This is an FBI investigation document from the Epstein Files collection (FBI VOL00009). Text has been machine-extracted from the original PDF file. Search more documents →
FBI VOL00009
EFTA00846354
37 pages
Pages 21–37
/ 37
Page 21 / 37
Over the past few weeks, proponents of the nuclear deal with Iran — from President Barack Obama on down — have marshaled a powerful attack on some of the deal's most prominent opponents. Specifically, they've been pointing out an indisputable fact: Many of the individuals and organizations that are most actively lobbying and speaking out against the deal helped dream up the idea of invading Iraq or worked hard to convince Congress and the American people to go along with the idea. The logic of the pro-deal camp is simple: Given that the opponents were so catastrophically wrong about the Iraq War, no one should listen to their advice today. I agree with this basic argument, of course, but opponents of the deal do have one line of defense against the "Wrong on Iraq, Wrong on Iran" meme. It is possible someone could have been dead wrong about the wisdom of invading Iraq in 2003, but nonetheless be correct to oppose the nuclear deal with Iran today. None of us is infallible, and it is at least conceivable that Bill Kristol, Elliott Abrams, James Woolsey, Fred Hiatt, Max Boot, et al. could have blown it big-time in 2002 - but be absolutely right this time around. Conceivable, I suppose, but highly unlikely. Why? Because their views in 2002 aren't independent from the views they're expressing today. On the contrary, their earlier support for the Iraq War and their opposition to the Iran deal stem from the basic neoconservative worldview that informs their entire approach to foreign policy. To be more specific, the problem isn't that these people just happened to be embarrassingly wrong about Iraq. After all, plenty of other people were equally misguided back then, including many people who now support the deal today. Nor is the problem the neocons' stubborn and morally dubious refusal to admit they were wrong and take responsibility for the lives and money they squandered. No, the real problem is that the neoconservative worldview — one that still informs the thinking of many of the groups and individuals who are most vocal in opposing the Iran deal — is fundamentally flawed. Getting Iraq wrong wasn't just an unfortunate miscalculation, it happened because their theories of world politics were dubious and their understanding of how the world works was goofy. When your strategic software is riddled with bugs, you should expect a lot of error messages. What are the main flaws that consistently lead neoconservatives astray? For starters, neoconservatives think balance-of-power politics doesn't really work in international affairs and that states are strongly inclined to "bandwagon" instead. In other words, they think weaker states are easy to bully and never stand up to powerful adversaries. Their faulty logic follows that other states will do whatever Washington dictates provided we demonstrate how strong and tough we are. This belief led them to conclude that toppling Saddam would send a powerful message and cause other states in the Middle East to kowtow to us. If we kept up the pressure, our vast military power would quickly transform the region into a sea of docile pro-American democracies. What happened, alas, was that the various states we were threatening didn't jump on our bandwagon. Instead, they balanced and then took steps to make sure we faced significant and growing resistance. In particular, Syria and Iran (the next two states on the neocons' target list), cooperated even further EFTA00846374
Page 22 / 37
with each other and helped aid the anti-American insurgency in Iraq itself. Neocons were outraged by this behavior, but it shouldn't have surprised anyone who understood Realism 101. At the same time, long-standing U.S. allies were upset by our actions and distanced themselves from us or else they took advantage of our excesses and free-rode at our expense. In short, the neoconservatives' belief that the United States could browbeat and intimidate others into doing our bidding was dead wrong. Today, of course, opposition to the Iran deal reflects a similar belief that forceful resolve would enable Washington to dictate whatever terms it wants. As I've written before, this idea is the myth of a "better deal." Because neocons assume states are attracted to strength and easy to intimidate, they