Valikko
Etusivu Tilaa päivän jae Raamattu Raamatun haku Huomisen uutiset Opetukset Ensyklopedia Kirjat Veroparatiisit Epstein Files YouTube Visio Suomi Ohje

Tämä on FBI:n tutkinta-asiakirja Epstein Files -aineistosta (FBI VOL00009). Teksti on purettu koneellisesti alkuperäisestä PDF-tiedostosta. Hae lisää asiakirjoja →

FBI VOL00009

EFTA00590045

51 sivua
Sivut 1–20 / 51
Sivu 1 / 51
From: 
G Maxwell < 
Sent: 
Saturda , Jul 18, 2009 8:42 PM 
To: 
Subject: 
<no subject> 
How old was 
in 1998 when she claims she started working for you? 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00069 
EFTA00590045
Sivu 2 / 51
From: 
G Maxwell < 
Sent: 
Frida March 11, 2011 7:16 PM 
To: 
Subject: 
Fw: Daily Mail 
 
Original Message 
From: Ross gow < 
To: Gmax; 
Cc: Brian Basham 
>; Ross Gow 
>; Ian Ian Maxwell 
>; Kevin Maxwell < 
>; Gareth Thompson 
< 
>< 
Sent: Thu Mar 1016:29:24 2011 
Subject: Re: Daily Mail 
Maz is the most devious and cunning of the bunch. However, Editors can pay for people, stories and documents. They 
can even pay criminals if it is in the public interest. 
Maz can pay who he wants for info but the Yorkshire Ripper for instance, as a convicted criminal, can't sell his 
story...unless in public interest cos there was say, a bent detective. 
Below is from PCC Code for Editors. It is not well drafted. 
15 
Witness payments in criminal trials 
i) No payment or offer of payment to a witness - or any person who may reasonably be expected to be called as a 
witness - should be made in any case once proceedings are active as defined by the Contempt of Court Act 1981. 
This prohibition lasts until the suspect has been freed unconditionally by police without charge or bail or the 
proceedings are otherwise discontinued; or has entered a guilty plea to the court; or, in the event of a not guilty plea, 
the court has announced its verdict. 
*ii) Where proceedings are not yet active but are likely and foreseeable, editors must not make or offer payment to any 
person who may reasonably be expected to be called as a witness, unless the information concerned ought 
demonstrably to be published in the public interest and there is an over-riding need to make or promise payment for 
this to be done; and all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure no financial dealings influence the evidence those 
witnesses give. In no circumstances should such payment be conditional on the outcome of a trial. 
*iii) Any payment or offer of payment made to a person later cited to give evidence in proceedings must be disclosed to 
the prosecution and defence. The witness must be advised of this requirement. 
16 
*Payment to criminals 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00070 
EFTA00590046
Sivu 3 / 51
i) Payment or offers of payment for stories, pictures or information, which seek to exploit a particular crime or to glorify 
or glamorise crime in general, must not be made directly or via agents to convicted or confessed criminals or to their 
associates —who may include family, friends and colleagues. 
ii) Editors invoking the public interest to justify payment or offers would need to demonstrate that there was good 
reason to believe the public interest would be served. If, despite payment, no public interest emerged, then the material 
should not be published. 
Ross Gow 
Managing Partner 
ACUITY Reputation Limited 
23 Berkeley Square 
London W1J 6HE 
Mobile 
Tel 
7788 
251 
acuityreputation.com 
Sent from my iPad 
On 10 Mar 2011, at 16:41, GMAX < 
> wrote: 
Actually school means university in the states. I think probably best not to get into the legality or not of sexual 
activity of young people and nor is it relevant to JE case as he was in his late 40's at the time of this story..the headline is 
deliberately wrong..school adults would have been accurate.. 
On 3/10/11 3:16 AM, "Brian Basham" < 
> wrote: 
We should think about a letter to the editor today. 'School' can mean university. Age of consent in Florida is 
complex — see below: 
If you are 16-yrs-old, a sexual relationship with someone 18-24is legal in Florida. The two persons involved 
must be between 16 and 24. 
Florida Statute 794.05 
(1) A person 24 years of age or older who engages in sexual activity with a person 16 or 17 years of age commits 
a felony of the second degree. 
So as soon as you turn 16 you are able to have sexual relations. And you can have sexual relations with a minor 
(under 18) until your 24th birthday. 
friend 
'Females for JE': Disturbing log of telephone calls from schoolchildren found in sex den of Duke's billionaire 
2 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00071 
EFTA00590047
Sivu 4 / 51
By Stephen Wright «http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?s=y&authornamef=Stephen+Wright> 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?s=y&authornamef=Stephen+Wright> 
Last updated at 6:30 PM on 9th March 2011 
Details of the disturbing lifestyle led by Jeffrey Epstein emerged last night after the Daily Mail uncovered logs of 
telephone messages left at his Florida child sex den. 
Schoolchildren were among hundreds of callers who apparently rang to arrange massages for the 58-year-old 
billionaire friend of Prince Andrew, who was later convicted of child sex offences. 
