EFTA00190318

Bates Range 
Description 
Privilege(s) Asserted 
P-015227 
thru 
P-015233 
10/18/2008-10/20/2008 emails between D. Lee, A. Acosta, J. Sloman, 
and A.M. Villafiula regarding correspondence with B. Edwards 
discussing changes to understanding of portions of Non-Prosecution 
agreement and victim notifications 
Work Product 
Deliberative Process 
P-015234 
thru 
P-015238 
11/4/2008 correspondence from Florida Bar Ethics Counsel regarding 
Florida Ethics Rules involved in distributing victim notification letters. 
Work Product 
Relevance 
Florida Bar Privacy Rules 
P415239 
thru 
P415263 
11/26/2008 emails between A.M. Villafana, J. Sloman, and R. Senior 
regarding email from R. Black about work release 
(NB: Email from R. Black has been produced to Petitioners' counsel) 
Work Product 
Deliberative Process 
P-015264 
thru 
P-015267 
12/4/2008 emails between E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and A.M. Villafafia 
regarding attempts to send victim notification letters overseas via Legal 
Attaches and unrelated Epstein financial issue 
Attorney-Client Privilege 
Work Product 
Investigative Privilege 
Privacy Act/TVPA/CVRA 
Page 7 of 7 
EFTA00190418

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
(0 
From: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) <AVillafana@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Tuesday, May 27, 2008 1:20 PM 
To: 
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
Re: Epstein 
Please tell me you that you are joking. Maybe we should throw him a party and tell him we are sorry to have bothered him. 
 
Original Message 
From: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tuc May 27 10:27:10 2008 
Subject: Epstein 
Don't know what is up but Bany talked to Rolando and according to Rolando said something about 90 days in jail. Rolando is talking 
to Jeff-he said. K 
Prottaatt 
4av 
Cov
40 
EFTA00190419

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
1\
From: 
Senior, Robert (USAFLS) <RSenior@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3:25 PM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) 
Cc: 
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: Epstein 
Marie, are you back ? We need to spend some time together on the indictment. I was planning on Monday because I thought you 
were back that day but if you're already back let me know. By the way, Jeff and Alex have been very clear that we are not negotiating 
with this guy any more in any way. 
Thx. Bob 
 
Original Message 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (US/U:1,S) 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: Epstein 
Hi jeff. Karen sent me an email about epstcin wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was 
supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. 
Please keep me posted. Thanks. 
41 
EFTA00190420

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) <AVillafana@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3:56 PM 
To: 
Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
Re: Epstein 
Hi bob. I get back on saturday. I will spend sunday with nesbitt and monday with you. I will be there by 10:00 unless you need me 
there earlier. 
Original Message ----
From: Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tue May 27 15:24:50 2008 
Subject: RE: Epstein 
Marie, are you back ? We need to spend some time together on the indictment. I was planning on Monday because I thought you 
were back that day but if you're already back let me know. By the way, Jeff and Alex have been very clear that we are not negotiating 
with this guy any more in any way. 
Thx. Bob 
---Original Message-----
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: Epstein 
Hi jell. Karen sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was 
supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. 
Please keep me posted. Thanks. 
42 
EFTA00190421

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Senior, Robert (USAFLS) <RSenior@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Tuesday, May 27, 2008 5:09 PM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: Epstein 
Perfect. Enjoy your trip. We're in good shape (so far). 
 
Original Message 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3:56 PM 
To: Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Subject: Re: Epstein 
Hi bob. I get back on saturday. I will spend sunday with nesbitt and monday with you. I will be there by 10:00 unless you need me 
there earlier. 
 
Original Message 
From: Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tue May 27 15:24:50 2008 
Subject: RE: Epstein 
Marie, are you back ? We need to spend some time together on the indictment. I was planning on Monday because I thought you 
were back that day but if you're already back let me know. By the way, Jeff and Alex have been very clear that we are not negotiating 
with this guy any more in any way. 
Thx. Bob 
 
Original Message 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: Epstein 
Hi jeff. Karen sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was 
supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. 
Please keep me posted. Thanks. 
44 
EFTA00190422

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) <AVillafana@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Tuesday, May 27, 2008 4:03 PM 
To: 
Kuyrkendall, E N. (MM) (FBI) 
Subject: 
Re: Mtg 
Hi ncsbitt. Just heard back from jeff. Theu haven't heard anything from epstein's people and they aren't interested in renegotiating so 
karen's msg is a non-starter. Let's plan to meet sunday at 1:30 at my house if that is okay. Then I will spend monday with bob in 
miaini. Thanks. 
 