think rejecting the deal, ratcheting up sanctions, and threatening war will cause Iran's government to finally cave in and dismantle its entire enrichment program. On the contrary, walking away from the deal will stiffen Iran's resolve, strengthen its hard-liners, increase its interest in perhaps actually acquiring a nuclear weapon someday, and cause the other members of the P5+1 to part company with the United States. The neoconservative worldview also exaggerates the efficacy of military force and downplays the value of diplomacy. Military force is an essential component of national power, of course, but neocons tend to see it as a magical tool that can accomplish all sorts of wonderful things (such as the creation of workable democracies) for which it is not really designed. In reality, military force is a crude instrument whose effects are hard to foresee and one which almost always produces unintended consequences (see under: Libya, Yemen, Somalia, Pakistan, etc.). So it was in Iraq, and the results of a direct military conflict with Iran would be equally unpredictable. Moreover, neocons believe military force is a supple tool that can be turned on and off like a spigot. If the United States uses force and things go badly, they seem to think the nation can just pull out quickly and live to fight another day. But that's not how things work in the real world of politics: Once forces are committed, the military brass will demand the chance to win a clear victory, and politicians will worry about the nation's prestige and their own political fortunes. The conflicts in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, and Somalia should remind us that it's a lot easier to get into wars than it is to get out of them, but that lesson has been lost on most neoconservatives. Third, the neoconservatives have a simplistic and ahistorical view of democracy itself. They claim their main goal is spreading freedom and democracy (except for Palestinians, of course), but they have no theory to explain how this will happen or how toppling a foreign government with military force will magically cause democracy to emerge. Instead, they believe the desire to live in freedom is hardwired into human DNA, and all one has to do is remove the bad guys at the top. Once they are gone, the now- liberated population will forget past grievances, form political parties, embrace tolerance, line up for orderly elections, accept the resulting outcomes willingly, and offer grateful thanks to Uncle Sam. It would be nice if that Pollyannaish scenario were accurate, but such views betray near-total ignorance of the prerequisites for meaningful democracy and the actual history of democratic growth in the West itself. In fact, the development of liberal democracy was a long, contentious, imperfect, and often violent process in Western Europe and North America, and anyone familiar with that history would have known the neocons' formula for democratic change was doomed from the start. EFTA00846375
Page 23 / 37
Fourth, as befits a group of armchair ideologues whose primary goal has been winning power inside the Beltway, neoconservatives are often surprisingly ignorant about the actual conditions of the countries whose politics and society they want to transform. Hardly any neoconservatives knew very much about Iraq before the United States invaded — if they had, they might have reconsidered the whole scheme — and their characterizations of Iran today consist of scary caricatures bearing little resemblance to Iran's complicated political and social reality. In addition to flawed theories, in short, the neoconservative worldview also depends on an inaccurate reading of the facts on the ground. Last but not least, the neoconservatives' prescriptions for U.S. foreign policy are perennially distorted by a strong attachment to Israel, which Max Boot (and others) have described as a "key tenet" of the entire movement. There's nothing wrong with such attachments per se, of course, but it has crippled their ability to give sensible policy advice to U.S. politicians. In particular, neoconservatives tend to believe that what's good for Israel is good for the United States — and vice versa — which is why they see no conflict between their attachment to Israel and their loyalty to the United States. But no two states have identical interests all the time, and when the interests of two countries conflict, people who feel strongly about both are forced to decide which