Ghislaine Maxwell, 49-year-old daughter of the disgraced media mogul Robert Maxwell, is named in several 
messages. 
Disturbing: Messages were found in Florida home of Jeffrey Epstein, left. The billionaire, 58, is a friend of Prince 
Andrew, right 
In one left for her or'_', 
a caller says she 'doesn't know at what time she must come this night for the 
massage'. 
Other messages for Epstein, the sources of which are not clear, contain such phrases as: 'She has females for 
Mr JE' and 'I have a female for him'. 
Another with sickening overtones comes from someone called Jeanluc for Epstein: 'He just did a good one —18 
years. (She spoke to me and said, "I love Jeffrey")'. 
The long list of women is punctuated by regular references to Epstein's celebrity friends including the business 
magnate Donald Trump, film producer Harvey Weinstein and magician David Copperfield, referred to as 'Magic David'. 
The sheer volume of phone traffic shows the frequency of Epstein's massages, many of which were 'erotic' and 
allegedly involved the abused girls. 
The evidence is from documents confiscated by police during a criminal investigation into Epstein and seen 
yesterday by the Mail. 
<image.png> 
<image.png> 
Logs: Two of the answer phone messages. 
Maxwell is asked, right, when a girl should give a massage 
One message left for Epstein reads: 'She is wondering if 2.30 ok cuz she needs to stay in school.' 
It was left in February 2005 — the same year that the mother of a 14-year-old girl alerted police to Epstein's 
abuse. 
Another note shows that 'Colleen' phoned to tell Epstein: 'Going into class —will be out in 45 min.' 
Last night the Daily Mail tried to contact the people whose names and telephone numbers are included in the 
logs. 
One girl named Jenny, who had left her number, hung up immediately when asked about Epstein. 
3 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00072 
EFTA00590048
Sivu 5 / 51
A man listed only as Darren said: 1 have no comment to make on that.' 
Today, Prince Andrew was embroiled in further controversy as it was revealed Kazakhstan had asked for his 
help in recruiting investors to the country. 
The plea came after the former Soviet Republic's President's son-in-law had bought the Prince's former marital 
home for £3million above the asking price. 
Timur Kulibayev paid £15million for Sunninghill Park but it has remained empty and has been allowed to fall 
into disrepair. 
Last year the Prince told Hello! magazine: 'It was like any property deal between friends.' 
Yesterday he attempted to perform business as usual as he visited an East London school and met rail bosses in 
Canary Wharf. 
He steadfastly ignored questions from journalists asking whether he was an 'embarrassment to his country' and 
would resign from his trade ambassador role as he arrived for a briefing from business executives at the headquarters of 
the £15billion train project Crossrail. 
Prince Andrew managed to sell Sunninghill Park for £3million more than the asking price 
Read more: <http://www.dailymail.co.ukinews/article-1364171/Females-Jeffrey-Epstein-The-damning-
telephone-log.htmlitixzz1GBL6XKcl> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1364171/Females-Jeffrey-Epstein-The-
damning-telephone-log.htmlffixzz1GBL6XKcl «http://www.dailymail.co.ukinews/article-1364171/Females-Jeffrey-
Epstein-The-damning-telephone-log.html> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1364171/Females-Jeffrey-Epstein-
The-damning-telephone-log.html> 
From: Ross Gow [ <mailto: 
> mailto: 
Sent: 10 March 2011 7:48 AM 
To: Ross gow 
Cc: 
• Ian Maxwell; Kevin Maxwell; Brian Basham; Gareth Thompson; 
Subject: Daily Mail 
Mail have published phone logs 
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1364171/Females-Jeffrey-Epstein-The-damning-telephone-log.html> 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1364171/Females-Jeffrey-Epstein-The-damning-telephone-log.html < 
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1364171/Females-Jeffrey-Epstein-The-damning-telephone-log.html> 
http://www.dailymail.co.ukThews/article-1364171/Females-Jeffrey-Epstein-The-damning-telephone-log.html> 
Ross Gow 
Managing Partner 
ACUITY Reputation Limited 
23 Berkeley Square 
4 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00073 
EFTA00590049
Sivu 6 / 51
London W1J 6HE 
Mobile 
Tel 
7788 
251 
<http://acuityreputation.com> acuityreputation.com 
Sent from my iPad 
On 10 Mar 2011, at 07:35, Ross gow < 
mailto: 
> > wrote: 
«mailto 
"Epstein's Gulfstream flew in to RAF Marham with him and the Duke's friend Ghislaine Maxwell on board, 
before they enjoyed the Duke's hospitality at the Queen's Norfolk estate 20 miles away...." 
Ross Gow 
Managing Partner 
ACUITY Reputation Limited 
23 Berkeley Square 
London W1J 6HE 
Mobile 
251 
Tel 
7788 
acuityreputation.com «http://acuityreputation.com> http://acuityreputation.com> 
Sent from my iPad 
On 9 Mar 2011, at 22:52, Ross Gow cz
«mailto 
mailto: 
> > wrote: 
Dear Ghislaine 
Thank you for your good-humoured patience with us and the legal team today, during what is, understandably, 
a testing time. 