Original Message 
From: Kuyrkendall, E N. (FBI) 
To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tue May 27 12:24:22 2008 
Subject: RE: Mtg 
Marie, 
Hope you are having a Great time and resting up. I'm afraid our days will be busy when u get back:) Jason is out on Sunday, but I 
think u and I should be able to handle it. Let me know what time, I will keep the day open. 
New York is not going well. The Agents are still t in to locate Marina (we now know here last name)liMbut no luck thus 
far. When we ran the name in TE 
ob 07/09/1990 departed Miami on Jan 28, 2008 for Brazil and has not 
reililliall 
not connect this 
wi 
ew ork so although the age matches this may not be our gal. There is no record of 
a 
in Choicepoint or ccunnt matching her description. We'll keep trying. 
We have spoken to the parents and a family attorney for Leanne but she does not want to speak with us. The Agents will keep at it 
this week in hopes that they will be able to locate and interview her. I'll email you as soon as I have more to report. 
It appears Joanne S. is residing in North Carolina now. Hcr house here is up for sale. We spoke with her mother and asked her to 
have Joanne contact us. 
The subpoenas u left have all been served. We had to redo Verizon's at their request but they said they could get us the info this 
week. Negative results at the storage unit. 
Unfortunately not much to report but we will stay at it. Entail a time for Sunday and I let u know if we have any further 
developments. 
Nesbitt 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) [Ann.Marie.C.Villafana@usdoj.gov] 
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 9:37 AM 
To: Kuyrkcndall, E N.; Richards, Jason R. 
Subject: Mtg 
Hi guys. Hope all is well. I understand that jeff has explained the status. Can we meet on sunday junc 1st to finalize everything so 
can meet with bob on monday and we can present on tuesday? And what is the status of new york? Thanks 
 2- 1
43 
EFTA00190423

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Richards, Jason R. (FBI) <Jason.Richards2@ic.fbi.gov> 
Sent: 
Tuesday, May 27, 2008 6:46 PM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Cc: 
Kuyrkendall, E N. (MM) (FBI) 
Subject: 
RE: Epstein 
Hey Marie, 
Sony to bother you on your vacation. Apparently the DAG is inclined to allow Epstein's counsel to present further arguments. Jeff 
Sloman has requested Nesbitt and Ito prepare, in email format, arguments to present to the DAG supporting why the case should not 
be stalled any further. Sloman mentioned statute of limitation issues. I don't know what the specific statute of limitations are (if there 
are any) for the various counts. Seems like the statute of limitations was for the life of the victim but I'm not certain. Other points that 
can be made include the private investigators continuing to contact the victims and the relocation of our victims to various parts of the 
country. Do you have any suggestions as to what would be our best course of persuasion? Thanks and happy travels. 
Jason 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) (Ann.Marie.C.Villafana(gusdoj.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: Epstein 
Hi jeff. Karen sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was 
supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. 
Please keep me posted. Thanks. 
45 
EFTA00190424

