Tämä on FBI:n tutkinta-asiakirja Epstein Files -aineistosta (FBI VOL00009). Teksti on purettu koneellisesti alkuperäisestä PDF-tiedostosta. Hae lisää asiakirjoja →
FBI VOL00009
EFTA01160176
Sivu 2721 / 3927
those which are not monastic transgressions, are those who bring harm and unhappiness for the manyfolk suffering to humans and angels alike — in so doing earning grave demerit, consuming much merit and causing an end to the Saddhamma." AnApati Sutta (A.i.20) and "Distortion of the Dhamma means claiming the Buddha said or didn't say EFTA01162896
Sivu 2722 / 3927
(A.i.59) or that the Suttas contain or don't contain (A.i.61) what is in fact not the case." This is in addition to what has already been mentioned in Blessing Three (§D.2) about joking about the Dhamma; 3. to acquire wisdom: Dhamma discussions are intended as a way of cultivating wisdom. Above all other things the Buddha praised `wisdom'. Most people know that wisdom is beyond price. EFTA01162897
Sivu 2723 / 3927
The Buddha even taught the proverb: PafifiA naranaO ratanaO wisdom is the (wish-fulfilling) gem of the people JarA Sutta (S.i.36) The Buddha's observation is in contrast to the opinion of many modem children who seem to think that a wish-fulfilling gem comes in the form of a television or a computer. Life is full of problems to solve. Whether it be trivial problems of physical hardship like drying EFTA01162898
Sivu 2724 / 3927
washing when it is raining, or problems from the people around us. There are even problems inside our own body from illnesses and pain. We must rely on wisBlessing Thirty: Regular Discussion of the Dhamma 333 dom to solve all these problems — but wisdom is something we cannot buy — it can however be acquired from two main sources (as already discussed in the "Two Formative Influences on EFTA01162899
Sivu 2725 / 3927
our discretion (0.3) in the First Blessing): 1. the advice and encouragement we get from good friends [kalyAAamitta] during discussion of the Dhamma with them; 2. the insights we come to through our ability to be a teacher to ourselves [yonisomanasikAra] — for which the regular practice of meditation is a prerequisite; 4. to sharpen our wits: having to think and apply the Dhamma we know `in EFTA01162900
Sivu 2726 / 3927
real-time' as one does in a discussion is a `performing art'. In order to do so well, we need to have sharp wits [paEibhAAa]. These are in addition to the five objectives of listening to the Dhamma already mentioned in Blessing Twenty-Six (SC.1). B. DISCUSSION OF THE DHAMMA B.1 Definitions: Dhamma & Discussion The word `dhamma' is not easy to define and can have up to a hundred meanings EFTA01162901
Sivu 2727 / 3927
depending on the context. In Blessing Sixteen we have already described Dhamma as being a description of the reality of things while at the same time referring to virtue. However, at this stage in the Manual of Peace it is perhaps also useful to reflect that the Dhamma in its context as the teaching of the Buddha and as the second component of the Triple Gem is recognizable by the following six characteristics (M.i.37, EFTA01162902
Sivu 2728 / 3927
A.iii.285): 1. properly expounded by the Exalted One [svAkkAto bhagavatA Dhamma]; 2. clearly perceived within ourselves [sandiEEhiko]; 3. timeless [akAliko]; 4. which inspires those who see it to call others to come and see it [ehipassiko]; 5. which should be internalized [opanayiko]; 6. which can be realized subjectively by the wise .. [paccataO veditabbo vifniEhi]; The word `discussion' means that EFTA01162903
Sivu 2729 / 3927
there must be at least two people dialoguing on a subject of the Dhamma (not on other matters). Such discussions should occur regularly and they should be aimed to increase the wisdom of the participants (not to show off who is the smartest like some sort of contest) arranged at an appropriate time and taking no more time than is appropriate. B.2 Varieties of Discussion Discussion of the Dhamma can be divided into two EFTA01162904
Sivu 2730 / 3927
types: I. Giving a Dhamma talk: which is more or less a one-way discussion of the Dhamma. This subject has already been touched upon in Blessing Twenty-Six, however, in this Blessing we are no longer simply on the receiving end of teachings, now we must start to take some of the responsibility for applying them to others for our own and others' increasing wisdom, without devaluing EFTA01162905