To confirm: 
1) I spoke to Dilenschneider in NYC at length tonight and shared strategy and role definition. 
2) we sent agreed statement to Dan Mangan ay NYPost - he's on deadline for a piece on Charlie Sheen/Rob 
Lowe and seems to have moved on - for the moment. 
3) we will release statement via Press Association and PR Newswire @11.00GMT tmrw and follow up with calls 
to those journalists who have written pieces. 
5 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00074 
EFTA00590050
Sivu 7 / 51
We will create call log/matrix and advise feedback and sentiment as appropriate tmrw. Please don't hesitate to 
call if you have any additional concerns. 
Best regards 
Ross 
Ross Gow 
Managing Partner 
ACUITY Reputation Limited 
23 Berkeley Square 
London W1J 6HE 
Mobile 
Tel 
7788 
251 
acuityreputation.com «http://acuityreputation.com> http://acuityreputation.com> 
Sent from my iPad 
6 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00075 
EFTA00590051
Sivu 8 / 51
From: 
GMAX < 
Sent: 
Monday, March 21, 2011 10:06 AM 
To: 
Jep' 
Subject: 
<no subject> 
--6_3383554032_6208970 
charset='ISO-8859-1" 
--6_3383554032_6208970 
charset="ISO-8859-1" 
--6_3383554032_6208970--
Content-type: multipart/alternative; 
boundary="6_3537634348_644846192" 
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not 
> understand 
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. 
--6_3537634348_644846192 
Content-type: text/plain; 
charset="UTF-8" 
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable 
What I need to hang my hat on is the following =E2=80=93 I only need this one pie= ce and I will then go quietly into the 
sunset.. 
What year actually did u meet V =E2=80=93 I am sure her version of dates are wron= g it was just to be able to say she 
was 15 =E2=80=93 i=E2=80=99m going to guess summer = August/ Sept =E2=80=9899 or 2000 =E2=80=93 just that 
piece alone will allow me to say so= mething that will along w/all the other information will discredit her stor= ies..if it 
was =E2=80=9898 then it will have been after her b=E2=80=9Dday as there was n= o party for her..she threw that in to 
add =E2=80=98legitimacy=E2=80=99 to her fraudulent= claim..did she have a fake ID to work at Marlargo?? Can you 
work full time = at 15 =E2=80=93 she was working full time that much I do remember When did she stop working at M 
=E2=80=93 if we could get her employment record th= at would be good 
=E2=80=93 she told me she was a masseuse..assume now that that was a lie too to a= dd to her many.. 
What lies did she tell on her immigration form to australia =E2=80=93 is that get= table? Is that a public document?=20 
Can darren tell me anything on her dates? =20 
--6_3537634348_644846192 
Content-type: text/html; 
charset="UTF-8" 
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable 
<html> 
<head> 
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8"> </head> <body> <font face=3D"Calibri, 
Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style=3D"font-size:12pt= ">What I need to hang my hat on is the following =E2=80=93 I 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00076 
EFTA00590052
Sivu 9 / 51
only need this one pi= ece and I will then go quietly into the sunset..<br> What year actually did u meet V =E2=80=93 I 
am sure her version of dates are wron= g it was just to be able to say she was 15 =E2=80=93 i=E2=80=99m going to 
guess &nbsp;su= mmer August/ Sept =E2=80=9899 or 2000 =E2=80=93 just that piece alone will allow me to s= ay 
something that will along w/all the other information will discredit her stories..if it was =E2=80=9898 then it will have = 
been after her b=E2=80=9Dday as there was no party for her..she threw that in to a= dd =E2=80=98legitimacy=E2=80=99 
to her fraudulent claim..did she have a fake ID to work = at Marlargo?? Can you work full time at 
15 =E2=80=93 she was working full time that much I do remember<br> When did she stop working at M =E2=80=93 if 
we could get her employment record th= at would be good<br> 
=E2=80=93 she told me she was a masseuse..assume now that that was a lie too to a= dd to &nbsp;her many..<br> What 
lies did she tell on her immigration form to australia =E2=80=93 is that get= table? Is that a public document? 
<br> 
Can darren tell me anything on her dates? &nbsp;<br> </span></font> </body> </html> 
—8_3537634348_644846192--
2 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00077 
EFTA00590053
Sivu 10 / 51
From: 
Jeffrey epstein boundary=Apple-Mail-4-669898702 < 
Sent: 
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 8:08 AM 
To: 
'GMAX' 
Subject: 
Re: Vanity Fair 
--Apple-Mail-4-669898702 
charset=utf-8 
--Apple-Mail-4-669898702 
charset=utf-8 
--Apple-Mail-4-669898702--
Content-type: multipart/alternative; 
boundary="B_3537537149_1356210193" 
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not 
> understand 
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. 
