EFTA00225102

500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phonc 561 209-1047 
Fax 561 820-8777 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-014975 
63 
EFTA00225362

...so Ann JUIUU4004U 
'Jam) ntli lAVOKR 
Memorandum 
Date 
[1002 
Subject 
Prosecution Memorandum 
In re Operation Leap Year 
To 
R. Alexander Acosta 
U.S. Attorney 
Rolando Garcia 
Deputy Chief, Criminal Division 
Karen Atkinson, Chief4,(W. 
Northern Division 
June 17, 2008 
From 
A. Marie Villafan 
Assistant U.S. Atto 
I. 
INTRODUCTION 
This memorandum seeks approval for the attached Request for Authorization to Apply for 
a Com ulsion Order seeking Immunity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sections 6001-6003 for witness 
in connection with the ongoing investigation named "Operation Leap Year." 
II. 
BACKGROUND 
kra
0 
ration Lea Year involves the investigation offeffre E stein and five of his assistants 
(née Mucinska), 
, and 
e targets'would arrange "sexual massages" for Epstein when he would travel to Palm Beach or 
New York, and many of those "sexual massages" were performed by minor females. Witness 
ti. 
began her relationship with Epstein as a i
se" when she was under the age of 18. 
er performing massages firiiiod of time, 
began recruiting other girls to perform 
massages. It is believed that 
received $200 for each girl she brought to Epstein's home. 
The investigation originally focused on the first three assistants who traveled with 
Epstein to Florida. Upon interviewing two identified New York victims, we determined that the 
last two assistants, Groff and Steen, arranged most of Epstein's New York massages. 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
EXHIBIT B-130 
P-008365 
EFTA00225363

has been approached by the FBI to provide information via an informal proffer with 
a "Kastigar letter" or testifying before t
djury with a "pocket immunity" letter. 
is 
represented by counsel in New York. 
has never spoken to any law enforcement o leer 
about what happened between her and Epstein. We believe that 
counsel is independent 
is
in (unlike some attorneys who have represented other witnesses , but he has stated that 
will not meet with agents or the Office or testify before the grand jury without full 
immunity. Counsel has told me that, if immunized, 
is ready and willing to provide complete 
information regarding her dealings with Epstein. 
On the one hand, I am reluctant to provide 
with immunity because I do not believe 
that she needs it. It appears that the majority of her dealings with Epstein occurred before she was 
18, our Office is not interested in prosecuting her, FBI New York is assisting FBI West Palm Beach 
in connection with the investigation, so a federal prosecution in New York is not forthcoming, and 
it is unlikely that the State of New York will open an investigation and charge 
However, 
it has been widely reported that the Palm Beach Police De artrnent prepared a 
ro able cause 
• 
' " to charge a similar victim/recruiter in Florida, 
,with a second-degree felony. 
name also appears in a number of Complaints in c vt awsuits filed a ainst Epstein. 
In the most recent draft of the Indictment, we have listed 
and 
as unindicted 
coconspirators which will make it easier to introduce their statemen 
o Epstein an the assistants. 
Depending on 
testimony, we may need to treat her similarly. 
III 
THE NEED FOR THE WITNESSES' TESTIMONY AND THE REQUESTED 
IMMUNITY. 
The most difficult part of this prosecution will be proving the knowledge and intent of the 
targets. For example, 
could assert that she knew that she was setting up massages for Epstein, 
but she believed that they were regular massages. All of the targets arc likely to aver that they did 
nut know that the girls were under the age of 18. 
helps us with this proof in several ways. 
First, she was victim whom we believe became invo v 
with Epstein when she was only fourteen 
years' old, and her you 
n help disprove lack of knowledge by Epstein and his assistants. 
Second, we believe that 
was a significant recruiter for Epstein, so she will be able to tell us 
what instructions she received from him and the assistants regarding the types of girls to recruit, what 
was expected of them, etc. Third, she provides us with a strong entrée into the New York situation, 
which strengthens the "interstate commerce" nexus of the case. Fourth, 
is likely to have 
dealt most closely with Epstein's New York assistants, Groff and Steen. 
e es way to strengthen 
our case at this point is to "flip" one of the assistants, and Groff is the most likely to flip if we have 
sufficient evidence to charge her. Steen is another potential cooperator, but we have heard from 
another witness that Steen had done something to upset Epstein and he "shipped her off' to the 
Middle East to work for one of his companies there. 
The U.S. Attorney's Manual recommends prosecuting witnesses in a situation such as this 
and getting their cooperation as part of a plea bargain. Our evidence against 
at this time is 
-2-
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-008366 
EFTA00225364

