EFTA00183038

ROY BLACK 
HOWARD M. SREBNICK 
SaYIT A. KORNSPAN 
LARRY A. STUMPY? 
MARIA NEYRA 
JACKIE PERCZEK 
MARK A.J.lAPIRO 
JARED 
BLACK 
SREBNICK 
KORNSPAN 
STUMPF 
P.A. 
May 18, 2010 
VIA EMAIL AND U.S. MAIL 
Assistant United States Attorney 
United States Attorney's Office 
Southern District of Florida 
500 South Australian Avenue 
Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 
RE: Jeffrey Epstein 
Dear Counsel: 
JESSICA FONSECA-NADER 
KATHLEEN P. PHILLIPS 
AARON ANTHON 
MARCOS BEATON, JR. 
JENIPER J. SOULUCIAS 
NOAH FOX 
JOSHUA SHORE 
E-Mail: RBlack(lfioyBlack.com 
Jeff Sloman, Esq. 
United States Attorney 
99 N.E. 4th Street 
Miami, FL 33132 
Assistant United States Attorney 
99 N.E. 4th Street 
Miami, FL 33132 
We received notice this morning that Podhurst Orseck, P.A. has filed a civil 
complaint seeking over $2,000,000 in addition to the $526,000 they have already 
been paid by Jeffrey Epstein for their work as attorney representatives. As we 
communicated to you during our February 3, 2010 meeting and both before 
(January 20, 2010) and thereafter (February 18, 2010) by letter, see appended 
letters, there exists significant differences between fees that Mr. Epstein and his 
civil counsel believe are within his NPA obligations and additional amounts which 
the attorney representative is claiming are due. 
Mr. Epstein has in the past attempted to resolve issues relating to the 
outstanding invoices through efforts to review the particulars in the unpaid bills 
with the attorney representative, through settlement discussions with the attorney 
representative, and through his signing on February 16, 2010 a Special Masters 
Agreement which would allow a neutral third party to make a binding 
determination as to what portions of the invoices at issue were reasonable, non-
201 S. Biscayne Boulevard. Suite 1300 • Miami. Florida 33131 • Phone: 305.371.6421 • Fax: 305•358-2006 • wm.RoyBlack.com 
EFTA00183038

Jeff Sloman. Esq. 
May 18, 2010 
Page 2 
duplicative, and within Mr. Epstein's NPA-obligations. As a preliminary matter, 
Mr. Epstein had been requesting, but did not receive, an invoice including billing 
dating back to the end of 2009 until May 11, 2010 - and even this invoice was 
without the charges of certain of the outside contractors relied upon by the 
Podhurst firm. 
We regret that these efforts did not resolve the matter and that Podhurst 
Orseck, P.A. elected instead to litigate. Mr. Epstein is today, in response to the 
lawsuit, filing a motion for authority to place $2,000,000 in an account 
maintained at the Clerk's Office for the United States District Court pending the 
results of the litigation. Mr. Epstein has always agreed that he is entirely 
responsible for any settlement-related fees that are not excessive and will take no 
litigation position inconsistent with that understanding. However, we have 
contended as a matter of principle that given the unexpected enormity of the 
claims for legal fees, that absent additional detail on why the invoiced fees were 
not duplicative and excessive and outside the ambit of Mr. Epstein's NPA 
obligations, payment should depend on either an agreement with the attorney 
representative which never occurred or a determination by a neutral third party. 
Mr. Epstein will pay whatever amount Judge Gold or any selected Master 
determine he owes under the NPA. 
Respectfully submitted, 
/wg 
Black, Srebnick. Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. 
EFTA00183039

