EFTA00184224

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-33 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 2 
EXHIBIT 
103 
EFTA00184984

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-33 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 2 
U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
June 30, 2008 
NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIMS 
On June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as "Epstein) entered a plea 
of guilty to violations of Florida Statutes Sections 796.07 (felony solicitation of prostitution) 
and 796.03 (procurement of minors to engage in prostitution), in the 15th Judicial Circuit in 
and for Palm Beach County (Case Nos. 2006-cf-009454AXXXMB and 2008-cf-
00938 IAXXXMB) and was sentenced to a term of twelve months' imprisonment to be 
followed by eighteen months' of Community Control I, the first six months of which must 
be served imprisoned at the Palm Beach County Detention Facility. 
In light of the entry of the guilty plea and sentence, the United States has agreed to 
defer federal prosecution in favor of this state plea and sentence, subject to certain 
conditions. 
One such condition to which Epstein has agreed is the following: 
"Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of a violation of an offense 
enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same 
rights to proceed under Section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr..Epstein 
had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes 
of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's 
attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an 
Indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial 
authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining 
which evidentiary burdens if any a plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is 
the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the. same position 
as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no 
less." 
Initials ofJeffrey Epstein  
 
Initials of Jack Goldberger 
US_Atty_Cor_00323 
EFTA00184985

1701 
118111X3 
L to 1 a6vd KOZ/OT/ZOlapoci aSld 110 paiewA pE-Z9£ luawnooa Wy)1-9£L08-A3-8O:6 asvo 
EFTA00184986

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-34 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 7 
U.S. Department of Justice 
United Stales Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
A. Marie 
500 S. Australian Ave 4th Floor 
Facsimile 
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET 
TO: 
Jack Alan Goldberger 
DATE: 
July 8. 2008 
FAX NO. 
PHONE NO. _ 
# OF PAGES: 
3 
RE: 
Jeffrey Epstein 
FROM: 
A. 
VILLAFASIA. Assistant U.S. Attorney 
PHONE NO. 
COMMENTS: 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
RFP WPB 000515 
EFTA00184987

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-34 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 3 of 7 
V-MARIkA 
RFP WPB 000516 
EFTA00184988

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-34 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 4 of 7 
U.S. Department 
of Justice 
OTIVI ON BFI 
tot 
NOTICE.. IN ACCORD A.NCE Wall TITLE 18, UNITED 
STATES CODE, SECTION 3509(d) AND FLORIDA L.ANN, 
TOE ATT `AC 
DOCUMENT 
IS TO RETREATED 
AS 
CON VIDF,NTIAL 
AND SHALL NOT BE DISCLOSED 
EXCEPT IN CONNECTION WITH  LEGAL 
PROCEEDING. 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
RFP WPB 000517 
EFTA00184989

J.S. Department ofJustice 
Document 
362-34 
United Stales Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
Entered on PI.SD 
Docket 
02/10/2026 Pe(, 
500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Infirsis 
June 30, 2008 
NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIMS 
June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as "Epstein) entered a plea 
,y to violations of Florida Statutes Sections 796.07 (felony solicitation of prostitution) 
16.03 (procurement of minors to engage in prostitution), in the 15th Judicial Circuit in 
r Palm Beach County (Case Nos. 2006-cf-009454AXXXMB and 2008-cf-
i8 I AXXXMB) and was sentenced to a term of twelve months' imprisonment to be 
owed by eighteen months' of Community Control I, the first six months of which must 
served imprisoned at the Palm Beach County Detention Facility. 
In light of the entry of the guilty plea and sentence, the United States has agreed to 
Jefer federal prosecution in favor of this state plea and sentence, subject to certain 
conditions. 
One such condition to which Epstein has agreed is the following: 
"Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of a violation of an offense 
enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same 
rights to proceed under Section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein 
had been tried federally and convicted o f an enumerated offense. Forpurposes 
of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's 
attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an 
Indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial 
authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining 
which evidentiary burdens if any a plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is 
the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position 
as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no 
less." 
Initials of Jeffrey Epstein  
 Initials of Guy Lewis 
EFTA00184990