of these feelings is going to take priority. Over the past few weeks, some proponents of the deal have pointed out — correctly — that some opponents don't like the deal because they think it is bad for Israel and because the Netanyahu government is dead set against it. As one might expect, pointing out these obvious facts has led some opponents of the deal to accuse proponents (including President Obama) of anti-Semitism. But as Lara Friedman, J.J. Goldberg, and Peter Beinart have made clear, this charge is absurd, even laughable. Among other things, it appears a majority of American Jews support the deal — and so do plenty of distinguished figures in Israel's own national security establishment. If anything, it is Netanyahu's efforts to persuade American Jews that it is their duty to support him, rather than their own president, that echoes those hateful anti-Semitic canards about "dual loyalty." Instead of being a serious criticism, this familiar smear is really just a way to change the subject and to put proponents of the deal on the defensive for pointing out the obvious. Fortunately, in this case the charge just doesn't seem to be sticking, and its appearance is just another sign that opponents don't have rational arguments or solid evidence to justify their opposition. The bottom line: The fact that the neoconservatives, AIPAC, the Conference of Presidents, and other groups in the Israel lobby were wrong about the Iraq War does not by itself mean that they are necessarily wrong about the Iran deal. But when you examine their basic views on world politics and their consistent approach to U.S. Middle East policy, it becomes clear this is not a coincidence at all. Support for the Iraq War and opposition to the Iran deal flow from the same flawed premises, and that's why following their advice today would be as foolish as it was back in 2003. STEPHEN M. WALT — Foreign Policy —AUGUST 21, 2015 ****** What the hell is Candida? EFTA00846376
Page 24 / 37
2 feline image I While reading an article in The Huffington Post, under the title 3 Foods to Avoid (That Are Killing Us from the Inside) halfway through I discovered that it was an infomercial for a digestive supplement that because of the bait and switch manipulation I have chosen to not mention the product. But what caught my interest is a little known bacteria (at least not known to me) is the bacteria Candida. Wikipedia describes Candida as the genus of yeasts and is the most common cause of fungal infections worldwide. Many species are harmless commensals or endosymbionts of hosts including humans; however, when mucosal barriers are disrupted or the immune system is compromised they can invade and cause disease. Candida albicans are the most commonly isolated species, and can cause infections (candidiasis or thrush) in humans and other animals. In winemaking, some species of Candida can potentially spoil wines. Many species are found in gut flora, including C. albicans in mammalian hosts, whereas others live as endosymbionts in insect hosts. Systemic infections of the bloodstream and major organs (candidemia or invasive candidiasis), particularly in immunocompromised patients, affect over 90,000 people a year in the U.S. The DNA of several Candida species has been sequenced. Antibiotics promote yeast infections, including gastrointestinal Candida overgrowth, and penetration of the GI mucosa. While women are more susceptible to genital yeast infections, men can also be infected. Certain factors, such as prolonged antibiotic use, increase the risk for both men and women. People with diabetes or impaired immune systems, such as those with HIV, are more susceptible to yeast infections. Candida are almost universal in low numbers on healthy adult skin and albicans are part of the normal flora of the mucous membranes of the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and female genital tracts. In the case of skin, the dryness of skin compared to other tissues prevents the growth of the fungus, but damaged skin or skin in intertriginous regions is more amenable to rapid growth of fungi. Overgrowth of several species including albicans can cause superficial infections such as oropharyngeal candidiasis (thrush) and vulvovaginal candidiasis (vaginal candidiasis). Oral candidiasis is common in elderly denture wearers. In otherwise healthy individuals, these infections can be cured with topical or systemic antifungal medications (commonly over-the-counter antifungal treatments like miconazole or clotrimazole). In debilitated or immunocompromised patients, or if introduced intravenously, candidiasis may become a systemic disease producing abscess, thrombophlebitis, endocarditis, or infections of the eyes or other organs. Typically, relatively severe EFTA00846377