J. MICHAEL BURMAN. PA" 
GREGORY W. COLEMAN. RA. 
ROBERT D. CRITTON. JR. PA I 
BERNARD A. LEBEDEKER 
MARK T. LUTTIER. P.A. 
MICHAEL J. PIKE 
MICHAEL L. SCHEVE 
DEAN T. XENICK 
DAVID A. YAREMA 
'FLORIDA WARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIM lAvAIR 
2ADMITTED 70 PRACTICE IN FLORIDA AND COLORADO 
BURMAN, CRITTON 
LUTTIER&COLEMAN, LLP 
YOUR 
TRUSTED 
ADVOCATES 
A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 
May 25, 2010 
ADELQ0 J. BENAVENTE 
PARALEGAVINvISTIGAToR 
JESSICA C.ADWELL 
BOBBIE M. MCKENNA 
ASHLIE STOKEN•BARING 
BETTY STOKES 
PARALEGALS 
RITA H. BuDNYK 
or COUNSEL 
EDWARD M. RICCI 
or COUNSEL 
Honorable Edward B. 
Sent by email and 
Akerman Senterfitt 
by U.S. Mail to Judge 
only 
One SE Third Avenue 
Floor 28 
Miami, FL 33131-1715 
Re: Jeffrey Epstein 
Dear Judge 
We are in receipt of Mr. Josefsberg's letter to you dated May 21, 2010. We confirm that 
Mr. Epstein settled each and every case brought by the attorney-representative selected by you. 
We write this response only to advise you that Mr. Epstein has never refused to pay 
reasonable settlement-related fees that are within the scope of the NPA. He has already paid 
the attorney-representative $526,000. The attorney-representative has not yet presented him 
with a final invoice for settlement-related work. The incomplete invoices that have been 
presented seek $2,000,000 in additional fees. Mr. Epstein has been advised by his attorneys 
that the requested fees include duplicative work, charges that relate to preparation for litigation 
not settlement (thus outside his NPA-fee obligations) and charges that are unreasonable and 
that should be reviewed by a Court rather than simply paid without meaningful review. A 
significant amount of the total fees (over $1,000,000) is for legal work that the invoices 
document were done by two outside attorneys who are not even attorneys with the Podhurst 
Orseck, P.A. law firm. 
Mr. Epstein's disputes the necessity for and redundancy of these 
charges. 
We respect Your Honor's selection and regret that the issue of disputed fees has resulted 
in litigation. Mr. Epstein is committed to paying whatever fees and costs are determined by the 
303 BANYAN BOULEVARD • SUITE 400 • WEST PALM BEACH. FL 33401 PHONE: 561-842-2820 • FAX: 561.844.6929 • MAIL@BCLCLAW.COM 
VVWW. BC LCLAW.COM 
EFTA00183040

May 25, 2010 
Page 2 
Court to be his obligation, if any, but he is not required to simply write a blank check. I have 
filed a motion in the case pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 67, to allow him to deposit $2,000,000 in Trust 
with the Court pending the outcome of the Complaint which confirms his commitment. 
Cordially yo 
Rob 
D. Critton, Jr. 
RDC/JPL:ab 
Cc 
EFTA00183041

L 
EFTA00183042

. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) 
Sent: 
811:55 AM 
To: 
. (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); 
exter 
inson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: New proposed response to Jay 
How about a slightly different version: 
(USAFLS); Lee, 
Thank you for your response. Our communications with Roy Black and later with you were solely to determine 
what Mr. Epstein considered to be the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. We appreciate your answering 
our question with finality. You have now made clear that Mr. Epstein did not accept the December 
modification, and accordingly, we will now consider that modification to be a nullity. 
Pursuant to our Agreement, I will prepare an Amended Notification that contains the name of additional 
identified victims. In accordance with Paragraph 7B, please provide me with a proposed written submission to 
the Special Master by Monday afternoon. 
Finally, as you are aware, yhe United States has been ordered to produce the Non-Prosecution Agreement. In 
accordance with that Order, we will produce the September Agreement with the October Addendum signed by 
your client. We understand that Mr. Goldberg may not have provided the state court with a true copy of the 
complete Agreement, and he should take steps to correct that error. 
From: 
. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 11:42 AM 
To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); 
(USAFLS) 
Subject: New proposed response to Jay 
Dear Jay: 
(USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen 
Thank you for your response. Our communications with Roy Black and later with you were solely to determine 
what Mr. Epstein considered to be the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. You have now made clear that 
Mr. Epstein did not accept the December modification and does not intend to perform the obligations set forth 
therein. The Office is not going to continue negotiating the terms of the Agreement. We only sought finality 
and you have answered our question. Accordingly, the December proposed modification is hereby withdrawn. 
The United States has been ordered to produce the Non-Prosecution Agreement and, in accordance with that 
Order, will produce the September Agreement with the October Addendum signed by your client. Mr. 
Goldberger should be advised that we understand he has not provided the state court with a true copy of the 
complete Agreement, and he should take steps to correct that error. I will prepare an Amended Notification that 
contains the name of additional identified victims and will provide that to you promptly. 
In accordance with Paragraph 7B of the Agreement, please provide me with a proposed written submission to 
the Special Master by Monday afternoon. We will expect a showing of good faith in the selection of the 
1 
EFTA00183043

