EFTA00590045

From: 
Jeffrey Epstein < 
Sent: 
Sunday, June 12, 2011 6:36 PM 
To: 
'GMAX' 
Subject: 
Re: This is the actual version they wanted me to send which I changed..but this is back 
from my UK lawyers.. 
--bcaec5171eb1d287f404a58d1b3b 
--bcaec5171eb1d287f404a58d1b3b 
--bcaec5171eb1d287f404a58d1b3b--
Content-type: multipart/alternative; 
boundary="8_3537537128_1113954667" 
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not 
> understand 
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. 
-43_3537537128_1113954667 
Content-type: text/plain; 
charset="UTF-8" 
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable 
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:12 PM, GMAX a 
wrote: 
Thank you _ I have it now and am working the letter a little =E2=80=93 I will sen= d the final version tomorrow and what 
ever is in it will be factually accura= 
te=20 
On 6/12/11 16:00 PM, "Philip Barden" < 
> wrot= 
e: 
See below as amended by me only for factual accuracy and some notes where 1= am uncertain of the accuracy. =20 
=20 
Dear Mr Klein 
=20 
Ross Gow of Acuity Reputation, who I have retained to deal with press enqui= ries, tells me that you have sent him the 
following list of questions. 
=20 
My condition of answering those questions is that you print this reply in f= ull. I=E2=80=99ve answered in a narrative 
form, which I hope will make sense both = to you and to your readers. I=E2=80=99ve tried to keep it succinct. 
=20 
We don't know each other but I am familiar with the world of journalism and= there is an obvious temptation for 
journalists to sensationalise their stor= ies, so, as a precaution, I've sent a copy of this letter to Vanity Fair=E2=80=99s= 
Editor in Chief, Graydon Carter. 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00109 
EFTA00590085

=20 
Driving straight to the heart of the matter, the allegations that have been= made against me are part of an attempt by 
and her lawyer, = Brad Edwards, to extort money from me. This follows an unsuccessful attempt= by 
them at blackmailing me. To spice up the story they have made allegatio= ns about HRH Prince Andrew. They are 
untrue. 
=20 
You must be aware that Mr Edwards=E2=80=99 former partner, Scott Rothstein, is no= w serving a 50 year prison term 
for creating false cases of a sexual nature = against Mr Epstein and then using those fabricated cases to obtain money 
b= y deception in a Ponzi scheme. You know that Mr Rothstein destroyed people= 's lives with his fantastic and untrue 
suits and that in pursuit of his evil= plans . You will be aware that Mr. Edwards now, himself, faces serious lit= igation 
with severe consequences 
=20 
=E2=80=99 allegations only emerged at the time that Scott Rothste= in was creating false claims and 
years atter the alleged misconduct . The re= leasing of the allegations to the national press only occurred after I refus= 
ed to make any payments to silence Ms 
or her attorneys because the = allegations were utterly false. As you 
will be aware, it is also believed to= be the case that she has been paid a large sum of money by at least one Bri= tish 
national newspaper. That represents a further incentive to make false = claims. 
=20 
If you write a balanced article, you will be bound to record that Ms Rober= ts has made a previous claims of sexual 
harassment totally unrelated to Mr E= pstein and which was not proceed with because the police took the view she h= 
ad no credibility.=20 
=20 
You will also, presumably, draw attention to the fact that, prior to filing= her civil suit against Mr Epstein, Ms 
fled the US to avoid being ar= rested for grand theft. police report availble 
All in all, given her record, which includes a number of other entirely fab= ricated events (of which I have no doubt you 
will be aware and will reflect)= I assume you will treat what she says with great scepticism. 
=20 
All the untrue events are alleged to have happened ten years ago. Until tho= se allegations emerged I had no 
recollection of Ms 
at all. I couldn= 't have picked her out in a crowd or, perhaps more relevantly in her case, i= n 
an identity parade. After some thought, I recalled that I first met Ms R= oberts when she was working at a Premier 
Health Resort, claiming to be 18 ye= ars old and a professional masseuse. As part of his health programme, Mr Eps= 
tein had regular massages and employed both female and male masseuses. Ms = 
always came to Mr Epstein=E2=80=99s property with either her mother or fia= 
nc=C3=A9 in attendance, sometimes both. I was aware of no improper conduct and n= one was brought to my 
attention.=20 
=20 
When it comes to Ms 
allegations about her time in London, I can't s= ay I remember her at all and neither can I 
remember flying with her. I fly = many thousands of miles a year all over the world in many different aircraft= . 
=20 
Of course, I've seen the photograph of the Duke of York with 
Rober= ts but I have absolutely no recollection at 
all of the photograph being take= n and cannot say who took it.=20 
=20 
I've met the Duke of York on a number of occasions but whenever I've seen h= im he has been properly attired and I 
have no knowledge of naked pool partie= sat Mr Epstein's Palm Beach estate or elsewhere. =20 
=20 
I do not share any homes with Mr Epstein and he does not support me in any= way. To put this in context my 
relationship with Mr Epstein ended over a de= cade ago and since then I have had a long term relationship. Mr 
Epstein=E2=80=99s = imprisonment and the circumstances to which that related occurred over 5 ye= ars after our 
relationship had ceased. =20 
=20 
If I=E2=80=99ve missed anything do let Mr. Gow know.=20 
2 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00110 
EFTA00590086