Page 25 / 37
neutropenia is a prerequisite for the Candida to pass through the defenses of the skin and cause disease in deeper tissues; in such cases, mechanical disruption of the infected skin sites is typically a factor in the fungal invasion of the deeper tissues. Candida Yeast/Fungal overgrowth has been found to be a common occurrence in many disorders and is also present in millions of other people who cannot figure out what is wrong with them, or what to do about it. Symptoms vary from person to person and fluctuate in severity, or may come and go. Most symptoms are invisible, which makes it difficult for others to understand the vast array of debilitating symptoms with which we contend. The most common are: • an incapacitating fatigue • problems with concentration and short-term memory • flu-like symptoms such as pain in the joints and muscle • extreme tightness in the shoulders and neck • hyper-acidity/acid reflux • brown colored mucus in the back of the throat • blisters in the mouth/tongue/throat • either white or "blood blisters" • un-refreshing sleep • sore throat • white coated tongue • dark circles under the eyes • an aversion to being touched or jumping • "crawling" skin • chronic sinus problems and headaches • chronic dental problems Visual disturbances may include blurring, sensitivity to light and eye pain. Psychological problems may include: • depression • irritability • anxiety • panic attacks • recurring obsessive thoughts • personality changes and mood swings (irrational rage or crying for no reason - fear of talking to people, any kind of confrontation, isolation) • paranoia More of the physical symptoms may include: • chills and night sweats • shortness of breath • dizziness and balance problems EFTA00846378
Page 26 / 37
• sensitivity to heat and/or cold • alcohol intolerance • gluten and/or casein intolerance • irregular heartbeat • irritable bowel • constipation and/or diarrhea • painful gas and abdominal bloating • low-grade fever or low body temperature • numbness, tingling and/or burning sensations in the face or extremities • dryness of the mouth and eyes • difficulty swallowing • projectile vomiting Also: • menstrual problems including PMS • recurrent yeast infections • recurrent ear infections • rashes and dry, flaking skin • eczema • dermatitis • acne • skin discoloration and/or blotchiness • dandruff • jock and rectal itching • chronic athlete's foot • chronic toenail and fingernail fungus • ringing in the ears • allergies and sensitivities to noise/sound, foods, odors, chemicals • anemia • weight changes without changes in diet • light-headedness • feeling in a fog • fainting • muscle twitching and muscle weakness • restless legs • low sex drive and/or numbness in the genital area These are only the symptoms most commonly reported and documented. It can be an underlying condition in many diseases, but is often not diagnosed, misdiagnosed, disputed to even exist or is disregarded altogether. To a person who does not suffer with this bizarre combination (in one form or another), it may seem to be impossible. However, to those who have suffered, it is a blessing and a confirmation that they are not alone. How do you test for candida overgrowth? Blood test EFTA00846379
Page 27 / 37
You'll want to start by checking your levels for candida antibodies called IgG, IgA, and IgM. This can be easily done through most labs, and high levels can clue you in to an overgrowth of candida. These tests can often be negative even when a stool or urine test is positive. Which brings me to the next two tests: Stool testing I find this to be the most accurate test out there. The lab will check for candida in your colon or lower intestines, and can usually determine the species of yeast — as well as which treatment will be most effective. Just make sure that your doctor orders a comprehensive stool test, rather than the standard. Urine Organix Dysbiosis Test This urine test looks for a waste product of candida yeast overgrowth that's called D-Arabinitol. Elevated results indicate an overgrowth of candida, and the test can help you determine if there is candida in your upper gut or small intestines. How do you treat candida