attorney representative and all other terms of the Agreement and excessive delays, like those that have occurred 
in the past, will be considered a breach of that duty of good faith. 
Sincerely, 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West P 
33401 
Phone 
Fax 561 820-8777 
2 
EFTA00183044

LAW OFFICE 
• aittel&Atter444 
AND ASSOCIATES 
July 3, 2008 
United States Attorney's Office 
500 South Australian Avenue 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 
Dear Ms. Villafana: 
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL 
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 
7007 2680 0002 5519 8503 
As you are aware, we represent several of the young girls that were victimized 
and abused by Jeffrey Epstein. While we are aware of his recent guilty plea and 
conviction in his State Court case, the sentence imposed in that case is grossly inadequate 
for a sexual predator of this magnitude. The information and evidence that has come to 
our attention in this matter leads to a grave concern that justice will not be served in this 
cause if Mr. Epstein is not aggressively prosecuted and appropriately punished. Based on 
our investigation and knowledge of this case, it is apparent that he has sexually abused 
more than 100 underage girls, and the evidence against him is overwhelmingly strong. 
As former Assistant State Attorneys with seven years' prosecution experience, we 
believe that the evidence against Mr. Epstein is both credible and deep and that he may 
be the most dangerous sexual predator of children that our country has ever seen. The 
evidence suggests that for at least 4 years he was sexually abusing as many as three to 
four girls a day. It is inevitable that if he is not confined to prison, he will continue to 
manipulate and sexually abuse children and destroy more lives. He is a sexual addict that 
focused all of his free time on sexually abusing children, and he uses his extraordinary 
wealth and power to lure in poor, underprivileged little girls and then also uses his wealth 
to shield himself from prosecution and liability. We are very concerned for the health 
and welfare of the girls he has already victimized, and concerned that if justice is not 
properly served now and he is not imprisoned for a very long time, he will get a free pass 
to sexually abuse children in the future. Future abuse and victimization is obvious to 
anyone who really reviews the evidence in this case, and future sexual abuse of minors is 
inevitable unless he is prosecuted, tried and appropriately sentenced. Money and power 
should not allow a man to make his own laws, and he has clearly received preferential 
treatment at every step up to this point. If he were a man of average wealth or the abused 
girls were from middle or upper class families, then this man would spend the rest of his 
life in prison. In a country of true, blind justice, those distinctions are irrelevant, and we 
really hope he does not prove the point that a man can commit heinous crimes against 
children and buy his way out of it. 
If the Department of Justice's recent commitment to the protection of our children 
from child molesters is to be more than rhetoric, then this is the time and the case where 
the Department must step forward. We urge the Attorney General and our United States 
2028 
'N STREET,SUITE 202, HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA 33020 
OFFIOEt 954-414-8033/305-935-2011 
FAX* 954-924-1530/305-935-4227 
BEOBRADEDWARDSLAW.00M 
EFTA00183045

