This is an FBI investigation document from the Epstein Files collection (FBI VOL00009). Text has been machine-extracted from the original PDF file. Search more documents →
FBI VOL00009
EFTA01137794
187 pages
Page 61 / 187
Page 522 1 correct? 2 A. I do. 3 Q. And you know her through Jeffrey Epstein, 4 right? 5 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same 6 instruction. 7 A. I wrote an article about her father's 8 death years ago, and I don't remember if I met her 9 independently. I do remember meeting her through 10 her -- I remember that the Lady Rothschild asked me 11 to meet Jeffrey Epstein, and when Jeffrey Epstein 12 came to meet me, he was with Ghislaine Maxwell. 13 BY MR. EDWARDS: 14 Q. And when was that? 15 A. The first time I Jeffrey Epstein, which 16 would have been in the summer of Leslie Wexner's 17 59th birthday. That's all I can tell you is the 18 summer of his 59th birthday because I then flew with 19 Jeffrey Epstein to Leslie Wexner's 59th birthday. I 20 was presented to Leslie Wexner. Leslie would like 21 to get as birthday gifts interesting people that his 22 friends had met during the year, and so I was 23 Jeffrey Epstein's intellectual gift to Leslie 24 Wexner. And it was that year that I met Jeffrey 25 Epstein. That's the best I can date it. EFTA01137854
Page 62 / 187
Page 523 1 Q. Okay. And Ghislaine Maxwell, you are 2 aware, is involved in litigation with 3 right now, correct? 4 A. She is being sued by ' for 5 defamation, not for the underlying offenses, which 6 are beyond the statute of limitations, as I 7 understand it, correct. 8 Q. And have you spoken with Ghislaine Maxwell 9 about the allegations against her and her denials? 10 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same 11 instruction. 12 MR. SCOTT: Don't answer it. It's 13 privileged. 14 BY MR. EDWARDS: 15 4. I'm asking about your conversations with 16 Ghislaine Maxwell, who's in a separate litigation, 17 civil litigation for defamation. Have you 18 personally spoken with Ghislaine Maxwell since these 19 allegations? 20 A. If there's no objection, I will answer. 21 MR. INDYKE: There was an objection. Same 22 objection, same instruction. 23 BY MR. EDWARDS: 24 Q. Is there a joint defense agreement related 25 to the civil allegation -- actions regarding the EFTA01137855
Page 63 / 187
Page 524 1 defamation actions that involve Ghislaine Maxwell 2 and yourself? 3 MR. INDYKE: Same objection. 4 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: What's the 5 basis -- can you explain to me what the basis 6 of the objection is -- and what was the 7 question? 8 MR. EDWARDS: Has Mr. Dershowitz spoken 9 with Ghislaine Maxwell since the allegations -- 10 since this defamation suit came about as well 11 as the defamation suit with Ghislaine Maxwell. 12 BY MR. EDWARDS: 13 Q. Let me ask it cleaner. Have you spoken 14 with Ghislaine Maxwell since January 2015? 15 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same 16 instruction. 17 BY MR. EDWARDS: 18 Q. So that I'm clear, there is a joint 19 defense of the allegations regarding Ghislaine 20 Maxwell that's New York litigation and this 21 defamation case? 22 MR. INDYKE: There's a common interest 23 agreement in effect with respect to the 24 New York case and a common interest agreement 25 with respect to this case. EFTA01137856
Page 64 / 187
Page 525 1 BY MR. EDWARDS: 2 Q. Okay. Was lying when she 3 says that she was taken by Ghislaine Maxwell and -- 4 MR. SCAROLA: Who negotiated the agreement 5 and when? 6 BY MR. EDWARDS: 7 Q. Is there a common interest agreement in 8 existence with respect to the allegations that have 9 arisen since January of 2015 or that you contend 10 covers that? 11 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same 12 instruction. 13 BY MR. EDWARDS: 14 Q. If there is, who negotiated this 15 agreement? 16 MR. SCAROLA: Can we have a ruling on 17 propriety? 18 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: You haven't 19 pushed me, so I let you go. 20 MR. SCAROLA: Can we have a ruling as to 21 whether we get to know whether Mr. Dershowitz 22 is a party to a common interest agreement with 23 Ghislaine Maxwell? 24 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Counsel -- 25 MS. McCAWLEY: Also, just this is Sigrid EFTA01137857
