EFTA02729582

06-01-'09 15:31 FROM-THOMAS & LOCICERO 8139843070 T-987 P001/007 F-845
THOMAS LOCI C ER 0
BRALOW
.t.
400 N. Ashley Drive•Suite I IO0eTampa FyL 33602
facsimile transmittal
To: R. Alexander Acosta, Esq. Fax: (561) 820-8777
Judith Stevenson Area, Esq. (561)355-7351
Michael McAuliffe, Esq.
Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. (561) 835-8691
Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. (954) 527-8663
William J. Berger, Esq.
From: Deanna K. Skullman, Esq. Date: 06/01/2009
Re: State v. J. Epstein Pages: 6
Urgent For review Please coTment U Please reffiltl Please =vale q
q
Please see attached Motion to Intervene and Petition for Amass
-(47)
ide&te
gi
a/a-
gfriidufrt
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMEh
TMs eatcoemic mettap tranSIDOS
OfiAIMS. The WomanIon b Iota
Us sly disclosure, espying_ iateib
in woe. please Reify os by ackpba
IRS Clammier 230 Diedoiert. To th
be toed by any taxpayer. for the
rocooneedleg go mother piny my trona:don a mean addressed herein If you nook) like us to prepare written Per advice demand* provide
penalty protection, please toad us and we will be happy to axon the meta with you n more detail
09/12/2019 Agencyto 19-411
C • clgP I Agency R"Liet
SDNY_GM_00331871
EFTA 00204597
EFTA02729582

06-01-'09 15:31 MI-THOMAS & L0CICER0 8139843070 T-987 P002/007 F-845
Tamps
400 N. Asbkry Or, St Int Tempe, Pi. &%02
THOMAS LOCICERO P.O. Box 2602. Tempt FL 331301.2002
ph. 613-904-X60 lax 813-044-3070 106 IN•0004954100
BRALOW Ft. Latartlala
101 N.E. mid Ave, MA 1500
Li Lauderdale FL 31301
ph 964-332.3019 lax 877.904244 toll tee 600-0074000
New York 0117
220 E. 42nd St, 1001Floor
Newton. NY 10017
ph 2)2-210-2898 fax 212-21020113
met.Nastraor
Deanna K. Shullman
Direct
(561) 967-2009
DeannaStullme00004reftrm.com
Reply To Tampa
June I, 2009
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS OVERNIGHT MAIL
The Honorable Jeffrey Colbath
Fifteenth Judicial Circuit-Palm Beach
Palm Beach County Courthouse
Main Judicial Complex
205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 11F
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Re:
Dear Judge Colbath:
Enclosed is a courtesy copy of non-party Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. d/b/a The Palm
Beach Post's (the "Post") Motion to Intervene and Petition for Access to certain court records in
this case. It is our understanding that Bradley Edwards and William Berger of Rothstein
Rosenfeldt Adler have filed a similar motion on behalf of a non-party known as "E.W .," and that
E.W.'s motion is set for hearing on June 10,2009. The Post requests an opportunity to be heard
on the issue of access to these records at that time.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me
with any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
THOMAS, LOCICERO & BRALOW PL
K 9,itabv,
Deanna K. Shulhnan
cc: Counsel of Record
09/12/2019 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411
CONFIDENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00331872
EFTA_00204598
EFTA02729583