tyj U lig 
weak. We have statements from two victims who 
at they went to Epstein's house with 
We have two telephone messages from 
that were recovered in t . 
h of 
ps ein s home. At this time we do not have any recor s of telephone calls between 
and 
IL=
the assistants (we have not identified 
cell phone number during the relevant period). Thus, 
the likelihood of succeeding on sue a prosecution is very small. Furthermore, a decision to 
prosecute Lacerda could result in a refusal by many more girls to come forward because the majority 
of the identified girls brought other girls to Epstein, so all of them would feel at risk. 
IV. 
RECOMMENDATION 
For these reasons, 1 recommend that the attached Request for Authorization to Apply for 
Compulsion Order on behalf of 
be submitted to the Witness Immunity Unit. 
a 
°"-"jjenQL 6/fin 
-3-
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-008367 
EFTA00225365

•• 
SO 
VW.. 
MIN 
U.S. Department of Justice 
Request for Authorization to Apply for Compulsion Order 
(18 U.S.C. 6001-6003; 28 CFR 0.175-0.178) 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
Prepare and Submit Original and One Copy. Answer Each Question as Accurately and 
Completely as Possible. 
TO: 
Witness Immunity Unit 
Criminal Division, Rm. 1056 
1001 G StreeLN.W. 
Washington, 
20530 
PHONE NO: (202) 514-5541 
TELEFAX NO: (202) 514-1468 
FROM: 
AUSA A. Marie Villafafia 
United States Attorneys Office 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 
PHONE NO: (561) 209-1047 
TELEFAX NO: (561) 820-8777 
(I) 
Name of Witness: Marina 
(3) 
Nature of Proceeding: 
( ) Trial 
(X) Grand Jury 
0 Other 
(2) 
District: Southern District of Florida 
(4) 
Name of Suliect s or Defendants : Jefir 
(5) 
Date of Testimony (two weeks lead time required): July 1, 2008 
(6) 
Proffer of Anticipated Testimony: 
(7) 
(8) 
(X) None Obtained 
( ) Proffer by Counsel 
( ) Proffer by Witness 
( ) Debriefing of Witness 
( ) Pursuant to Plea Agreement 
( ) Statement in other proceeding 
Summary of Case or Proceeding: The grand jury investigation is related to interstate travel with intent 
to engage in illicit sexual conduct, use of a means of interstate commerce to induce or entice a minor 
to engage in prostittlit anal a ' ' 
rafficking, and related offenses. In short, Epstein 
used his assistants— 
 II., and 
to arrange "dates" with underage girls to come 
to his home to perform sexual acts. 
gig
Background and Role in Case or Matter and Summary of Anticipated Testimony or Information: 
was a victim (she was paid to perform sexual acts when she was under 18) and also was paid 
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE 
Previous editions and Form OBD- I 11A are obsolete 
FORM OBD-11I 
JAN. 93 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-008368 
EFTA00225366