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
ViBaratta, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) <AVillafana@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Tuesday, May 27, 2008 11:45 PM 
To: 
Richards, Jason R. (MM) (FBI); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Kuyrkendall, E N. (MM) (FBI) 
Subject: 
Re: Epstein 
Aaaargh. 
The statute of limitations issue is the state statute of limitations. I think joe says it is two years. The issue is implicated in two ways. 
First, because of the state's leniency for the first set of girls, the second set have been presented only to us for prosecution. If we 
cannot go forward, then there will be no prosecution of those crimes. (In response to the argument that joe should just present them 
now, we believe that some of the victims are unknown to the defense and disclosing them further weakens our case by allowing them 
to depose and harass those victims.) 
Second, our "state resolution" of the case requires epstein to plead to something that hasn't been charged yet so further delay will 
allow him to escape one of the terms of the deal he signed several months ago. (There also is a sol on the private cause of action 
under 2255 pursuant to which he must pay damages to the girls. The delay will allow him to escape responsibility for that term, too.) 
Other reasons: 
The victims are getting older. Clearly one of epstein's arguments will be that he did not know they were minors. The older they are 
when they testify the more plausible epstein's argument becomes. 
The grand jury we are using will expire soon. We have already presented more than a dozen hours of testimony and the grand jury is 
invested and wants to indict. 
We promised the girls swift justice so they could move on with their lives. 
is a perfect example of why this is needed. The 
delay so far has led many to reach out to private lawyers which, in turn, lets e argue that they are only in it for money. 
Why give him more time? He has had more than a years delay already for no reason other than the names of the attorneys he can 
afford to hire. This is not a white collar or other non-violent crime. This is a child exploitation crime with more than 20 known child 
victims. We are mandated by statute and doj policy to prosecute those cases vigorously and in a timely fashion - whether the children 
were prostitutes or unwilling victims. Why is this case being treated so differently? 
--- Original Message ----
From: Richards, Jason R. (FBI) 
To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Cc: Kuyrkendall, E N. (FBI) 
Sent: The May 27 18:45:37 2008 
Subject: RE: Epstein 
Hey Marie, 
Sorry to bother you on your vacation. Apparently the DAG is inclined to allow Epstein's counsel to present further arguments. Jeff 
Sloman has requested Nesbitt and Ito prepare, in email format, arguments to present to the DAG supporting why the case should not 
be stalled any further. Sloman mentioned statute of limitation issues. I don't know what the specific statute of limitations arc (if there 
are any) for the various counts. Seems like the statute of limitations was for the life of the victim but I'm not certain. Other points that 
can be made include the private investigators continuing to contact the victims and the relocation of our victims to various parts of the 
country. Do you have any suggestions as to what would be our best course of persuasion? Thanks and happy travels. 
Jason 
46 
EFTA00190425

From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) (Ann.Marie.C.Villafaita(Qusdoj.gov) 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: Epstein 
Hi jell'. Karen sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was 
supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. 
Please keep me posted. Thanks. 
47 
EFTA00190426

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Kuyrkendall, E N. (FBI) <E.Kuyrkendall@ic.fbi.gov> 
Sent: 
Wednesday, May 28, 2008 6:33 PM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
Re: Epstein 
Hey we emailed Jeff MOST:) of your comments re any further delays and added a few of our own. The US Atty Gen was here today 
in MM. I would love to know if Epstein came up. Jeff and Acosta were going to present to the DAG reasons not to delay any further. 
Hopefully they were successful and we r still on for Tues. We interviewed SR today. She told Epstein her true age, she belvd was 14 
or IS. Phone records show contact @ age 16. She said Epstein told her he did not care about age. She also said that E 
told her he had rad TM. TM brought SR. Anyways, I'll fill u in later. NY getting close to locating ML. We have cell and good 
address. Keep your fingers crossed. Talk to u soon. 
-- Original Message ----
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) <Ann.Marie.C.Villafana@usdoj.gov> 
To: Richards, Jason R.; Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Kuyrkendall, E N. 
Sent: Tue May 27 23:45:06 2008 
Subject: Re: Epstein 
Aaaargh. 
The statute of limitations issue is the state statute of limitations. 1 think joe says it is two years. The issue is implicated in two ways. 
First, because of the state's leniency for the first set of girls, the second set have been presented only to us for prosecution. If we 
cannot go forward, then there will be no prosecution of those crimes. (In response to the argument that joe should just present them 
now, we believe that some of the victims are unknown to the defense and disclosing them further weakens our case by allowing them 
to depose and harass those victims.) 
Second, our "state resolution" of the case requires epstein to plead to something that hasn't been charged yet so further delay will 
allow him to escape one of the terms of the deal he signed several months ago. (There also is a sol on the private cause of action 
under 2255 pursuant to which he must pay damages to the girls. The delay will allow him to escape responsibility for that term, too.) 
Other reasons: 
The victims are getting older. Clearly one of epstein's arguments will be that he did not know they were minors. The older they are 
when they testify the more plausible epstein's argument becomes. 
The grand jury we are using will expire soon. We have already presented more than a dozen hours of testimony and the grand jury is 
invested and wants to indict. 
We promised the girls swift justice so they could move on with their lives. 
is a perfect example of why this is needed. The 
delay so far has led many to reach out to private lawyers which, in turn, let's e argue that they are only in it for money. 
Why give him more time? He has had more than a year's delay already for no reason other than the names of the attorneys he can 
afford to hire. This is not a white collar or other non-violent crime. This is a child exploitation crime with more than 20 known child 
victims. We are mandated by statute and doj policy to prosecute those cases vigorously and in a timely fashion - whether the children 
were prostitutes or unwilling victims. Why is this case being treated so differently? 
--- Original Message 
From: Richards, Jason R. (FBI) 
To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Cc: Kuyrkendall, E N. (FBI) 
Sent: Tue May 27 18:45:37 2008 
Subject: RE: Epstein 
Hey Marie, 
Sony to bother you on your vacation. Apparently the DAG is inclined to allow Epstein's counsel to present further arguments. Jeff 
Sloman has requested Nesbitt and Ito prepare, in email format, arguments to present to the DAG supporting why the case should not 
be stalled any further. Sloman mentioned statute of limitation issues. I don't know what the specific statute of limitations are (if there 
50 
EFTA00190427

