EFTA00233329

it has specifically failed to do so. The trial court did not depart from the essential 
requirements of law in holding that Petitioner failed to demonstrate a compelling 
interest in closure. 
Epstein next asserts that closure is warranted to protect the interest of 
"innocent third parties" and identifies those third parties as Mr. Epstein's co-
conspirators. (Petition at 15). Again, Mr. Epstein lacks standing to assert the 
interests of third parties. Doe'. Museum of Science and History of Jacksonville, 
Inc., Case No. 92-32567, 1994 WL 741009 (Fla. 7th Jud. Cir. June 8, 1994) 
(plaintiff lacks standing to assert privacy interest of third party, minor victims of 
sexual assault by defendant's former employee, who had been convicted) (copy 
attached at Supp.A.-4). In addition, even if the third parties Mr. Epstein identifies 
— his purported co-conspirators — were before the Court, they would have no 
privacy interest in matters pertaining to their criminal conduct. Post-Newsweek 
Stations, Florida, Inc.'. Doe, 612 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 1992) (Does, whose names 
were implicated in criminal prostitution scheme, had no right to privacy by virtue 
of their participation in a crime and thus their names could not be redacted from 
records provided to the public). Thus, the trial judge did not depart from the 
essential requirements of law in finding insufficient third-party interests to justify 
closure. 
17 
EFTA00233629

The third interest Epstein seeks to invoke is his own right to privacy. See 
Petition at 15. While Epstein actually does have standing to assert his own right to 
privacy, Florida law is clear that closure is only proper to protect a "substantial 
injury to a party by disclosure of matters protected by a common law or privacy 
right not generally inherent in the specific type of proceeding sought to be closed." 
Ha. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420(c)(9)(A)(vi) (emphasis added). Epstein argues 
disclosure of a plea agreement is not generally inherent in a state court plea hearing 
See Petition at 16. That argument is absurd. Of course Epstein's plea agreement is 
generally inherent in his criminal prosecution. It is the very reason that 
prosecution ended, and as the lower court recognized in accepting the plea, it was a 
"significant inducement" to Petitioner to take the state's deal. (A-7 at p. 39, II. 19-
21.; p. 40,11. 10-13.) 
Moreover, Florida's constitutional right to privacy is expressly subordinate 
to the rights of Floridians to access the records of their government. To wit, 
Article I, § 23, which sets forth the right to privacy, further provides: "[t]his 
section shall not be construed to limit the public's right of access to public records 
and meetings as provided by law." Fla. Const. Art. I, § 23. As the Florida 
Supreme Court has recognized, the privacy amendment has not been construed to 
protect names and addresses contained in public records. Post Newsweek, 612 So. 
18 
EFTA00233630

2d at 552. The trial court, having reviewed the NPA in camera, certainly had an 
opportunity to assess whether a privacy interest not inherent in his criminal 
prosecution for felony solicitation of children for prostitution is implicated by the 
NPA. It cannot in good faith be argued that the trial court departed from the 
essential requirements of law in determining that no such privacy interest was 
implicated. 
2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 
(S.D. Ha. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's 
Orders Unsealing the NPA.1°
Nor did the trial court's rejection of Petitioner's comity argument depart 
from the essential requirements of law. In the Southern District of Florida, one of 
the minor victims of Epstein filed a Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's 
Rights Acts (A-I)." The victim also asked the federal court to allow her to share 
the NPA with third parties (A-3). Judge Marra denied the motion, finding — as the 
U.S. Government had argued (A-4) — that the NPA was not a record of the federal 
court. (A-6) ("First, as respondent points out, the Agreement was not filed in this 
10 The Post adopts and incorporates E.W.'s arguments and analysis on this issue 
in addition to the arguments it sets forth herein. 
" The Post notes that A-3 through A-5 were not part of the record below. If the 
Court is inclined to consider these federal court pleadings, then in fairness it must 
consider those related pleadings which are attached hereto as Supp.A.-5 through 
Supp.A.-7 of the Post's Supplemental Appendix. 
19 
EFTA00233631