--B_3537537149_13562 10193 
Content-type: text/plain; 
charset="UTF-8" 
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable 
He wont ad details but you can try 
Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone 
On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:52 PM, GMAX <
> wrote: 
On 6/8/11 9:49 AM, "J Jep" < 
> wrote: 
I would say a paid for story thar was nothing mote than a malicious fabrica= tion =E2=80=930O YOU MEAN INSTEAD OF 
ALL OF THIS JUST SAY THAT IT WAS A FABRICATIO= N..WHAT ABOUT SAYING THAT I MET HER WHEN SHE WAS 17 AND 
LIVING WITH HER FIA= NCE AND AVOID ALL THE OTHER STUFF 
Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone 
On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:42 PM, GMAX <
> wrote: 
MY PROPOSED ANS IN CAPS..PLSE COMMENT 
 
Forwarded Message 
From: Ross Gow < 
<mailto: 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00078 
EFTA00590054
Sivu 11 / 51
>> 
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:49:02 -0400 
To: G G 
<mailto: 
Cc: Brian Basham 
<mailto:
> > 
Subject: Vanity Fair 
Dear Ghislaine 
Klein's questions follow, below. If we are to respond, I would advise we stick to written responses rather than engage via 
'phone. Klein has form for story-twisting re Hillary Clinton. Written responses at least give us an audit trail of what was 
said. 
A lot of this is Mail on Sunday rehash. Klein has our statement, but is offering the chance for further clarification...I get 
the feeling he's likely to make unflattering assumptions if we don't give him on the record answers. 
Please advise on those questions which you feel you more comfortable answering. We can head him off at the pass on 
those and put legal frighteners on him elsewhere. 
Just a caveat - we should be aware that there is a chance that anything other than fully robust answers might be 
construed as inadvertent admissions of wrongdoing, so we will need legal team to advise on precise wording. Do you 
want me to pass this on to Devonshires if you have not already done so...? 
best 
Ross 
Dear Ross, 
Here are some fact-checking questions for Ghislaine Maxwell to comment on and answer: 
1. Do Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell share a home in London or anywhere else? Do they still see each other? 
Does Epstein help support Ghislaine? Her friends tell me that Ghislaine once loved Epstein. Does she still love him? 
MS MAXWELL DOES NO SHARE ANY HOMES WITH MR EPSTEIN. MR EPSTEIN DOES NOT SUP= PORT MS MAXWELL IN 
ANYWAY. MS MAXWELL HAD INFACT BEEN IN COMMITTED RELATIONS= HIP WITH SOMEONE ELSE FOR THE PAST 7 
YEARS 
2. The Mail on Sunday published a photograph showing the Duke of York with his arm around 
. Standing 
off to one side in the photo was Ghislaine Maxwell. The newspaper said that this photo taken in Ghislaine's London 
home. Was it? Did Jeffrey Epstein take the photo? If not, who did? 
MS MAXWELL HAS NO RECOLECTION OF THE PHOTO BEING EVEN TAKEN GIVEN WE ARE TA= LKING AN EVENT THAT 
ALLEDGEDLY TOOK PLACE OVER 10 YEARS AGO IT WOULD BE SURP= 
RISING=20 
3. According to 
Ghislaine Maxwell recruited her as Epstein=E2=80=99s =E2=80=9Csex slave=E2=80=9D 
when she was 15 years old and arranged for her to see Andrew three times=E2=80=94at Jeffrey Epstein=E2=80=99s 
homes in London and New York and on his private Caribbean island, Little Saint James=E2=80=94where, 
said, 
she=E2=80=99d been =E2=80=9Csexually exploited by Epstein=E2=80=99s adult male peers, including 
royalty.=E2=80=9D Would Ghislaine please comment on this assertion by 
MS MAXWELL MET MS 
WHEN SHE WAS 17 AND WAS HIRED AS A MASSUSE. MS R= OBERTS WAS LIVING AT 
THE TIME WITH HER FIANCE. MS 
HAS A PRIOR SEXUAL= HASSARASSMENT SUIT AGAINST OTHER INDIVIDUALS 
2 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00079 
EFTA00590055
Sivu 12 / 51
THAT WAS THROWN OUT FOR LACK O= F HER CREDABILITY AND DRUG USE. MS 
FINALLY FLED THE US TO 
AVOID ARR= EST FOR THEFT. I THINK GIVEN THIS AND OTHER HIGHLY INDICATIVE EVENTS IN HER = LIFE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE 
TO BELIEVE ONE WORD OUT OF HER MOUTH. FURTHER THE INCE= NTIVE OF A LARGE AMOUNT OF MONEY PAID BY A 
NEWSPAPER NO DOUBT ADDED TO HER = COLOURFUL =E2=80=98MEMORIES=E2=80=99 WHICH IN FACT ARE NOTHING 
BUT MADE UP STORIES. 
4. The Mail on Sunday and other newspapers ran the story about Andrew=E2=80=99s rendezvous with 
in Ghislaine Maxwell=E2=80=99s London home. These reports said that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell left the 
Duke of York and 
alone for several hours, and that the next morning Ghislaine Maxwell told 
that the Duke had a good time. Would Ghislaine please comment on this story. What did the Duke tell Ghislaine 
about his rendezvous with 
5. The Mail on Sunday said it had evidence to support 
story=E2=80=94flight logs from Jeffrey 
Epstein=E2=80=99s Boeing 727 and Gulfstream jet. Was Ghislaine Maxwell on these airplanes and who else was 
onboard? 