Page 65 / 187
Page 526 1 McCawley, if any of the individuals on the 2 phone are representing Ghislaine Maxwell, my 3 understanding is the person on the phone is 4 representing Jeffrey Epstein, not Ghislaine 5 Maxwell. That needs to be clarified. 6 MR. INDYKE: Correct. Correct. 7 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: The answer is 8 correct? 9 MR. INDYKE: With respect to Mr. Epstein, 10 I can tell you there's a common interest 11 agreement with respect to this matter and a 12 common interest agreement with respect to the 13 Ghislaine Maxwell suit in New York. 14 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Is 15 Mr. Dershowitz party to that? 16 MR. INDYKE: Mr. Dershowitz is party to a 17 common interest agreement with Jeffrey in this 18 case. And I believe -- I'd have to check, but 19 I believe that that would extend -- 20 MR. SCAROLA: We want an answer from the 21 witness as to whether the witness is a party to 22 a common interest agreement with Ghislaine 23 Maxwell. 24 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Then ask the 25 question, because I haven't seen the question EFTA01137858
Page 66 / 187
Page 527 1 asked yet. 2 BY MR. EDWARDS: 3 Q. Are you a party to a common interest 4 agreement with Ghislaine Maxwell? 5 A. If there's no objection, I'll answer it. 6 MR. INDYKE: I apologize. I thought we 7 were still operating under the original set of 8 objections. So I will repeat it. Same 9 objection, same instruction. 10 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: With respect to 11 that question, you can answer. 12 A. My understanding is that I am still 13 Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer. Jeffrey Epstein, I 14 understand, has a common interest or joint defense 15 agreement with Ghislaine Maxwell, so I have -- my 16 understanding is that I am bound by a common 17 agreement. 18 BY MR. EDWARDS: 19 Q. Is this the same common interest agreement 20 that we were talking about from 2005, or is this a 21 separate common interest agreement that has been 22 signed as a consequence of the lawsuits that have 23 been filed since January 2015? 24 MR. INDYKE: If this is a new question, 25 I'll assert the same objection and the same EFTA01137859
Page 67 / 187
Page 528 1 instruction. 2 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: And I'm going to 3 overrule the objection. And you can answer 4 that. 5 A. My understanding is that it's a 6 combination; that is, it reflects the previous 7 agreement and that there is a new agreement that 8 supplemented the previous agreement. 9 BY MR. EDWARDS: 10 Q. When you say it's your understanding, is 11 this understanding in writing; meaning, is there a 12 written common interest agreement that has been put 13 in place since January of 2015? 14 A. I don't know. 15 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same 16 instruction. 17 MR. SCOTT: Can we take a recess when we 18 get a chance? 19 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Yes, but I'm 20 going to instruct you 21 A. I don't know. I don't know the answer to 22 that, whether there's additional writing or not. 23 BY MR. EDWARDS: 24 Q. Last question, then we take a break. Have 25 you signed any such agreement EFTA01137860
Page 68 / 187
Page 529 1 2 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same instruction. 3 BY MR. EDWARDS: 4 Q. -- since January 2015? 5 A. Since January? Not to my recollection. 6 MR. EDWARDS: We can take a break. 7 VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off the record. The 8 time is approximately 2:09 p.m. 9 (Recess was held from 2:09 p.m. until 2:26 p.m.) 10 VIDEOGRAPHER: Going back on the record. 11 Time is approximately 2:26 p.m. 12 BY MR. EDWARDS: 13 Q. Going back to the photograph, was 14 lying when she says that she was taken to 15 London where this photograph was taken? 16 A. I have no idea. 17 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same 18 instructions. 19 BY MR. EDWARDS: 20 Q. Was lying when she says 21 that she was paid to have sex with Prince Andrew? 22 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same 23 instructions. 24 A. Can you tell me what age she was when that 25 happened? EFTA01137861