06-01-'09 15:32 FROM-THOMAS & L0CICER0 8139843070 T-987 P003/007 F-845
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CRIMINAL DIVISION
STATE OF FLORIDA
vs. Case Nos.: 2006-CF9454-AXX &
2008-9381CF-AXX
JEFFREY EPSTEIN
PALM BEACH POST'S MOTION TO INTERVENE
AND PETITION FOR ACCESS
Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc., d/b/a The Palm Beach Post (the "Post") moves to
intervene in this action for the limited purpose of seeking access to documents filed under seal.
The documents relate directly to the Defendant's guilty plea and sentence. Thus, the sealed
documents go to the heart of the disposition of this case. But in requesting that Judge Pucillo
seal these documents, the panics failed to comply with Florida's strict procedural and substantive
requirements for sealing judicial records. In addition, continued sealing of these documents is
pointless, because these documents have been discussed repeatedly in open court records. For all
of these reasons, the documents must be unsealed. As grounds for this Motion, the Post states:
I. The Post is a daily newspaper that has covered this matter and related
proceedings. In an effort to inform its readers concerning these matters, the Post relies upon
(among other things) law enforcement records and judicial records.
2. As a member of the news media, the Post has a right to intervene in criminal
proceedings for the limited purpose of seeking access to proceedings and records. So Barron v
Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc., 531 So. 2d 113, 118 (Fla. 1988) (news media have standing
to challenge any closure order); Pybl'g Co. 426 So. 2d I, 7 (Fla. 1982)
(news media must be given an opportunity to be heard on question of closure).
09/1212019 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411
CONFITDENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00331873
EFTA_00204599
EFTA02729584

06-01-'89 15:32 FROM-THOMAS & L0CICER0 8139843070 T-987 P004/007 F-845
3. The particular documents under seal in this case are a non-prosecution agreement
that was docketed on July 2, 2008, and an addendum docketed on August 25, 2008. Together,
these documents apparently restrict any federal prosecution of the Defendant for offenses related
to the conduct to which he pleaded guilty in this case. Judge Pucillo accepted the agreement for
filing during a bench conference on June 30, 2008. The agreement, Judge Pucillo found, was "a
significant inducement in accepting this plea." Such agreements and related documents typically
are public record. See Oregonian Publishing Co. v United States District come 920 F.2d 1462,
1465 (9th Cir. 1990) ("plea agreements have typically been open to the public"); United States v
el y , 796 F.3d 1390, 1390-91 (11th Cir. 1986) (documents relating to defendant's change of
plea and sentencing could be sealed only upon finding of a compelling interest that justified
denial of public access).
4. The Florida Constitution provides that judicial branch records generally must be
open for public inspection. $__t An. I, § 24(a), Fla. Const. Closure of such records is allowed
only under narrow circumstances, such as to "prevent a serious and imminent threat to the fair,
impartial and orderly administration of justice; or to protect a compelling governmental interest.
Ha. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420(c)(9)(A). Additionally, closure must be effective and no broader
than necessary to accomplish the desired purpose, and is lawful only if no less restrictive
measures will accomplish that purpose. $ Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2. 420(c)(9XB) & (C); Lewis
426 So. 2d at 3.
5. In this case, the non-prosecution agreement and, later, the addendum were sealed
without any of the requisite findings. Rather, it appears from the record, the documents were
sealed merely because the Defendant's counsel represented to Judge Pucillo that the non-
prosecution agreement "is a confidential document." See Plea Conference Transcript page 38
2
09/12/2019 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-011
CONFPIDa ENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00331874
EFTA 00204600
EFTA02729585

. 06-01-'89 15:32 FROM-THOMAS & LOCICERO 8139843070 T-987 P005/007 F-845
(June 30, 2008). Such a representation falls well short of demonstrating a compelling interest, a
genuine necessity, narrow tailoring, and that no less restrictive measures will suffice.
Consequently, the sealing was improper and ought to be set aside.
6. In addition, at this time good cause exists for unsealing the documents because of
their public significance. Since the Defendant pleaded guilty to soliciting a minor for
prostitution, he has been named in at least 12 civil lawsuits that — like the charges in this case —
allege he brought and paid teenage girls to come his home for sex and/or "massages.i' At least
11 cases are pending. In another lawsuit, one of the Defendant's accusers has alleged that
federal prosecutors failed to consult with her regarding the disposition of possible charges
against the Defendant= State prosecutors also have been criticized: The Palm Beach Police
Chief has faulted the State Attorney's handing of these cases as "highly unusual" and called for
the State Attorney's disqualification. Consequently, this case — and particularly the Defendant's
agreements with prosecutors — are of considerable public interest and concern.
7. The Defendant's non-prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors also was
important to Judge Pucillo. As she noted in the June 2008 plea conference, "I would view [the
non-prosecution agreement] as a significant inducement in accepting this plea." See Plea
Conference Transcript page 39. Florida law recognizes a strong public right of access to
documents a court considers in connection with sentencing. Sarasota Herald Tribune. Div
See. e.g.. Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-80069 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 2 v. Epstein.
Case No. 08-80119 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 3. v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80232 (S.D. Fla. 2008);
Doe No. 4._vinstein, Case No. 08-80380 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 5 v, Epstein, Case No. 08-
80381 (S.D. Ha. 2008); C.M.A. v. Epstein Case No. 08-80811 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe v. Epstein,
Case No. 08-80893 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No, 7 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80993 (S.D. Fla. 2008);
Doe No. 6 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80994 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe II v, Epstein, Case No. 09-80469
(S.D. Fla. 2009)• Doe No. 101 v. Epstein. Case No. 09-80591 (S.D. Fla. 2009). Doe No. 102 v
Epstein, Case No. 09-80656 (S.D. Fla. 2009); Doe No. 8 v. Epstein, Case No. 09-80802 (S.D.
Fla. 2009).
2 Em In re: Jane Doe, Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008).
3
0911212019 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411
CONFPIDa ENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00331875
EFTA_0020460
EFTA02729586