AGAIN TO REMEMBER ANY SPECIFIC FLIGHT AND WHO WAS ON BOARD A PLANE FOR EVEN= TS THAT ALEDEGEDLY 
TOOK PLACE OVER 10 YEARS AGO IS SIMPLY UNREALISITC 
6. According to a sworn deposition by Juan Alessi, a former employee at Jeffrey Epstein=E2=80=99s Palm Beach estate, 
Prince Andrew attended naked pool parties and was treated to massages by a harem of adolescent girls. 
MS MAXWELL CANNOT COMMENT ON WHAT MR ALESSI ALLEDEGDLY SAW OR DID NOT SEE B= UT MS MAXWELL NEVER 
SAW THE DUKE IN ANY STATE OF UNDRESS AND HE WAS INDEED A= LWAYS PROPERLY ATTIRED.=20 
That's it for now. 
I hope that you can arrange for me to speak directly to Ghislaine. 
All the best, 
Ed 
Edward Klein 
1085 Park Avenue 
5A 
New York, NY 10128 
Tel. 
Cell. 
<mailto 
>=20 
Ross Gow 
Managing Partner 
ACUITY Reputation 
23 Berkeley Square 
London W1J 6HE 
7788 
5251 
3 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00080 
EFTA00590056
Sivu 13 / 51
www.acuityreputation.com <http://www.acuityreputation.com> <http://www.acu= 
ityreputation.com>=20 
---- End of Forwarded Message 
--6_3537537149_1356210193 
Content-type: text/html; 
charset="UTF-8" 
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable 
<html> 
<head> 
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8"> </head> <body bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF"> 
<div>He wont ad details but you can try<br> <br> Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone</div> <divxbr> On Jun 8, 
2011, at 3:52 PM, GMAX &It;<a href=3D"mailto: 
">gmax= 
</a>8Lgt; wrote:<br> 
<br> 
</div> 
<div></div> 
<blockquote type=3D"cite"> 
<divxfont face=3D"Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Aria l"><span style=3D"font-size= :11pt"><br> <br> <br> On 6/8/11 9:49 
AM, &quot;J lep&quot; &It;<a href=3D" 
1><1= 
axa href=3D"mailto: 
>
</a>&gt; 
a>wrote= 
:<br> 
<br> 
</span></font> 
<blockquote><font face=3D"Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style=3D"fo= nt-size:llpt">I would say a paid for 
story thar was nothing mote than a mali= cious fabrication =E2=80=93DO YOU MEAN INSTEAD OF ALL OF THIS JUST SAY 
THAT IT WAS= A FABRICATION..WHAT ABOUT SAYING THAT I MET HER WHEN SHE WAS 17 AND LIVING WITH HER 
FIANCE AND AVOID ALL TH= E OTHER STUFF<br> <br> Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone<br> <br> On Jun 8, 
2011, at 3:42 PM, GMAX &It;<a href=3
"></a>ca href= 
=3D"mailtoflicia>&gt; 
wrote:<br> <br> </span></font> <blockquote><font 
face=3D"Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style=3D"fo= nt-size:llpt">MY PROPOSED ANS IN CAPS..PLSE 
COMMENT<br> <br> 
--- Forwarded Message<br> 
<b>From: </b>Ross Gow &Itsa href=3D" 
1></a><a href=3D"= 
mailto: 
'>
</a> &It;<a href=3D= 
"mailto: 
"></a><a href=3D"mailto:ross@acuityreputation= 
.com">mailto 
/a>&gt; 
&gt;<br> 
<b>Date: </b>Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:49:02 -0400<br> 
<b>To: </b>G G &Itsa href=3D' 
1></a>ca href=3D"mailto:gmaxl@ell= 
max.com">
</a> &It;<a href=3D"mailto 
1></axa h= 
ref=3D"mailtonmailto 
a>&gt; •Segtsbr> 
<b>Cc: </b>Brian Basham &Itsa href=3D' 
'></a><a href=3D"mai= 
Ito:mail@brianbasham.com"
</a> &It;<a href=3D"mailto:mail@= brianbasham.com"></a><a 
href=3D"mailto: 
">mailto:mail@brian= 
basham.com</a>&gt; &gt;<br> 
4 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00081 
EFTA00590057
Sivu 14 / 51
<b>Subject: </b>Vanity Fair<br> 
<br> 
Dear Ghislaine<br> 
<br> 
Klein's questions follow, below. If we are to respond, I would advise<br> we stick to written responses rather than 
engage via 'phone. Klein has<br> form for story-twisting re Hillary Clinton. Written responses at least<br> give us an 
audit trail of what was said.<br> <br> A lot of this is Mail on Sunday rehash. Klein has our statement, but<br> is offering 
the chance for further clarification...I get the feeling<br> he's likely to make unflattering assumptions if we don't give 
him on<br> the record answers.<br> <br> Please advise on those questions which you feel you more comfortable<br> 
answering. We can head him off at the pass on those and put legal<br> frighteners on him elsewhere.<br> <br> Just a 
caveat - we should be aware that there is a chance that<br> anything other than fully robust answers might be 
construed as<br> inadvertent admissions of wrongdoing, so we will need legal team to<br> advise on precise wording. 