overgrowth? Inline image 3 To successfully treat candida, one needs to do three things: stop the yeast overgrowth, build up the friendly bacteria and heal your gut, so that candida can no longer enter your bloodstream. First step: getting rid of the candida overgrowth, which mainly requires switching to a low- carbohydrate diet. Sugar is what feeds yeast. So one should start by eliminating sugar in all of its simple forms — such as candy, desserts, alcohol and flours. At the same time, cut back to just one cup a day of the more complex carbohydrates, like grains, beans, fruit, bread, pasta and potatoes. This will help prevent the candida from growing and eventually cause it to die. It is also recommended, eliminating all fermented foods. That's because, while it's common knowledge that fermented foods help to feed the good bacteria, most people don't realize that bad bacteria feed off of these foods as well. Still, using diet alone could take three to six months before the candida is back under control. Doctors often recommend that their patients use an anti-fungal medication, such as Diflucan or Nyastatin, for at least a month. If you are self-treating, you can also take a supplement of caprylic acid. Caprylic acid, which comes from coconut oil, basically "pokes holes" in the yeast cell wall, causing it to die. And while some people advise using herbs like oil of oregano, I don't recommend it since it can also kill the good bacteria. Next, one should rebuild the good bacteria that typically keep your candida population under control. Taking anywhere from 25 to too billion units of probiotics on a regular basis should help to reduce the EFTA00846380
Page 28 / 37
candida levels and restore your levels of good bacteria. Finally, heal one's gut. Eliminating inflammatory foods that can harm your GI tract — and introducing foods that help — will prevent candida from working its way through your body, and dramatically improve one's overall health. ****** Are Generic Drugs As Good As The Real Thing? Inline image I In many ways, yes. But there are a few key differences you should know about. It's one of healthcare's greatest bargains: Nearly 88 percent of prescriptions written in the U.S. in 2014 were for knock-offs of brand-name drugs, sold at a fraction of the price. And for the most part, consumers don't lose anything in the deal. "Even though generics aren't perfect replicas, the FDA is really on top of evaluating them and ensuring that the ones it approves have the same active ingredients and absorb in the bloodstream just as if a person were taking the brand name," says Mario Rocci, PhD, president of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. Three things you should do before filling your next prescription: Gauge the grade. You may be surprised to learn that the FDA labels every copycat drug either A or B, depending on whether it releases active ingredients at the same rate and levels as the brand name (A) or at different rates or levels (B). If a drug enters your bloodstream too slowly or too quickly, it may cause side effects or prove ineffective, requiring your doctor to adjust your dose. While it's uncommon that you'll be prescribed a B drug, your pharmacist can tell you the rating of meds you're taking. EFTA00846381
Page 29 / 37
Look for undisclosed side effects. Some medication side effects don't become apparent until a drug has been on the market for a few years, at which point the sheer number of people who have taken it can lead to the discovery of issues not present during a clinical trial. "If a brand-name drugmaker discovers a new side effect and wants to add it to the label, they can do so immediately," says Rocci. Generic manufacturers don't have that freedom; their drug's packaging info can't be altered in any way that's different from the original brand name, even if they learn of side effects. Print out the package insert for the brand-name drug online and compare it with your generic Rx. Read the ingredient list. Since the active ingredients in generic and brand-name drugs must remain the same, the biggest variables are inactive substances such as binders, fillers, flavors, and dyes used to keep a pill together or distinguish it from other meds. "An adverse reaction to a drug may be the result of an allergy to one of those components," says Stephen Schondelmeyer, PhD, professor and head of pharmaceutical care and health systems at the University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy. Tell your doctor and pharmacist if you're allergic to any ingredients, like sulfites, gluten, or Yellow 5, that may be in your medication. Brittany Burke - OWN - 08/28/2015 ****** Now some food for thought And for those of you who don't think that guns need more regulation You are nuts!!! Inline image 1 EFTA00846382