06-01-'09 15:32 FROM-THOMAS 8. LOCICERO 8139843070 T-987 P006/007 F-845
of the New York Times Co. v. Holtzendorf 507 So. 2d 667, 668 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) ("While a
judge may impose whatever legal sentence he chooses, if such sentence is based on a tangible
proceeding or document, it is within the public domain unless otherwise privileged."). In this
case, no interest justifies continued sealing of these "significant" documents that Judge Pucillo
considered in accepting the plea and sentencing the Defendant. The lack of any such
compelling interest — as well as the parties' failure to comply with the standards for sealing
documents initially — provide good cause for unsealing the documents at this time.
8. Finally, continued closure of these documents is pointless, because many portions
of the sealed documents already have been made public. For example, court papers quoting
excerpts of the agreement have been made public in related federal proceedings.3 As the Florida
Supreme Court has noted, "there would be little justification for closing a pretrial hearing in
order to prevent only the disclosure of details which had already been publicized." Lewis, 426
So. 2d at 8. Similarly, in this case, to the extent that information already has been made public,
continued closure is pointless and, therefore, unconstitutional.
9. The Post has no objection to the redaction of victims' names (if any) that appear
in the sealed documents. In addition, insofar as the Defendant or State Attorney seek continued
closure, the Post requests that the Court inspect the documents in camera in order to assess
whether, in fact, continued closure is proper.
See, es "Defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen's Motion for Stay " C.M.A. v.
Epstein, Case No. 08-80811 (S.D. Fla. July 25, 2008) (filed publicly Jan. 7, 2009).
4
09112/2019 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411
CONFIal5ENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00331876
EFTA_002 04602
EFTA02729587

86-01-'09 15:33 FROM-THOMAS & L0CICER0 8139843070 T-987 P007/007 F-845
WHEREFORE, the Post respectfully requests that this Court unseal the non-prosecution
agreement and addendum and grant the Post such other relief as the Court deems proper.
Respectfully submitted,
THOMAS, LOCICERO & BRALOW PL
fiv
K. Sh man
Florida Bar No.: 0514462
lame:TB-Lake
101 N.E. Third Avenue, Suite 1500
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Attorneys for The Palm Beach Post
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished
via facsimile and U.S. Mail to: R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney's Office - Southern
District, 500 S. Australian Ave., Ste. 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (fax: 561.820-8777);
Michael McAuliffe, Esq., and Judith Stevenson Arco, Esq., State Attorney's Office - West
Palm Beach, 401 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (fax: 561-355.7351); Jack
Man Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger, et al., 250 S. Australian Ave.. Ste. 1400, West
Palm Beach, FL 33401 (fax: 561-835-8691); and Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. and William J.
Berger, Esq., Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale,
FL 33394 (fax: 954-527-8663) on this 1st day of June, 2009.
lu tAtuazftki
Pa5 g3 e8 55
09/1212019 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411
CONFIDENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00331877
EFTA_002 04603
EFTA02729588