=20 
Regards 
=20 
=20 
Ghislaine Maxwell 
=20 
Attach Klein=E2=80=99s questions. 
=20 
=20 
Brian Basham 
Mobile: 07771 828828 
<mailto
>=20 
=20 
--=20 
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute 
inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein=20 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be 
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to 
and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all 
rights reserved 
--B_3537537128_1113954667 
Content-type: text/html; 
charset="UTF-8" 
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable 
<html> 
<head> 
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8"> </head> <body> <br> <br> <div 
class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:12 PM, GMAX <span dir=3D"l= tr">&lt;<a 
href=3D"mailto: 
"
</a>&gts/span> wit ote:<br> <blockquote 
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:lpx #c= cc solid;padding-left:lex;"> <div>dont 
face=3D"Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style=3D"font-size= :11pt">Thank you _ I have it now and am working 
the letter a little =E2=80=93 I wi= II send the final version tomorrow and what ever is in it will be factually = accurate 
<br> <br> <br> On 6/12/11 16:00 PM, &quot;Philip Barden&quot; &It;<a href=3D"http://philip.b= 
target=3Dtblank" 
/a>= 
&gt; wrote:<br> 
<br> 
</span></font> 
<blockquote><font color=3D"#00007F"><font size=3D"2"><font face=3O"Arial"xspan s= tyle=3D"font-size:10pt">See 
below as amended by me only for factual accuracy a= nd some notes where I am uncertain of the accuracy. &nbsp;<br> 
&nbsp;<br> </span></font></font></font>dont face=3D"Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"= 
><span style=3D"font-size:12pt"><i>Dear Mr Klein<br> 
3 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00111 
EFTA00590087