Page 30 / 37
Things That You Might Not Know About Beets Inline image 1 gt Inline image 3 Did you know that one-third of the world's sugar supply comes not from sugar cane, but from a special variety of beets known as the sugar beet? Beets also have the distinction of being very rich in red pigment, and they'll stain your hands if you're not careful. In fact, borscht, a traditional Russian soup, is colored red with beet juice.... Beets 101 Beets are both sweet and earthy tasting and pair well with other root vegetables as well as with tangy- sweet fruits like pineapple. While most beets are deep red in color, there are a number of beet varieties that range in color from white to yellow to red. There's even one variety, known as the Chioggia beet, which has red and white concentric rings. Beets come to us from the Chenopodiaceae family and are related botanically to spinach. In fact, one variety of beets is known as the spinach, or leaf beet. It is grown for its greens, which are actually more nutritious than the root itself. Selection, Storage & Cooking Beets are available both canned and fresh at your grocer's market. However, fresh beets are considered to be crispier and more flavorful. If you're shopping for fresh beets, choose smaller beets over larger, tougher beets, and pass over any beets that are cracked, shriveled or look very dry. If the beet greens are still attached to the root, they should be crisp-looking and not at all wilted or slimy. Baby beets are available in some specialty and farmer's markets and are considered a delicacy for their tenderness and delicate flavor. EFTA00846383
Page 31 / 37
Once your beets are home, you can refrigerate them in a perforated plastic bag, separate from the greens, for up to three weeks. Greens will only last for a few days in the refrigerator and should be used right away. Wash both the roots and leaves before using to remove any soil still clinging to them. You can either enjoy your beets raw on salads or sandwiches or cook them in any variety of ways, including boiling, baking, sautéing with other vegetables, or even pickling. Beets should be cooked with their peel on to preserve nutrients and to prevent their deep red color from leaking out, which turns them brown, making them unappetizing in appearance. You should also leave about half an inch of the stem on while cooking so that the pigment doesn't leak out of the top. Adding an acidic food to the pot can also help preserve the color of the beets. Both lemon juice and vinegar work well for this purpose. Once your beets are done cooking, peel the skin off while wearing gloves, unless you don't mind having your hands stained a deep red. Nutritional Benefits Beets are a great source of folate, the b-vitamin known for its role in preventing birth defects in growing fetuses. The root of the beet is also a good source of iron, potassium and magnesium, although an abundance of nutrition actually lies in its leafy greens. A half-cup of beet greens, cooked, supplies upwards of 92% of your daily need for vitamin A (as beta-carotene). Beet greens are also higher in potassium, magnesium, vitamin C, thiamin, riboflavin, and vitamin B6 than the root. However, if it's the folate you're after, stick with the root, which supplies 17% of the RDA for this nutrient; beet greens only offer 2.5%. Here are nutritional facts for one-half cup of beets: Calories: 37 Fat: Carbohydrates: 8g (2g dietary fiber) Protein: ig Nutrients and RDAs: 2omg magnesium (6%-7%); 32mg phosphorus (4.5%); lmg iron (10%); 3mg vitamin C (5%); 68mcg folate (i7%) and 259mg potassium (8%-13%). There is no RDA for potassium, but adults need about 2,00o-3,000mg a day. Ready to serve up some nutritious beets? EFTA00846384
Page 32 / 37
THIS WEEK's QUOTE You never really know what poverty is until you see it through the eyes of a child. Lyndon Baines Johnson THINK ABOUT THIS Inline image I BEST VIDEO OF THE WEEK An amazing, realistic 3D drawing of a glass of water that will blow your mind. EFTA00846385
Page 33 / 37
This is an actual drawing.... Watch the video below to see how it was made Inline image 1 Web Link: https://youtu.be/ozzA-wkHaTY 3D Drawing: A Realistic Glass of Water/ AMAZING illusion anamorphic THIS WEEK's MUSIC James Moody EFTA00846386
