EFTA00233329

Page 49
office 4:8,10 26:20 
27:4 43:5,12,25 
44:5 
Official 2:22 44:22 
officials 7:2 
often 40:2 
okay 3:25 5:19,21 
18:10 30:2 
Olas 1:17 
old 31:18,18 
once 22:5 
one 4:23 7:17 11:25 
17:24 18:5,16,20 
18:21 20:1,8 22:24 
31:11 36:24 39:10 
40:16 42:23 44:11 
only 13:22 14:3 
17:24 23:20 25:4 
29:20 36:6 39:1,3 
42:23 
open 26:24 43:19 
opportunity 8:14,17 
9:21 
opposed 33:21 
opposite 20:22 21:18 
21:22 28:20 
opposition 27:24 
option 7:23 
order 6:16 12:14 
22:21 30:23,24 
33:17,17 36:19 
44:15 
ordinarily 26:3 
34:12 
ordinary 27:10 
39:13 
originally 6:5 
Orseck 2:2,5 3:17 
other 7:1,17 16:4,5 
17:22 22:13,18 
23:6,21,22 24:1 
25:21 26:8 32:8 
34:9,11 36:12 
42:18 43:8 44:10 
otherwise 39:14 
out 8:8 10:16 22:24 
26:16,23 28:22 
30:11 36:12 38:17 
39:20 44:15 
outside 13:18,19 
24:17 16:7 
over 11:19 24:24 
own 12:21 38:13 
Pacer 30:19 
pages 7:14 27:23 
28:9 
paint 29:17 
Palm 1:2,4,21 2:10 
2:13 
paper 10:16 13:7 
papers 8:10,16 9:25 
10:811:2) 12:20 
15:6,1041:5 
paragraphs 36:15 
paraphrasing 6:20 
Park 2:18 
part 10:18 18:9 
20:23 21:7 23:9,20 
34:16 39:23 40:2,5 
44:1 
particular 6:15,18 
7:24 8:22 9:18 
11:17 13:5 
parties 9:23 11:6 
16:21 22:21 39:20 
partner 3:18 4:3 
parts 19:25 21:17 
party 11:11 14:25 
30:12,17 36:18 
past 9:11 10:5 12:3,4 
pay 17:3 21:8,10 
25:5 
pending 6:15 9:5 
17:15 21:6 
people 23:6 
per 24:14,14,14,14 
perception 28:21 
perfect 36:1 39:5 
perhaps 20:24 27:22 
period 9:21 34:4 
37:3,14 
permitted 24:6,18 
permitting 42:18 
person 36:11 
personal 10:23 
23:21 
perspective 16:23 
35:10 
pertains 29:20 
phone 4:12,14,15 
42:18,19 
picking 12:13 
place 31:12 37:14 
43:20 
plaintiff 3:7,14 
24:15 30:4 34:20 
43:7 
plaintiffs 1:5,13 3:4 
3:24 11:8 17:8,14 
17:22 19:3 22:14 
23:7,24 27:5 29:1 
29:12,14,20 30:9 
39:16 43:8 
plaintiffs 19:4 26:8 
36:16 
playing 7:8 
Plaza 2:18 
plead 17:11 18:10,11 
pleading 7:14 31:10 
33:4 40:9,14 
pleadings 23:4 31:3 
32:13 
please41:22 
pled 17:8,1620:14 
41:8 
Podhurst 22,5 3:17 
point 6:18 14:12 
26:16,23 28:14 
29:15 36:12 4323 
pointed 14:20 
portion 32:24 36:14 
portions 5:15 
posed 11:25 
posing 8:4 
position 5:5,8 6:4 7:7 
7:25 9:16,20 ID:12 
10:13 11:21,22 
12:12,17,23 14:8,8 
14:15 15:16 16:16 
16:17 17:4,7 18:11 
18:17 19:19 20:13 
22:1,11 25:8 30:14 
31:12 32:10,15,20 
34:8 35:3,21 36:23 
37:9 40:10 41:17 
43:5 
positions 30:20 41:5 
possible 30:17 31:4 
44:15 
osslbly 34:9 
*sting 25:22 
otentlal 5:3 15:2 
2R:2 
otentially 10:18 
15:19 
ower 13:2 
medal 1025 15:9 
ractice 34:11 38:3 
redicate 20:8,15 
repared 20:5 27:15 
resent 5:5 11:15 
resents 9:7 
ress 43:10 
ressure 21:15 
resume 23:24 
retry 8:1 
nor 6:6 8:25 12:14 
36:19 
stymy 19:22 12:7 
robably 35:18 36:3 
36:13 
roblem 14:12 22:22 
23:2,3 28:18 
rocedure 32:16 
34:24 
roceed 12:10 18:23 
32:22 38:13 
roceedlug 6:15,15 
roceedings 4:23,25 
44:19 
rocess 39:25 
reduction 14:24 
1920 
rohlblted 38:3,4,18 
rohibits 37:22 
roof 20:16 
roper 25:1 27:14 
27:15 
roseeuted 20:13 
26:4 27:11 29:10 
31:15 
prosecuting 37:25 
prosecution 26:6 
28:23 29:6,7 34:25 
prospect 16:15 
protect 32:7 
protecting 32:7 
provide 31:8 36:13 
36:21 
provided 16:9 32:12 
provides 9:22 
providing 31:8 
provision 6:12 8:11 
29:19,25 34:10,25 
37:11 38:3 39:17 
39:18 
provisions 13:6,7 
psychologically 
21:24 
publish 23:5 
pure 24:8 
purpose 21:19,23 
28:20 
pursuant 25:15 32:8 
41:17 
pursue 23:12 
pursuing 22:12,15 
put 9:15 18:21 32:10 
41:6 
puts 18:25 34:4 
40:10 41:11 
0
question 8:3,7 9:2 
12:1 30:25 
questions 42:1 
quite 19:10 
R 
R44:17 
raise 16:2 36:11 
raised 15:25 16:13 
18:5,21 19:13 
28:10 33:14 35:9 
40:1 
read 37:20 42:2,23 
reading 18:18 23:19 
ready 29:7 
real 9:6 10:8 36:11 
41:18 
really 12:2 18:11 
30:20,23 33:14 
36:17 
Realtime 2:22 
reason 6:14 7:3 
29:23 31:11 34:2 
reasons 18:5,20 
34:19 40:8 
recapitulating 41:1 
received 5:5 15:3,4 
20:4 
recent 7.7 15:24 
records 34:21 
redacted 36:14 
reference 27:25 
referred 31:6 
refers 41:16 
refusal 9:10 
refuses 8:7 
refusing 25:5 
regard 9:11,12,13 
10:12,13,14,14 
11:4 12:19 14:9 
16:18 18:23 35:12 
36:23 
regarding 6:24 
23:15 37:9 
regardless 31:17,18 
registering 41:9 
relate 9:3 30:1 
related 30:24 33:24 
relates 8:12 
relating 29:19 
release 41:9 
relevant 19:22 
remain 42:13 
remedy 7:20 8:17 
29:21 33:20 34:7 
41:2 
remember 23:19 
remind 44:3 
remote 10:8 
rep 35:14 
replies 10:15 
reply 35:22 
REPORTED 2:21 
Reporter 2:22,22 
44:22 
represent 21:3 32:12 
35:15 
representation 
26:18 
representatives 4:7 
43:9 
represented 21:7 
26:24 33:5 
representing 38:11 
represents 18:16 
35:16 
requests 14:23 
required 17:3 
requirement 33:8 
resist 34:18,23 
resolve 42:8 
resolved 7:4 19:12 
24:16 
respect 22:14 
respectfully 7:6 14:4 
respond 20:5 30:13 
44:9 
response 5:6 7:14 
8:2 11:20 15:16,23 
18:22 33:15 34:1,1 
35:17,21 
responses 10:14 
30:21 35:8 
restitution 29:2 
31:16,23 
EFTA00233729