United States Attorney's Office 
Page Two 
Attorney to consider the fundamental import of the vigorous enforcement of our Federal 
laws. We urge you to move forward with the traditional indictments and criminal 
prosecution commensurate with the crimes Mr. Epstein has committed, and we further 
urge you to take the steps necessary to protect our children from this very dangerous 
sexual perpetrator. We will help you to do this in any way possible to ensure that true 
Justice is served in this case. 
Sincerely, 
Brad Edwards, Esquire 
Jay Howell, Esquire 
2028 
8TRERT,SUITII 202, HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA 33020 
OFFICE: 954-414-8033/305-935-2011 
FAX: 954-924-1530/305-935-4227 
BRORADEDWARD8LAW.OO11 
EFTA00183046

LAW OFFICE 
• Olierateeds • 
AND ASSOCIATES 
October IS, 2008 
AUSA 
United States Attorney's Office 
99 N.E. 4th Street 
Miami, Florida 33132 
Re: 
Jane Doe # and Jane Doe #21. United States of America 
Case No.: 
08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON 
Dear Mr. Lee: 
I am writing to inquire about whether Mr. Epstein has violated his Non-Prosecution 
Agreement with the Government. 
As you know, the Government has repeatedly described the Non-Prosecution Agreement 
as guaranteeing to the victims of Epstein's sexual abuse at least $150,000 in civil damages. The 
Government has made these representations in reliance on a current provision in the U.S. Code —
18 U.S.C. § 2255(a) — which provides for an automatic amount of damages of at least $150,000. 
At the time that the Non-Prosecution Agreement was drafted and signed, that was the law that 
was in effect. 
In Epstein's latest filing in federal court, however, he takes the position that the pre-2006 
Amendments version of the law applies. See Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss, for Mo
Definite Statement and To Strike Directed to Plaintiff Jane Doe's Complaint at 9, Jane Doe'. 
Jeffrey Epstein, No. 08-CIV-80893-Marrallohnson (discussing § 2255 and stating that the 
"applicable version of the statute" is "pre-2006 Amendments"). The 2006 Amendments altered 
§ 2255(a), by increasing the presumed minimum damages from $50,000 to $150,000. See Pub. 
L. 109-248, Title VII, § 7070:0, (c), July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 650. 
In light of Epstein's latest filing, I write to ask several questions: 
(1) Would you stipulate that you told me several times that Epstein had agreed to pay at 
least $150,000 to the identified victims of his abuse? 
(2) Did Epstein in fact agree to pay damages to the identified victims of his abuse at least 
$150,000? 
(3) Did the Government tell victims, either directly or through counsel, that Epstein had 
agreed to pay his victims at least $150,000? 
2028 
STREET, SUITE 202, HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA 33020 
•
 
OFFICE: 034-414-8033/305-935.-2011 
FAX: 354.-924-1530/308-938-4227 
• 
B EDE RADED WARDS LAW. COM 
EFTA00183047

, AUSA 
United States Attorney's Office 
October 15, 2008 
Page Two 
(4) Is Epstein in compliance with his Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Government 
when he is now taking the legal position, through his attorneys, that he only has to 
pay the victims $50,000 damages under § 2255? 
Thank you for any clarification you can provide on these questions. 
Sincerely, 
BE/sg 
Brad Edwards 
cc: 
United States Attorney's Office 
500 South Australian Avenue 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 
2028 
STREET,SUITE 202, HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA 33020 
OFFICE: 954-414-8033/305-935-2011 
FAX: 954-924-1530/305-935-4227 
BEOBRADEDWARDSLAW.COM 
EFTA00183048