case, under seal or otherwise."). The federal court also declined to provide any 
relief from restrictions on the parties' use and dissemination of the discovery 
document without prejudice. (A-6 at p.2.) 
Petitioner argues that the Post should be required to seek relief in Judge 
Marra's court. He mischaracterizes the nature of the proceedings there. There is 
no document to unseal in Judge Marra's court. The NPA is not a record of that 
court, and thus any effort by the Post to obtain access to the NPA there would be 
futile, and any order requiring it be unsealed by the lower court herein does not 
conflict with any decision of the federal court. (A-16 at p.3.) 
In fact, when Judge Marra has been asked to seal records of his court that 
quote the NPA, he has refused to do so, and has required such records to be filed in 
the public court file (Supp.A.-5 through Supp.A.-7)12 Thus, though the NPA is not 
a record of the federal court, the federal court has rejected attempts to file portions 
of it under seal. As a result, portions of the NPA appear in the public court file in 
12 Page 4 of Supp.A.-5 and paragraph 5 of Supp.A.-6, both publicly on file in the 
federal court, quote from the NPA. In addition, Epstein's own lawyers quoted 
extensively from the NPA in seeking to stay one of the civil suits against him. (A-
11 at 116; A-18, p. 35, I. 18 — p. 36,1. 1 (inc rporating by reference Supp.A.-5 
I
through Supp.A-6 and Supp.A.-7 (C.M.A. I. Epstein, Case No. 08-cv-8081 I (S.D. 
Fla. 2008) at Dkt. 33 pp. 2-5)).) 
20 
EFTA00233632

the federal civil litigation against Epstein. (Supp.A-5 at p. 4; Supp.A.-6 at ¶ 5; 
Supp.A.-7 at pp. 2-5.) The proverbial cat is already out of the bag. 
Notwithstanding, the NPA is a record of this lower court. The lower court 
did not enter an order conflicting with Judge Marra's rulings (A-16 at p. 3 — 
expressly noting lack of conflict with Judge Marra's orders) and did not depart 
from the essential requirements of law in unsealing the NPA. 
3. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6 Did Not Preclude 
the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA.t3
Finally, unsealing the NPA did not conflict with federal law. Records 
available under state law are sealed by federal law only when federal law 
absolutely conflicts with state law and requires confidentiality of the records. The 
Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, Art. VI, U.S. Const., comes 
into play only when federal law clearly requires the records to be closed, and the 
state is clearly subject to its provisions. E.g., Wallace,. Guzman, 687 So. 2d 
1351, 1353 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (exemptions to federal Freedom of Information 
Act do not apply to state agencies); Hous. Auth. of the City of Daytona Beach'. 
Gomillion, 639 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (Federal Privacy Act does not 
exempt from disclosure records of housing authority which are open for inspection 
13 The Post adopts and incorporates E.W.'s arguments and analysis on this issue 
in addition to the arguments it sets forth herein. 
21 
EFTA00233633

under Florida Public Records Act); Fla. Sugar Cane League, Inc.'. Fla. Dept. of 
Envtl. Reg., Case No. 91-2108 (Fla. 2d Jud. Cir. Sept. 20, 1991), per curiam 
affirmed 606 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992 (documents received by state 
agency in course of settlement negotiations to resolve federal lawsuit and 
confidential settlement agreement with U.S. Department of Justice open to 
inspection because federal law did not clearly require confidentiality) (Supp.A.-8.) 
Federal law imposes no such preemption of the Florida constitution and common 
law in this case. 
In particular, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) does not restrict 
access to the NPA. Federal Rule 6(e) restrains grand jurors, court reporters, 
government attorneys, interpreters and the like from disclosing matters occurring 
before the grand jury. Petitioner — apparently the former target of the grand jury — 
is none of these persons. His actions in filing the NPA under seal do not implicate 
Rule 6(e) no matter what information the NPA contains. The lower court's actions 
in unsealing the NPA likewise do not implicate Rule 6, because the lower court 
also is not restrained by Rule 6(e). 
Moreover, the information contained in the NPA does not constitute 
"matters occurring before the grand jury" within the meaning of Rule 6. The 
secrecy rule is limited to such matters for the purpose of "preventing targets of an 
22 
EFTA00233634