Page 50 
restitution/damages 
32:19 
restrictions 43:18 
result 10:21 15:19 
18:20 
resulted 32:17 
review 31:3 36:22 
Richard 1:23 3:13 
26:10 
ride 40:17 
right 3:24 6:24 
12:25 13:3 25:8,14 
34:23 37:2041:3 
42:20 43:14 44:8 
rights 13:5 25:16 
32:7 
risk 9:6 10:6,7 18:25 
38:6 40:1041:6,11 
risks 21:5 
Robert 2:1,8 4:2 6:3 
role 25:1317:7 
Room 2:23 
Rosenfeldt 1:17 
rose-colored 11:16 
Rothstein 1:17 
HPR-CM-RNIR-F... 
44:21 
RPR-RMR-FCRR... 
2:21 
rule 39:9 42:13 
rules 22:3 25:1 34:24 
40:15 42:13 
ruling 8:25 42:7 
rulings 19:21 23:8 
25:2 27:13,15 30:6 
run 22:18 
running 21:13 23:14 
27:16 
S
same 6:10,168:3 
20:13 27:12 31:12 
32:10 35:21 38:21 
satisfied 20:9 
saying 7:10 8:1 
17:17 19:12,16 
20:6,7,8 21:14 
25:5 33:9 37:10 
39:5 
says 8:15 13:7 17:11 
18:13 35:1 38:5 
40:14 41:3 
scheduled 4:2i 
seal 5:18,23 
sealed 42:14 
second 20:23 27:2,5 
30:24 36:25 37:4 
Secondly 41:20 
secret 17:1 
Section 33:7 
see 4:7 15:11 20:12 
seek 23:25 
seeking 6:7 24:3 
seeks 34:22 
•"”Irteer>  
seen 5:14,15 
selected 35:15 
self-fulfilling 24:23 
self-Incrimination 
6:25 
send 10:16 38:17 
39:6 
sends 22:23 
sent 14:22,23,24 
16:6 17:10 39:15 
39:19 
separate 5:20 17:17 
serve 11:5,6 
set 12:21 13:13 18:4 
31:22 36:9 
settle 21:8 
settling 21:10 25:5 
severely 21:21 
sex 41:9 
sexual 23:6 
shape 11:4 
shield 29:1 
show 36:22 42:11 
Sid 3:10 
side 7:17,17 
sideline 8:9 
silent 29:23 
sim0ar 35:18 43:2 
simply 11:17 
since 20:20 
sir 19:9 35:8 37:5 
41:15 
sit 8:9 
sitting 42:3 
situation 12:6 20:25 
25:12 26:24 
sole 29:21 
solely 12:15 32:10 
some 4:7 5:4 7:2,10 
7:11,12 9:1,8,9 
10:16 15:12 16:1,8 
17:22 20:25 21:3 
30:18 35:8 38:7 
43:13 
someone 10:17 19:22 
24:20 26:3 34:12 
34:17 37:16 39:15 
something 13:19,24 
l4:17 15:24 20:19 
26:17 28:13 349 
37:21,23 38:4,9 
39:9 43:2 
Sometimes 13:4 
somewhat 6:5 
soon 44:15 
sorry 15:14 27:19 
sort 32:10 33:17 
34:19 
sought 31:11 
sound 37:16 
South 2:12 
SOUTHERN 1:1 
speak 12:16 19:8 
speaking 26:14 32:2 
'MAY Maio Ia... 
Ilia•TmoV 
Specia121:2 32:16 
specific 8:2 11:1 
16:24 17:13 30:25 
43:25 44:4 
specifically 43:7 
spector 11:18 
speculative 109 
spirit 25:20 
spoken 30:3 
standard 11:1 
standpoint 10:25 
15:9 
start 23:15 
state 3:3 9:6 28:4 
29:4 40:12,17 41:8 
stated 3:25 
statement 33:23 
statements 43:9 
States 1:1,11 2:22 
4:8 5:1,5,17 6:1 
9:24 10:6 13:21 
14:8,17 16:7 19:14 
22:10,19 29:9 39:4 
44:5,22 
State's 27:16 
statute 17:4 18:3 
20:6 24:14 28:7 
29:21 36:4,7,11 
41:20 
statutory 6:12 24:25 
25:3 34:18 37:2 
stay 4:23 6:8,19,21 