U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
500 South Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
(561)820-8711 
Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 
June 27, 2008 
VIA FACSIMILE 
Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. 
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 
One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400 
250 Australian Ave S. 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5015 
Roy Black, Esq. 
Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf P.A. 
201 S. Biscayne Blvd, Suite 1300 
Miami, FL 33131 
Re: 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Dear Messrs. Goldberger and Black: 
I write to follow up on my e-mail correspondence of June 24 and June 26, and my message 
this morning. As of 3:15 p.m., Friday, June 27, 2008, the Office still has not received a copy of a 
proposed plea agreement between Mr. Epstein and the State Attorney's Office, nor has the Office 
received notice of a date and time for a change of plea. 
As you know, the Non-Prosecution Agreement between Mr. Epstein and the Office called 
for Mr. Epstein to plead, be sentenced, and begin serving his sentence not later than January 4, 
2008—almost six months ago. The Office has continued that deadline to allow Mr. Epstein to raise 
various issues with the Department of Justice, but repeatedly advised that, once those appeals were 
completed, Mr. Epstein would need to perform the terms of the agreement within a short window 
thereafter. Now that those appeals have been exhausted, we promptly informed counsel for Mr. 
Epstein that he must enter his plea, be sentenced, and begin serving his sentence by 5:00 on Monday, 
June 30, 2008. 
This week I have sent two e-mails and left a message with Mr. Black's receptionist asking 
for the date and time of the change of plea and for a copy of the proposed plea agreement between 
Mr. Epstein and the State Attorney's Office in accordance with the terms of the Non-Prosecution 
Agreement. I have received no response to any of those requests. 
EFTA00183049

JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQ. 
ROY BLACK, ESQ. 
Jut€ 27, 2008 
PAGE 2 OF 2 
I have received correspondence from counsel for a witness asking to cancel or continue the 
witness's appearance because he "understand[s] that there has been a recent development with 
respect to Mr. Epstein in that he intends to plead guilty in Florida state court on Monday pursuant 
to a deferred prosecution agreement with your office that has already been executed" and that he has 
"learned from Mr. Epstein's attorney that the plea is scheduled to take place on Monday morning." 
I also understand that there is an entry on Judge McSorley's docket that a hearing is scheduled for 
8:30 a.m. on Monday. 
Both parties have agreed that it is a material term of the Non-Prosecution Agreement that the 
United States shall have the right to review the terms of any agreements between Epstein and the 
State Attorney's Office prior to entering into those agreements. If, indeed, the change of plea is set 
for 8:30 Monday morning, the agreement with the State Attorney's Office must be provided to the 
Office by 4:30 today to allow adequate time to review and comment. Failure to provide this 
opportunity shall be deemed a breach of the Agreement. 
Accordingly, I again ask that you provide me with a copy of the Plea Agreement with the 
State Attorney's Office and notification of the date and time of the change of plea. 
Thank you. 
Sincerely, 
R. Alexander Acosta 
United States Attorney 
By: 
Assistant United States Attorney 
cc: 
AUSA 
EFTA00183050