00/15/2001 15:10 FAX 5611050541 
itO NPR COWRN 
Cit 006 
to bring girls to Epstein, thus Lacerda could be classified both as • victim and as a co-conspirator. 
Her testimony will relate to how she was first introduced to Epstein; the type of sexual activity that 
be engaged in with the girls; the co-conspi rata re knowledge of the ages of the victims and the sexual 
activity that was occurring with Epstein; and the method for arranging the "appointments" with the 
girls and the recruitment of additional girls. 
(9) 
Witness' Family Relationship, if any, to the Subjects) or Defendant(s): None 
(10) 
Assurances or Promises, if any, to Witness in Return for this Testimony: None. 
(11) 
Acts of Witness Considered as a Waiver of Fifth Amendment Privilege. None. 
(12) 
Means Other than Immunity to Obtain thisTestimony Mi 
has been 
appear before a grand 
jury or to attend a proffer session. Lacerda's attorney has stated that 
will not appear unless 
compelled to do so and will assert her Fifth Amendment privilege in response to questions. 
(13) 
Basis Other than Proffer for Summary ofAnticipatedTestimony: Statements of other !vitamin, telephone 
records, and items seized during search of Epstein's home. 
(14) 
Relative Culpability of Witness Compared to Subject(s) or Dercodant(s): 
could be charged as a 
coconspirator or aider/abettor during the period when she was recruiting other girls; however, she 
also qualifies as a victim du nn the period when she was engaging insexual activity and while she was 
a minor. We believe that 
was a minor d 
ajority of the time she was Involved with 
is less culpable than the targets of the 
or their sexual activity and arranged his 
Epstein. In terms of her re alive culpability, 
investigation. Epstein and his assistants paid the g 
schedule of appointments. 
(15) 
Why Immunity is Necessary to the Public Interest State Facts. Epstein is believed to have engaged In 
sexual activity with at least 36 girls ranging In age from 14 to 18 years old. This activity occurred over 
a two-year period and some girls were contacted as many as 60 times. To prosecute successfully 
Epstein and his assistants, we man prove that Epstein and the assistants intended that Epitein engage 
in this sexual activity before he traveled to the Southern District of Florida or returned to New York, 
certain charges, that he knew or reasonably should have known that the girls were under 18. 
, who was both a victim and a "recruiter," is in the best position to testify regarding those 
in en ions. 
LOWED OFFICIAL USE 
Previous editions and Form ODD-I11 A arc obsolete 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
FORM OBD-1 II 
JAN. 93 
P-008369 
EFTA00225367

w.... 
•• ... 
'.a..r 
nn 
le; U1.1! 
(16) 
Basis for Belief that Witness Will Assert Fifth Amendment Privilege: As explained above, the witness's 
attorney has informed the undersigned that she will assert her Fifth Amendment Privilege. 
(17) 
Likelihood that Witness Will Testify if Immunity is Granted: High. The witness's attorney has stated 
that the witness will appear and answer questions if immunity is granted. 
(18) 
Prosecution of Witness in this Case or Matter: 
( ) Yes 
(X) No 
() Acquitted 
( ) Convicted 
( ) Plea 
If not indicted, why not? If convicted, has the witness been sentenced? Witness has not been indicted 
because she is more properly classified as a victim. As explained above, she could be charged as a co-
conspirator during the period that she recruited girls, but it is believed that her testimony is more 
important than charging her with those offenses because she also is a victim of the offense. 
(19) 
Witness' Privilege Survives Because: Witness' testimony will relate in part to her recruitment of 
underage girls to engage in sexual activity with Epstein. 
(20) 
Witness is Presently Incarcerated: 
( ) Yes 
(X) No 
If yes, give details: 
(21) 
Pending Federal or Local Charges against Witness: 
( ) Yes 
(X) No 
if yes, give details: 
(22) 
Federal and State Offenses by Witness that Her Testimony Could Disclose: Conspiracy to travel in 
interstate commerce to engage in illicit sexual conduct; conspiracy to use a means of interstate 
commerce to induce a minor to engage in sexual activity. 
(23) 
Opposition, if any, to Granting Immunity by State or Local Prosecuting Officials: None 
(24) 
Effect, if any, of Granting Immunity to the Witness Upon Any Other Federal District: None 
(25) 
Conviction of Witness Possible on Evidence Other than His Own Testimony? 
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE 
Previous editions and Form OBD-111A are obsolete 
FORM OBD- Ill 
JAN. 93 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-008370 
EFTA00225368