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-34 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 6 of 7 
No IWICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIMS 
JUNE 30, 2008 
PAGE 2 OF 3 
Through this letter, this Office hereby provides Notice that the individuals identified 
below arc individuals whom the United States was prepared to name as a victim of an 
enumerated offense. 
Identified Individuals 
Courtney Wild 
UNITED STATES AI I ORNEY 
Dated: 
By: 
A. 
VILLAFARA 
ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY 
ACKNOWLEDGMENT 
I have received this Notification from my attorney, Guy Lewis, Esquire, have read it 
and discussed it with my attorney, and I hereby acknowledge that it accurately sets forth my 
understanding and agreement with the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern 
District of Florida regarding the notification and rights of identified victims. I understand 
Initials of JefFrey Epstein  . 
 Initials of Guy Lewis 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
RFP WPB 000519 
EFTA00184991

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-34 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 7 of 7 
NOTIFICATION 01' IDENTIFIED VICTIMS 
JUNE 30, 2008 
PAGE 3 0E 3 
that an exact copy of this Notification will be provided to each identified individual, except 
that the names of all other identified individuals will be redacted, and I hereby waive any 
evidentiary challenges to the introduction of a copy of this document—even in redacted 
form—in any judicial proceeding between any identified individual and myself. 
Dated: 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Witnessed by: 
Guy Lewis, Esquire 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
RFP WPB 000520 
EFTA00184992

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-35 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 3 
EXHIBIT 
105 
EFTA00184993

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 3q27,tv 
cRterepEon FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 3 
a kiriel&ZInit 
?Cif 
• 
AND A S S () 
ATES 
July 3, 2008 
Am.= 
C 
t, AUSA 
United States Attorney's Office 
500 South Australian Avenue 
Dear Ms.IIM: 
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL 
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 
7007 2680 0002 5519 8503 
As you are aware, we represent several of the young girls that were victimized 
and abused by Jeffrey Epstein. While we are aware of his recent guilty plea and 
conviction in his State Court case, the sentence imposed in that case is grossly inadequate 
for a sexual predator of this magnitude. The information and evidence that has come to 
our attention in this matter leads to a grave concern that justice will not be served in this 
cause if Mr. Epstein is not aggressively prosecuted and appropriately punished. Based on 
our investigation and knowledge of this case, it is apparent that he has sexually abused 
more than 100 underage girls, and the evidence against him is overwhelmingly strong. 
As former Assistant State Attorneys with seven years' prosecution experience, we 
believe that the evidence against Mr. Epstein is both credible and deep and that he may 
be the most dangerous sexual predator of children that our country has ever seen. The 
evidence suggests that for at least 4 years he was sexually abusing as many as three to 
four girls a day. It is inevitable that if he is not confined to prison, he will continue to 
manipulate and sexually abuse children and destroy more lives. He is a sexual addict that 
focused all of his free time on sexually abusing children, and he uses his extraordinary 
wealth and power to lure in poor, underprivileged little girls and then also uses his wealth 
to shield himself from prosecution and liability. We are very concerned for the health 
and welfare of the girls he has already victimized, and concerned that if justice is not 
properly served now and he is not imprisoned for a very long time, he will get a free pass 
to sexually abuse children in the future. Future abuse and victimization is obvious to 
anyone who really reviews the evidence in this case, and future sexual abuse of minors is 
inevitable unless he is prosecuted, tried and appropriately sentenced. Money and power 
should not allow a man to make his own laws, and he has clearly received preferential 
treatment at every step up to this point. If he were a man of average wealth or the abused 
girls were from middle or upper class families, then this man would spend the rest of his 
life in prison. In a country of true, blind justice, those distinctions are irrelevant, and we 
really hope he does not prove the point that a man can commit heinous crimes against 
children and buy his way out of it. 
If the Department of Justice's recent commitment to the protection of our children 
from child molesters is to be more than rhetoric, then this is the time and the case where 
the Department must step forward. We urge the Attorney General and our United States 
2028 HARRISON STREET,SUITE 202, HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA 33020 
OFFICE: 954-414-8033/305-935-2011 
FA Eas
t: 9g4-- Mig o/M-
41 44:227 
1$§1V/0 
000001 
EFTA00184994