are any) for the various counts. Seems like the statute of limitations was for the life of the victim but I'm not certain. Other points that 
can be made include the private investigators continuing to contact the victims and the relocation of our victims to various parts of the 
country. Do you have any suggestions as to what would be our best course of persuasion? Thanks and happy travels. 
Jason 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) [Ann.Marie.C.Villaftma@usdoj.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27,2008 2:54 PM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: Epstein 
Hi jell. Karen sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less lime. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was 
supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. 
Please keep me posted. Thanks. 
51 
EFTA00190428

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) <KAtkinson@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Wednesday, May 28, 2008 9:21 AM 
To: 
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: Epstein 
19-
This was info that Rolando got from Barry, the state attorney, but he was waiting for an email to confirm. I am much to lowly to have 
communications with the "star" team. 
 
Original Message 
From: Stamen, Jeff (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3:09 PM 
To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: RE: Epstein 
Marie/Karen, 
No one has contacted anyone in Miami. Please copy me and Bob on all communications. Thanks, 
Jeff 
 
Original Message 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: Epstein 
Hi Jeff. Karen sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was 
supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. 
Please keep me posted. Thanks. 
48 
EFTA00190429

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) <1Sloman@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Wednesday, May 28, 2008 9:37 AM 
To: 
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: Epstein 
Rolando, 
Please fill me in. 
Jeff 
 
Original Message 
From: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 9:21 AM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: RE: Epstein 
This was info that Rolando got from Barry, the slate attorney, but he was waiting for an email to confirm. I am much to lowly to have 
communications with the "star" team. 
 
Original Message 
From: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3:09 PM 
To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: RE: Epstein 
Marie/Karen, 
No one has contacted anyone in Miami. Please copy me and Bob on all communications. Thanks, 
Jeff 
 
Original Message 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) 
Subject: Epstein 
Hi jeff. Karen sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was 
supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the I8 months. 
Please keep me posted. Thanks. 
49 
EFTA00190430

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) <JSloman@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Thursday, May 29, 2008 9:29 AM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: 
Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Kuyrkendall, E N. (MM) (FBI); Richards, Jason R. (MM) (FBI) 
Subject: 
RE: Epstein 
No telling how long the DAG's office will take to decide. Tucsday is off. 
 
Original Message 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 9:03 AM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Kuyrkendall, E N. (FBI); Richards, Jason R. (FBI) 
Subject: Epstein 
Hi Jeff and Bob. I received Jeffs e-mail stating that the DAG agreed to meet with epstein's people. Does this mean that Tucsday is 
off? I need to let the gj coordinator know. 
Also, I am sure that you remember m. She was the person whom we initially classified as a victim until epstein's attorneys 
complained. Well, nesbitt has,interviewed a girl who was 14 or 15 when she first went to epstein's house who reports that epstein 
told her that he had sex with 
. (MI probably would have been 15 or 16 when this conversation occurred.) The girl also reports 
that she told epstein her true age and epstein told her that he doesn't care about age. 
I know that epstcin's people will, no doubt, continue to tell the dag and others that epstein didn't know about the girls' ages so I 
thought you should know. 
Please let me know about tuesday so I don't needlessly spoil nesbitt's sunday. And, any chance the case was discussed with the ag 
when he was in town? 
Thanks. 
52 
I r; 
EFTA00190431