investigation from fleeing or tampering with witnesses or grand jurors, 
encouraging witnesses to appear voluntarily and speak fully and frankly, avoiding 
damage to the reputation of subjects or targets of the investigation who are not 
indicted, and encouraging grand jurors to investigate suspected crimes without 
inhibition and engage in unrestricted deliberations." Lockhead Martin Corp.'. 
Boeing Co., 393 F. Supp. 2d 1276, 1279 (M.D. Fla. 2005). The rule aims to 
"prevent disclosure of the way in which information was presented to the grand 
jury, the specific questions and inquiries of the grand jury, the deliberations and 
vote of the grand jury, the targets upon which the grand jury's suspicion focuses, 
and specific details of what took place before the grand jury." In re Grand Jury 
Investigation of Ven-Fuel, 441 F. Supp. 1299, 1302-03 (M.D. Fla. 1977). In other 
words, Rule 6 is implicated if disclosure would reveal secret inner workings of the 
grand jury. U.S. . Rosen, 471 F. Supp. 2d 651, 654 (E.D. Va. 2007). 
Disclosure of details of a government investigation that is independent of a 
parallel grand jury proceeding does not violate Rule 6. Id. Statements by a 
prosecutor's office about its own investigation, therefore, are not covered by the 
secrecy rule. Id. at 655. Likewise, the mere mention of other targets of an 
investigation does not implicate the grand jury secrecy rule. E.g., In re Interested 
Party, 530 F. Supp. 2d 136,140-42 (D.D.C. 2008) (government not prohibited by 
23 
EFTA00233635

Rule 6 from disclosing plea agreement and other materials); Doe y. Hammond, 502 
F. Supp. 2d 94, 99-101(D.D.C. 2007) (same). Moreover, "when the fact or 
document is sought for itself, independently, rather than because it was stated 
before or displayed to the grand jury, there is no bar of secrecy." In re Grand Jury 
Investigation of Ven-Fuel, 441 F. Supp. at 1304. Here, the Post seeks to review 
the NPA for its own intrinsic value, and not for the purpose of discerning what 
transpired before the grand jury now more than a year ago. It is clearly well within 
the public's right and interest to review the NPA, given the circumstances 
surrounding the investigation and prosecution of Petitioner as well as the civil 
claims by women who say Epstein sought to make them his child prostitutes. 
These facts clearly constitute a proper basis for unsealing these improperly sealed 
documents. 
Finally, and even assuming for a moment that the NPA contains grand jury 
information — which the Post doubts — when the grand jury's work has concluded, 
and the accused apprehended, the veil of secrecy no longer is necessary and safely 
may be lifted. In re Grand Jury Investigation of Ven-Fuel, 441 F. Supp. at 1303. 
Here, Petitioner has been convicted, and nothing in the record suggests the grand 
jury's work is ongoing. Consequently, no basis exists for finding that the trial 
court departed from the essential requirements of law. 
24 
EFTA00233636

CONCLUSION 
The trial court was correct in unsealing the non-prosecution agreement and 
its addendum. These materials were not properly sealed in the first instance. 
Moreover, Epstein has not and cannot provide any basis for closure at this juncture. 
The trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law in unsealing 
the NPA. Its order should be affirmed, and the Post should be awarded its fees and 
costs and such other further relief as this Court deems proper. 
Respectfully submitted, 
THOMAS 
°CICERO & BRALO , PL 
D nna K. Shullman 
James B. Lake I•1 
Attorneys for The Palm Beach Post 
25 
EFTA00233637

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been 
furnished via U.S. Mail to: Hon. Jeffrey Colbath, Palm Beach County 
Courthouse, 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 11F, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; R. 
Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney's Office - Southern District, 500 S. 
Australian Ave., Ste. 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Barbara Burns, Esq., 
State Attorney's Office - West Palm Beach, 401 North Dixie Highway, West Palm 
Beach, FL 33401; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger, et al.,■ 
Robert D. Critton, 
Esq., Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, 
Jane Kreusler-Walsh, Esq., 
Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq., Leopold-Kuvin, 
nd 
Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. and William J. Berger, Esq., Rothstein Rosenfeldt 
Adler, 4 
day of July, 2009. 
26 
on this 10ffi
EFTA00233638

CERTIFICATE OF TYPE, SIZE AND STYLE 
Counsel for Petitioners certifies that this Petition is typed in 14 point 
(proportionately spaced) Times New Roman. 
27 
EFTA00233639