Lanu nrb tAMPHM 
&as 
() Yes 
() No 
If yes, give details: Not applicable. 
(26) 
Violations (Statutes & Descriptions) by Subject(s) or Defendant(s): For all targets: 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b) 
(travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct); 18 U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy); 18 U.S.C. § 
2422(b) (use of a means of interstate commerce to entice a minor to engage in sexual activity); 18 
L'.S.C. § 1591(a) (sex trafficking). 
(27) 
Witness Previously Immunized? 
( ) Yes 
(X) No 
If yes, give details: 
(28) 
Witnesses for whom Immunity has been Authorized in this Proceeding: 
and 
(two other girls who were both victims and recruiters). 
(29) 
Date Investigation Began: July 2006 
(30) 
Witness Subject to Electronic Surveillance? ( ) Yes 
(X) No 
If yes, give details: 
(31) 
Birth Date of Witness: 
6/29/88 
(32) 
FBI I. No.: 
(33) 
Birthplace: 
(35) 
Alias: 
• 
(36) 
Address of Witness: 
Brazil 
34 
Social Security No.: None 
(37) 
If Requestor is Department Attorney, Has United States Attorney Been Notified? ( ) Yes ( ) No Not 
applicable. 
Sign 
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE 
tun of United States A 
Previous editions and Form OBD-111A are obsolete 
FORM OBO-111 
JAN. 93 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-008371 
EFTA00225369

Memorandum 
Subject 
Prosecution Memorandum 
In re Operation Lean Year 
Date 
June 17, 2008 
To 
R. Alexander Acosta 
U.S. Attorney 
Jeff Sloman 
First Assistant U.S. Attorney 
Rolando Garcia 
Deputy Chief, Criminal Division 
Karen Atkinson, Chief
_ 
Northern Division 
From 
A. Marie Villafatia 
Assistant U.S. Attoa
t)
I. 
INTRODUCTION 
This memorandum seeks approval for the attached Request for Authorization to Apply for 
Order seeking Immunity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sections 6001-6003 for witness 
in connection with the ongoing investigation named "Operation Leap Year." 
II. 
BACKGROUND 
Operation Lea Year involves the investi ation of Jeff 
E stein and five of his assistants, 
Kellen, 
, and 
The targets would arrange "sexual massages" for Epstein when he wou travel to a m eac or 
Mi
rk, and many of those "sexual massages" were performed by minor females. Witness 
began her relationship with Epstein as a "masseuse" when she was under the age of 18. 
After performing massages friliod 
of time, 
began recruiting other girls to perform 
massages. It is believed that 
received $2 
or each girl she brought to Epstein's home. 
'The investigation originally focused on the first three assistants who traveled with 
Epstein to Florida. Upon interviewing two identified New York victims, we determined that the 
last two assistants, Groff and Steen, arranged most of Epstein's New York massages. 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-008372 
EFTA00225370