Page 69 / 187
Page 530 1 BY MR. EDWARDS: 2 Q. The photograph is printed in March of 3 2001, which is when she's 17, which just means that 4 the photograph was taken sometime before that date. 5 So she was at least as young as 17 is the best that 6 I can tell you. 7 A. Under the age of consent, that would be an 8 act of prostitution If she was paid $15,000 to 9 have sex with Prince Andrew at the age of 17 in 10 England, she would be guilty of prostitution. 11 Q. My question is, was she lying when she 12 says that she was paid to have sex with Prince 13 Andrew? 14 A. I have no idea. 15 Q. You have met Prince Andrew, right? 16 A. I have. 17 Q. He sat in the back of your classrooms? 18 MR. SCOTT: Objection, asked and answered 19 twice. 20 A. Once, yes 21 BY MR. EDWARDS: 22 Q. I think we went to Jeffrey Epstein sitting 23 in your classrooms, but now I'm talking about Prince 24 Andrew sat in your classroom as well, right? 25 A. Yes, once. EFTA01137862
Page 70 / 187
Page 531 1 MR. SCOTT: I thought we went through 2 Andrew before; maybe I'm wrong. 3 BY MR. EDWARDS: 4 Q. Have you, since the -- since January of 5 2015, have you contacted Prince Andrew? 6 A No. I got a Christmas card from him. 7 Q. Have you spoke with him about the 8 allegations that were alleged against Prince Andrew? 9 A. Not to him, but to -- not to him. 10 Q. Have you spoke to some representative of 11 his, of Prince Andrew? 12 A. I need to know whether -- 13 MR. INDYKE: Guy, sorry, I was just cut 14 off for some reason. 15 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Hold on a 16 second. Go ahead and restate your question 17 so -- Darren, can you hear now? 18 MR. INDYKE: Yes, I can. 19 BY MR. EDWARDS: 20 Q. My question is, have you spoken with 21 Prince Andrew or any representative of or for Prince 22 Andrew since January of 2015? 23 MR. SCOTT: If any of that involved work 24 product on our part, I am instructing you not 25 to answer. EFTA01137863
Page 71 / 187
Page 532 1 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same 2 instruction on my end as well. 3 BY MR. EDWARDS: 4 Q. Whether or not you have spoken with him 5 would not be protected. 6 A. I have not spoken to him. 7 MR. SCOTT: That, I don't have a problem 8 with. 9 BY MR. EDWARDS: 10 Q. Have you spoken with any representative of 11 Prince Andrew since January of 2015? 12 A. Is there any objection? I don't think I 13 have, but I think my lawyers have. But I don't 14 think I have. 15 MR. SCOTT: Don't go into any work 16 product. 17 A. I don't think I have. 18 BY MR. EDWARDS: 19 Q. Do you know that some representative of 20 yours has spoken with some representative of Prince 21 Andrew since January of 2015? 22 A. I think so, yes. 23 Q. Is Prince Andrew a party to any joint 24 defense agreement? 25 A. Not that I am -- EFTA01137864
Page 72 / 187
Page 533 1 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same 2 instruction. 3 A. I'm not aware of any. 4 BY MR. EDWARDS: 5 Q. Okay. Do you know which representative 6 which of your representatives communicated with 7 which of Prince Andrew's representatives? 8 A. No. I do remember being told, though, 9 that there was a call from Prince Andrew's people to 10 one of my lawyers, but that's all I know. 11 Q. So when I'm asking you whether 12 is lying about having sex with Prince Andrew 13 when she was under the age of 18, do you know the 14 answer to that question from -- 15 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same 16 instruction. 17 A. Same answer. If it's based on her own 18 statement, I have no reason to believe it. If 19 there's other objective evidence, I'm not aware of 20 it. So based on her own statements, since she in 21 the same affidavit falsely accused me, I have no 22 reason to believe she would be telling the truth. 23 But I don't have any personal knowledge of that. 24 BY MR. EDWARDS: 25 Q. What information do you have from Prince EFTA01137865
