Valikko
Etusivu Tilaa päivän jae Raamattu Raamatun haku Huomisen uutiset Opetukset Ensyklopedia Kirjat Veroparatiisit Epstein Files YouTube Visio Suomi Ohje

Tämä on FBI:n tutkinta-asiakirja Epstein Files -aineistosta (FBI VOL00009). Teksti on purettu koneellisesti alkuperäisestä PDF-tiedostosta. Hae lisää asiakirjoja →

FBI VOL00009

EFTA00913180

3 sivua
Sivu 1 / 3
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacationggmail.com> 
To: GMAX
Subject: Re: This is the actual version they wanted me to send which I changed..but this is back from my 
UK lawyers.. 
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:26:17 +0000 
i u nderstand „ do you want to come with the gang, 
jeanluc, 
, etc 
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:24 PM, GMAX < 
> wrote: 
The lawyers and PR people want me to be on standby with supporting dots for any of my claims where possible or to 
couch the lang in a way if I don't have a doc but not to allow me to be sued for slander or be damaged by any form of 
premable or exaggeration or — well you know what they want and you and andrew know what will help and what cold 
hurt me not being 100% sure for sure 
Gx 
On 6/12/11 16:20 PM, "J Jep" <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 
I will be able to edit after 9 tonight or tomorrow morning, where are you? 
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:12 PM, GMAX < 
wrote: 
Thank you _ I have it now and am working the letter a little — I will send the final version tomorrow and what ever is 
in it will be factually accurate 
On 6/12/11 16:00 PM, "Philip Barden" < 
> wrote: 
See below as amended by me only for factual accuracy and some notes where I am uncertain of the accuracy. 
Dear Mr Klein 
Ross Gow of Acuity Reputation, who I have retained to deal with press enquiries, tells me that you have 
sent him the following list of questions. 
My condition of answering those questions is that you print this reply in full. I've answered in a narrative 
form, which I hope will make sense both to you and to your readers. I've tried to keep it succinct. 
We don't know each other but lam familiar with the world of journalism and there is an obvious 
temptation for journalists to sensationalise their stories, so, as a precaution, I've sent a copy of this letter 
to Vanity Fair's Editor in Chief Graydon Carter. 
Driving straight to the heart of the matter, the allegations that have been made against me are part of 
an attempt by 
and her lawyer, S 
to extort money from me. This follows an 
unsuccessful attempt by them at blackmailing me. To spice up the story they have made allegations 
about HRH Prince Andrew. They are untrue. 
EFTA00913180
Sivu 2 / 3
You must be aware that Mr 
' former partner (check this), S 
is now serving a 50 
year prison term for creating false allegations against Mr Epstein and then using those allegations to 
obtain money by deception in a Ponzi scheme. You know that Mr 
destroyed people's lives with 
his fantastic and untrue suits and that in pursuit of his evil plans he corrupted ex policemen to create 
faked cases. He even forged the signatures of judges to sign off on those charges [I am not aware of this 
level of detail — is it correct?) . You will be aware that Mr. 
now, himself, faces a professional 
investigation and serious potential charges. 
allegations only emerged at the time that 
was creating false claims and 
years atter the alleged misconduct . The releasing of the allegations to the national press only occurred 
after I refused to make any payments to silence Ms 
or her attorneys because the allegations were 
utterly false. As you will be aware, it is also believed to be the case that she has been paid a large sum of 
money by at least one British national newspaper. That represents a further incentive to make false 
claims. 
If you write a balanced article, you will be bound to record that Ms 
has made a previous claim of 
sexual harassment totally unrelated to Mr Epstein and which was not proceed with because the police 
took the view she had no credibility. 
You will also, presumably, draw attention to the fact that, prior to filing her civil suit against Mr Epstein, 
Ms 
fled the US to avoid being arrested for grand theft.(is this correct. My recollection is that we 
knew she was indicted but did not know the outcome. Perhaps you have better information now) 
All in all, given her record, which includes a number of other highly colourful events (of which I have no 
doubt you will be aware and will reflect) I assume you will treat what she says with great scepticism. 
All the untrue events are alleged to have happened ten years ago. Until those allegations emerged I had 
no recollection of Ms 
at all. I couldn't have picked her out in a crowd or, perhaps more relevantly 
in her case, in an identity parade. After some thought, I recalled that I first met Ms 
when she 
was working at a 
, claiming to be 18 years old and a professional masseuse. As part 
of his health programme, Mr Epstein had regular massages and employed both female and male 
masseuses. Ms 
always came to Mr Epstein's property with either her mother or fiance in 
attendance, sometimes both. I was aware of no improper conduct and none was brought to my 
attention. 
When it comes to Ms 
allegations about her time in London, I can't say I remember her at all and 
neither can ! remember flying with her. I fly many thousands of miles a year all over the world in many 
different aircraft. 
Of course, I've seen the photograph of the Duke of York with 
but I have absolutely no 
recollection at all of the photograph being taken and cannot say who took it. 
I've met the Duke of York on a number of occasions but whenever I've seen him he has been properly 
attired and I have no knowledge of naked pool parties at Mr Epstein's Palm Beach estate or elsewhere. 
I do not share any homes with Mr Epstein and he does not support me in any way. To put this in context 
my relationship with Mr Epstein ended over a decade ago and since then I have had a long term 
relationship. Mr Epstein's imprisonment and the circumstances to which that related occurred over 5 
years after our relationship had ceased. 
EFTA00913181
Sivu 3 / 3
If I've missed anything do let Mr. Gow know. 
Regards 
Ghislaine Maxwell 
Attach Klein's questions. 
Brian Basham 
Mobile: 
<mailto 
The information contained in this communication is 
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may 
constitute inside information, and is intended only for 
the use of the addressee. It is the property of 
Jeffrey Epstein 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this 
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited 
and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and 
destroy this communication and all copies thereof, 
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 
EFTA00913182