06-26-'09 13:44 FROM-THOMAS & LOCICERO 8139843070 T-060 P001/005 F-889
THOMAS I OCICFRO
BRALOW
400N. AshleyDl-M:0,31Mo 1100•Tampa, FL 33602
813-984.3060 (Pbone)•813.984-3070 (Fax)
Toll Free: 866.395-7100
L
facsimile transmittal
To: Marilyn, Judicial Assistant to Jodge FAX
Colbatb
R. Alexander Acosta, Esq., USAO
Barbara Burns, Esq., ASAO
Jack Alan Coldberger, Esq.
Bradley J. Edwards, Esq.
William J. Berger, Esq.
Robert D. eritteet, Esq.
Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq.
Erotti Deanna K. %ulinaa, Esq. Date:
Ro. State v. J. Epsteln Pages: 5
Urgent❑ For review O Please comrnentO j. Fleet* replyO _I Please regale O
Please see attached proposed Order.
C0NfIDfNTULtTY STATEmENT
This ele«rooic @osuu uusiutui« conuins inforoution TIPU Me Iaw firm of Thome@ LoCkero @ Bralos./ PL, ard is ~Maiti@ or
privikgcd. The ideaali« b inenek4 lo be for the tae Mike: individual or oUty named ahon. If you are nol Me intended raipicm, be awarc
tal any discluure.copying.distribution or ase of ;he COIllertforthls Informan n prolubitcd. ifyou Sure rocentd this elcctronsc ~intoa
in cfrot, picote noify us by telophou (813)984-3060 nnmedialtly. Thank >cm for per. CoOpourion
1R$ Circular 230 DistiMult To (he «uni his conespondesce costains fetkral tiw edvice, such adrice et% nor Wanda to he used, amd cannot
be used by any Uupuu. for OK ',tappio of midi,' pcnaltird uida Ne laterna] Rennes Code or (i) pronsOdny„ or
reconsowndinlyto media pury any uovattion or maa addrused IfyouwouWlikaintopreparewr®enaadvioedesigrcdwpmvi.b
PonkllY proxdim, Pachn COntia La and wc yval bo hamy to enon, me mm« wiM you b morc &UI
p
09/1212019 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411
SDNY_GM_00331878
EFTA 00104604
EFTA02729589

06-26-'09 13:44 FROM-THOMAS 8. L0CIGER0 8139843070 T-060 P002/005 F-889
Tan*.
600 N Ashley Dr., ale. 1100. Fornro. FL 33602
THOMAS I OfICFRO P ph .O 6 . 1 B 3 o 4 x 6 2 4 6 - 0 3 2 0 . 6 T 0 a m ta p x a / . 1 F 1 L 3 4 3 4 3 4 0 4 0 0 1 7 -2 0 6 0 io 2 n ON 806-335-7100
BRALOW FL Latxlerdele
to, N.E. Third Ave. SI. 1603
FL Lou0pdole. FL 33301
Oh 9644324610 lax 0174674244 loll te0 N4467-2000
New Yak City
210E 4260 St. 1061 Floor
Nevi York NY 10017
p1212.210.2093 fax 2124104883
0366129Kstasc03
Deanna K. Shuhman
Direct Dial (561) 967-2009
DeanneShullmanratiolawfirm.corn
Reply To Tampa
June 26,2009
VIA FASCIMILE
The Honorable Jeffrey Colbath
Fifteenth Judicial Circuit-Palm Beach
Palm Beach County Courthouse
Main Judicial Complex
205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 11F
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Re: State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein
Dear Judge Colbath:
This law firm represents the Palm Beach Post in the above matter. I have prepared a
proposed Order, which I believe accurately reflects your ruling at the hearing on June 26, 2009
on Defendant Jeffrey Epstcin's Motion to Stay Disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement
and Addendum Pending Review.
By copy of this letter, I am providing all counsel of record a copy of the proposed Order.
If the attached Order meets with Your Honor's approval, please enter the same. If you would
like to have an electronic copy of this proposed order, please have your Judicial Assistant call
my office to make arrangements for us to send you the order via email.
Sincerely.
THOMAS, LOCICERO & BRALOW PL
&As, K
Deanna K. Shullman
09/12/2019 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411
CONFPIDnENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00331879
EFTA_0020 4605
EFTA02729590

