Tämä on FBI:n tutkinta-asiakirja Epstein Files -aineistosta (FBI VOL00009). Teksti on purettu koneellisesti alkuperäisestä PDF-tiedostosta. Hae lisää asiakirjoja →
FBI VOL00009
EFTA01160176
Sivu 161 / 3927
28 A Manual of Peace: 38 Steps towards Enlightened Living the example of those people we are closest to, such as our family and friends. The second major influence on our formation of discretion is ourselves. Sometimes we call it the ability to be a good teacher to ourselves [yonisomanasikAra]. Even if you have been listening to advice for good or bad friends, you always have to consider advice and justify it to yourself before getting down to EFTA01160336
Sivu 162 / 3927
following the advice. If you have accurate discretion when you consider things, even given faulty data, you will have the common sense to see through the discrepancies and come out with the right decision required by the situation — unlike the man with unreliable discretion, who even when given reliable data, will come to the wrong conclusion. Usually we have to learn discretion from the example of other people by transactions EFTA01160337
Sivu 163 / 3927
with them first, before we can calibrate our "auto-didactic" discretion and come to accurate conclusions independently — because in the beginning we have no idea what constitutes a sensible decision and what constitutes neglect. Thus when we are learning discretion, at first we are very vulnerable to the example set by others. The example they set us may calibrate the way we think for the rest of our life. Thus EFTA01160338
Sivu 164 / 3927
a correct example has the power to correctly calibrate our thinking for the rest of our lives — but conversely, a faulty example may damage the way we think for the rest of our life. C. PROCESS OF ACQUIRING DISCRETION C.1 Benefitting from others without catching their bad habits Every time we have a transaction with a person it is like a negotiation or tug-of-war between us to see whose discretion will brush EFTA01160339
Sivu 165 / 3927
off who. In a situation where people are unable to recognize good or bad examples of discretion, then the exchange of "discretion" will be like osmosis flowing from a point of high concentration to a point of low concentration. If Person A has a lot of good discretion and Person B less, then Person A's good discretion will tend to brush off on Person B. If Person C has a lot of bad discretion and EFTA01160340
Sivu 166 / 3927
Person D less, then Person C's bad discretion will tend to brush off on Person D. In practice though, as adults with a degree of life experience, we don't passively let others' habits brush off on us. If we are able to recognize good habits and good discretion then we will open ourselves up especially to absorb them. However, if we recognize bad habits and bad discretion, then we will try to protect ourselves from picking those EFTA01160341
Sivu 167 / 3927
habits up. Thus, normally we are selective— and try (to the best of our ability and discretion) to pick up good habits while avoiding the bad ones. In this way, we can have transactions with others without losing our own virtues under their influence. You can compare it to visiting someone in hospital who has a fever. You can visit them, talk to them and console them — you can do all these things without EFTA01160342
Sivu 168 / 3927
catching their fever, but you would try to avoid having them sneeze over you. There are some sorts of patients and some sorts of illness, however, that are so dangerous that we cannot afford to have any transaction with that person. Such diseases like the plague are so contagious, that it is not safe for healthy people to transact (specifically come into physical contact) with them. Such patients, by the EFTA01160343
Sivu 169 / 3927
nature of their disease need to be nursed in an isolation ward with no visitors. If they were animals, they would be put in quarantine. When considering the transmission of discretion, there are some cases of those so contagiously infected with faulty discretion that despite our immunity or our efforts to be selective, we will nonetheless be infected by their faulty discretion. Even if we EFTA01160344
Sivu 170 / 3927
started with healthy discretion, it would be undermined by the strength of negative discretion of those people — what more the danger if we are still inexperienced and impressionable (perhaps still children or lacking world experience) and don't even know what it means to be selective? These quarantine victims of faulty discretion, whether intentionally so or not, are the first and most fundemental obstacle we EFTA01160345
Sivu 171 / 3927
will meet as we try to acquire blessings in the Manual of Peace we call such people by the technical name of "fools". Blessing One: Not Associating with Fools 29 D. FOOLS: BEARERS OF CONTAGIOUS MISAPPREHENSION D.1 Definition of a Fool A fool is someone wicked, or weak, or feeble. They are made feeble by the fact they habitually think, say and do things that are EFTA01160346
Sivu 172 / 3927
unwholesome. The root of the lack in common sense by which they can justify such unwholesome behaviour is the fact that they don't have their mind centred or under their control. To call such a dangerous person a "fool" might seem like an understatement — because some fools might look like a proverbial giant punching sandbags, a frightening prospect for a rhinocerii, let alone a fragile human being. Thus, how come we EFTA01160347
Sivu 173 / 3927
use the term "feeble" for a fool? A fool is made weak like a person made weak by a serious disease — we do not fear him on the basis of his strength or knowledge or ability to think but because his disease is dangerous. D.2 Four Human Strengths Human beings have four different sources of power: I. Physical Strength: different people are endowed with different degrees of physical strength. Anyone with plenty of muscles and no EFTA01160348
Sivu 174 / 3927
disabilities is endowed with the first storehouse of power. 2. Strength of Knowledge: derived from one's background of education and the experience of passing years. Having the ability to apply educated reasoning in useful subjects is the second storehouse of power. 3. Strength of Thought: Some people go through the same number of classes together. They have an equal amount of knowledge, but EFTA01160349
Sivu 175 / 3927
their ability to think through things using their knowledge may not be equal. Some people know so much, but it is of no use to them when they come to think things through. Someone may know how to mend an engine but sits idle all day long. Why don't they offer their services as a mechanic? Or earn their living in the engine business? Sitting around all day long, waiting for someone to come EFTA01160350
Sivu 176 / 3927
along and find work for them...? We can blame this on their having knowledge but not using the knowledge as part of their thinking. Thus, if anyone uses both their strength of knowledge and their strength of thought, they are at great advantage because they are endowed with the third storehouse of power. 4. Strength of virtue: When one has both the strength of thought and mindfulness of what one EFTA01160351
Sivu 177 / 3927
is doing, when one is using one's knowledge and thought to perform good service to oneself and others, one is endowed with the fourth storehouse of power: strength of virtue. The human being has the potential to be endowed with all four storehouses of power: physical strength, strength of knowledge, strength of thought and strength of virtue. Even if someone is endowed with (some of) these storehouses of power, if their EFTA01160352
Sivu 178 / 3927
judgment is faulty, they will not be able to put their power to full use. If, for example, a foolish guy is physically strong, and may be qualified as a professor with a Ph.D., with plenty of knowledge, but without the ability to think properly, he will be want to apply his mastery of chemistry for dishonest purposes (e.g. distilling heroine). Thus even if you are endowed with only some of the four powers, you can still be classified EFTA01160353
Sivu 179 / 3927
with the fools and those powers are not used to their full potential. At the most a fool can use only three of the storehouses of power. They can use only three of the four. Like a four-cylinder car in which only three of the spark plugs fire — it is of no use to anybody. If you have a four-cylinder car, all four need to work in order to get benefit from any one of the four. Thus, if you know your `cylinders' are damaged, you EFTA01160354
Sivu 180 / 3927
don't need to wait until none of them are left firing before you go for mending! In conclusion, when we define the meaning of a fool as someone weak or feeble, we can see more clearly now that it means that they are weak or feeble in doing good deeds. Now that we know about the risk they present to our discretion and know a little about the reason for a fool's weakness, the next challenge that faces us is EFTA01160355