EFTA00223748

(USAFLS) 
From: 
(USAFLS) 
Sent: 
hursda 
ua 
' 
To: 
N.: 
Subject: 
ist o names 
From: 
(USAFLS) 
t 
Ser
riii.1:43111
.
To: 
N.; 
Subject: List of names 
Here are the names of people I am intending to keep in the indictment: 
eyewitness info only) 
- initials only. not' listed Jane Doe 
Not all will be in substantive counts, but they will be mentioned in the oven acts. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
1668 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
F014604 
EFTA00223748

(USAFLS) 
From: 
(USAFLS) 
Sent: 
h r 
February 14 2 8 2. 
P 
To: 
N.: 
Subject: 
I now you hate d when I o this,but. . . 
I always seem to notice something new when I go through these records. In 
notes, he shows 'payment to 
Golden Cab on 6/17/05. Can you call and see if they have any reco s or any trips tcrEl Brillo Way? Or a Dennis 
working there? And that long string of unknown numbers on 
cell phone. Could those be 'group of lines for 
Yellow Cab? 
Thanks. 
I am almost finished with the changes to the girls we are keeping. I will send that to you and then when I finish the new 
girls, I will send that portion. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
1670 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
F014605 
EFTA00223749

(USAFLS) 
From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
Here are the names of people I am intending to keep in the indictment: 
eyewitness info only) 
— initials only, not 'listed Jane Doe 
II
Not all will be in substantive counts, but they will be mentioned in the overt acts. 
I 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
1672 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
•014606 
EFTA00223750

. (USAFLS) 
From: 
(USAFLS) 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
RE DOBs 
Hi guys - sorry to bother you. On some of the new girls I don't have dobs. 
Martell 
Dicenso (the 302 says her dob is 84 5/2007) 
and do we have 'phone number?) 
Have you guys ever talked to 
or 
Should I include them? 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
1674 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
♦014607 
EFTA00223751

M, 
Ann Marie I. (USAFLS) 
From: 
(USAFLS) 
Sent: 
hursda
February 14. 2008 1:21 PM 
To: 
Subject:
Epstein Indictment 
I In 
- I didn't send the indictment yet. I was just asking tor input on who to include and who to exclude. 
How old was 
w hen she went Vl jilt 
From: 
Sen 
14, 2008 1:00 PM 
To: 
(USAFLS) 
Subject: RE: Epstein Indictment 
Hey Marie, 
There was no indictment attached to your email. Can you send it again. 
%I
In addition to the two calls from 
to 
on her cell 
/04 at 1:35 pm and 5/2/04 at 10:32 am, 
we have two telephone calls from 
to Shawn Haught's (boyfriend) 
telephone on 03/04/2004 at 
9:46 am and 2:30 pm. 
Message pads reflect 10 
Inning 03/11/2003 ending 03/01/2006. Individuals identified as 
taking the messages are 
and Alfredo Rodriguez. 
From: 
(USAFLS) [Ann.Marie.
j.gov] 
Sen 
1 AM 
To: 
N.; 
Subject: RE: Epstein Indictment 
F Y I 
jell me what you think. Also. can you pu i u 
essages from 
what the dates are and ‘s.ho took the messages? 
at we has only two phone calls with 
' 4/23/04 and 5/2/04 
561 
rue> 
From: 
(USAFLS) 
Sen 
ruary 14, 2008 11:22 AM 
To: 
Subject: Epstein Indictment 
1678 
and see if you can tell 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
I-014608 
EFTA00223752

Hi Myesha — Our server was down for 'few hours this morning. so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted 
to talk about which iris we should drop. 
and 
I. are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them. 
With respect to the other girls brought by 
. here are my thoughts. We c 
and 
S. 
very easily. Both only gave I or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. ill 
S. is good witness 
because she shows that, if you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't 
want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative 
nature outweighs its plie
s
I think we should drop 
I because I don't believe she will ever be completely zuthful about the amount of 
sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as 'I virgin on graduation 
day.") 
That only leaves 
. the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth 
keepisWe have such good documents evidence related to her - message bads, car rental records. 156 calls 
with 
. and 2 calls with 
(we have very few phone calls with =, 
so this is 
M). 
What do vou think? 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
1679 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
F014609 
EFTA00223753

. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Sent: 
hursda Febru 
r 14. 2008 1 00 PM 
To: 
■
(USAFLS) 
Subject: 
pstein Indictment 
Hey Marie, 
There was no indictment attached to your email. Can you send it again. 
In addition to the two calls from 
on her cell 10/04 
at 1:35 pm and 5/2/04 at 10:32 am, 
we have two telephone calls from 
to Shawn Haught's ( 
boyfnend) telephone on 03/04/2004 at 
9:46 am and 2:30 pm. 
Message pads reflect 10 messa es from 
beginning 03/11/2003 ending 03/01/2006. Individuals identified as 
taking the messages are 
and Alfredo Rodriguez. 
From: 
(USAFLS) [Ann. 
1 
Sen • 
ru 
• 1 AM 
To: 
N.; 
Su act: RE: Epstein Indictment 
FYI -fell me ■ 
you think. Also. can you pull the messages from 
what the dates arc and who took the messages? Thanks. 
And 
• ) 
• 
at we have only two phone calls with MP 4/23/04 and 5/2/04 
and see if you can tell 
From: 
(USAFLS) 
Ton
ruary 14, 2008 11:22 AM 
To:
Subject: Epstein Indictment 
Hi Myesha — Our server was down for' few hours this morning. so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted 
to talk about which 
we should drop. 
and 
I. are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them. 
With respect to the other girls brought by M. 
here are my thoughts. We c 
and 
S. 
very easily. Both only gave I or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. 
S. is good witness 
because she shows that, if you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't 
want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative 
nature outweighs its pie 
I think we should drop 
I because I don't believe she will ever be completely zuthful about the amount of 
sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as
 virgin on graduation 
day.") 
That only leaves 
. the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth 
keeping. We have such good documentary evidence related to her — message pads. car rental records, 156 calls 
1686 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
I-014610 
EFTA00223754

with 
and 2 calls with 
(we have very few phone calls with M, 
so this is 
key). 
I
 
hat do ou think? 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
561 
1687 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
1-014611 
EFTA00223755

(USAFLS) 
From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
Thur 
F 
14, 2008 12:37 PM 
(USAFLS) 
Epstein Indictment 
I'm not supposed to be involved in n 
tantive decisions until I get word from on h h'. However, my gener
thoughts are that you are correct 
5 
of th 
Vence and will be I good witness, although
reluctant one. Am I correct to assume that 
and 
I. are still in? Their past history of commitment will 
have to be dealt with and it won't be easy. but I agree that they should be lite 
fact that their commitments were 
post-Epstein is good but his
 going to try to destroy them. Is 
in as well? I thought that she was 
truthful. What about M 
'7
From: 
(USAFLS) [mailto 
Sen 
2008 11:22 AM 
To: 
Su • ect: Epstein Indictment 
I
Hi Myesha — Our server was down for few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted 
to talk about which girls we should dro . 
and 
I. are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them. 
With respect to the other girls brought by 
. here arc my thoughts. We can dm 
and 
S. 
very easily. Both only gave I or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. 
good witness 
because she shows that, if you aren't willing to do more sexual activity. Epstein stops the massage and doesn't 
want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative 
nature outweighs its prejudice. 
I think we should drop 
I because 1 don't believe she will ever be completely truthful about the amount of 
sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as'i virgin on graduation 
day:') 
That only leaves 
the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth 
keep' 
such good documentary evidence related to her — message pads, car rental records, 156 calls 
with 
. and 2 calls with 
(we have very few phone calls with 
. so this is 
key). 
What do you think? 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
1690 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
F014612 
EFTA00223756

(USAFLS) 
From: 
(USAFLS) 
Sent: 
Thur d 
Februa 
14 20 81 41 M 
To:
N , 
Subject: 
RE. EpsteinIndictment 
FYI - len me 
you think. Also. can you pull the messages from 
dates are and 11. 
oak the messages? Thanks. 
And am I correct that we have only two phone calls with M.' 
4/23104 and 5/2/U4 
ssistant .S, 
56I 209-1047 
From: 
.IICSAFLS) 
ruary 14, 2008 11:22 AM 
To: 
Subject: Epstein Indictment 
and see ilyou can tell what the 
Hi Myesha — Our server was down for' few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted to talk 
about which girls we should drop. 
M 
and 
I are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them. 
Both only gave 1 or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. 
With respect to the other girls brought by 
. here are my th 
S. is good witness 
ause s e shows that, if 
e cal drop I.T
eld MI 
S. very easily. 
you aren't willing to do more sexual activity. Epstein stops the massage and doesn't want to see you anymore. She seems 
like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its prejudice. 
I think we should drop 
I because I don't believe she will ever be completely truthful about the amount of sexual 
activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as 'i virgin on graduation day.") 
That only leaves Il.. 
the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be wort 
in . 
We have such g 
document 
evidence related to her — message pads, car rental records. 156 calls with. 
and 2 calls with 
(we have very few phone calls with 
• so this is key). 
What do you think? 
SLY 
1702 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
•014613 
EFTA00223757