7:3 11:24 12:16,19 
12:23 15:25 19:16 
21:22 22:2,4,4,5,7 
24:22 25:21 30:24 
33:14,15,16,21 
34:2,2 37:21,22 
42:5 43:4 44:1 
stayed 25:19 
staying 21:18 
steps 27:10 
still 5:7 
Street 2:2,6,9 
strictly 11:15 
strikes 36:12 
stuck 18:14 36:10 
stuff 34:19 
subject 5:3 26:5,21 
27:13 30:6 
submit 7:6 14:4 
submitted 42:15 
subpoena 119 34:17 
34:20 
subpoenaes 11:5 
subpoenas 14:25 
22:21 38:18 39:19 
subsequently 6:9 
9:16 
substantial 9:6 
1122,23 13:2 
1825 41:11 
sue 7:17 
suffered 32:3 
suggest 8:10,23 
suggested 12:13,21 
14:16 15:5,6 36:3 
39:2 40:8,9 
suggesting 16:7 
suggestion 15:17 
41:25 44:10 
suing 25:10 
suit 20:21 21:4 32:22 
suits 26:25 
summary 40:3 
supporting 15:16 
supposed 20:18 
22:25 23:17 249 
29:1 
sure 5:7 14:11 26:2 
29:16 33:22 37:25 
Susan 3:17 
system 31:23 
&Larry 44:20 
— T 
— 
— - 
T44:17,17 
take 7:12 9:12 10:3,3 
10:12,13,21 11:12 
11:18,21,22 14:7 
14:21 16:16,16 
18:2 19:20 22:10 
27:9,10 29:3 33:1 
34:15,20 35:20 
38:7,17 41:14,22 
taken 7:7 9:11,21 
14:9 15:5 30:20 
41:10 43:5 
takes 18:17 
taking 9:8 14:23 
19:17 22:12,20 
23:15 25:20 34:8 
41:5 
talk 6:18 25:23 
team 4:14 12:3 
telephone 2:4,19,20 
3:19 
tell 11:13,14 42:12 
telling 21:13 22:9 
temporary 11:1 
terminates 34:4 
terms 9:3 22:7 33:20 
thank 19:1,2 27:8,21 
30:8,15 35:5,6 
42:17 44:7,13 
their 3:3,25 7:14,14 
8:10,16 9:25 11:8 
11:20 12:21 13:7 
14:21 15:6,10 
21:21 23:6 27:5 
29:21 32:5,7,7 
themselves 32:4 
thing 25:4 27:12 
28:21 31:11 39:11 
things 11:3 38:15 
39:22 43:10 
think 6:8,14 8:15 9:4 
9:22 10:19 11:22 
12:24,25 13:6,6 
17:16 18:18,23 
19:14 25:13 27:6,6 
27:22 28:18 29:15 
30:23 39:6,8 42:1 
42:2,6 43:15 44:14 
third 11:6,11 14:25 
22:21 39:20 
thIrd-party 19:11 
21:16 25:14 
thoughts 27:2,5 
threatening 44:1 
three 41:14 
through 3:5 6:9 11:7 
11:16 29:14,22 
31:5,24 32:6,16 
till 14:2 
time 6:10,11,12,15 
6:19,20 13:3 17:5 
21:12 31:18,19 
34:4 36:3 37:2 
38:21 
dines 17:191&2 
today 8:4 13:11 14:3 
14:6,6 15:5 28:17 
31:9,19 35:23 
36:21 43:14 44:11 
44:14 
today's 13:12,14 
told 2320 35:23 
tools 10:25 
tort 10:24 23:22 
24:4,6 
totally 20:5,21 23:1 
41:24 
TRANSCRIPT 1:10 
transcription 44:19 
trauma 32:3 
traumatized 21:21 
tried 31:3 32:6 
troubled 43:24 
true 17:12 
try 23:11 30:16 
32:18 34:17 44:15 
trying 10:11 22:3 
28:25 32:9 37:8 
39:20 
turn 12:8 
two 4:13 9:23 1925 
21:11 36:24 
type 12:15 22:13 
35:17 39:18 
types 22:16 36:24 
typical 11:2,4 22:15 
23:3,4,8 
ultimately 39:9 
unable 29:19 
uncertainty 9:14 
uncomfortable 
23:11 
under 5:17,17,23 
7:20 8:18 9:25 
EFTA00233730