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-35 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 3 of 3 
Ann 
C. 
AUSA 
United States Attorney's Office 
Page Two 
Attorney to consider the fundamental import of the vigorous enforcement of our Federal 
laws. We urge you to move forward with the traditional indictments and criminal 
prosecution commensurate with the crimes Mr. Epstein has committed, and we further 
urge you to take the steps necessary to protect our children from this very dangerous 
sexual perpetrator. We will help you to do this in any way possible to ensure that true 
Justice is served in this case. 
Sincerely, 
Brad Edwards, Esquire 
Jay Howell, Esquire 
2028 HARRISON STREST,813/TE 202, HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA 33020 
OFFICE, 954-414-8033/305-936-2011 
It A tri VS
94 444tratra 
g 
42
"7
000002 
EFTA00184995

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-36 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 2 
EXHIBIT 
106 
EFTA00184996

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-36 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 2 
am, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
(uSAILS) 
no,. June 4u. zu 8 5 35 PM 
tpatein Investigation 
Ili Jason - Sorry we missed each other today. I wanted to inform you and (through you) your clients. of the 
resolution of the federal investigation of Mr. Epstein. Ile plead guilty today in state court to one charge of 
felony solicitation of prostitution and one charge of procurement of minors to engage in prostitution. Ile 
received 18 months' imprisonment to be followed by 12 months of community control with home confinement. 
Ile also must register as a sex offender for the remainder of his life. 
Ilis agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office also required him to make ccnain concessions regarding possible 
civil suits brought by the victims. I was hoping to discuss this with you over the telephone. I also wanted to 
confirm the names of the victims whom you represent, and I wanted to see if you arc in a position either to 
represent the victims in connection with such litigation or if you can refer them to someone who could perform 
that task. if the victims ask for recommendations. 
Let's talk tomorrow in more detail. Thank you. 
Please treat this e-mail as confidential. 
.4. 
Mafia, 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, Fl. 33401 
774 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
RFP WPII-001861 
EFTA00184997

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-37 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 6 
EXHIBIT 
107 
EFTA00184998

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-37 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 6 
• s 
U.S. Department of Justice 
Untied States Attorney 
Southern District of Markle 
DELIVERY BY ELECTRONIC MAIL 
Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. • 
Kirkland & Ellis LLP 
Citiaroup Center 
New York, New York 10022-4675 
Re: 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Dear Jay: 
SOO S. AultrallanAve, Ste 400 
West Palm Beach FL 3340) 
December 13, 2007 
I am writing not to respond to your asserted "policy concerns" regarding Mr. Epstein's Non-
Prosecution Agreement, which will be addressed by the United States Attorney, but the time has 
come for me to respond to the ever-increasing attacks on my role in the investigation and 
negotiations. 
It is an understatement to say that I am surprised by your allegations regarding my role 
because I thought that we had worked very well together in resolving this dispute. I also am 
surprised because I feel that I bent over backwards to keep in mind the effect that the agreement 
would have on Mr. Epstein and to make sure that you (and be) understood the repercussions of the 
agreement. For example, I brought to your attention that one potential plea could result in no gain 
time for your client; I corrected one of your calculations of the Sentencing Guidelines that would 
have resulted in Mr. Epstein spending far more time in prison than you projected; I contacted the 
Bureau of Pri sons to see whether Mr. Epstein would be eligible for the prison camp that you desired; 
and I told you my suspicions about the source of the press "leak" and suggested ways to avoid the 
press. Importantly, I continued to work with you in a professional manner even after I learned that 
you had been proceeding in bad faith for several weeks — thinking that X had incorrectly concluded 
that solicitation of minors to engage in prostitution was a registrable offense and that you would 
"fool" our Office into letting Mr. Epstein plead to a non-registrable offense. Even now, when it is 
clear that neither you nor your client ever intended to abide by the terms of the agreement that he 
signed, I have never alleged misconduct on your part. 
The first allegation that you raise is that I "assiduously" hid from you the fact that Bert 
Ocariz is a friend of my boyfriend and that I have a "longstanding relationship" with Mr. Ocariz. 
US_Atty_Cor_00267 
EFTA00184999