From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
FYI — Tell me what >nu think. Also. cairtill 
the messages from
il and see if you can tell what the 
dates are and who took the messages?
And am I correct that we have only two phone calls with 
4/23/04 and 5/2/04 
I. Mark VAIN& 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
561 209-1047 
From: 
(USAFI.S) 
Sen •
February 14, 2008 11:22 AM 
To: 
Subject: Epstein Indictment 
Hi Myesha - Our server was down for' few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. 1 wanted to talk 
about which girls we should drop. 
and 
I. are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them. 
With respect to the other girls brought by 
, here are my th 
e c
 drop 
and 
S. very easily. 
Both only gave I or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. 
S. is I good witness because she shows that, if 
you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't want to see you anymore. She seems 
like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its prejudice. 
etely truthful about the amount of sexual 
activity that occurred. !Ps the girl that one of the witnesses described as'  virgin on graduation day.") 
I think we should drop 
I because I don't believe she will ever be cornui 
That only leaves
oo
 the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be wo 
We have such g
documentary evidence related to her — message palmnal 
records, 156 calls with 
and 2 calls with 
(we have very few phone calls with 
so this is key). 
What do you think? 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
1794 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
II-014614 
EFTA00223758

(USAFLS) 
From: 
(USAFLS) 
Sent: 
illhursc
ruary
. 2008 11:22 AM 
To: 
Subject: 
Epstein Indictment 
Hi Myesha — Our server was down for' few hours this morning. so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted to talk 
about which girls we should drop. 
and 
are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them. 
With respect to the other girls brought by 
M
.
 
here are my th 
e cal drop 
and 
S. very easily. 
Both only gave 1 or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. 
S. is I good witness because she shows that, if 
you aren't willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn't want to see you anymore. She seems 
like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its prejudice. 
I think we should drop 
I because I don't believe she will ever be completely truthful about the amount of sexual 
activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as 1 virgin on graduation day.") 
That only leaves 
the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth 
pin . 
We have such good document 
evidence related to her - message pads. car rental records, 156 calls with 
and 2 calls with 
(we have very few phone calls with 
so this is key). 
What do you think? 
I Marie Villafatia 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
1706 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
I-014615 
EFTA00223759

(USAFLS) 
From: 
(USAFLS) 
Sent:
February 12, 2008 4:33 PM 
To: 
N. 
Subject: 
Te 
ne numbers 
Can you 'mail me your summary chart, too? The Excel spreadsheet. 
Thanks. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
561 209-1047 
1713 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
F014616 
EFTA00223760

(USAFLS) 
From: 
(USAFLS) 
Sent: 
Tuesday February 12. 2008 4 33 PM 
To: 
N 
Subject: 
elephone numbers 
Can you e-mail me your summary chart, too? The Excel spreadsheet. 
Thanks. 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
1714 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
F014617 
EFTA00223761

. (USAFLS) 
From: 
(USAFLS) 
Sent: 
U
M. 
ri
l
iary -i 
2008 3 19 PM 
To: 
Subject: 
Telephone charts and 
phone records 
the 
Hi 11- 
Im
im i get thiament package finalized. C's 
d 
. 
and 
Also, do you have all o f 
to me the final telephone charts for all of 
records electronically? Maybe we can 
search for phone numbers for some of the new girls, even though we don't have their phone records yet. 
Also, can you check on the lead to New York? Ideally. I would like to turn the package in on Thursday, so I need to know 
if we can include any of those girls. 
When you have I chance. please give me I call. I am in the U.S. Attorney's Office 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
561 sai 
1717 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
♦014618 
EFTA00223762