• 
Page 51 
10:1,11,22 12:6,10 
12:20 13:7,8 16:8 
16:17,23 17:2,4,8 
17:12,18 18:4,8,19 
20:9,18,19,21 21:9 
22:7 24:8,11,18,20 
24:20 25:1,6 28:6 
30:12 31:21 32:21 
32:23 33:7,10 
34:18,23 35:24 
36:5,8,9 37:1,13 
38:25 39:6,14 40:6 
40:21,23 41:1 
understand 5:7 
14:15 21:25 22:3 
23:24 29:25 30:14 
31:7 37:8 38:20 
3925 
understanding 
20:10 
unfair 42:2 
unilateral 12:22 
unilaterally 7:13 
1224 
United 1:1,11 2:22 
4:8 5:1,5,17 6:1 
9:24 10:6 13:21 
14:8,17 16:7 19:14 
22:10,19 29:8 39:4 
44:5,22 
unless 11:7 34:25 
unlimited 40:21 
until 37:23 
urge 22:9 
use 10:25 11:8 20:24 
23:11 28:25 40:11 
used 28:19 
U.S 2:15 4:10 7:1,9 
8:6 12:8,12 16:16 
26:19 27:4,18,19 
43:5,11,25 
U.S.A 2:16 
U.S.0 33:7 
various 3:1 1025 
very 4:21 5:7 11:1,2 
11:20 12:21 16:19 
16:24 17:12,12 
23:11 29:4 32:1 
35:18 38:10 40:18 
42:2 43:18 44:14 
Via 2:4,19,20 
victim 37:13 
victims 20:12 21:20 
28:23 31:12,16,23 
32:13 33:18 35:16 
39:20 41:17,18,19 
41:19 
view 36:19 
14 4:9 
4:10 17:10 30:10 
30:15 33:24 34:14 
35:2,4,6,12 39:4 
44:9,12 
violate 19:18 34:6 
violated 5:2 14:2 
39:6 
violates 8:5,11 33:2 
42:25 
violating 9:16,19 
38:17 41:6 43:13 
oblation 8:23 9:9 
10:4,19 11:20 12:7 
12:9 13:15,19,20 
13:23 14:10,19 
15:2 16:7 18:19 
24:19 25:19,20 
29:10 34:10,13,24 
35:12,24 37:17 
40:25 41:4 
violations 17:17,18 
17:24 18:1,16 
19:23 40:16 43:17 
43:22 
voluminous 31:4 
vs 1:6 3:1 5:17 
W 2:5 
wait 8:10 18:13 
42:12 
waive 25:14 
waiving 18:7 
want 8:9,10 11:15 
12:2 16:22 17:20 
21:4,4,5,14 22:1,6 
25:17 26:2,8,16,18 
26:23 27:4 29:16 
35:7 37:21 41:17 
41:21 42:14,21 
44:9 
wanted 11:11 14:21 
17:5 20:12 29:15 
42:24 443 
wants 11:14 13:3 
19:2,16,20 23:4 
24:24 33:16 34:2 
warranted 6:22 
wasn't 28:21 
way 8:23 9:9 10:5,16 
10:19 11:4 13:16 
14:10 19:23 25:1 
25:18 27:3,4 28:22 
28:23 
ways 30:18 
wealthy 32:13 
weigh 26:11 
Weinberg 2:17 4:16 
4:16 
Weiss 2:12 
wel17:10 8:20 10:22 
11:12,12,13,13 
12:17 13:16 14:11 
15:7 16:18 17:15 
17:23 18:10,11 
33:24 35:12,19,20 
36:5 39:4 40:13 
went 6:18,22 26:23 
32:1643:19 
were 6:10 14:6 15:10 
18:7 19:11 21:2 
29:23 31:17,18 
32:1,4,22 34:17 
36:24 43:1 44:10 
weren't 32:9 
West 1:2,4,21 22,6 
2:10,13 
we'll 7:19,22 8:16 
17:23 26:13 40:17 
we're 9:810:2 12:10 
13:14 19:10,12 
20:5 27:15 28:17 
39:143:14 44:2 
we've 15:4 35:23 
363 43:12 
whatsoever 27:7 
while 32:7 34:16 
35:14 
whole 20:12 38:11 
wide 26:24 43:19 
willful 8:23 12:7 
willfully 9:19 
Willits 1:23 3:13,14 
26:10,10,14,15 
27:12,19 
win 29:5 
withdraw 28:8,11 
wonderful 28:23,24 
word 24:21 
worried 39:22 
worry 41:1 I 
Worth 1:24 
writing 28:13 
written 5.6 2P9 23:4 
X
x 1:9 
yeah 41:3 
yesterday 21:9 
young 20:23 21:3,20 
515 17:20 
5150,000 32:21 
550,000 17:5 32:21 
37:2 
0 
12116 2:18 
08 12:18,18 
08-80119-C1Y-M 
1:3 
1 5:17 
10 36:15 
10th I:23 
101 2:3,7 33:5 35:13 
35:17 38:23 39:3,7 
40:8 
102 6:8 35:19 36:1,3 
40:9 41:21 
103 21:5 35:19 
104 35:19 
105 35:20 
11:1044:16 
12 1:5 9:4 
12th 13:12 
13 7:14 9:4 
14 7:14 
150 17:19,20 18:2 
24:12 
17 27:23 28:9 
18 33:7 
18205 1:14 
19 27:23 28:9 
2 
2 3:5 5:17 6:9,16 
29:14,22 
20 2:18 17:25 18:2 
2009 1:5 13:12 
22 7:21 10:2 
2241:21 
2255 16:23 17:4,17 
17:18 18:8,12,14 
20:2,9,19,21 23:21 
23:22,23 24:8,17 
24:21 25:6 31:21 
32:21,23 33:7,10 
36:6,23 37:13 41:2 
2290 1:23 
25 2:2,6 
250 2:12 
26 20:4 
3 
3 1:18 
30 17:16,19,19 
30-count 40:12 
305358.2800 2:3,7 
305.523.5290 2:23 
305.931.2200 1:15 
3051523-5290 44:23 
305/523-5639 44:23 
33 6:17 9:1 
33128 2:23 44:23 
33130 2:3,6 
33160 1:15 
33301 1:18 
33394 2:16 
33401 1:21 2:10,13 
33461 1:24 
34 21:20 
4 
4 1:18 11:12 
400 2:23 4422 
401 1:17 
5
5 1:18 6:9 
5th 12:18 
50 18:2 24:12 
500 2:15 
515 2:9 
561.582.7600 1:24 
561.659.8300 2:13 
561.832.8033 1:22 
561.842.2820 2:10 
6
61:18 
617.227.3700 2:19 
7 
7 1:18 3:5 29:14,22 
36:15 
8
8 36:15 
8N09 2:23 
9 
936:15 
954.356.7255 2:16 
954.52234561:19 
EFTA00233731