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-37 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 3 of 6 
13, 
JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. 
DECEMBER 13,2007 
PAGE 2 OF 5 
I informed you that I selected Mr. Ocariz because he was a friend and classmate of two people 
whom I respected, and that I had never met or spoken with Mr. Ocariz prior to contacting him about 
this case. All of those facts are true. I still have never met Mr. Ocariz, and, at the time that he and 
I spoke about this case, he did not know about my relationship with his friend. You suggest that I 
should have explicitly informed you that one of the referrals came from my "boyfriend" rather than 
simply a "friend," which is the term I used, but it is not my nature to discuss my personal 
relationships with opposing counsel. Your attacks on me and on the victims establish why I wanted 
to find someone whom I could trust with safeguarding the victims' best interests in the face of 
intense pressure from an unlimited number of highly skilled and well paid attorneys. Mr. Ocariz 
was that person. 
One of your letters suggests a business relationship between Mr. Ocariz and my boyfriend. 
This is patently untrue and neither my boyfriend nor I would have received any financial benefit 
from Mr. Ocariz's appointment. Furthermore, after Mr. 0cariz learned more about Mr. Epstein's 
actions (as described below), he expressed a willingness to handle the case pro Bono, with no 
financial benefit even to himself. Furthermore, you were given sevirither options to choose from, 
including the Podhurst firm, which was later selected by Judge 
. You rejected those other 
options. 
You also allege that I improperly disclosed information about the case to Mr. Ocariz. 
provided Mr. Ocariz with a bare bones summary of the agreement's terms related to his appointment 
to help him decide whether the case was something he and his firm would be willing to undertake. 
I did not provide Mr. Ocariz with facts related to the investigation because they were confidential 
and instead recommended that he "Google" Mr. Epstein's name for background information. When 
Mr. Ocariz asked for additional information to assist his firm in addressing conflicts issues, 
forwarded those questions to you, and you raised objections for the first time. I did not share any 
further information about Mr. Epstein or the case. Since Mr. Ocariz had been told that you 
concurred in his selection, out of professional courtesy, I informed Mr. Ocariz of the Office's 
decision to 
pecial Master to make the selection and told him that the Office had made contact 
with Jude 
We have had no further contact since then and I have never had contact with 
Judge 
. I understand from you that Mr. Ocariz contacted Judge 
You critic' alis 
decision to do so, yet you feel that you and your co-counsel were entitled to contact Judge 
to 
try to "lobby" him to select someone to your liking, despite the fact that the Non-Prosecution 
Agreement vested the Office with the exclusive right to select the attorney representative. 
Another reason for my surprise about your allegations regarding misconduct related to the 
Section 2255 litigation is your earlier desire to have me perform the role of "facilitator" to convince 
the victims that the lawyer representative was selected by the Office to represent their interests alone 
and that the out-of-court settlement of their claims was in their best interests. You now state that 
doing the same things that you had asked me to do earlier is improper meddling in civil litigation. 
Much of your letter reiterates the challenges to Detective Recarey's investigation that have 
US_Atty_Cor_00268 
EFTA00185000