Page 34 / 37
Gr Inline image 4 Vw Inline image 5 Inline image 6 This week I invite you to enjoy the music of Mr. James Moody who for over six decades, saxophone and flutist master serenaded lovers with his signature song Moody's Mood for Love an improvisation on the chord progressions of I'm in the Mood for Love. Born in Savannah, Georgia on March 26, 1925 and partially deaf. As a result when he was young and unable to hear the teacher, he was labelled mentally deficient and ordered to attend a school for the mentally disabled. Shortly thereafter, his family moved to Newark, New Jersey, where he attended public school. Eventually, his hearing problem was diagmsed and he was sent to the Bruce Street School for the Deaf He later attended Arts High in Newark,. James Moody took up the alto sax, a gift from his uncle, at the age of 16. Within a few years he fell under the spell of the deeper more full-bodied tenor saxophone after hearing Buddy Tate and Don Byas perform with the Count Basie Band at the Adams Theater in Newark, New Jersey. Moody, who preferred to be called by his last name, was born in Savannah, Georgia on March 26, 1925. His uncle gave him an alto sax when he was 16. After hearing Buddy Tate and Don Byas perform with the Count Basie Band at the Adams Theater in Newark, •., Moody switched to the tenor saxophone. He was just 18 years old when he was drafted into the Air Force in 1943 during World War II. Unable to play with the white Air Force band, Moody played in an unofficial Negro Air Force band for three years. He was disturbed by the segregation that was prevalent in the military service at that time. Incredibly, he met Dizzy Gillespie while in the Air Force, as Gillespie came through for a performance EFTA00846387
Page 35 / 37
SE
on the base. After he got out of the service, in 1946, he joined the recently formed Dizzy Gillespie Big Band, one of the most important jazz groups at that time. In 1946, following service in the United States Air Force, Moody joined the seminal bebop big band of Dizzy Gillespie, beginning an association that - on stage and record, in orchestras and small combos - afforded a young Moody worldwide exposure and ample opportunity to shape his improvisational genius. Upon joining Gillespie, Moody was at first awed, he now admits, by the orchestra's incredible array of talent, which included Milt Jackson, Kenny Clark, Ray Brown, Thelonius Monk. The encouragement of the legendary trumpeter-leader, made his mark on the young saxophonist. His now legendary 16-bar solo on Gillespie's Emanon alerted jazz fans to an emerging world-class soloist. During his initial stay with Gillespie, Moody also recorded with Milt Jackson for Dial Records in 1947. One year later he made his recording debut as a leader James Moody and His Bop Men for (Blue Note). In 1949 Moody moved to Europe where in Sweden he recorded the masterpiece of improvisation for which he is renowned, Moody's Mood for Love. Returning to the States in 1952 with a huge "hit" on his hands, Moody employed vocalist Eddie Jefferson. Also, working with him during that period were Dinah Washington and Brook Benton. In 1963 he rejoined Gillespie and performed off and on in the trumpeter's quintet for the remainder of the decade. Moody moved to Las Vegas in 1973 and had a seven year stint in the Las Vegas Hilton Orchestra, doing shows for Bill Cosby, Ann-Margaret, John Davidson, Glen Campbell, Liberace, Elvis Presley, The Osmonds, Milton Berle, Redd FOX1C, Charlie Rich, and Lou Rawls to name a few. Moody returned to the East Coast and put together his own band again - much to the delight of his dedicated fans. In 1985, Moody received a Grammy Award Nomination for Best Jazz Instrumental Performance for his playing on Manhattan Transfer's Vocalize album thus setting the stage for his re- emergence as a major recording artist. Moody's 1986 (RCA/NOVUS) debut Something Special ended a decade-long major label recording hiatus for the versatile reedman. His follow-up recording, Moving Forward showcased his hearty vocals on What Do You Do and his interpretive woodwind wizardry on such tunes as Giant Steps and Autumn Leaves. In 1990, Moody and Gillespie received a Grammy Award Nomination for their rendition of Gillespie's Get the Booty, which showcases scatting at its best. Moody returns the soprano sax to his woodwind arsenal on Honey, his nickname for his wife, Linda, and