Page 73 / 187
Page 534 1 Andrew's representative on that subject? 2 MR. SCOTT: Don't answer that question. 3 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same 4 instruction. 5 A. I can say publicly -- 6 MR. SCOTT: Don't answer that. You've 7 been told. 8 A. Okay, I'm sorry. 9 BY MR. EDWARDS: 10 Q. So makes the statement 11 that she was made to have sex with Prince Andrew 12 when she was underage, and you have looked at 13 statement and said, I don't 14 believe it. Now the other person that would know 15 the answer to that is Prince Andrew. 16 A. Who has denied it. 17 Q. So is it your statement now that Prince 18 Andrew, through his -- through some agent of his or 19 representative, has communicated to you or some 20 representative of yours that he is denying that 21 allegation? 22 A. Denied it in public. 23 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same 24 instruction. 25 MR. SCOTT: Work product. Unless you know EFTA01137866
Page 74 / 187
Page 535 1 from a public source. 2 A. I do. He's denied it in public. Also, if 3 her story is true, it would not be underage sex, it 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 would be above age sex if it occurred at the time she says it occurred in the place she says that it took place. And it would, therefore, be an act of prostitution under British law. BY MR. EDWARDS: Q. So in your opinion, did she -- do you have information that indicates that committed an act of prostitution by having sex with Prince Andrew? A. I have no indication other than -- MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same instruction. A. -- other than her own word, which I don't credit. BY MR. EDWARDS: Q. Has Jeffrey Epstein spoken with Prince Andrew about the allegations? A. I have no idea. MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same instruction. Please wait until I get my objection. MR. SCOTT: Don't answer that question, EFTA01137867
Page 75 / 187
Page 536 1 he's telling you. 2 BY MR. EDWARDS: 3 Q. Ghislaine Maxwell has been friends and 4 acquaintances of Prince Andrew for a very long time. 5 You know that, right? 6 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same 7 instruction. 8 BY MR. EDWARDS: 9 Q. Is that privileged, the answer to that 10 question, Ghislaine Maxwell's relationship with 11 Prince Andrew? Let me ask it this way -- 12 MR. INDYKE: To the extent that 13 Mr. Dershowitz obtained that information in 14 connection with his representation of Jeffrey 15 Epstein, of course it is. 16 BY MR. EDWARDS: 17 Q. I have a better way to go about this, 18 then. Ghislaine Maxwell and -- you met her well 19 before 2005, didn't you? 20 A. I did, yes. 21 Q. And Prince Andrew you met before 2005 as 22 well, correct? 23 A. I think it was before 2005, yeah. 24 Q. And prior to 2005, you understood that 25 Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew were social EFTA01137868
Page 76 / 187
Page 537 1 acquaintances, didn't you? 2 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same 3 instruction. 4 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: That deals with 5 if you have any nonprivileged. 6 A. I do. 7 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: Then I would 8 overrule the objection to that extent. 9 A. I've seen them together at a party on 10 Martha's Vineyard given by Lady Rothschild. 11 BY MR. EDWARDS: 12 Q. And back at that time, prior to your 13 representation of Jeffrey Epstein, did he tell you 14 that he had been introduced to Prince Andrew through 15 Ghislaine Maxwell? 16 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same 17 instruction. As Mr. Dershowitz previously 18 responded to the question about representation, 19 he said it was -- maybe he did not represent 20 Mr. Epstein in this case, but he represented 21 him in other cases. 22 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: I will overrule 23 the objection to the extent that you have 24 nonprivileged information that you can base the 25 answer. EFTA01137869