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-37 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 4 of 6 
0 
JAY P, LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. 
DECEMBER I3, 2007 
PAGE 3 or 5 
already been submitted to the Office on several occasions and you suggest that I have kept that 
information from those who reviewed the proposed indictment package. Contrary to your 
suggestion, those submissions were attached to and incorporated in the proposed indictment 
package, so your suggestion that I tried to hide something from the reviewers is false. I also take 
issue with the duplicity of stating that we must accept as true those parts of the Recarey reports and 
witness statements that you like and we niust accept as false those parts that you do not like. You 
and your co-counsel also impressed upon me from the beginning the need to undertake an 
independent investigation. It seems inappropriate now to complain because our independent 
Investigation uncovered facts that are unfavorable to your client. 
You con-plain that I "forced" your client and the State Attorney's Office to proceed on 
charges that they do not believe in, yet you do not want our Office to inform the State Attorney's 
Office of facts that support the additional charge nor do you want any of the victims of that charge 
to contactMs. Belohlavek or the Court. Ms. Belohlavek' s opinion may change if she knows the MI 
scope of your client's actions: You and I spent several weeks trying to identify and put together a 
plea to federal charges that your client was willing to accept. Yet your letter now accuses me of 
"manufacturing" charges of obstruction of justice, making obscene phone calls, and violating child 
privacy laws. When Mr. Lourie told you that those charges would "embarrass the Office," he meant 
that the Office was unwilling to bend the facts to satisfy Mr. Epstein's desired prison sentence — a 
statement with which I agree. 
I hope that you understand how your accusations that I imposed "ultimatums" and "forced" 
you and your client to agree to unconscionable c ntract terms ca not square with the true facts of 
this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. 
and 
the indictment was postponed 
for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to 
the Office to convince the Office not to prosecute. Those presentations were unsuccessful. As you 
mention in your letter, I—a simple line AUSA —handled the primary negotiations for the Office, and 
conducted those negotiations with you, Ms. Sanchez, Mr. Lewis, and a host of other highly skilled 
and experienced practitioners. As you put it, your group has a "combined 250 years experience" to 
my fourteen. The agreement itself was signed by Mr. Epstein, Ms. Sanchez, and Mr. Lefcourt, 
whose experience speaks for itself. You and I spent hours negotiating the terms, including when to 
use "a" versus "the" and other minutiae. When 
and ta
t realsement, you repeatedly 
went over my head, involving Messrs. Lourie, 
, and 
in the negotiations at 
various times. In any and all plea negotiations the defendant understands that his options are to 
plead or to continue with the investigation and proceed to trial. Those were the same options that 
were proposed to Mr. Epstein, and they are not "persecution or intimidation tactics." Mr. Epstein 
ohose to sign the agreement with the advice of a multitude of extremely noteworthy counsel. 
You also make much of the fact that the names of the victims were not released to Mr. 
Epstein prior to signing the Agreement. You never asked for such a term. During an earlier 
meeting, where Mr. Black was present, he raised the concern that you now voice. Mr. Black and 
I did not have a chance to discuss the issue, but I had already conceived of a way to resolve that 
US_Atty_Cor_00269 
EFTA00185001