Moody's last recording for (RCA/NOVUS). On March 26th, 1995 Moody got the surprise of his life with a birthday party in New York. It was an evening of historical significance for Jazz with many guest stars and Bill Cosby as the emcee. It can be heard on Telarc's recording, Moody's Party -- James Moody's 70th, Birthday Celebration, Live at the Blue Note. In 1995 Moody's (Warner Bros.) release of Young at Heart, was a tribute to songs that are associated with Frank Sinatra. With an orchestra and strings many people feel this is among the most beautiful of all James Moody recordings. Moody's last recording for Warner Bros. is Moody Plays Mancini which showcases Moody on all of his horns and flute. A tribute to the American icon Henry Mancini. Moody's 2004 release of Homage on the Savoy Label has been a great cause for celebration. His first new studio album in 6 years, the aptly named Homage is a tribute to Moody featuring new tunes specially written for him by the likes of Joe Zawinul, Chick Corea, Kenny Barron, Horace Silver, Herbie Hancock, David Hazeltine and Marc Copland. Bob Belden produced the project. EFTA00846388
Page 36 / 37
Whether Moody is playing the soprano, alto, tenor, or flute, he does so with deep resonance and wit. Moody has a healthy respect for tradition, but takes great delight in discovering new musical paths, which makes him one of the most consistently expressive and enduring figures in modern jazz today. To quote Peter Watrous of the New York Times, "As a musical explorer, performer, collaborator and composer he has made an indelible contribution to the rise of American music as the dominant musical force of the twentieth century." James Moody played on Keilwerth saxophones exclusively. James Moody died on December 9, 2010 at his home in the San Diego area. He was 85 years old. Moody had been suffering from pancreatic cancer and had recently chosen to decline treatment by radiation or chemotherapy. Having met James Moody late in his life at the Montreux Jazz Festival with Quincy Jones one the most endearing things about him was the love that he showed for his lovely wife Linda who told me that for more than twenty years wherever they or he was in the world, he would send her a bouquet of her favorite white flowers. James Moody (or just Moody to his friends) was one of the great treasures of American Culture. He is one of the most unsung influences on all of the jazz saxophone world. His music has permeated the universe. Known as the musical and spiritual brother to Dizzy's alter ego Moody was the last of the original bebop masters, whose bold souls who followed Dizzy Gillespie and Charlie Parker and worked with them to create a fresh, modern musical dialect within the jazz language. With this said, I again invite you to enjoy the music of one of the masters in Jazz Music Mr. James Moody or in this case Moody.... James Moody - I'm in the Mood for Love -- https://youtu.be/Vu4MPVP4A James Moody — Rainy Days -- https://youtu.be/4ZrCcJ6n8ok James Moody — Wave - - James Moody — Benny's From Heaven -- https://youtu.be/Y7MSTcRIKzs James Moody — Last Train From Overbrook https://youtu.be/J2J3ImSFym4 James Moody — The World Is A Ghetto -- https://youtu.be/IiHZA3 widk James Moody — First thing in the morning -- https://youtu.be/Trx5be-LVGY James Moody — It Might Be Spring -- https://youtu.be/KUi-zn7Ppnl James Moody - Moody's Mood for Love (story of) -- https://youtu.be/ckxMozZZLzA Dexter Gordon & James Moody — Lady Bird-Haff Nelson -- https://youtu.be/Yjv8tOJoBbE James Moody with Dizzy Gillespie — Cherokee -- https://youtu.be/AUYWCpLtHKM James Moody — Giant Steps -- https://youtu.be/nW4SMTOOiWk James Moody — Easy Living -- https://youtu.be/buVhCpB9pAI James Moody — I Can't Get Started -- https://youtu.be/wulM K.R.jLGk EFTA00846389
Page 37 / 37
James Moody — Body And Soul -- lyttps://youtu.be/euxaF38lipY Dizzy Gillespie & James Moody — No More Blues -- https://youtu.be/h87H9iHiMsM James Moody, Al Haig, Ray Brown & Kenny Clarke — Groovin' High -- https://youtu.be/PKflivtzMQOg BONUS TRACK King Pleasure — I'm In The Mood For Love -- https://youtu.be/ERmWoiDUE Quincy Jones, James Moody & Brian McICnigh - Moody's Mood For Love -- https://youtu.be/v6UP lzXbqs I hope that you have enjoyed this week's offerings and wish you and yours a wonderful week.... Sincerely, Greg Brown Gregory Brown Chairman & CEO GlobalCast Pannell, LLC US: +I-4)5-994-7RM Tel: +I-800-406-5892 Fax: +1-310-R61-0927 EFTA00846390
Pages 21–37
/ 37