EFTA00182748

CT 
DATE(S) 
DEFENDANT(S) 
VICTIM(S) 
STATUTES/CHARGE 
25 
August 2003 - 
February 2004 
Jane Doe #18 
18 U.S.C. §§ 2422(b) and 2 
Using a facility or means of interstate commerce to 
knowingly persuade, induce, or entice a person who had 
not attained the age of 18 years to engage in prostitution 
or sexual activity for which any person can be charged 
with a criminal offense 
26 
2001 - October 2005 N ill 
Jane Does 1-19 
18 U.S.C. § 2423(e) 
Conspiracy to travel in interstate commerce for the 
purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct 
27 
2001 - October 2005 
Jane Does 1-19 
18 U.S.C. § 2423(d) 
For the purpose of commercial advantage or private 
financial gain, arranging or facilitating the travel of a 
person knowing that the person was traveling in 
interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit 
sexual conduct 
28 
I
Jane 
Ir
July 16. 2004 
Jane Doe #7 
Doe #8 
Jane Doe #9 
Jane Doe #10 
18 U.S.C. §§ 2423(b) and 2 
Traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of 
engaging in illicit sexual conduct with a minor 
29 
August 6. 2004 
\EPSTEIN 
Jane Doe #9 
(Fayth P.) 
Jane Doe #11 
(Alexandra IL) 
18 U.S.C. §§ 2423(b) and 2 
Traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of 
engaging in illicit sexual conduct with a minor 
Pal,e 7 of 9 
EFTA00182948

CT 
DATE(S) 
DEFENDANT(S) 
VICTIM(S) 
STATUTES/CHARGE 
30 
August 19, 2004 
- \EPSTEIN 
Jane Doe #9 
(Alexandra H.) 
Jane Doe #10 
(Britany B.) 
Jane Doe #11 
18 U.S.C. §§ 2423(b) and 2 
Traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of 
engaging in illicit sexual conduct with a minor 
31 
October 29, 2004 
Sill 
"
iPSTEIN 
Jane Doe #10 
(Britany B.) 
Jane Doe #11 
Jane Doe #13 
(Dainya N.) 
18 U.S.C. §§ 2423(b) and 2 
Traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of 
engaging in illicit sexual conduct with a minor 
32 
February 21, 2005 
Jane Doe #11 
(Vanessa Z.) 
Jane Doe #14 
(Felicia E.) 
Jane Doe #15 
18 U.S.C. §§ 2423(b) and 2 
Traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of 
engaging in illicit sexual conduct with a minor 
33 
March 31, 2005 
STEIN 
Jane Doe #11 
(Saige G.) 
Jane Doe #14 
(Vanessa Z.) 
Jane Doe #15 
(Fayth P.) 
Jane Doe #16 
18 U.S.C. §§ 2423(b) and 2 
Traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of 
engaging in illicit sexual conduct with a minor 
34 
September 18, 2005 
STEIN 
Jane Doe #16 
(Ashley D.) 
18 U.S.C. §§ 2423(b) and 2 
Traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of 
engaging in illicit sexual conduct with a minor 
Page 8 of 9 
EFTA00182949

CT 
DATE(S) 
FENDANT(S) 
VICTIM(S) 
STATUTES/CHARGE 
35 
September 29, 2005 
TEIN 
Jane Doe #16 
(Ashley D.) 
18 U.S.C. §§ 2423(1)) and 2 
Traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of 
engaging in illicit sexual conduct with a minor 
1
1 . 
Page 9 of 9 
EFTA00182950

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 147 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 
Page 1 of 9 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
JANE DOE NO. 2, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 3, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 4, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 5, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON 
EFTA00182951

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 147 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 
Page 2 of 9 
JANE DOE NO. 6, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 7, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE, 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA/JOHNSON 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-MARRA/JOHNSON 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON 
EFTA00182952

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 147 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 
Page 3 of 9 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
DOE II, 
CASE NO.: 09-CV-80469-MARRA/JOHNSON 
Plaintiff, 
JANE DOE NO. 101, 
CASE NO.: 09-CV-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
JANE DOE NO. 102, 
CASE NO.: 09-CV-80656-MARRA/JOHNSON 
Plaintiff, 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 
Defendant. 
Plaintiff, 
PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO 
STRIKE CASES FROM CURRENT TRIAL DOCKET AND MOTION TO CONTINUE 
CASE AND/OR ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO MODIFY TRIAL AND SCHEDULING 
ORDER DEADLINES 
The Plaintiff, 
by and through undersigned counsel, files this Response to 
Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Strike Cases From Current Trial Docket And 
Motion to Continue Case And/Or Alternative Motion to Modify Trial and Scheduling 
Order (D.E. 104), and further states as follows: 
EFTA00182953