has been approached by the FBI to provide information via an informal pmm
th 
a -Kasugar e er" or testifying before 
represented by counsel in New York. 
has never spoke to 
w enforcement officer 
about what happened between her and pstein. We believe that 
counsel is independent 
i
y. Counsel has told me that, if immun i ze:101 is ready and willing to provide complete 
• 
in (unlike some attorneys who have represented other witnesses), but he has stated that 
will not meet with agents or the Offi
testify before the grand jury without MI 
immuni 
information regarding her dealings with Epstein. 
On the one hand, I am reluctant to provide = 
with immunity because I do not believe 
that she needs it. It appears that the majority of her dealings with Epstein occurred before she was 
18, our Office is not interested in prosecuting her, FBI New York is assisting FBI West Palm Beach 
in connection with the investigation, so a federal prosecution in New York is n 
ming, and 
it is unlikely that the State of New York will open an investigation and charge 
I lowever, 
it has been widely reported that the Palm Beach Poli 
t prepared a "probable cause 
affidavit" to charge a similar victim/recruiter in Florida, 
,with a second-degree felony. 
name also appears in a number of Complaints in the 
suits 
ainst Epstein. 
n t e most recent draft of the Indictment, we have listed 
and 
as unindicted 
coconspirators, which will make it easier to introduce their statements to Epstein and the assistants. 
Depending on 
testimony, we may need to treat her similarly. 
jury with a "pocket immunity" letter. 
is 
III 
THE NEED FOR THE WITNESSES' TESTIMONY AND THE REQUESTED 
IMMUNITY. 
The most difficult 
of this prosecution will be proving the knowledge and intent of the 
targets. For example, 
could assert that she knew that she was setting up massages for Epstein, 
but she believed that t ey were regular massages. 
the targets are likely to aver that they did 
not know that the girls were under the age of 18. 
helps us with this proof in several ways. 
First, she was victim whom we believe became involved with Epstein when she was only fourteen 
years' old, and her youn a e can help disprove lack of knowledge by Epstein and his assistants. 
Second, we believe that 
was a significant recruiter for Epstein, so she will be able to tell us 
what instructions she receive from him and the assistants regarding the types ofgirls to recruit, what 
lil
was expected of them, etc. Third, she provides us with a strong entrée into 
York situation, 
which strengthens the "interstate commerce" nexus of the case. Fourth, 
is likely to have 
dealt most closely with Epstein's New York assistants, Groff and Steen. The best way to strengthen 
our case at this point is to "flip" one of the assistants, and Groff is the most likely to flip if we have 
sufficient evidence to charge her. Steen is another potential cooperator, but we have heard from 
another witness that Steen had done something to upset Epstein and he "shipped her off" to the 
Middle East to work for one of his companies there. 
The U.S. Attorney's Manual recommends prosecuting witnesses in aajsystpn such as this 
and getting their cooperation as part of a plea bargain. Our evidence against 
at this time is 
-2-
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-008373 
EFTA00225371

ihe
e have statements from two victims wh 
at they went to Epstein's house with 
We have two telephone messages from 
that were recovered in the search of 
R
Epstein's home. At this time we do not have any records of telephone calls between 
and 
the assistants (we have not identified 
cell phone number during the relevant peIrt 
). 
us, 
the likelihood of succeeding on such a prosecution is very small. Furthermore, a decision to 
prosecute 
could result in a refusal by many more girls to come forward because the majority 
of the identified girls brought other girls to Epstein, so all of them would feel at risk. 
IV. 
RECOMMENDATION 
For these reasons, I recommend that the attached Request for Authorization to Apply for 
Compulsion Order on behalf of 
be submitted to the Witness Immunity Unit. 
-3-
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-008374 
EFTA00225372