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF 
APPEAL OF THE STATE OF 
FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT 
CASE NO: 4D09-2554 
L.T. No. 2008 CF 9381 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Petitioner, 
STATE OF FLORIDA, 
E.W., THE PALM BEACH POST, 
B.B, 
Respondents. 
E.W.'S SEALED REQUEST TO DISMISS THE PETITION FOR 
LACK OF JURISDICTION 
Respondent, E.W., would show the Court as follows: 
1. This Court lacks jurisdiction to hear this petition. 
The order under review is a non-final order for which no appeal is 
provided by Rule 9.130. A non-final order for which no appeal is provided 
by Rule 9.130 is reviewable by petition for certiorari only in limited 
circumstances. The order must depart from the essential requirements of law 
and thus cause material injury to the petitioner throughout the remainder of 
the proceedings below, effectively leaving no adequate remedy on appeal. 
Allstate Ins. Co.'. Langston, 655 So.2d 91, 94 (Fla. 1995); Barad & Co.'. 
EFTA00233732

McGuire, 670 So.2d 153 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); see, Menke'. Broward 
School Bd, 916 So.2d 8 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). 
The requirement of irreparable harm is jurisdictional. Allstate; Barad 
& Co. A petitioner's failure to demonstrate the satisfaction of this 
jurisdictional element should result in dismissal of a petition for writ of 
certiorari. Barad & Co. 
As shown below, petitioner fails to meet this jurisdictional threshold. 
2. Disclosure of the NPA will not cause petitioner irreparable 
harm. 
a. There is nothing in the NPA that is confidential and disclosure 
will not cause petitioner irreparable harm ("there's no cat in the bag"). 
Petitioner does not cite a single term, provision, sentence or word in 
the NPA' that is confidential. There are no "confidentiality provisions" in 
the NPA, contrary to petitioner's misleading assertions (i.e., petition at page 
10). There is not a single detail about this sex offender's plea deal with the 
U.S. Attorney or the state attorney that should be hidden from the public. 
A page-by-page review of the NPA demonstrates this. The first page 
discusses that local law enforcement have conducted investigations of 
The undersigned attorneys were given a copy of the NPA through the 
federal proceedings before Judge Marra (see E.W.'s response to the petition 
filed herewith), but, inexplicably, undersigned was not provided a copy of 
the Addendum. We have never seen it and do not know its contents. 
2 
EFTA00233733