Sivu 2731 / 3927
the Dhamma by doing so; 2. Dhamma debate: which is a two (or more)-way discussion on the subject of the Dhamma. B.2.1 Giving a Dhamma Talk The Buddha enumerates the following five qualities of a good Dhamma preacher as already mentioned in the Twenty-Sixth Blessing §B3. The Buddha went further to say (Candupama Sutta S.ii.195) that anyone who teaches simply to attract followers does not teach in a pure way. EFTA01162906
Sivu 2732 / 3927
However anyone who thinks that the Dhamma with its six characteristics will bring benefit to those who know it and practice it and who teaches it on the basis of loving- kindness, compassion and the thought to help others, that sort of teaching is pure. In addition to these basic skills, according to the Kest Sutta (A.ii.112ff.) different approaches are required for training different types of people in the Dhamma EFTA01162907
Sivu 2733 / 3927
some disciples need to be taught gently by elaborating the meaning of good behaviour and the wholesome fruits of such good behaviour — some need to be taught sternly by elaborating the meaning of evil and the unwholesome retribution of such evil behaviour — some need to be taught by a combination of these two means — and for those that cannot be helped in any of the previous three ways, 334 A Manual of Peace: 38 Steps EFTA01162908
Sivu 2734 / 3927
towards Enlightened Living one needs to accept that there is no use in giving them further teachings until such time as they can gain benefit therefrom. B.2.2 Dhamma Debate Preaching is challenging in that one needs to have a sensitivity to the disposition and needs of the listener without hearing anything from them. However, even though in debating others' position is more express, the debate is more challenging because EFTA01162909
Sivu 2735 / 3927
one must have the ability to `think on one's feet'. It is not only a question of satifactorily answering questions, but also the ability to gauge the type of question and the real purpose behind the question too. The Buddha enumerates five sorts of questions (S.ii.1): 1. questions about things the person asking has not yet seen; 2. questions comparing things to those the person asking has already seen; EFTA01162910
Sivu 2736 / 3927
3. questions to overcome the person asking's doubts; 4. questions to encouraging the listener to follow what the questioner has seen; 5. rhetorical questions; Surprisingly, many questions do not require a straight answer and this becomes easier to comprehend if one looks at the five reasons the Buddha identified for why questions are asked (A.iii.191): 1. asking under the influence of ignorance or forgetfulness EFTA01162911
Sivu 2737 / 3927
2. asking under the influence of evil desires 3. asking as a way to express looking down on others 4. asking out of curiousity to know 5. asking with the expectation that they will get a good answer Thus, one needs a multifaceted strategy in answering questions— and it turns out that even the Buddha himself had four different ways of answering a question (A.ii.46): 1. answering directly [ekaOsabyAkaraAa]; wellprepared EFTA01162912
Sivu 2738 / 3927
questions deserve a direct answer 2. answering by dividing one's response [paEipucchabyAkaraAa]; Answer which requires you to make a division clear. If someone is mixing up their practice because they are confusing steps which should be made separate or practising things in the wrong order, then your answer must start by making a clear division between the factors in an issue. Sometimes you need to EFTA01162913
Sivu 2739 / 3927
limit the scope of what you are answering. Sometimes, you need to make sure that both you and the listener understand the same thing by the terms you are using in a dialogue (e.g. when they are talking about `evil' are they in fact meaning `sin' defined in their own terms?) 3. answering by a question in return [vibhajjabyAkaraAa], Sometimes people ask questions not because they are interested in the answer but EFTA01162914
Sivu 2740 / 3927
they are interested in whether you can answer. In such cases maybe you should ask such people why they ask such a question. In some cases you need to ask them whether they would like to know or whether they would like to experience it for themselves — without answering, and; 4. keeping one's silence [EhapanEyaparila]. This is otherwise known as `Noble silence' — or in modern EFTA01162915