Do you want me to pass this on to<br> Devonshires if you have not already done so...?<br> best<br> Ross<br> <br> Dear 
Ross,<br> <br> Here are some fact-checking questions for Ghislaine Maxwell to comment<br> on and answer:<br> <br> 
<br> 1. Do Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell share a home in London or<br> anywhere else? Do they still see each 
other? Does Epstein help support<br> Ghislaine? Her friends tell me that Ghislaine once loved Epstein. Does<br> she still 
love him?<br> <br> MS MAXWELL DOES NO SHARE ANY HOMES WITH MR EPSTEIN. MR EPSTEIN DOES NOT SUP= PORT 
MS MAXWELL IN ANYWAY. MS MAXWELL HAD INFACT BEEN IN COMMITTED RELATIONS= HIP WITH SOMEONE ELSE FOR 
THE PAST 7 YEARS<br> <br> 2. The Mail on Sunday published a photograph showing the Duke of York<br> with his arm 
around 
. &nbsp;Standing off to one side in the= <br> photo was Ghislaine Maxwell. The newspaper said 
that this photo taken<br> in Ghislaine's London home. Was it? &nbsp;Did Jeffrey Epstein take the<br> photo? If not, 
who did?<br> <br> MS MAXWELL HAS NO RECOLECTION OF THE PHOTO BEING EVEN TAKEN GIVEN WE ARE TA= LKING 
AN EVENT THAT ALLEDGEDLY TOOK PLACE OVER 10 YEARS AGO IT WOULD BE SURP= RISING <br> <br> 3. According to 
Ghislaine Maxwell recruited her as<br> Epstein=E2=80=99s =E2=80=9Csex slave=E2=80=9D when she 
was 15 years old and arranged for her<= 
br> 
to see Andrew three times=E2=80=94at Jeffrey Epstein=E2=80=99s homes in London and New<= 
br> 
York and on his private Caribbean island, Little Saint James=E2=80=94where,<br> 
said, she=E2=80=99d been 
=E2=80=9Csexually exploited by Epstein=E2=80=99s adult male= <br> peers, including royalty.=E2=80=9D Would 
Ghislaine please comment on this<br> assertion by 
.<br> <br> MS MAXWELL MET MS 
WHEN 
SHE WAS 17 AND WAS &nbsp;HIRED AS A MASSUSE.= MS 
WAS LIVING AT THE TIME WITH HER FIANCE. MS 
HAS A PRIOR S= EXUAL HASSARASSMENT SUIT AGAINST OTHER INDIVIDUALS THAT WAS THROWN OUT FOR L= 
ACK OF HER CREDABILITY AND DRUG USE. 
MS 
FINALLY FLED THE US TO AVOID ARREST FOR THEFT. I THINK GIVEN TH= IS AND OTHER HIGHLY INDICATIVE 
EVENTS IN HER LIFE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO BELIEV= E ONE WORD OUT OF HER MOUTH. FURTHER THE INCENTIVE OF A 
LARGE AMOUNT OF MONE= Y PAID BY A NEWSPAPER NO DOUBT ADDED TO HER COLOURFUL 
=E2=80=98MEMORIES=E2=80=99 WHICH IN FACT ARE NOTHING BUT MADE U= P STORIES.<br> <br> 4. The Mail on 
Sunday and other newspapers ran the story about<br> Andrew=E2=80=99s rendezvous with 
in 
Ghislaine Maxwell=E2=80=99s<br> London home. These reports said that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine<br> Maxwell left 
the Duke of York and 
alone for several<br> hours, and that the next morning Ghislaine Maxwell told 
cbr> 
that the Duke had a good time. Would Ghislaine please comment<br> on this story. What did the 
Duke tell Ghislaine about his rendezvous<br> with 
?<br> <br> <br> 5. The Mail on Sunday said it had 
evidence to support 
cbr> 
&nbsp;story=E2=80=94flight logs from Jeffrey Epstein=E2=80=99s Boeing 727 
and= <br> Gulfstream jet. Was Ghislaine Maxwell on these airplanes and who else<br> was onboard?<br> <br> AGAIN 
TO REMEMBER ANY SPECIFIC FLIGHT AND WHO WAS ON BOARD A PLANE FOR EVEN= TS THAT ALEDEGEDLY TOOK 
PLACE OVER 10 YEARS AGO IS SIMPLY UNREALISITC<br> <br> 6. According to a sworn deposition by Juan Alessi, a former 
employee<br> at Jeffrey Epstein=E2=80=99s Palm Beach estate, Prince Andrew attended naked<br> pool parties and 
was treated to massages by a harem of adolescent<br> girls.<br> <br> MS MAXWELL CANNOT COMMENT ON WHAT MR 
ALESSI ALLEDEGDLY SAW OR DID NOT SEE B= UT MS MAXWELL NEVER SAW THE DUKE IN ANY STATE OF UNDRESS AND 
HE WAS INDEED A= LWAYS PROPERLY ATTIRED. 