&nbspsbr> 
Ross Gow of Acuity Reputation, who I have retained to deal with press enqui= ries, tells me that you have sent him the 
following list of questions.<br> &nbspsbr> My condition of answering those questions is that you print this reply in f= 
ull. I=E2=80=99ve answered in a narrative form, which I hope will make sense both = to you and to your readers. 
I=E2=80=99ve tried to keep it succinct.<br> &nbsp;<br> We don't know each other but I am familiar with the world of 
journalism and= there is an obvious temptation for journalists to sensationalise their stor= ies, so, as a precaution, I've 
sent a copy of this letter to Vanity Fair=E2=80=99s= Editor in Chief, Graydon Carter.<br> &nbsp;<br> Driving straight to 
the heart of the matter, the allegations that have been= made against me are part of an attempt by 
and her lawyer, = Brad Edwards, to extort money &nbsp;from me. This follows an unsuccessful at= tempt by them at 
blackmailing me. To spice up the story they have made allegations about HRH Prince Andrew. The= y are untrue.<br> 
&nbspsbr> You must be aware that Mr Edwards=E2=80=99 former partner, Scott Rothstein, is no= w serving a 50 year 
prison term for creating false cases of a sexual nature&= nbsp; against Mr Epstein and then using those fabricated 
cases&nbsp; to obta= in money by deception in a Ponzi scheme. You know that &nbsp;Mr Rothstein destroyed people's 
lives with his fantastic a= nd untrue suits and that in pursuit of his evil plans&nbspsfont color=3D"#FF0= 000"> </font>. 
You will be aware that Mr. Edwards now, himself, faces serious&nbs= p; litigation with severe consequences<br> 
&nbspsbr> 
E2=80=99 allegations only emerged at the time that Scott Rothste= in was creating false 
claims and years atter the alleged misconduct . The re= leasing of the allegations to the national press only occurred 
after I refus= ed to make any payments to silence Ms 
or her attorneys because the allegations were utterly 
false. As= you will be aware, it is also believed to be the case that she has been pai= d a large sum of money by at least 
one British national newspaper. That repr= esents a further incentive to make false claims.<br> &nbspsbr> &nbsp;lf 
you write a balanced article, you will be bound to record that Ms = 
has made a previous claims of sexual 
harassment totally unrelated to= Mr Epstein and which was not proceed with because the police took the view = she 
had no credibility. 
<br> 
&nbspsbr> 
<font color=3D"#FF0000">You will also, presumably, draw attention to the fact= that, prior to filing her civil suit against 
Mr Epstein, Ms 
fled th= e US to avoid being arrested for grand theft. police report availble<br> </font><br> All 
in all, given her record, which includes a number of other entirely fab= ricated events (of which I have no doubt you will 
be aware and will reflect)= I assume you will treat what she says with great scepticism.<br> &nbsp;<br> All the untrue 
events are alleged to have happened ten years ago. Until tho= se allegations emerged I had no recollection of Ms 
at all. &nbsp;I 
ouldn't have picked her out in a crowd or, perhaps more relevantly in her ca= se, in an identity 
parade. &nbsp;After some thought, I recalled that I first met Ms 
when she was working at a = Premier Health 
Resort, claiming to be 18 years old and a professional masseu= se. As part of his health programme, Mr Epstein had 
regular massages and emp= loyed both female and male masseuses. 
&nbsp;Ms 
always came to Mr Epstein=E2=80=99s property with either her mo= ther or flanC3=A9 in 
attendance, sometimes both. I was aware of no improper co= nduct and none was brought to my attention. 
<br> 
&nbspsbr> 
When it comes to Ms 
allegations about her time in London, I can't s= ay I remember her at all and neither can I 
remember flying with her. &nbsp;l= fly many thousands of miles a year all over the world in many different air= 
craft.<br> &nbsp;<br> Of course, I've seen the photograph of the Duke of York with 
Rober= is but I have 
absolutely no recollection at all of the photograph being take= n &nbsp;and cannot say who took it. 
<br> 
&nbspsbr> 
I've met the Duke of York on a number of occasions but whenever I've seen h= im he has been properly attired and I 
have no knowledge of naked pool partie= s at Mr Epstein's Palm Beach estate or elsewhere. &nbspsbr> &nbspsbr> I do 
not share any homes with Mr Epstein and &nbsp;he does not support me i= n any way. To put this in context my 
relationship with Mr Epstein ended over= a decade ago and since then I have had a long term relationship. Mr Epstein= 
=E2=80=99s imprisonment and the circumstances to which that related occurred over 5 years after our relationship had 
cea= sed. &nbsp;&nbspsbr> &nbspsbr> If I=E2=80=99ve missed anything do let Mr. Gow know. <br> &nbspsbr> 
Regards<br> &nbspsbr> &nbspsbr> Ghislaine Maxwell<br> &nbsp;<br> </i>Attach Klein=E2=80=99s questions.<br> 
&nbspsbr> &nbspsbr> Brian Basham<br> 
4 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00112 
EFTA00590088

Mobile: &nbsp;07771 828828<br> 
<a href=3D"http:/ 
target=3Dtblank">a= 
/a> &Itsa href=3D"mailto 
target=30"_blank">mailto:ma 
/a>&gt; <br> 
&nbspsbr> </span></font><span style=3D"font-size:12pt"><font face=3D"TimesNew oman >< r= 
</font></span><font color=3D"t100007F"><font size=3D"2"><font face=3D"Arial"><span= style=3D"font-
size:10pt"><br> </span></font></font></font><font face=3D"Arial"><font color=3D"#7F7F7F"><font = 
size=3D"1"><span style=3D"font-size:7pt"><br> <hr size=3D"2" width=3D"100%" align=3D"CENTER"> 
</span></font></font></font></blockquote> 
</div> 
</blockquote> 
</div> 
<br> 
<br clear=3O"all"> 
<br> 
<br> 
 
br> 
The information contained in this communication is<br> confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may<br> 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for<br> the use of the addressee. It is the property of<br> Jeffrey 
Epstein <br> Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this<br> communication or any part thereof is strictly 
prohibited<br> and may be unlawful. If you have received this<br> communication in error, please notify us immediately 
by<br> return e-mail or by e-mail to <a href=3D"mailto
l" target= =3O"_blank"> 
/a>, and<br> destroy this communication and all copies thereof,<br> including all attachments. 
copyright -all rights reserved<br> <br> </body> </html> 
—6_3537537128_1113954667--
5 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00113 
EFTA00590089

From: G Maxwell [mailto: 
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 3:53 PM 
Subject: FW: 
 