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Kuyrkendall, E N. (FBI) <E.Kuyrkendall@ic.fbi.gov> 
Sent: 
Thursday, May 29, 2008 12:19 PM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: Epstein 
Marie, 
The NY agents made contact with Marina today. She met them at the door with her attorney's card. (she is connected to a target in 
another FBI investigation) I'll explain later. Anyway, she contacted the agent a few minutes ago and sounded surprised when she was 
informed it was about Epstein. She switched the conversation immediately about coming to Grand Jury on Tues. The agent left the 
door open to contact her if she decides to talk to her. I think we should let her travel down here and let Jason and I attempt to 
interview her prior to putting her in the GJ. What do you think? I told the NY agent if Marina should reach out to her again to 
provide her with my name and information as her contact once she gets down here. I do not know if she plans on getting her attorney 
involved or not. His info is as follows: Diannuid White of White and White, 148 E. 78th Street, NY NY 10075, telephone number 
. I have a feeling she will reach out to Epstein, so it could get interesting. We have to schedule time for her in front of 
et inc know. 
Nesbitt 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) (Ann.Marie.C.Villafana(gusdoj.gov) 
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 9:03 AM 
To: Sloman, Jeff(USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Kuyrkendall, E N.; Richards, Jason R. 
Subject: Epstein 
Hi Jeff and Bob. I received Jeffs e-mail stating that the DAG agreed to meet with epstein's people. Does this mean that Tuesday is 
off? I need to let the gj coordinator know. 
Also, I am sure that you remember 
m. She was the person whom we initially classified as a victim until epstein's attorneys 
complained. Well, nesbitt has 'list interviewed a girl who was 14 or 15 when she first went to epstein's house who reports that epstein 
told her that he had sex with 
probably would have been 15 or 16 when this conversation occurred.) The girl also reports 
that she told epstein her true age and epstein told her that he doesn't care about age. 
I know that epstein's people will, no doubt, continue to tell the dag and others that epstein didn't know about the girls' ages so I 
thought you should know. 
Please let me know about tuesday so I don't needlessly spoil nesbitt's sunday. And, any chance the case was discussed with the ag 
when he was in town? 
Thanks. 
53 
EFTA00190432

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) <AVillafana@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Thursday, May 29, 2008 3:24 PM 
To: 
Kuyrkendall, E N. (MM) (FBI) 
Subject: 
Re: Epstein 
Hi nesbitt. Very intereting. Is she coining down on her own dime? If she wants us to pay we have to set up the travel. Can you figure 
that out and if she is showing up this tuesday call karen atkinson to reserve grand jury time. Ask to put us last in case she is willing to 
do an interview and them we will not bring her to gj. We may want to video her. Since we aren't indicting on tuesday let's meet 
monday afternoon to go over everything. Thanks. 
 
Original Message 
From: Kuyrkendall, E N. (FBI) 
To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Thu May 29 12:18:50 2008 
Subject: RE: Epstein 
Marie, 
The NY agents made contact with Marina today. She met them at the door with her attorney's card. (she is connected to a target in 
another F131 investigation) I'll explain later. Anyway, she contacted the agent a few minutes ago and sounded surprised when she was 
informed it was about Epstein. She switched the conversation immediately about coining to Grand Jury on Tues. The agent left the 
door open to contact her if she decides to talk to her. I think we should let her travel down here and let Jason and I attempt to 
interview her prior to putting her in the al. What do you think? I told the NY agent if Marina should reach out to her again to 
provide her with my name and information as her contact once she gets down here. I do not know if she plans on getting her attorney 
involved or not. His info is as follows: Diarmuid White of White and White, 148 E. 78th Street, NY NY 10075, telephone number 
I have a feeling she will reach out to Epstein, so it could get interesting. We have to schedule time for her in front of 
. 
t me now. 
Nesbitt 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)[Ann.Marie.C.Villafana@usdoj.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 9:03 AM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Kuyrkendall, E N.; Richards, Jason R. 
Subject: Epstein 
Hi Jeff and Bob. I received Jeffs e-mail stating that the DAG agreed to meet with epstein's people. Does this mean that Tuesday is 
off? I need to let the gj coordinator know. 
Also, I am sure that you remember 
m. She was the person whom we initially classified as a victim until epstein's attorneys 
complained. Well, nesbitt haifinterviewed a girl who was 14 or 15 when she first went to epstein's house who reports that epstein 
told her that he had sex with 
( 
probably would have been 15 or 16 when this conversation occurred.) The girl also reports 
that she told epstein her true age and epstein told her that he doesn't care about age. 
I know that epstein's people will, no doubt, continue to tell the dag and others that epstein didn't know about the girls' ages so I 
thought you should know. 
Please let me know about tuesday so I don't needlessly spoil nesbites sunday. And, any chance the case was discussed with the ag 
when he was in town? 
Thanks. 
54 
EFTA00190433