<br> 
5 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00082 
EFTA00590058
Sivu 15 / 51
<br> 
That's it for now.<br> 
<br> 
I hope that you can arrange for me to speak directly to Ghislaine.<br> <br> All the best,<br> <br> Ed<br> <br> Edward 
Klein<br> 
1085 Park Avenue<br> 
5A<br> 
New York, NY 10128<br> 
Tel. 
cbr> 
Cell. 
cbr> 
<a href=3D' 
"></a><a href=3D"mailto 
'>ed@edw= 
ardklein.com</a> &Itsa href=3D"mailto 
'></a><a href=3D"ma 'Ito= 
">mailto: 
a>&gt; 
<br> 
<br> 
<br> 
<br> 
--<br> 
Ross Gow<br> 
Managing Partner<br> 
ACUITY Reputation<br> 
23 Berkeley Square<br> 
London W1J 6HE<br> 
&#43;44 (0) 
<br> 
&#43;44 (0) 
<br> 
<a href=3D"http://www.acuityreputation.com">www.acuityreputation.com</a> &It= <a 
href=30"http://www.acuityreputation.com"></a>ca href=3D"http://www.acuityrepu= 
tation.com">http://www.acuityreputation.com</a>&gt; &nbsp;&Itsa href=3D"http:= 
//www.acuityreputation.com"></a><a href=3D"http://www.acuityreputation.com">ht= 
tp://www.acuityreputation.com</a>&gt; 
<br> 
<br> 
<br> 
---- End of Forwarded Message<br> 
</span></font></blockquote> 
<font face=3D"Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style=3D"font-size:llpt= "><br> </span></font></blockquote> 
</div> </blockquote> </body> </html> 
--B_3537537149_1356210193-
6 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00083 
EFTA00590059
Sivu 16 / 51
From: 
G Maxwell < 
Sent: 
Wednesda June 08, 2011 9:09 AM 
To: 
Subject: 
Re: Vanity Fair 
Do you have a problem with anything I said. 
 
Original Message 
From: jeffrey epstein 
To: Gmax 
Sent: Wed Jun 0810:08:11 2011 
Subject: Re: Vanity Fair 
He wont ad details but you can try 
Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone 
On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:52 PM, GMAX <
> wrote: 
On 6/8/11 9:49 AM, "1 Jep" 
wrote: 
I would say a paid for story thar was nothing mote than a malicious fabrication -DO YOU MEAN INSTEAD OF ALL 
OF THIS JUST SAY THAT IT WAS A FABRICATION..WHAT ABOUT SAYING THAT I MET HER WHEN SHE WAS 17 AND LIVING 
WITH HER FIANCE AND AVOID ALL THE OTHER STUFF 
Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone 
On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:42 PM, GMAX <
 wrote: 
MY PROPOSED ANS IN CAPS..PLSE COMMENT 
mailto: 
mailto: 
 
Forwarded Message 
From: Ross Gow < 
«mailto 
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:49:02 -0400 
To: G G < 
«ma 
mailto 
Cc: Brian Basham < 
«mailto: 
> > 
Subject: Vanity Fair 
> > 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00084 
EFTA00590060
Sivu 17 / 51
Dear Ghislaine 
Klein's questions follow, below. If we are to respond, I would advise 
we stick to written responses rather than engage via 'phone. Klein has 
form for story-twisting re Hillary Clinton. Written responses at least 
give us an audit trail of what was said. 
A lot of this is Mail on Sunday rehash. Klein has our statement, but 
is offering the chance for further clarification...I get the feeling 
he's likely to make unflattering assumptions if we don't give him on 
the record answers. 
Please advise on those questions which you feel you more comfortable 
answering. We can head him off at the pass on those and put legal 
frighteners on him elsewhere. 
Just a caveat - we should be aware that there is a chance that 
anything other than fully robust answers might be construed as 
inadvertent admissions of wrongdoing, so we will need legal team to 
advise on precise wording. Do you want me to pass this on to 
Devonshires if you have not already done so...? 
best 
Ross 
Dear Ross, 
Here are some fact-checking questions for Ghislaine Maxwell to comment 
on and answer: 
1. Do Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell share a home in London or 
anywhere else? Do they still see each other? Does Epstein help support 
Ghislaine? Her friends tell me that Ghislaine once loved Epstein. Does 
she still love him? 
MS MAXWELL DOES NO SHARE ANY HOMES WITH MR EPSTEIN. MR EPSTEIN DOES NOT SUPPORT MS 
MAXWELL IN ANYWAY. MS MAXWELL HAD INFACT BEEN IN COMMITTED RELATIONSHIP WITH SOMEONE ELSE FOR THE 
PAST 7 YEARS 
2. The Mail on Sunday published a photograph showing the Duke of York 
with his arm around 
. Standing off to one side in the 
photo was Ghislaine Maxwell. The newspaper said that this photo taken 
in Ghislaine's London home. Was it? Did Jeffrey Epstein take the 
photo? If not, who did? 