Forwarded Message 
From: G G 
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:40:46 -0400 
To:1 Jep < 
Subject: FW: 
 
Forwarded Message 
From: G G <
> 
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:53:48 -0400 
To: Dana B < 
Subject: FW: 
 
Forwarded Message 
From: G G 
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:04:39 -0400 
To:1 Jep < 
Subject: <no subject> 
MY PR peePs want me to write a letter rather than ans the question directly. They say I will loose all credibility 
and all voice if one single thing is wrong or exaggerated..please read it v carefullly to check that what I say is 
100% true and provable.. they think I still have a voice and can speak.. use it once and get it wrong it will be 
gone for ever —AM IN MY OFFICE CALL 
Please get back to me with any changes today as it has to go they say tomorrow 
Dear Mr Klein 
Ross Gow of Acuity Reputation, who I have retained to deal with press enquiries, tells me that you have sent 
him a list of questions. 
I've answered in a narrative form, which I hope will make sense. I've tried to keep it succinct. 
Driving straight to the heart of the matter, I believe the continuing press on Mr Epstein is in large measure part 
of a blatant attempt to game the legal system by lawyers that are involved in civil action against Mr Epstein 
and by newspapers who love and need a sensational story that sells papers regardless of balance or truth. 
Trying to tie Prince Andrew to Mr Epstein's story, is part of that larger plan. 
You must be aware that Mr Edwards,' one of the lawyers who continues to promote this story is in, 1E NEED 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00114 
EFTA00590090

YOU TO WRITE LAWYERS NAMES HERE AND WHAT EVER THE AGREEMENT IS OF THE REALTIONSHOIP 
EDWARDS HAS WITH THEM SO iT TIES THEM TO THE SCHEM EVEN iF REMOVED ONE BY EDWARDS was 
working for and a Partner in a now defunct law firm with Scott Rothstein. Scott Rothstein very recently was 
sent to jail for 50 years for creating false allegations against Mr Epstein and then using those allegations to 
obtain money by deception. You know that Mr Rothstein destroyed people's lives with his fantastic and untrue 
suits and that in pursuit of his evil, greedy plans he corrupted ex policemen to create fake cases and forged the 
signatures of judges to sign off on those charges. Rothstein's plea related to, AMONGST OTHER THINGS, CREATING 
AND PROMOTING fake legal settlements AND SELLING interests in those settlements TO UNSUSPECTING INVESTORS. 
Rothstein engaged in these CORRUPT ILLEAGAL AND SHAMELESS SCHEMES UNDERNEATH THE UMBREALLA OF A LEGAL 
PRACTICE TO STEAL MONEY. HE, AND OTHERS IN HIS FIRM, DEMONSTRATED AN EXPLOITATION OF THE U.S. LEGAL 
SYSTEM THAT USED AND CREATED FAKE 'VICTIMS' TO PROMOTE HIS ILLEGAL AND LIFE DESTROYING, FAKE SUITS. FBI 
Investigations continue into the now defunct firm, those who worked for the firm, and many of the ex partners of 
Rothstein's firm are subject to legal and civil proceedings. You will be aware that Mr. Edwards himself, faces a 
professional investigation and serious potential charges brought by Mr Epstein. 
' civil suit against Mr Epstein, along with her allegations in it, emerged iN THE PUBLIC 
DOMAIN at the time that Scott Rothstein was creating HIS false claims. If you write a balanced article, you will 
be bound to record that Ms 
has made years pReviously sexual harrasment claims against people other 
than Mr Epstein and that they were thrown out of court for her lack of credibility. You will also, presumably, 
draw attention to the fact that, prior to filing her civil suit against Mr Epstein, and long after she allegedly 
ceased to be employed by him as a masseuse, Ms 
fled the US to avoid being arrested and presumably 
be sent to jail for grand theft. Also I think it is probably fair to mention that she has been paid a large sum of 
money by at least one British national newspaper, aside from any other monies that she has received, which 
represents a further incentive to make any claims that would help keep her name in the public domain by 
attempting to link her to Prince Andrew and have what she has to to say be worth any money to those seeking 
to use her for their own means. All in all, given her record, which includes a number of other highly colourful 
events, (of which I have no doubt you will be aware and will reflect) I assume you will treat what she says with 
great scepticism. 
TO this point Ms 
was i believe actually 17 and living with her fiance when Mr Epstein first employed her 
as a Masseuse. When it comes to Ms 
allegations about her time in London, I can't say i remember 
being in London with her at all and neither can I remember flying with her. I fly thousands of miles a year all 
over the world and would be hard pushed to say what plane and with whom i was flying even with in the last 
year. Of course, I've seen the photograph of the Duke of York with 
but I have absolutely no 
recollection at all of the photograph being taken. 
I've met the Duke of York on a number of occasions but whenever I've seen him he has been fully and properly 
attired and I have no knowledge of naked pool parties, unless one considers the odd person sunbathing 
without a swimming costume a party, at Mr Epstein's home. 
As to my relationship with Mr Epstein, I can tell you that i do not share any homes anywhere with Mr 
Epstein; he does not support me in any way at all. For the record I had in fact, until very recently, been in a 
committed and happy relationship for the last seven years with someone else. Mr Epstein's imprisonment and 
the circumstances to which that related occurred many years after our relationship had ceased. 
Regards 
2 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00115 
EFTA00590091