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Kuyrkendall, E N. (FBI) <E.Kuyrkendall@ic.fbi.gov> 
Sent: 
Friday, May 30, 2008 2:53 PM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
RE: Epstein 
Marie, 
just heard from Marina's attorney, Brendan White. He informed me that he is representing Marina and that she would not be able to 
make the June 3rd date and that she will invoke her 5th amendment right unless she is granted immunity. I informed him that Marina 
was considered a victim/witness but he said that she would still invoke w/o immunity. SOUNDS like he has been well 
informed. Anyway Mr. White advised he had left you a message so I told him I would let the two of you work out the details. We can 
meet Monday afternoon and I will fill you in on the rest. I'll let Karen Odell and Karen Atkinson know we are off for Tuesday. Have a 
great weekend. 
Nesbitt 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) (Ann.Marie.C.Villafana®usdoj.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 3:24 PM 
To: Kuyrkendall, EN. 
Subject: Re: Epstein 
Hi nesbitt. Very intereting. Is she coming down on her own dime? If she wants us to pay we have to set up the travel. Can you figure 
that out and if she is showing up this tuesday call karen atkinson to reserve grand jury time. Ask to put us last in case she is willing to 
do an interview and them we will not bring her to gj. We may want to video her. Since we aren't indicting on tuesday let's meet 
monday afternoon to go over everything. Thanks. 
-- Original Message — 
From: Kuyrkendall, E N. (FBI) 
To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Sent: Thu May 29 12:18:50 2008 
Subject: RE: Epstein 
Marie, 
The NY agents made contact with Marina today. She met them at the door with her attorney's card. (she is connected to a target in 
another FBI investigation) I'll explain later. Anyway, she contacted the agent a few minutes ago and sounded surprised when she was 
informed it was about Epstein. She switched the conversation immediately about coming to Grand Jury on Tues. The agent left the 
door open to contact her if she decides to talk to her. I think we should let her travel down here and let Jason and I attempt to 
interview her prior to putting her in the GL What do you think? I told the NY agent if Marina should reach out to her again to 
provide her with my name and information as her contact once she gets down here. I do not know if she plans on getting her attorney 
involved or not. His info is as follows: Diarmuid White of White and White, 148 E. 78th Street, NY NY 10075, telephone number 
. I have a feeling she will reach out to Epstein, so it could get interesting. We have to schedule time for her in front of 
et me know. 
Nesbitt 
From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) [Ann.Marie.C.Villafana®usdoj.gov] 
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 9:03 AM 
To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS) 
Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Kuyrkendall, E N.; Richards, Jason R. 
Subject: Epstein 
Hi Jeff and Bob. I received Jeff's e-mail stating that the DAG agreed to meet with epstein's people. Does this mean that Tuesday is 
oft? I need to let the gj coordinator know. 
55 
EFTA00190434

Also, I am sure that you remember 
m. She was the person whom we initially classified as a victim until cpstein's attorneys 
complained. Well, nesbitt haiiiiinterviewed a girl who was 14 or IS when she first went to epstein's house who reports that epstein 
told her that he had sex with 
. (MI probably would have been 15 or 16 when this conversation occurred.) The girl also reports 
that she told epstein her true age and epstein told her that he doesn't care about age. 
I know that epstein's people will, no doubt, continue to tell the dag and others that epstein didn't know about the girls' ages so I 
thought you should know. 
Please let me know about tuesday so I don't needlessly spoil nesbitt's sunday. And, any chance the case was discussed with the ag 
when he was in town? 
Thanks. 
56 
EFTA00190435

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) <1Sloman@usa.doj.goy> 
Monday, June 02, 2008 4:25 PM 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
draft letter to DAG 
57 
EFTA00190436

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
From: 
Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) <1Sloman@usa.doj.gov> 
Sent: 
Monday, June 02, 2008 4:25 PM 
To: 
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) 
Subject: 
draft letter to DAG 
57 
EFTA00190437