US. Department of Justice 
Request for Authorization to Apply for Compulsion Order 
(18 U.S.C. 6001-6003; 28 CFR 0.175-0.178) 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
Prepare and Submit Original and One Copy. Answer Each Question as Accurately and 
Completely as Possible. 
TO: 
Witness Immunity Unit 
Criminal Division, Rm. 1056 
1001 G Street N.W. 
Washington, 
20530 
PHONE NO: (202) 514-5541 
TELEFAX NO: (202) 514-1468 
FROM: 
AUSA A. Marie Villafafia 
United States Attorney's Office 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 
PHONE NO: (561) 209-1047 
TELEFAX NO: (561) 820-8777 
(1) 
Name of Witness: 
(3) 
Nature of Proceeding: 
( ) Trial 
(X) Grand Jury 
( ) Other 
(2) 
District: Southern District of Florida 
(4) 
Name of Sub-ect(s) or Defendants : Jeff 
Epstein, 
Kellen, 
(5) 
Date of Testimony (two weeks lead time required): July 1, 2008 
(6) 
Proffer of Anticipated Testimony: 
(7) 
(8) 
(X) None Obtained 
( ) Proffer by Counsel 
( ) Proffer by Witness 
( ) Debriefing of Witness 
( ) Pursuant to Plea Agreement 
( ) Statement in other proceeding 
Summary of Case or Proceeding: The grand jury investigation is related to interstate travel with intent 
to engage in illicit sexual conduct, use of a means of interstate commerce to induce or entice a minor 
to engage in prostit
sexual activity,
afficking, and related offenses. In short, Epstein 
used his assistants— 
, and 
— to arrange "dates" with underage girls to come 
to his home to perform sexua acts. 
is
Background and Role in Case or Matter and Summary of Anticipated Testimony or Information: 
was a victim (she was paid to perform sexual acts when she was under 18) and also was paid 
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE 
Previous editions and Form OBD-111A are obsolete 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
FORM OBD- I I 1 
JAN. 93 
P-008375 
EFTA00225373

to bring girls to Epstein, thus 
could be classified both as a victim and as a co-conspirator. 
Her testimony will relate to how she was first introduced to Epstein; the type of sexual activity that 
he engaged in with the girls; the co-conspirators' knowledge of the ages of the victims and the sexual 
activity that was occurring with Epstein; and the method for arranging the "appointments" with the 
girls and the recruitment of additional girls. 
(9) 
Witness' Family Relationship, if any, to the Subject(s) or Defendant(s): None 
(10) 
Assurances or Promises, if any, to Witness in Return for this Testimony: None. 
(11) 
Acts of Witness Considered as a Waiver of Fifth Amendment Privilege: None. 
( I 2) 
Means Other than Immunity to Obtai 
ony: 
has been > 
appear before a grand 
jury or to attend a proffer session. 
attorney has stated that 
will not appear unless 
compelled to do so and will assert her Fifth Amendment privilege in response to questions. 
(13) 
Basis Other than Proffer for Summary of Anticipated Testimony: Statements of other witnesses, telephone 
records, and items seized during search of Epstein's home. 
(14) 
Relative Culpability of Witness Compared to Subject(s) or Defendant(s): 
could be charged as a 
coconspirator or aider/abettor during the period when she was recruiting of er girls; however, she 
also qualifies as a victim d 
e period when she was engaging in sexual activity and while she was 
a minor. We believe that 
was a minor d ' 
ajority of the time she was involved with 
Epstein. In terms of her relative culpability, 
is less culpable than the targets of the 
investigation. Epstein and his assistants paid the gir s or their sexual activity and arranged his 
schedule of appointments. 
(15) 
Why Immunity is Necessary to the Public Interest: State Facts. Epstein is believed to have engaged in 
sexual activity with at least 36 girls ranging in age from 14 to 18 years old. This activity occurred over 
a two-year period and some girls were contacted as many as 60 times. To prosecute successfully 
Epstein and his assistants, we must prove that Epstein and the assistants intended that Epstein engage 
in this sexual activity before he traveled to the Southern District of Florida or returned to New York, 
certain charges, that he knew or reasonably should have known that the girls were under 18. 
, who was both a victim and a "recruiter," is in the best position to testify regarding those 
intentions. 
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE 
Previous editions and Form OBD-111A are obsolete 
FORM OBD-111 
JAN. 93 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-008376 
EFTA00225374

