
renewable energy, is just as clear. But for some reason the Republican are in total denial when it 
comes to science. To become a teacher, a doctor, or even to drive a car one has to pass test(s) for 
competency. Yet the Chairman of the Congressional Committee for Science, Space and Technology 
not only denies Climate Change but publically says that the Earth was created in six days six thousand 
years ago. 
Web Site: http://billmoyers.com/segmSers-essatongressmen-deny-climate-change-and-evolution/ 
PRINT TRANSCRIPT 
BILL MOYERS: The battle never ends. And the choices we make in democracy often pit religious or 
partisan beliefs against scientific evidence that contradicts them. And beliefs can be stubborn, hard to 
give up. They even determine which facts we choose to accept. Partisans, especially — and who among 
us is not sometimes a partisan — will twist the facts to fit their preconceived notions. So, when people 
do stupid things, journalists and politicians included, cherished beliefs are often driving them, 
sometimes right over the cliff. As people in recovery say, denial is not just the name of a river in Egypt. 
And that's what makes it dangerous. 
Right now, two powerful belief systems have converged to counter facts staring us right in the face. 
Just as the number of Americans who question the science of evolution has gone up, so too has the 
number who deny that global warming is happening, and that human activity is causing it. This, at a 
time when the global scientific community is more certain than ever that you and I, and everyone else, 
are helping to turn up the heat and seal our fate. And here's the scary political reality: on both fronts, 
evolution and climate change, radical right Republicans have made denial a litmus test. You can see it 
EFTA01141406

embodied in this man, Paul Broun, Republican congressman from Georgia, and a physician with 
strong religious beliefs: 
PAUL BROUN: I've come to understand that all that stuff I was taught about evolution, and 
embryology, and Big Bang theory, all that is lies straight from the pit of hell. And it's lies to try to keep 
me and all the folks who are taught that from understanding that they need a savior. You see there are 
a lot of scientific data that I found out as a scientist that actually show that this is really a young earth. 
I don't believe that the earth's but about 9,000 years old. I believe it was created in six days as we know 
them. That's what the Bible says. 
BILL MOYERS: And when he took on the science of global warming, his fellow Republicans in the 
House of Representatives enthusiastically applauded: 
PAUL BROUN on CSPAN: Now we hear all the time about global warming. Well, actually we've had a 
flat line temperatures globally for the last eight years. Scientists all over this world say that the idea of 
human-induced global climate change is one of the greatest hoaxes perpetrated out of the scientific 
community. It is a hoax. 
BILL MOYERS: Not true, simply not true. Up to a point, we might agree that Representative Broun's 
personal beliefs are his own business, even when he is telling the extremist John Birch Society that this 
entire concept of man-made global warming is a conspiracy to, and I'm quoting, "destroy America." 
But remember, this man is chairman of oversight and investigations for the Science, Space, and 
Technology Committee of the United States House of Representatives, passing judgment on public 
policy and science. God help us. 
My opinion is the "Duck Dynasty Wing" of the Republican Party has taken over the GOP, and they're 
not about to retreat in their war on science and common sense. 
Chad Brown Brown resigned his position as Polk County Republican Party of Iowa Co-Chair in August of 2013. 
Increasingly in Republican circles, activists, leaders and politicians are more interested in saying what 
the far right of the party wants to hear than doing anything to change "Grand Old Party". It has gotten 
to the point that activist, political leaders and politicians in the GOP are increasingly throwing around 
hateful slurs, offensive remarks and taking the most extreme positions to outdo each other to establish 
their conservative street creds. As a result, in the past two decades, the Republican Party has been the 
party of subtraction. When I was growing up in the 195os and 1960s, the GOP strived to become a big 
tent. It stood behind the ideals of Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt and Eisenhower because they stood for 
freedom and justice for all. As a result, professionals like my father, a black doctor, were proud to be 
Republican, working with the likes of Nelson Rockefeller, Jacob Javits, Kenneth Keating and later 
John V. Lindsey to make the country better for all Americans. 
For the past fifty years, Republicans appear to be hell bent to pushing a war on common sense. It is a 
party that now hates government, especially the Federal Government. Other than being hawkish in 
defense matters, GOP officeholders and candidates have been vocal about puffing measures in place 
that are harmful to education, ranging from shutting down the Department of Education to 
eliminating state funded early childhood education. If this were to happen, all children will be led on 
EFTA01141407

the path to mediocrity. The same is true for healthcare, the social safety net and immigration policies. 
Our families deserve better. 
The hateful rhetoric of Iowa's Rep. Steve King should be an embarrassment to the GOP, as his latest 
comments may have permanently damaged the party's standing with Latinos and fair-minded Iowans. 
Yet the leaders in the Iowa GOP refused to stand up to him, only offering bland disapproval. The GOP 
was founded on the ideas of expanding the rights and freedoms of Americans, but today it seems only 
interested in protecting the interests of rich, white men. 
Today, it is estimated that more than 97 percent of scientists have affirmed that climate change is a 
man-made problem, yet GOP leaders still claim it to be a hoax. While a majority of Americans believe 
that the country needs common sense gun regulations that will help protect children and adults from 
deranged gunmen, the GOP fights any and all new regulations. You would think that Republican 
leaders feel an obligation to make the United States a better place for all Americans. But more and 
more, they only believe this for white people or minorities that blindly support the white ruling class. 
GOP leaders across the country in pursuit of ideology purity have compromised any values that would 
make them a Big Tent Party, refusing to take a stand against the extremists in the party. How else can 
one explain that Rep. Paul Broun (R-GA), chairman of oversight and investigations for the Science, 
Space and Technology Committee of the US House of Representatives, who says evolution is a lie 
"straight from the pit of hell" and climate change, a hoax has not been castigated by the GOP 
leadership? 
THIS WEEK's QUOTE 
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong 
man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. 
The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is 
marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who 
comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and 
shortcoming; ...who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high 
achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring 
greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls 
who neither know victory nor defeat." 
—Theodore Roosevelt 
BEST VIDEO OF THE WEEK 
Values We Learned Growing Up 
I can't believe we made it. 
Web Link: http://vimeo.corn/52231459 
EFTA01141408