MS MAXWELL HAS NO RECOLECTION OF THE PHOTO BEING EVEN TAKEN GIVEN WE ARE TALKING AN 
EVENT THAT ALLEDGEDLY TOOK PLACE OVER 10 YEARS AGO IT WOULD BE SURPRISING 
3. According to 
Ghislaine Maxwell recruited her as 
Epstein's "sex slave" when she was 15 years old and arranged for her 
to see Andrew three times—at Jeffrey Epstein's homes in London and New 
2 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00085 
EFTA00590061
Sivu 18 / 51
York and on his private Caribbean island, Little Saint James—where, 
said, she'd been "sexually exploited by Epstein's adult male 
peers, including royalty." Would Ghislaine please comment on this 
assertion by 
MS MAXWELL MET MS 
WHEN SHE WAS 17 AND WAS HIRED AS A MASSUSE. MS 
WAS 
LIVING AT THE TIME WITH HER FIANCE. MS 
HAS A PRIOR SEXUAL HASSARASSMENT SUIT AGAINST OTHER 
INDIVIDUALS THAT WAS THROWN OUT FOR LACK OF HER CREDABILITY AND DRUG USE. MS 
FINALLY FLED THE 
US TO AVOID ARREST FOR THEFT. I THINK GIVEN THIS AND OTHER HIGHLY INDICATIVE EVENTS IN HER LIFE IT IS 
IMPOSSIBLE TO BELIEVE ONE WORD OUT OF HER MOUTH. FURTHER THE INCENTIVE OF A LARGE AMOUNT OF MONEY 
PAID BY A NEWSPAPER NO DOUBT ADDED TO HER COLOURFUL 'MEMORIES' WHICH IN FACT ARE NOTHING BUT MADE 
UP STORIES. 
4. The Mail on Sunday and other newspapers ran the story about 
Andrew's rendezvous with 
in Ghislaine Maxwell's 
London home. These reports said that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine 
Maxwell left the Duke of York and 
alone for several 
hours, and that the next morning Ghislaine Maxwell told 
that the Duke had a good time. Would Ghislaine please comment 
on this story. What did the Duke tell Ghislaine about his rendezvous 
with 
7 
5. The Mail on Sunday said it had evidence to support 
story—flight logs from Jeffrey Epstein's Boeing 727 and 
Gulfstream jet. Was Ghislaine Maxwell on these airplanes and who else 
was onboard? 
AGAIN TO REMEMBER ANY SPECIFIC FLIGHT AND WHO WAS ON BOARD A PLANE FOR EVENTS THAT 
ALEDEGEDLY TOOK PLACE OVER 10 YEARS AGO IS SIMPLY UNREALISITC 
6. According to a sworn deposition by Juan Alessi, a former employee 
at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach estate, Prince Andrew attended naked 
pool parties and was treated to massages by a harem of adolescent 
girls. 
MS MAXWELL CANNOT COMMENT ON WHAT MR ALESSI ALLEDEGDLY SAW OR DID NOT SEE BUT MS 
MAXWELL NEVER SAW THE DUKE IN ANY STATE OF UNDRESS AND HE WAS INDEED ALWAYS PROPERLY ATTIRED. 
That's it for now. 
I hope that you can arrange for me to speak directly to Ghislaine. 
All the best, 
Ed 
Edward Klein 
1085 Park Avenue 
5A 
New York, NY 10128 
Tel. 
3 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00086 
EFTA00590062
Sivu 19 / 51
Cell. 
«mailto: 
> mailto: 
> 
Ross Gow 
Managing Partner 
ACUITY Reputation 
23 Berkeley Square 
London W11 6HE 
7788 
5251 
www.acuityreputation.com «http://www.acuityreputation.com> http://www.acuityreputation.com> < 
<http://www.acuityreputation.com> http://www.acuityreputation.com> 
End of Forwarded Message 
4 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00087 
EFTA00590063
Sivu 20 / 51
From: 
Jeffrey Epstein < 
Sent: 
Wednesday, June 08, 2011 10:38 AM 
To: 
'Gmax' 
Subject: 
Re: Vanity Fair 
--bcaec5186af405152304a535f62c 
--bcaec5186af405152304a535f62c 
--bcaec5186af405152304a535f62c--
Content-type: multipart/alternative; 
boundary=13_3537537144_1463473083" 
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not 
> understand 
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. 
--6_3537537144_1463473083 
Content-type: text/plain; 
charset="UTF-8" 
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable 
no its ok „ but he will take out of context 
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Gmax <
> wrote: 
Do you have a problem with anything I said. 
 
Original Message 
From: jeffrey epstein 
To: Gmax 
Sent: Wed Jun 0810:08:11 2011 
Subject: Re: Vanity Fair 
He wont ad details but you can try 
Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone 
On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:52 PM, GMAX <
> wrote: 
=20 
=20 
=20 
On 6/8/11 9:49 AM, "1 Jep" ‹
> wrote: 
=20 
=20 
> 
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00088 
EFTA00590064
Sivut 1–20 / 51