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-37 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 5 of 6 
JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. 
DECEMBER 13,2007 
PAVE 4 OF 5 
issue if it were raised during negotiations. AS I stated, it was not, leading me to believe that it was 
not a matter of concern to the defense. Since the signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the 
agents and I have vetted till list of victims more than once. In one instance, we decided to remove 
a name because, although the minor victim was touched inappropriately by Mr. Epstein, we decided 
that the link to a payment was insufficient to call it "prostitution." I have always remained open to 
a challenge to the list, so your suggestion that Mr. Epstein was forced to write a blank check is 
simply unfounded. 
Your last set of allegations relates to the investigation of the matter. For instance, you claim 
that some of the victims were informed of their right to collect damages prior to a thorough 
investigation of their allegations against Mr. Epstein. This also is false. None of the victims was 
informed of the right to sue under Section 2255 prior to the investigation of the claims. Three 
victims were notified shortly after the signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement of the general 
terms of that Agreement. You raised objections to any victim notification, and no further 
notifications were done. Throughout this process you have seen that I have prepared this case as 
though it would proceed to trial. Notifying the witnesses of the possibility of damages claims prior 
to concluding the matter by plea or trial would only undermine my case. If my reassurances are 
insufficient, the fact that not a single victim has threatened to sue Mr. Epstein should assure you of 
the integrity of the investigation' 
'There are numerous other unfounded allegations in your letter about document demands, 
the money laundering investigation, contacting potential witnesses, speaking with the press, end the 
like. For the most part, these allegations hove been raised and disprove', earlier and need not be 
readdressed. However, with respect to the subpoena served upon the private investigator, contrary 
to your assertion, and as your co-counsel has already been told, I did consult with the Justice 
Department prior to issuing the subpoena and I was told that because I was not subpoenaing an 
attorney's office or an office physically located within an attorney's office, and because the business 
did private investigation work for individuals (rather than working exclusively for Mr. Black), I 
could issue a 
in the normal course, which is what I did. I also did not 
"threaten" the State Attorney's Office with a 
as the correspondence with their 
coordinator makes perfectly clear. 
With regard to your allegation of my filing the 
'with the court knowing that the public could access it," I do not know to what you 
ard refeltittrAldb-Curantgltrated'05 tIle 
filed under seal, ith-d 
the  
' 1 has never been filed with the Court. 
If, in fact, you are referring to the 
• 
•
• 
should have access to it except the Court and myself. Those documents are still in the Court file 
only because you have violated one of the terms of the Agreement by failing to "withdraw 
. . 
[Epstein's] pending motion to intervene and to quash certain 
US_Atty_Cor_00270 
EFTA00185002

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-37 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 6 of 6 
JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ, 
DECEMBER 13, 2007 
PAGE 5 OF 5 
With respect ue 
I contacted her attorney — who was paid for by Mr. Epstein and 
was directed by counsel for Mr. Epstein to demand immunity — and asked only whether he still 
representedatnd 
if he wanted me to send the victim notification letter to him. Ile asked 
what the letter would say and 1 told him that the letter would be forthcoming in about a week and 
that I could not provide him with the terms. With respect 
',status as a victim, you 
again want us to accept as true onl fact that are beneficial to your client and to reject as false 
anything detrimental to him. 
made a number of statements that are contradicted by 
documentary evidence and a review of her recorded statement shows her lack of credibility with 
respect to a number of statements. Based upon all of the evidence collecteralSr is classified 
as a victim as defined by statute. Of course, that does not mean tha, 
 considers herself 
a victim or that she would seek damages from Mr. Epstein. I believe that a number of the identified 
victims will not seek damages, but that does not negate their legal status as victims. 
I hope that you now understand that your accusations against myself and the agents are 
unfounded. In the future, I recommend that you address your accusations to me so that I can correct 
any misunderstandings before you make false allegations to others in the Department. 1 hope that 
we can move forward with a professional resolution of this matter, whether that be by your client's 
adherence to the contract that he signed, or by virtue of a trial. 
Sincerely, 
United States Attorney 
By: 
A. 
Villafaffa 
Assistant United States Attorney 
cc: 
U.S. Attorney 
Jeffrey 
First Assistant U.S. Attorney 
You also accuse me of "broaden[ind the scope of the investigation without any foundation 
for doing so by adding charges of money laundering and violations of a money transmitting business 
to the investigation." Again, I consulted with the Justice Department's Money Laundering Section 
about my analysis before expanding that scope. The duty attorney agreed with my analysis. 
US_Atty_Cor_00271 
EFTA00185003