petitioner; that he was charged by indictment with solicitation of 
prostitution; that the U.S. Attorney and FBI have conducted their own 
investigation of his crimes against the United States from 2001-2007 
including crimes for inducing minor females to engage in prostitution; 
conspiring to use interstate commerce to engage in illicit sexual conduct; 
using interstate commerce to induce minor females to engage in prostitution; 
traveling in interstate commerce to engage in illicit sexual conduct with 
minor females; recruiting minors to engage in a commercial sexual act. 
The second page provides that petitioner wishes to resolve globally 
his state and federal charges; that the interests of the state, the United States 
and petitioner would be served by so doing; that prosecution by the U.S. 
Attorney shall be deferred in favor of prosecution by the state provided 
petitioner abides by the agreement; that should petitioner violate any 
conditions of the agreement he may be prosecuted for any offense; that if 
petitioner fulfills the terms of the agreement, the U.S. Attorney will not 
prosecute him for any offense. 
The third page discusses that he will plead guilty to state charges of 
solicitation of prostitution and solicitation of minors to engage in 
prostitution and be registered as a sex offender; he will agree to a county jail 
sentence of 18 months for the two charges followed by 12 months 
3 
EFTA00233734

community control; the state judge must approve the sentence; the 
agreement does not preclude petitioner and the state attorney from agreeing 
to recommend additional charges or additional terms of probation or 
incarceration; petitioner waives his rights; petitioner shall provide the U.S. 
Attorney with copies of his agreements with the state attorney. 
Page four provides that the United States shall provide petitioner with 
a list of victims; the United States shall select an attorney to represent the 
victims; if any victims files suit based on federal claims petitioner will not 
contest them; he is not admitting liability by signing this agreement; that he 
will use his best efforts to plead guilty by a certain date. 
Page five provides that he will not be treated differently than any 
other offender as to county jail gain time; that the parties anticipate this 
agreement will not be made part of any public record but if there is a 
Freedom of information Act Request or compulsory process on the United 
States for this agreement, the U.S. will give petitioner notice before 
disclosing the agreement; that the U.S. Attorney cannot guarantee what the 
state attorney does; that the United States will not prosecute potential co-
conspirators; that ongoing grand jury proceedings will be halted. 
4 
EFTA00233735

Page six provides there is consideration for the NPA and a breach 
allows the United States to elect to terminate it; that petitioner waives certain 
rights. 
Finally, page seven provides that petitioner has read the agreement 
and understands it. 
Where is there a single confidential term, provision, sentence or word 
in the NPA the disclosure of which will cause petitioner irreparable harm? 
The answer is there is none. 
Will it cause petitioner irreparable harm for the public to learn that he 
and the U.S. Attorney agreed he will be sentenced in state court to a mere 18 
months county jail time (in his home county, not a prison, with all the usual 
gain time and work release benefits not available in the state prison system, 
so he serves about 60% of the sentence) plus 12 months non-sexual offender 
community control, for solicitation of a minor to engage in prostitution, a 
second degree felony punishable by up to 15 years in prison, and felony 
solicitation of prostitution, a third degree felony punishable by up to 5 years 
in prison? 
Will it cause petitioner irreparable harm for the public to learn that if 
petitioner fulfills the terms of the agreement, the U.S. Attorney will not 
5 
EFTA00233736

prosecute him for a single federal crime he committed against multiple 
minor female victims? 
Will it cause petitioner irreparable harm for the public to learn the 
state attorney will only prosecute him for just two of his crimes involving 
only just two of his minor female victims and that he does not face any 
further state prosecution for all his other crimes against the many more 
minor female victims identified by the U.S. Attorney? 
Will it cause petitioner irreparable harm for the public to know that 
the other participants in his criminal enterprise for procuring minor females 
to engage in prostitution, co-conspirators 
ill not be prosecuted at all? 
Will it cause petitioner irreparable harm for the public to learn that an 
attorney will be appointed to represent his other minor female victims in 
civil lawsuits; that, if they bring only a single specified federal cause of 
action, he will not contest, but not admit, liability, but if they bring other 
causes of action such as battery or intentional infliction of emotional 
distress, he can defend in any manner he choices? 
Will it cause petitioner irreparable harm for the public to know that 
the U.S. Attorney and the state attorney have utterly compromised their roles 
6 
EFTA00233737