06-26-'09 13:44 RCM-THOMAS & L0CICER0 8139843070 T-060 P003/005 F-889
Hon. J. Colbath
06/26/09
Page 2 of 2
DKS/kb
Enclosures
cc: U.S. Attorney's Office (via facsimile)
State Attorney's Office (via facsimile)
Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. (via facsimile)
Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. (via facsimile)
Deanna K. Shullman, Esq. (via facsimile)
Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. (via facsimile)
Pag3e8 58
09112/2019 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411
CONFIDENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00331880
EFTA_002 04606
EFTA02729591

06-26-'09 13:45 FROM-THOMAS 8 L0CICER0 8139843070 T-060 P004/005 F-889
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CRIMINAL DIVISION
STATE OF FLORIDA
vs. Case Nos.: 2006-CF9454-AXX &
2008-9381CF-AXX
JEFFREY EPSTEIN
ORDER
This matter came before the Court on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay
Disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and Addendum Pending Review and upon further
consideration of this Court's June 26, 2009 Order unsealing certain records in this case. A
hearing was conducted on these matters on June 26, 2009.
On June 26, 2009, this Court entered an order unsealing the non-prosecution agreement
and an addendum on file in this case. Having inspected the documents, this Court finds that they
do not name any victims and do not contain any material subject to confidentiality pursuant to
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6. Thus, the Court declines to make any redactions to the
records before releasing them to the public.
The Court further finds that Defendant has not demonstrated that a stay pending appeal is
warranted. Defendant has not shown any irreparable harm or likelihood of success on the merits
on appeal. These documents were not properly closed in the first instance, no present basis for
closure exists, and good cause supports disclosure given the public interest in these proceedings
and the lack of compelling interest in closure.
Accordingly, it is ordered and adjudged as follows:
1. Effective at noon on July 2, 2009, the non-prosecution agreement (docketed July
2, 2008) and addendum (docketed August 25, 2008) are unsealed;
0911212019 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411
CONFPIDanENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00331881
EFTA_0020 4607
EFTA02729592

06-26-'09 13:45 FROM-THOMAS & L0CICERD 8139843070 T-060 P005/005 F-889
2. Defendant's Motion for Stay pending appellate review is DENIED:
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to release the documents to the public at noon on
Thursday, July 2, 2009.
Done and ordered this day of June, 2009 in Palm Beach County, West Palm
Beach, Florida.
Hon. Jeffrey Colbath
CIRCUIT JUDGE
cc: U.S. Attorney's Office
State Attorney's Office
Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
Bradley J. Edwards, Esq.
Deanna K. Shullrnan, Esq.
Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq.
2
Pag3e8 60
09112/2019 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-011
CONFIDENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00331882
EFTA_002 04608
EFTA02729593

JUN-26-2009 FRI 02:29 P11 FAX NO. 5818358891 P. 01/03
ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
SUITE 1400
250 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE SOUTH
WEST PALM
FAX COVER SHEET
Date: 6/26/09
To: R. Alexander Acosta, Esq. USAO
Barbara Burns, Esq. ASAO
Bradley J. Edwards, Esq.
William J. Berger, Esq.
Robert D. Critton, Esq.
Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq.
Subject: State of Florida v. Epstein
Pages: 3 including this cover sheet.
See attached letter.
ORIGINAL WILL BE SENT: YES _X__ NO
IF THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS WITH
THE TRANSMISSION, PLEASE CONTACT
(661) 659-8300 AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
Y p r o T e o r n h o c u l e i h y p i i f i b n e o i f n t r o e t t m d , h y e a o I u b u f s o y a e n o r e u o c f o h h t n e a h t v r e a e e i i b n n r y e e d d c n iv e o I i n d i t v t u f t e i h a e d i l d s o t h t f r h a i s e a c n t c s a t o im it n m y i y l m n e d a u m i m s n e s i e c s e d a s m t a a i i o g n b n e a o I t v I n i s o e n e . a , r t I r t c f o o f t u r r h n , t t e p e rt l y r b e e u p a a t r s i d o iv e n e i l i r e m o o g r m f e c t d e o h d p a is i y n a m o d te e f c l y t s o h s n n i a s o fi g c t d i e o f e y m I n s u t m i s n a o u l b i n t y n t i f c h t o e a a r l m t e i i o n p a n t h e t i o i o n s n n d s e e i t . n r d i T t c e h t n l a y d n e k d
ge 61
09/12/2019 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411
CONFIDENTIAL
SDNY_GM_0033t 883
EFTA 00204609
EFTA02729594