.(USAFLS) 
From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
r 
08208 PM 
(USAFLS) 
e. hone call info 
Ill fax it in 5 min(what fax U?) 
Fro 
(USAFLS) < 
To:  
N. 
Sent: Fri Feb 22 14:07:06 2008 
Subject: Phone call info 
Hi 
- Can you "nail or air the dates of the calls? I can add them to 
the ni dictment today. I think 
is going to try to finish her review over 
the weekend. 
Thanks. 
II Marie 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 
156n 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
1-014619 
EFTA00223763

USAFLS 
From: 
(USAFLS) 
Sent: 
lila 
eb rt
i.wi
,t082. 10 PM 
To: 
N 
Subject: 
: hone ca info 
Thanks 
y 
500 S. Austra Ian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm 
h 
FL 33401 
Phone 5 
 
Original Messa  
From: Kuyrkendall, IN. 
Sent. 
• 
Fliiiiiiiiiii2008 2:08 PM 
To: 
(USAFLS) 
Subject: Re: Ph!!!M!!!!Millo 
I11 fax it in 5 min(what fax II) 
From: 
To: Kuyrkendall, 
N. 
Sent: Fri Feb 22 14:07:06 2008 
Subject: Phone call info 
Hi 
- Can you l[mail or 
the in is ment today. I think 
the weekend. 
(USAFLS) < 
Illr 
the dates of the calls? I can add them to 
is going to try to finish her review over 
Thanks. 
II Marie Villafana 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 
1562 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
1-014620 
EFTA00223764

(USAFLS) 
From: 
(USAFLS) 
Sent: 
n 
ry 
, 
2:07 PM 
To: 
N. 
Subject: 
one ca m o 
Hi Nesbitt — Can you Imail or fax me the dates of the calls? I can add them to the indictment today. I think 
is going to try to finish her review over the weekend. 
Thanks. 
I Marie Villafatla 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach. FL 33401 
Phone 
Fax 
1564 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
F014621 
EFTA00223765

From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
of the FedEx records 
last name is 
or 
and her phone number is 
(this may be an office number, not 
ce phone number). They also show another corporate name: "Max Hotel Services Corp." 
They show' phone number for Epstein and Eric Gany as 
They have an Imail address for 
as: 
and show her phone number as 
The notes show that the Max Hotel Services Corp credit card was declined and then they shos
n 
a 
with company name "NYSG LLC" 
They want us to be more specific about individual shipment records. so we will have to comb through what they 
gave us to identify specific shipments. 
lam running to lunch but will be back this afternoon. 
Thanks. 
I Marie VillafaAa 
Assistant U.S. Attorney 
500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 
West Palm Beach. FL 33401 
Phone 
Fax 
1567 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
F014622 
EFTA00223766

(USAFLS) 
From: 
(USAFLS) 
Sent: 
n aiiiiriary 25. 2008 11 24 AM 
To: 
(USAFLS) 
Subject: 
uestion regarding use of Grand Jury 
Thank you. &reline. It is most appreciated. 
I Mark' rub:law 
Assistantli.S. Atturne) 
500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 
West Palm Beach. FL 33401 
Phone 561 209-1047 
Fax 
From: M, 
(USAFLS) 
Sett : 
nd 
F 
5, 2008 11:23 AM 
To: 
(USAFLS) 
Sub ect: RE: Question regarding use of Grand Jury 
Marie: 
I see no need to change grand juries. Indeed, changing grand juries might suggest that something untoward 
occurred, which is not the case. 
Nor do I see' requirement to give 1404(b) tape instruction. Let's not forget dig the role of the grand is to 
investigate, and it is wholly apEropriate that I grand jury in good faith pursued I line of investigation that does 
not lead to indictment. That is very different matter from presenting information pursuant to 404(b), to prove 
motive, lack of accident, etc. 
I share your instinct that just dropping six victims, and the draft proposed indictment, might call for some 
explanation, or at least acknowledgement, to the grand jury. It's always dicey, and not really desirable, to 
explain and share legal strategies with the grand jury. Perhaps you can simply tell them that the old draft 
II
proposed indictment is being withdrawn, and 
ifferent set of facts is being pursued, and ask them if they can 
set aside what they heard previously, and base determination of probable cause solely on the new evidence. If 
any of them indicat  inability to do so, perha
 they should li excused from consideration of this case; if that 
leaves you without I quorum, then you have I basis to go to I new grand jury. 
I hope this helps; I'm available by phone as well. 
Cctralitie, 
1546 
08-80736-CV-MARRA 
I-014623 
EFTA00223767