as prosecutors and protectors of the public safety by entering into this 
sweetheart deal with petitioner? 
As in the old Wendy's commercial, "Where's the beef?" 
b. The parties to the NPA did not agree it would be confidential; 
in fact, the United States agreed the NPA would be publicly disclosed if 
a Freedom of Information Act Request or compulsory process were 
made to disclose it. 
There is nothing in the record to support petitioner's assertion that the 
parties agreed to confidentiality. Petitioner has not proven by any evidence 
extrinsic to the NPA that it was intended to be confidential. 
The wording of the NPA, moreover, does not show it was intended by 
both parties to be confidential. The NPA on its face does not state anywhere 
that it is confidential. The word "confidential" does not appear in it. There 
is not a single term, provision, sentence or word in it where both parties 
affirmatively agree to keep it confidential. The term "confidential" 
essentially means that something is "meant to be kept secret." Black's law 
dictionary (801 ed. 2004). The NPA does not contain an expression of this 
intent. In fact, the parties to it expressly agree to the contrary: that the 
United States will disclose the NPA if a Freedom of Information Act 
Request or compulsory process is made to disclose it: 
7 
EFTA00233738

The parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part 
of any public record. If the United States receives a Freedom of 
Information Act request or any compulsory process commanding the 
disclosure of the agreement, it will provide notice to Epstein before 
making that disclosure. 
(NPA, paragraph 13(emphasis added.) 
The first sentence of the above quote does no more than state an 
expectation by both sides that they do not anticipate the document being 
made part of a public record, i.e., not filed in federal court. At most it states 
merely an intent that neither side will take affirmative steps to make place it 
in a public record. But that is not a provision that the document is 
confidential or that it will be kept confidential. In the same paragraph, the 
United States agrees to disclose the NPA if a Freedom of Information Act 
Request or compulsory process for the document is made. 
In fact, with all the hearings held in state court to the present on this 
issue, the United States, which was always noticed, has not once intervened 
in state court to request that the document remain sealed. A representative 
of the U.S. Attorney's office has not even appeared at any of the hearings 
before the trial judge below on this issue. Moreover, at the plea colloquy, 
representatives of the United States were present and did not object to the 
8 
EFTA00233739

terms of the agreement being discussed on the record or being placed in the 
state court file (see below).2
Also, the text of the NPA quote above (par. 13) shows that petitioner's 
arguments based on the supremacy clause and the doctrine of secrecy of 
grand jury proceedings are wholly without merit. Can these arguments have 
any conceivable validity if the U.S. Attorney agreed to publicly disclose the 
NPA if there were a Freedom of Information Act Request or compulsory 
service of process? There should be no serious consideration given to 
petitioner's contention that the U.S. Attorney intended to look to petitioner 
to protect the rights of the United States under the supremacy clause or to 
protect the sanctity of the doctrine of federal grand jury secrecy. This is but 
another smoke-screen. 
c. Petitioner himself and the state prosecutor already publicly 
disclosed the contents of the NPA ("the cat's already out of the bag"). 
At the plea colloquy (A-8), with representatives of the U.S. Attorney 
present, petitioner's attorney and the prosecutor disclosed on the record, in 
public, the essential terms of the NPA. After the trial judge cautioned 
2 It was noted on the record that representatives of the U.S. Attorney were 
present in court. A-8, page 39, lines 22-23. 
9 
EFTA00233740

counsel that any sidebar conversation would be on the record, the following 
exchange occurred: 
MR. GOLDBERGER [petitioner's counsel]: The reason why I 
asked to come sidebar is there is a nonprosecution agreement with 
the United States Attorney's office that triggers as a result of the 
plea agreement. In other words, they have signed off and said 
they will not prosecute Mr. Epstein in the Southern District of 
Florida for any offense upon his successful [sic] taking of this plea 
today. That is a confidential document that the parties have agreed to. 
I wanted to tell the court. 
THE COURT: I understand, that would also be invalidated 
should he violate community control? 
MR. GOLDBERGER: 
Absolutely. 
That nonprosecution 
agreement —
MS. BELOHLAVEK [the state prosecutor]: They spell all that 
out. 
THE COURT: Mr. Epstein needs to come closer. 
Mr. Epstein, your attorney has told me that in addition to 
everything, we talked about another inducement, shall we say, to 
your taking this plea is that the U.S. Attorney for the Southern 
District of the State of Florida, federal prosecutor, has agreed to a 
nonprosecution agreement with you, meaning that if you 
successfully complete probation and do everything you're 
supposed to, they have, have agreed not to prosecute you 
federally, did you understand that? 
THE PETITIONER: Yes, ma'am. 
(A-8, pages 38-39)(emphasis added). 
We can see from the page-by-page review of the NPA (section 2a. 
above) that the other provisions of the NPA are incidental to the highlighted 
quotations. The substance of the NPA is the publicly disclosed provision 
that the U.S. Attorney will not prosecute petitioner for any federal offense 
10 
EFTA00233741

upon his pleading guilty to the two state crimes and agreeing to the sentence 
discussed in the plea colloquy. 
CONLUSION 
For the reasons stated above, it is respectfully requested that the 
petition for certiorari be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been served by 
mail on the parties listed below this 1 
day of July, 2009. 
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is submitted in Times New 
Roman 14-point font and complies with the font requirement of Rule 9.100. 
ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER 
Attorneys for E.W. 
50 
Willia; J. verger 
SERVICE LIST 
Jane Kreusler-Walsh 
Kreusler-Walsh, Compiani & Vargas, P.A. 
11 
EFTA00233742