THE PALM BEACH POST 
• 
FRIDAY, SEPI EMBER 4 2009 
Appeals court backs unsealing 
of Epstein's '07 deal with feds 
By SUSAN SPENCER-WENDEL 
Palm Reath Post Staff Writer 
WEST PALM BEACH —
An appeals court has 
affirmed a lower court 
ruling unsealing the con-
fidential deal Jeffrey Ep-
stein struck with federal 
prosecutors to avoid being 
charged by them. 
The 4th District Court 
of Appeal this week up-
held Circuit Judge Jeffrey 
Colbathb earlier decision 
to unseal the agreement 
Attorneys for the mon-
ey manager of billionaires 
have fought vigorously 
against the agreements 
release. They have 15 
days to request a rehear-
ing with the 4th District 
Court of Appeal. 
Absent that, it will be-
come public. 
Epstein local criminal 
defense 
attorney 
jack 
Goldberger did not return 
a call seeking comment 
Epstein own attorneys, 
in federal filings, have 
See EPSTEIN, 6B ► 
Epstein 
Attorneys 
for the 
• Palm Beach 
money 
manager 
have 15 
days to seek 
a rehearing. 
Civil litigation intensifies; 
deposition ends abruptly 
► EPSTEIN from IB 
referred to his confiden-
tial deferred prosecution 
agreement with the U.S. 
Attorney's Office, struck 
in September 200Z as "un- 
precedented" and "highly 
unusual." 
Attorneys for The Palm 
Beach Post as well as al-
leged victims of Epsteinb 
sexual advances sought to 
have the deal unsealed in 
state court 
Colbath found that the 
proper. sealing procedures 
had not been followed by 
an earlier judge. 
"There is nothing more 
fundamentally important 
than for the public and 
press to observe how the 
government is doing its 
job," Post attorney Deantia 
Shullman has said. "There 
is great public interest 
in how everybody in this 
case is doing their job." 
According to various 
media accounts, Epstein 
moved in circles that in-
cluded President Clinton, 
4 
An attorney's questioning 
of Epstein becomes personal. 
Donald 'frump and Prince 
Andrew. 
"International 
Moneyman of Mystery," 
declared a 2002 New York 
magazine profile of Ep-
stein. 
He pleaded guilty in 
2008 to procuring teens 
for prostitution and was 
sentenced to 18 months 
in jail, but allowed out ex-
tensively for work release. 
Epstein was released in 
late July, after serving '13 
months of the sentence. 
He now faces civil 
lawsuits filed by young 
women allegedly lured to 
his Palm Beach home and 
paid to perform massages 
and other acts. 
That civil litigation is. 
intensifying 
This week, while Ep-
stein was being deposed 
by attorney Spencer Kuvin, 
who represents an alleged 
victim identified only as 
"B.B.", Kuvin questioned 
Epstein about the shape 
of his genitalia and the 
deposition abruptly ended, 
according to a transcript. 
Kuvin has since made 
a motion in court to be 
able to inspect Epstein 
genitalia. 
Kuvin said Thursday he 
seeks to corroborate a de-
scription one woman gave 
Palm Beach police. 
Because Epstein is in-
voking his right to remain 
silent in depositions, this 
is the only way to do it, 
Kuvin said. 
"We want to corroborate 
what those girls saw," 
Kuvin said. 
e susan_spencer weneleUt 
pbposl.com 
EFTA00183051

U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
(561) 820-8711 
Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 
June 27, 2008 
VIA FACSIMILE AND ELECTRONIC MAIL 
Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. 
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 
One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400 
250 Australian Ave S. 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5015 
Roy Black, Esq. 
Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf P.A. 
201 S. Biscayne Blvd, Suite 1300 
Miami, FL 33131 
Re: 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Dear Messrs. Goldberger and Black: 
Thank you for providing me with the proposed plea agreement between Mr. Epstein and the 
State Attorney's Office. The U.S. Attorney's Office hereby provides Notice that the proposed 
sentencing provision does nit comply with the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. 
The second sentencing paragraph of the proposed plea agreement reads: 
On 08CF009381AMB, the Defendant is sentenced to 18 months Community Control 
I (one). As a special condition of this Community Control, the Defendant must serve 
the first 6 months in the Palm Beach County Detention Facility . 
The Non-Prosecution Agreement specifically provides: 
Epstein shall be sentenced to consecutive terms of twelve (12) months and six (6) 
months in county jail for all charges, . . . without probation or community control in 
lieu of imprisonment. 
Thus, the proposed plea agreement with the State Attorney's Office does not comply with the terms 
of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. To comply with the Agreement, Mr. Epstein must make a 
binding recommendation of eighteen months imprisonment, which means confinement twenty-four 
EFTA00183052

JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQ. 
ROY BLACK, ESQ. 
JUNE 27, 2008 
PAGE 2 OF 2 
hours a day at the County Jail, and the judge must accept that recommendation. Community control 
must follow that term of incarceration. 
Secondly, we have not been provided with a copy of the Information filed in case number 
08CF009381AMB. I want to confirm that Mr. Epstein is being charged with the substantive offense 
of procuring minors to engage in prostitution, not attempted procurement. Accordingly, please 
provide me with a copy of the Information at your earliest opportunity. I will be available via e-mail 
throughout the weekend or you may reach me on my cell phone at 561 601-2301. 
Thank you. 
Sincerely, 
R. Alexander Acosta 
United States Attorney 
By: 
Assistant United States Attorney 
cc: 
AUSA 
EFTA00183053