- Not an Official Document 
Page 1 of 11 
Report Selection criteria 
Case ID: 
Docket Start Date: 
Docket Ending Date: 
Case Description 
Case ID: 
Case Caption: 
Division: 
Filing Date: 
Court: 
Location: 
Jury: 
Type: 
Status: 
502008CF009381AXXXMB 
502008CF009381AXXXMB 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
W - COLBATH 
Thursday , June 26th, 2008 
CF -FELONY 
MB - MAIN BRANCH 
N-Non Jury 
CF -FELONY 
CLSD - CLOSED CASE 
Related Cases 
No related cases were found. 
Case_EventSchedule 
No case events were found. 
Case Parties 
Sea • Assoc Expn 
Date 
Type 
ID 
Name 
2 
JUDGE 
W 
COLBATH, JUDGE 
JEFFREY 
Aliases: none 
3 
I 
DEFENDANT 24167391 EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Aliases: none 
4 
3 30-JUN- 
2008 
ATTORNEY 
0262013 
GOLDBERGER , ESQ, 
JACK A 
Aliases: none 
O_acket Entries 
http://courtcon.co.palm-beachnus/p1s/jiwp/ck_public_qry_doct.cp_dktrpt_docket_report?b... 8/4/2009 
EFTA00233640

- Not an Official Document 
Page 2 of I I 
Docket 
Number 
Docket Type 
Book and Page No. 
Attached To: 
0000C - CASE INITIATED TIMELINESS 
RPT 
Filing Date: 
26-JUN-2008 
Filing Party: 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text 
none. 
1 
INFO - INFORMATION SHEET 
Filing Date: 
J26-JUN-2008 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
ARISES FROM 2006CF009454AXX 
1 A 
AREC - ARREST RECORD 
Filing Date: 
26-JUN-2008 
iFiling Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Amount: 
L
Disposition 
Docket Text: 
J none. 
1B 
I
TEXT - SEE 
DESCRIPTION 
DOCUMENT 
Filing Date: 
26-JUN-2008 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
ROUGH ARREST - NO PROBABLE CAUSE FILED 
1 C 
il WOAR - WAIVER OF ARRAIGNMENT 
Filing Date: 
26-JUN-2008 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
J FILED BY JACK GOLDBERG 
EVSCH HEARING EVENT 
SCHEDULED 
Filing Date: 
27-JUN-2008 
Filing Party: 
I 
1 
Disposition Amount: 
http://courtcon.co.palm-beach.fl.us/p1s/jiwpktpublic_gry_doct.ep_dktrpt_docket_report?b... 8/4/2009 
EFTA00233641

- Not an Official Document 
Page 3 of 11 
'Docket Text: 
none. 
2 
JDN - JUDICIAL NOTES 
Filing Date: 
27-JUN-2008 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
SET CASE FOR 6/30/08 @ 8:30 AM FOR STATUS CHECK 
EVHLD - EVENT HELD 
Filing Date: 
30-JUN-2008 
Filing Party: 
VEPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
CR-DAMES. PLEAD & ADJ GUILTY AS CHARGED. STIP/FOUND: 
SEXUAL OFFENDER. PBCJ 6 MOS W/CD FOR 1 DAY, TO RUN 
CONSECUTIVE W/06-9454AXX. PBCJ SENTENCE FOLLOWED BY 
1
12 MOS PROB. DEFT MUST REGISTER AS A SEXUAL 
OFFENDER W/IN 48 HRS OF RELEASE. DNA SWAB. MER 
2 A 
1GUIL - JUDGMENT OF GUILTY 
Filing Date: 
30-JUN-2008 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
'Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
none. 
2 B 
FNGR - FINGERPRINTS 
Filing Date: 
30-JUN-2008 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
none. 
2 C 
1 SORD - SENTENCE ORDER 
Filing Date: 
30-JUN-2008 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
(Docket Text: 
(none. 
2 D 
SORC - 
CONTINUED 
SENTENCE ORDER -
Filing Date: 
j 30-JUN-2008 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount:
I 
I 
http://courtcon.co.palm-beach.fl.us/pls/jiwpick_public qry_doct.cp_dktrpt_docket_report?b... 8/4/2009 
EFTA00233642