By: Bart Mitchum 1 year ago 
If you grew up in the 1950's through the i98o's this is a tribute to you making it to adulthood. This is 
for when you hear a 2O, a 3o, or even a 4o "something" sneer and say "old school" in a negative 
manner. Many of the great values and lessons learned from "old school" watch above linked video. 
WONDERFUL PERFORMANCE 
THIS IS A SCENE THAT WAS NOT SHOWN DURING THE 
OSCAR CEREMONIES. 
ABSOLUTELY SPECTACULAR! 
Web Link: hnp://wwwiwitvid.com/embed.php?guid=L558O8autoplay=0
THIS WEEK's MUSIC 
EFTA01141409

Pete Seeger, the man considered to be one of the pioneers of contemporary folk music who inspired 
legions of activist singer-songwriters died this week. Seeger's best known songs include "Where Have 
All the Flowers Gone," "Turn! Turn! Turn! (To Everything There Is a Season)" and "If I Had a 
Hammer (The Hammer Song)." But his influence extended far beyond individual hits. In a career 
spanning more than 70 years, Seeger frequently courted controversy. "He lived at a time when so 
many things hadn't been done yet, the idea of making music about something hadn't really been 
done," Jackson (Seeger's grandson) said. "And now people do it all the time." Seeger's opinions didn't 
always sit well with authorities. "From the start, he aspired to use folk music to promote his left-wing 
political views, and in times of national turmoil that brought him into direct confrontation with the 
U.S. government, corporate interests, and people who did not share his beliefs," William Ruhlmann 
wrote in a biography on allmusic.com. 'These conflicts shaped his career." 
In 2009, Seeger talked to CNN about the beginnings of his music career in the late 1930s. "I come 
from a family of teachers, and I was looking for a job on a newspaper and not getting one," he said 
in the interview. "I had an aunt who said, 'Peter, I can get five dollars for you if you come and sing 
some of your songs in my class.' Five dollars? In 1939, you would have to work all day or two days to 
make five dollars. It seemed like stealing." But Seeger said he took his aunt up on the offer. "Pretty 
soon I was playing school after school, and I never did work on a newspaper," he said "You don't 
have to play at nightclubs, you don't have to play on TV, just go from college to college to college, and 
the kids will sing along with you." "He was a second father to me, he was a friend, he was a best 
friend,"Jackson (Seeger's grandson) said. "He was just this wonderful, genuine person." 
With this said I invite everyone to enjoy the music of one of America's national treasures, Mr. Pete 
Seeger 
Pete Seeger —
Pete Seeger —
Pete Seeger —
Pete Seeger —
Pete Seeger —
Pete Seeger —
Pete Seeger —
Pete Seeger — 
Where Have All The Flowers Gone -- http://youtu.baffinu6ao 
If I Had A Hammer -- httpilyoutu.be/ujzKk 4WBsE 
Guantanamera 
http://youtu.behE.ItIcloyBzg
Turn Turn Turn -- http://youtu.be/q7
.4mf7o
This Land Is Your Land -- http://youtu.be/HE4Hok8TDgw
Garden Song (Inch by inch) -- httmayoutu.be/w
iltE2F7CM
We Shall Overcome -- httpillyoutu.be/QhnPVP23rzo 
Forever Young -- http://youtu.beiEzyd4oloap 
Pete Seeger/Arlo Guthrie - You Gotta Walk That Lonesome Valley --
http://youtu.be/BcbqCssiBUe 
Pete Seeger, Sonny Terry, Brownie McGhee - Down by the Riverside --
http://youtu.be/IgeDUog5u E 
Pete Seeger - Michael Row The Boat Ashore -- httpillyoutu.be/pd 5-2kCzfs 
Pete Seeger & Johnny Cash — Worried Man Blues -- http://youtu.be/NliblIVJOnw
Pete Seeger — Rye Whiskey -- httmavoutu.be/qFSAciEihWe 
EFTA01141410

Peter Seeger & Buffy Sainte-Marie — Cindy -- http://youtu.be/Y8 gmoliCUeE 
Pete Seeger & Donovan — Colours -- littp://youtu.be/LoG3FUZGeM
Pete Seeger, Sonny Terry, Brownie McGhee — Rock Island Line -- http://youtu.be/6bSQKOGD8AU 
I hope that you have enjoyed this week's offering 
and wish you and yours a great week 
Sincerely, 
Greg Brown 
Gregory Brown 
Chairman & CEO 
GlobalCast Partners. LLC 
WIrk 
CIS.CO111
EFTA01141411