(16) 
Basis for Belief that Witness Will Assert Fifth Amendment Privilege: As explained above, the witness's 
attorney has informed the undersigned that she will assert her Fifth Amendment Privilege. 
(17) 
Likelihood that Witness Will Testify if Immunity is Granted: High. The witness's attorney has stated 
that the witness will appear and answer questions if immunity is granted. 
(18) 
Prosecution of Witness in this Case or Matter: 
() Yes 
(X) No 
( ) Acquitted 
( ) Convicted 
( ) Plea 
If not indicted, why not? If convicted, has the witness been sentenced? Witness has not been indicted 
because she is more properly classified as a victim. As explained above, she could be charged as a co-
conspirator during the period that she recruited girls, but it is believed that her testimony is more 
important than charging her with those offenses because she also is a victim of the offense. 
(19) 
Witness' Privilege Survives Because: Witness' testimony will relate in part to her recruitment of 
underage girls to engage in sexual activity with Epstein. 
(20) 
Witness is Presently Incarcerated: 
( ) Ycs 
(X) No 
If yes, give details: 
(21) 
Pending Federal or Local Charges against Witness: 
( ) Yes 
(X) No 
If yes, give details: 
(22) 
Federal and State Offenses by Witness that Her Testimony Could Disclose: Conspiracy to travel in 
interstate commerce to engage in illicit sexual conduct; conspiracy to use a means of interstate 
commerce to induce a minor to engage in sexual activity. 
(23) 
Opposition, if any, to Granting Immunity by State or Local Prosecuting Officials: None 
(24) 
Effect, if any, of Granting Immunity to the Witness Upon Any Other Federal District: None 
(25) 
Conviction of Witness Possible on Evidence Other than His Own Testimony? 
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE 
Previous editions and Form OBD-111A are obsolete 
FORM OBD-111 
JAN. 93 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-008377 
EFTA00225375

() Yes 
( ) No 
If yes, give details: Not applicable. 
(26) 
Violations (Statutes & Descriptions) by Subject(s) or Defendant(s): For all targets: 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b) 
(travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct); 18 U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy); 18 U.S.C. § 
2422(b) (use of a means of interstate commerce to entice a minor to engage in sexual activity); 18 
U.S.C. § 1591(a) (sex trafficking). 
(27) 
Witness Previously Immunized? 
( ) Yes 
(X) No 
If yes, give details: 
(28) 
Witnesses for whom Immunity has been Authorized in this Proceeding: 
and 
(two other girls who were both victims and recruiters). 
(29) 
Date Investigation Began: July 2006 
(30) 
Witness Subject to Electronic Surveillance? ( ) Yes 
(X) No 
(31) 
Birth Date of Witness: 
(33) 
Birthplace: 
(35) 
Alias: 
(36) 
6/29/88 
Brazil 
Married name is 
Address of Witness: 4103 31st Avenue, Astoria, NY 11103 
(32) 
FBI I. No.: 
34) 
Social Security No.: None 
If yes, give details: 
(37) If Requestor is Department Attorney, Has United States Attorney Been Notified? ( ) Yes ( ) No Not 
applicable. 
at
ifi
de
Signature of Requestor 
Signature of United States Attorney 
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE 
Previous editions and Form OBD-111A are obsolete 
FORM OBD-111 
JAN. 93 
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA 
P-008378 
EFTA00225376

U.S. Department of Justice 
Criminal Division 
Office of the Assistant Attorney General 
Washington, DC 20530-0001 
JUN 24 2008 
The Honorable R. Alexander Acosta 
United States Attorney 
Southern District of Florida 
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 
Attention: 
A. Marie Villafana 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Re: 
Grand Jury Investigation, 
Jeffrey Epstein, et al. 
Dear Mr. Acosta: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by 18 U.S.C. § 6003(b) and 28 C.F.R. § 0.175(a), l 
hereby approve your request for authority to apply to the United States District Court for the 
Southern District of Florida for an order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 6002-6003 requiting 
to give testimony or provide other information in the above matter and in any 
er proceedings resulting therefrom or ancillary thereto. 
Sincerely, 
Matthew W. Friedrich 
Acting Assistant Attorney General 
Sigal P. Mandetker 
Deputy Assistant Attorney General 
7itv;cino. 
EXHIBIT B-131 
EFTA00225377