- Not an Official Document 
Page 4 of II 
'Docket Text: 
Inone. 
2E 
1 
RITE - WAIVER OF RIGHTS 
Filing Date: 
30-JUN-2008 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
none. 
1
2F
Filing Date: 
30-JUN-2008 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
none. 
2G 
GLSS - GUIDELINE SCORESHEET 
Filing Date: 
30-JUN-2008 
Filing Party: 
!EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
none. 
2H 
[
_OAFC - ORDER ASSESSING 
FEES/COST 
Filing Date: 
Filing Party: 
30-JUN-2008 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
(JUDGE PUCILLO FOR MCSORLEY) IN THE AMOUNT OF $473.00 
AS CONDS OF PROB. MER 
3 
AREC -(ARREST RECORD 
Filing Date: 
01-JUL-2008 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
'Filing Date: 
Filing Party: 
RECOMMIT 
RCMIT - RECOMMITMENT 
Docket Text: 
Disposition Amount: 
01-JUL-2008 
none. 
CLSD - CLOSED CASE 
http://courteon.co.palm-beach.fl.us/p1s/jiwp/ek_public_qry_doct.cp_dktrpt_docket_report?b... 8/4/2009 
EFTA00233643

- Not an Official Document 
Page 5 of 1 I 
'Filing Date: 
08-JUL-2008 
Filing Party: 
Disposition Amount 
Docket Text: 
none. 
RCPT - RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT 
Filing Date: 
14-JUL-2008 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
A Payment of -$473.00 was made on receipt CFMB30200 From 
Bond ID: 00073142 
4 
ORD - ORDER 
Filing Date: 
21-JUL-2008 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
(JUDGE MCSORLEY) OF PROBATION..NUNC PRO TUNC 6/30/08 
5 
PROC - 
TRANSCRIPT 
CRT REPORTER 
OF 
Filing Date: 
22-JUL-2008 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
PLEA CONFERENCE, TAKEN 6/30/08 
6 
MOT - MOTION 
Filing Date: 
04-DEC-2008 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
TO CLARIFY SENTENCE TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERROR 
FILED BY JACK GOLDBERGER 
7 
1AGOR - AGREED ORDER 
Filing Date: 
04-MAY-2009 
Filing Party: 
JEPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
(JUDGE COLBATH) THAT THE ORDER OF COMMUNITY 
CONTROL IS CORRECTED TO DELETE SPECIAL CONDITION 
#26 AND #27. 
8 
MOT - MOTION 
http://courteon.co.palm-beach.fl.us/p1s/jiwp/ck_public_qry_doctop_dktrpt_docket_report?b... 8/4/2009 
EFTA00233644

- Not an Official Document 
Page 6 of I I 
Filing Date: 
Filing Party: 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
(NONPARTY E.WS) TO VACATE ORDER SEALING RECORDS 
AND UNSEAL RECORDS. 
112-MAY-2009 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
9 
ORSH - ORDER SETTING HEARING 
Filing Date: 
Filing Party: 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
15-MAY-2009 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
SET FOR 5/29/09 RE:MOTION TO VACATE ORDER TO SEAL AND 
UNSEAL RECORD 
EVSCH - HEARING EVENT 
SCHEDULED 
Filing Date: 
Filing Party: 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
10 
19-MAY-2009 
none. 
NOH - NOTICE OF HEARING 
Filing Date: 
Filing Party: 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
12 
Filing Date: 
26-MAY-2009 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
SET FOR 5/29/09 10:30 
PONG - PLEA OF NOT GUILTY 
29-MAY-2009 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
 
linone. 
EVSCH - HEARING EVENT 
SCHEDULED 
Filing Date: 
Filing Party: 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
01 -JUN-2009 
NON PARTY E.W.'S MOTION TO VACATE ORDER SEALING 
RECORDS AND UNSEAL RECORDS 
EVCAN - EVENT 
http://courtcon.co.palm-beach.fl.us/p1s/jiwp/ck_public_qry_doct.cp_dktrpt_docket_report?b... 8/4/2009 
EFTA00233645