JUN-28-2009 FRI 02;29 PM
JOSEPH R.ATTERBURY
t JACK A. GOLDBERGER
JASON SVVEISS
Rose ratified CrtrnivITrill Attonicy
; member of New Jolty Et ReSda firm
June 26, 2009
TELECOPIED THIS DATE
The Honorable Jeffrey Colbath
Palm Beach County Courthouse
205 N. Dixie Highway
Room 11F
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Re; State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein
Dear Judge Colbath:
o D r e d a e n r n d a O a t S n e h d b u e J l h l u m a n a l e f n o 2 o f 5 M n , 2 b r. 0 e E 0 h 9 p a s l o f t e n o i : f n t , h w e e P s a t l r m on B g e ly a o ch b j P ec o t s t t o . t T h h e e p c ro o p u o rt s h e a d s o a rd lr e ea r s d u y b e m nt it e te re d d b a y n
a) R N e o c n o -p rd a s rt y, E.W.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal
b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and petition for Access
c) B.B's Motions to Intervene and for an order to Unseal Records
d} Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Court Records Confidential.
c E t S o o p t n a y s t y o t a e u w i i n n b h T e h y i d h c a e t h i h s n o t e m h t n h P e l e e y a c t m p l o h m r u i a o s r B t p t t b e e o d u r a s e r b e c d n h e d e ie f n P o o d r r o o . d e s f e C i t t r , r h o r t e e w n h p t e e c r a r o a c e r u r a o y a r b u t t d l r o t e d t o m t r d h h e a a a e s y r d s m a w e e s . d a s a A e s i n s r d D t p t i d o h e e i n e t f c i e s o i f c n i n i c o d n a u f a l t i r l n n h y t d ' t e , s i E a n p O l p g l r r s o o d t t p h f e e o a t i r h n s t o e ' e t s f h d o J M e t o u h D o r n e d t e e i r o e f m e 2 n r n 5 s a f d , o u t t 2 a r b e 0 n a m rs 0 t i 9 tte . d
c s o h u o r u t l 's d I o s t i r i m d s e p th r l y e o s f p t J a o u s t n e it e i t o h 2 n a 5 t o , t f 2 h D 0 e e 0 D f 9 e e n o fe d n n a t d h n a e t n E m t p 's e s r t M e its i o n t o i t o f h n t a h t t e o t h i S s e s t a o u y r e d i s a e n r d d o e n n th i t e e o d d o . a rd I y n ' e s r t M h o is o f t t w h io e a n y c t , o o t u h S r e t t ay
ow12/2019 O . ne Clearlake Centre Suite 1400 250 A
F
us
I
tp
D
ikp
E
flan
U
ue
T
Sou
I
th
A
W
L
est
.
P alm EREWEFERAIRRey Requet:19-411
p 581.0 I
SDNY_GM_00331884
EFTA_002046 10
EFTA02729595

JUN-26-2009 FIN 02:30 PM FAX W2 5618358691 F. 03/03
The Honorable Jeffrey Colbath
June 26, 2009
Page 2
denying the stay motion can properly be reviewed by the Fourth District Court of
Appeal.
V trulyyWurs,
ACK A. GOLDBERGER
JAG:cg
cc: U.S. Attorney's Office (via facsimile)
State Attorney's Office(via facsimile)
Deanna K Shullman, Esquire (via facsimile)
Bradley J. Edwards, Esquire (via facsimile)
Spencer t. Kuvin, Esquire (via facsimile)
09112/2019 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411
CONFPITSENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00331885
EFTA 0020461
EFTA02729596