Robert D. Critton 
Burman, Critton.
Jack A. Goldberger 
Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, P.A. 
U.S. Attorney's Office-Southern District 
500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, Fl 33401 
Honorable Jeffrey Colbath 
Palm Beach County Courthouse 
205 North Dixie Highway 
Room 11F 
West Palm Beach. Fl 33401 
12 
EFTA00233743

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 
FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
CASE NO. 4D09-2554 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Petitioner, 
vs. 
STATE OF FLORIDA, PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS, INC., 
E.W., AND B.B., 
Respondents. 
SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX TO 
PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS, INC., d/b/a THE PALM BEACH POST'S 
RESPONSE TO EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI 
THOMAS, LOCICERO & BRALOW PL 
Deanna K. Shullman 
James B. Lake 
101 N.E. 3nd Avenue, Suite 1500 
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 
EFTA00233744

Document 
Tab 
Transcript of June 10, 2009 hearing 
 
1 
Administrative Order No. 2.303-9/08 
Of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit 
 
2 
Administrative Order no. 2.032-10/06 
Of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit  
 3 
John Doe I. Museum of Science and History of Jacksonville, 
Case No. 92-32567, 1994 WL 741009 
(Fla. 7th Jud. Cir. June 8, 1994) 
4 
Government's Response to Victim's 
Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim Rights 
Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771  
 5 
Declaration of  
In Support of United State's Response to Victim's 
Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim 
Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771  
 6 
Defendants Jeffrey Epstein an 
Motion for Stay 
Florida Sugar Cane League. Inc. I. Florida Dept. of Environmental 
Regulation, Case No. 91-2108 (Fla. 2d Jud. Cir.), 
Order Releasing Public Records dated September 20, 1991  
7 
8 
2 
EFTA00233745

oq-a-3-714 
1.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 
IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 
CRIMINAL DIVISION 
CASE MOs.: 2006-CF9454 AXX and 2008-CP9381 AXX 
STATE OF FLORIDA, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
PROCEEDINGS HELD BEFORE 
THE HONORABLE JEFFREY J. COLBATH 
JUNE 10, 2009 
11:08 A.M. - 11:25 A.M. 
PALM BEACH COUNTY COURTHOUSE 
WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA
Reported by Louanne Rawls 
Notary Public, State of Florida 
West Palm Beach Office *100578 
EFTA00233746

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
Proceedings 
June 10, 2009 
2 
APPEARANCES: 
On 
On 
behalf 
behalf 
of the 
JACK ALAN 
Atterbury, 
Defendant 
GOLDBERGER, 
Goldberger, 
ESQUIRE 
et al. 
of the Defendant 
ROBERT CRITTON, JR., ESQUIRE 
Burman, Critton, et al. 
On behalf of Third Party E.W. 
WILLIAM J. BERGER, ESQUIRE 
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQUIRE 
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 
On behalf of Third Party, The Post 
DEANNA SHULLMAN, ESQUIRE 
Thomas, LoCiero & Bralow, PL 
EFTA00233747

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
Proceedings 
June 10, 2009 
3 
PROCEEDINGS 
- - 
SS IT REMEMBERED that the following proceedings were had 
and testimony adduced before the Honorable Jeffrey Colbath, at 
the Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm Beach, Florida 
beginning at the hour of 11:Of a.m. on June 10, 2009, with 
appearances as herein noted to-wit: 
THE COURT: State vs. Epstein. Let me have for the 
record, announce everybody's appearance. 
MR. BERGER: 
Your Honor, William J. Horner and 
Bradley Edwards for non-party E.W. 
MS. SHULLMAN: Your Honor, Deanne Shullman of 
Thom, 
LoCiero a Bralow for non-➢arty The Palm Beach 
Post. 
THE COURT: Let me slow down a little bit. On behalf 
of The Post is? 
MS. SHULLMAN: Deanna Shullman. 
THE COURT: S-H-V-L --
MS. SHULLMAN: S-H-U-L-L-K-A-N. 
THE COURT: Ms. Shullman, good morning. Mr. Borger, 
gOOd morning. And Hr. Berger, your client is E --
HR. BERGER: E.W., yes. 
THE COURT: Anybody else here? 
MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edward■ on behalf of E.N. as 
well, Judge. Thanks. 
EFTA00233748