- Not an Official Document 
Page 7 of II 
IICANCELLED/SETTLED 
I 
Itting Date: 
01-JUN-2009 
!Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
none. 
11 
RNOH - RE-NOTICE OF HEARING 
Filing Date: 
01-JUN-2009 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
SETTING CASE FOR OTHER HEARING 
AM FILED BY BRADLEY EDWARDS, 
MOTION TO VACATE ORDER 
RECORDS, HEARING SEET FOR 
ON 6/10/2009 AT 10:30 
ESQ. RE: NON PARTY E.W.'S 
SEALING RECORDS AND UNSEAL 
5/29/2009 IS CANCELLED 
13 
MOT - MOTION 
Filing Date: 
03-JUN-2009 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
!Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
TO VACATE ORDER SEALING 
FILED BY BRADLEY EDWARDS, 
RECORD AND UNSEAL RECORDS 
ESQ. 
14 
1 MOT - MOTION 
Filing Date: 
03-JUN-2009 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
PALM BEACH POST'S MOTION 
'FOR ACCESS FILED BY DEANNA 
TO INTERVENE AND PETITION 
SHULLMAN, ESQ. 
EVRST EVENT RESET 
Filing Date: 
10-JUN-2009 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
r 
CR-BELTRAN. MOTION TO INTERVENE
ON MOTION TO UNSEAL. RESET 
BLE 
-GRANTED. NO ACTION 
FOR MOTION HRG ON 6/25/09. 
_J 
15 
FIORD -ORDER 
Filing Date: 
10-JUN-2009 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
http://courtcon.co.palm-beach.fl.us/p1s/jiwp/ck_public_qry doct.cp_dktrpt_docket_report?b... 8/4/2009 
EFTA00233646

- Not an Official Document 
Page 8 of I] 
'Docket Text: 
(COLBATH)
16 
CEF - COURT EVENT FORM 
Filing Date: 
10-JUN-2009 
Filing Party: 
PEPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
none. 
17 
LORD -ORDER 
Filing Date: 
10-JUN-2009 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
IDisposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
(COLBATH)
EVSCH 
SCHEDULED 
- HEARING EVENT 
'Filing Date: 
11-JUN-2009 
JI
!Filing Party: 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
none. 
19 
MOT - MOTION 
Filing Date: 
11-JUN-2009 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
TO MAKE COURT RECORDS CONFIDENTIAL. FILED BY J. 
GOLDBERGER, ESQ 
18 
MOT - MOTION 
Filing Date: 
15-JUN-2009 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
TO INTERVENE AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW. 
FILED BY S. KUBIN, ESQ 
EVSCH 
SCHEDULED
- HEARING EVENT 
Filing Date: 
25-JUN-2009 
Filing Party: 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
^TO STAY DISCLOSURE 
http://courtcon.co.palm-beach.fLus/pls/jiwp/ck_public_qry_doct.cp_dIctrpt_docket_report?b... 8/4/2009 
EFTA00233647

- Not an Official Document 
Page 9 of II 
I EVHLD - EVENT HELD 
Filing Date: 
25-JUN-2009 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
CR-WIGGINS (COLBATH) DEFT PRES W/J.GOLDBERGER,
GRANTED, CASE RESET FOR MOTION TO STAY DISCLOSURE 
EVSCH - 
SCHEDULED 
HEARING EVENT 
Filing Date: 
25-JUN-2009 
Filing Party: 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
TO STAY DISCLOSURE 
20 
I CEF - COURT EVENT FORM 
Filing Date: 
25-JUN-2009 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
none. 
21 
MOT - MOTION 
Filing Date: 
25-JUN-2009 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
TO STAY DISCLOSURE OPF THE NON- PROSECUTION 
AGREEMENT AND ADDENDUM PENDING REVIEW. FILE BY R 
CRITON, PA 
EVHLD EVENT HELD 
Filing Date: 
!Filing Party: 
26-JUN-2009 
EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E 
Disposition Amount: 
Docket Text: 
CR-WIGGINS. MOTION TO STAY, DENIED. WRITTEN ORDER TO 
FOLLOW. DOCUMENTS IN QUESTION ARE DELAYED UNTIL 
NOON ON THURSDAY 02-JUL-2009. MOTION TO COMPEL THE 
DEFT TO POST BOND - DENIED. 
25 
J MOT - MOTION 
Filing Date: 
26-JUN-2009 
Filing Party: 
EPSTEIN JEFFREY E 
,I.Disposition Amount: 
http://courtcon.co.palm-beach.fl.us/p1s/jiwp/ck_public_qry_doct.cp_dIctrpt_docket_report?b... 8/4/2009 
EFTA00233648