Page 77 / 187
Page 538 1 A. Yes. And in a letter that Prince Andrew 2 wrote to me thanking me for inviting him to my class 3 and having the dinner for him at Harvard Law School, 4 he made a reference to Jeffrey Epstein. 5 BY MR. EDWARDS: 6 Q. And when was -- when did Prince Andrew 7 write a letter to you? 8 A. When he came to my class at Harvard Law 9 School, just a thank-you note. 10 Q. What was the approximate date of that 11 letter? 12 A. I don't know. 13 Q. What was the approximate year of the 14 letter? 15 A. I don't know. 16 Q. Do you still have the letter? 17 A. I'll check. 18 Q. Is there any reason why you haven't 19 personally contacted Prince Andrew to discuss these 20 allegations? 21 MR. SCOTT: Objection, hypothetical, 22 speculation. 23 A. Not easy to reach the Queen, not easy to 24 reach the Prince. I don't know who I would call. 25 EFTA01137870
Page 78 / 187
Page 539 1 BY MR. EDWARDS: 2 Q. Couldn't you just call Ghislaine Maxwell, 3 though? It's not that easy for many people. 4 Couldn't you call Ghislaine? 5 MR. INDYKE: Objection. 6 MR. SCOTT: Argumentative. 7 BY MR. EDWARDS: 8 Q. Do you know the circumstances -- as you 9 sit here, the circumstances that led to this 10 photograph being taken in London? 11 A. No. 12 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same 13 instruction. 14 BY MR. EDWARDS: 15 Q. Have you ever seen photographs or the 16 copies of photographs of young naked teenage girls 17 that were taken from within the closet of Jeffrey 18 Epstein's home in Palm Beach? 19 A. Absolutely not. 20 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same 21 instruction. 22 BY MR. EDWARDS: 23 Q. Have you ever attempted to get those 24 photographs from the law enforcement -- 25 MR. SCOTT: Let the lawyer make his EFTA01137871
Page 79 / 187
Page 540 1 objection before you respond, Professor 2 Dershowitz. 3 MR. INDYKE: Finish your question, please. 4 BY MR. EDWARDS: 5 Q. Have you ever attempted to obtain those 6 photographs taken through the search warrant of 7 Jeffrey Epstein's home from law enforcement? 8 MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same 9 instruction. 10 MR. EDWARDS: He's being instructed not to 11 answer whether he's ever attempted to obtain 12 the photographs? 13 MR. INDYKE: If it was done in connection 14 with his representation of Mr. Epstein, it's 15 work product. 16 BY MR. EDWARDS: 17 Q. But I'm asking about communication that 18 you had with law enforcement. Are you claiming that 19 the communication you had with law enforcement is 20 protected by privilege? 21 MR. SCOTT: He's not claiming anything. 22 He's being instructed by a lawyer. 23 MR. EDWARDS: Okay. Well, I want to 24 understand what the record is -- 25 MR. SCOTT: Then ask the lawyer, not my EFTA01137872
Page 80 / 187
Page 541 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 client. MR. EDWARDS: Darren, is that you? MR. INDYKE: That is me, yes. MR. EDWARDS: Are you saying that Mr. Dershowitz or any of Jeffrey Epstein's legal team, that their communication with law enforcement is privileged? MR. INDYKE: Whether or not such communication exists and if they've never been used, yes. BY MR. EDWARDS: Q. Do you know whether the photographs of young, naked teenage girls that were taken within Jeffrey Epstein's home contain photographs of while she was a young girl? MR. INDYKE: Same objection, same instruction. A. Of course not. I've never seen those photographs. But here I can answer nowhere, if I ever was with Jeffrey Epstein in any of his homes, did I ever see a naked photograph of anybody except for a Rodin model, which was a sepia print in the entranceway, kind of a classic Rodin model print, but I've never, ever seen any photograph of any naked, underage, inappropriate -- my grandchildren EFTA01137873