Ghislaine Maxwell 
End of Forwarded Message 
End of Forwarded Message 
End of Forwarded Message 
3 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00116 
EFTA00590092

From: G Maxwell [mailto: 
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 9:44 PM 
To: 'Jeffrey Epstein' 
Subject: Re: Daily Mail story 
That mentions me right in detail? What more can they say? This is dredging up all the lies in her deposition in 
more detail like it's new..god I hate them - WTF..so many more important things to talk about and stories that 
are real not made for money or fame.. 
Ok 
Keep me posted 
FACEBOOK chttps://www.facebook.com/TerraMarProject> - TWITTER 
<http://twitter.com/terramarproject> - G+ <https://plus.google.com/104195649525707945586/posts> -
PINTEREST <http://pinterest.com/terramarproject/> - INSTAGRAM 
<http://instagram.com/p/PhLoOKAVEq/> - PLEDGE <http://theterramarproject.org/#citizenship> - THE DAILY 
CATCH <http://theterramarproject.org/thedailycatch/ 
From: Jeffrey Epstein 
Sent: Thursday, 3 April 2014 22:37 
To: G Maxwell 
Subject: Re: Fw: Daily Mail story 
Received the same weeks ago . The 
transcript 
On Thursday. April 3. 2014. G Maxwell < 
Hi there — what is this referencing 
Gx 
FACEBOOK <https://www.facebook.com/TerraMarProject>
TWITTER <http://twitter.com/terramarproject>
G+ <https://plus.google.com/10419564952570794SS86/oosts>
PINTEREST <http://pinterest.comiterramarprojectk 
INSTAGRAM http://instagram.com/theterramarproject>
PLEDGE <htto://theterramarproject.orgfikitizenshio>
THE DAILY CATCH <http://theterramarproject.org/thedailycatch/ 
From: gmax 
Date: Thursday, April 3, 2014 21:31 PM 
To: _I Jep 
Subject: Fw: Daily Mail story 
> wrote: 
FACEBOOK <https://www.facebook.com/TerraMarProiect> - TWITTER <http://twitter.com/terramarproiect> - G+ 
<https://plus.google.com/104195649S2S707945586/posts> - PINTEREST <http://pinterest.com/terramarproject/> - 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00117 
EFTA00590093

INSTAGRAM <http://instagram.com/p/PhLoOKAvEcii> - PLEDGE <http://theterramarprojectoreacitizenship> - THE DAILY 
CATCH <http://theterramarproject.org/thedailycatch/ 
From: Brett D. Jaffe 
Sent: Thursday, 3 April 2014 21:30 
To: G Maxwell 
Subject: Fwd: Daily Mail story 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: "daniel bates" < 
To: "Brett D. Jaffe" 
Subject: Daily Mail story 
Hello 
I am a reporter with the Daily Mail newspaper and have been working on a story with 
my colleague Guy Adams in London. 
I understand that you represent Ghislaine Maxwell. 
I have left phone messages with you and Miss Maxwell but have not had any response. 
This is to let you know that we are going to report the details of the attached filing 
which was made in the case of Epstein vs Rothstein in the Palm Beach County Court. 
Under the new British Defamation Act we have privilege in the UK to report this filing, 
so long as we do so accurately and reflect any comment or reaction your client may 
have to it. 
For this reason I wanted to see if your client may wish to offer any comment on the 
version of events which it depicts. 
You can reach me at this email address or 
>. 
itchboard in the UK which is -= 
Thanks 
Daniel [h 
: 
r
AtiKitai Lgafan 
I 
r 
if] 
*********************************************************** 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential. may be attorney-client privileged. may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Jeffrey Epstein 
2 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00118 
EFTA00590094

Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notif us immediate) by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to 
and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
3 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00119 
EFTA00590095