U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
VIA FA SIMILE 
, Esq. 
Lewis Tein, P.L. 
3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 
Coconut Grove, FL 33133 
Re: 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Dear Mr. Tein: 
500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 
West Palm Beach FL 33401 
(561)8204711 
Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 
July 17, 2008 
The Office has reviewed your "Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal 
Action," and we feel that it misrepresents the posture of the federal investigation. For 
example, you cite to In re Grand Jury, No. FGJ 07-103 (WPB), as evidence that the federal 
criminal action remains pending. That is a citation to Mr. Epstein's Motion to Quash a 
subpoena for computer equipment removed from Mr. Epstein's home after he and his 
attorneys were aware of the existence of the state investigation. Pursuant to the Non-
Prosecution Agreement, that motion was supposed to have been withdrawn several months 
ago, and, therefore, is not "pending" in our estimation. 
The Non-Prosecution Agreement calls for deferment of federal prosecution "in favor 
of prosecution by the State of Florida, provided that Epstein abides by the [enumerated] 
conditions and the requirements of th[e] Agreement . .." (Non-Prosecution Agreement, p. 
2 (emphasis added).) One of those conditions is Epstein's agreement that the subject Jane 
Does, while minors, were victims of a violation of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United 
States Code Section 2255, and that they "will have the same rights to proceed under Section 
2255 as [they] would have had if Mr. Epstein had been tried and convicted of an enumerated 
offense." (United States Attorney's December 19, 2007 letter to Lilly Ann Sanchez.) 
If, in fact, your position is that the federal criminal action is still pending such that the 
Court must stay the civil proceedings, then the Office proposes that we seek the prompt 
resolution of the Motion to Quash, so that the computer equipment can be analyzed and the 
EFTA00183054

MICHAEL TEIN, ESQ. 
JULY 17, 2008 
PAGE 2 
federal investigation can continue. If, instead, Mr. Epstein intends to fully abide by the Non-
Prosecution Agreement, then the "federal Grand Jury investigation will remain suspended, 
and all pending federal Grand Jury subpoenas will be held in abeyance unless and until 
[Epstein] violates any term of [the Non-Prosecution Agreement]." (Non-Prosecution 
Agreement, page 5.) 
Please advise whether you intend to correct the representations to the Court regarding 
the status of the federal investigation. 
Sincerely, 
R. Alexander Acosta 
United States Attorney 
cc: 
Jack Goldber er, Esq. 
, Esq. 
Assistant United States Attorney 
EFTA00183055

U.S. Department of Justice 
United Stales Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
TO: 
FAX NO. 
A. Mark PiIktfaila 
500 S. Australian Ave, 4th Floor 
West Palm Reach, Florida 33401 
(561) 8204711 
Facsimile (S61) 820-8777 
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET 
PHONE NO. 
TO: 
Jack Alan Goldbereer 
FAX NO. 
PHONE NO. 
DATE: 
July 17, 2008 
N OF PAGES:  
3 
RE: 
Jeffrey Epstein 
FROM: 
. Assistant U.S. Attorney 
PHONE NO. 
COMMENTS: 
EFTA00183056

UY/17/011 18:17 PAX 150111594528 
USAO WEST PALM 
a001 
TRANSMISSION OK 
** ****** ************* 
s** 
TX REPORT 
** s 
********************* 
TX/RX NO 
3957 
CONNECTION TEL 
8358091 
SUDADDRESS 
CONNECTION ID 
ST. TIME 
07/17 18:16 
USAGE T 
00'42 
PGS. SENT 
3 
RESULT 
OK 
U.S. Department of Justice 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
TO: 
FAX NO. 
A. Marie Pi/Jolene 
500 S. Australian Ave, 4th Floor 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 
(561) 820-8711 
Facsimile (361)820-8777 
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET 
PHONE NO. 
TO: 
Jack Alan Goldberger 
FAX NO. 
PHONE NO. 
DATE: 
July 17, 2008 
 
# OF PAGES:  
3
RE: 
Jeffrey Epstein 
FROM: 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
PHONE NO. 
EFTA00183057