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 147 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 
Page 4 of 9 
1. 
Defendant EPSTEIN seeks to have this case (and others that are 
presently pending) stricken from the trial docket, or continued for at least an additional 
three months or have the existing pretrial deadlines extended. In light of Plaintiffs filing 
of her Conditional Notice of Intent to Exclusively Rely on Statutory Damages Provided 
by 18 U.S.C. §2255 (D.E. 113) on June 5, 2009, Plaintiff agrees to a modification of the 
pretrial schedule as outlined in Defendant EPSTEIN's Motion to Strike (D.E. 104); to wit, 
extending discovery for an additional three months from the currently set deadline of 
August 28, 2009, extending the current deadline of October 15, 2009 by two months to 
file substantive pretrial motions, extending the current deadline of December 21, 2009 
by one month to mediate this matter, and extending the deadline of June 29, 2009 by 
one month to exchange expert witness reports) 
2. 
EPSTEIN's requests to have this case stricken from the trial docket, or in 
the alternative, continued for three months, however, are not warranted under the 
circumstances and would unreasonably and unnecessarily delay the resolution of this 
case. The filing of the instant motion marks the third different way EPSTEIN has sought 
to delay the trial on this matter. First, it was Defendant's Motion for Stay (D.E. 33), 
which was denied by the Court on December 17, 2008. Next, it was Defendant's 
second Motion for Stay (D.E. 51), which is presently pending before the Court. Third, 
and unfortunately, probably not the last, is Defendant's latest attempt to delay the trial of 
this case. 
With regards to the last requested modification of the pretrial order, EPSTEIN requests "an additional 
month to complete the remaining deadlines under each of the Court's Trial Orders." Given that each of 
the other deadlines not specifically listed above are to take place 15 days or less from the calendar call 
date of February 19, 2010 (which is 3 days from the trial date of February 22, 2010), the only logical 
deadline EPSTEIN could be referring to is the expert witness report exchange. 
EFTA00182954

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 147 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 
Page 5 of 9 
3. 
In order to justify his latest attempt to delay the trial of this case, EPSTEIN 
argues that Plaintiff's conduct has prevented him from "conducting any meaningful 
discovery, including the taking of 
's supervisors, co-workers, acquaintances, 
friends, and other third parties."(D.E. 104, pg. 7). The sworn affidavit by counsel for 
Defendant, Michael Pike, Esq. repeats the same allegation ("As a result, the 
undersigned has not had an opportunity to depose any individuals that may have 
information about the allegations made by Plaintiffs."(D.E. 042-2, paragraph 4). 
4, 
Defendant's Motion and affidavit are simply not supported by the history of 
this case. First, this case was filed in state court on February 21, 2008. Defendant 
EPSTEIN was served with a summons and complaint on July 2, 2008. For reasons that 
are known only to himself and his counsel in this case, EPSTEIN waited a full six 
months before propounding any discovery of any kind upon Plaintiff. EPSTEIN filed his 
first set of interrogatories on January 16, 2009, and his first set of requests to produce 
on January 16, 2009. EPSTEIN's choice to wait a half a year before engaging in formal 
discovery is not the Plaintiff's fault, nor can he now be allowed to argue that the current 
trial setting is unworkable because of his failures. 
5. 
Second, Plaintiff provided answers to Defendant's first set of 
interrogatories on February 18, 2009 (Attached as Exhibit "1"). Plaintiffs answers to 
interrogatories identifies thirty six (36) people, other than herself and EPSTEIN, who 
have or may have knowledge regarding the subject matter of the instant law suit. This 
list of individuals includes Plaintiff's relatives, mental health providers, a former 
boyfriend, her friends, other victims of EPSTEIN, members of law enforcement who 
investigated EPSTEIN, and former employees and/or associates of EPSTEIN. Armed 
EFTA00182955

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 147 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 
Page 6 of 9 
with the identities of these crucial fact witnesses for almost the last four (4) months, 
EPSTEIN had not set a single one of them for deposition as of the time he filed the 
instant motion. 
Defendant's claims that he has been absolutely prevented from 
engaging in any discovery as a result of Plaintiffs "delay tactics" are absolutely belied 
by the fact that he actually has much of the information he complains Plaintiff is 
concealing from him, but has chosen to do nothing with it over the last four months. 
6. 
Plaintiff also filed on February 2, 2009 her Initial Disclosure which likewise 
identified multiple individuals who had or may have knowledge regarding the subject 
matter of the instant suit (Attached as Exhibit "2"). Defendant failed to set any of those 
indentified individuals for deposition either. 
7. 
Once again, Defendant cannot bury his head in the sand by failing to take 
available discovery and then turn around and complain that he cannot get ready for trial 
scheduled in February of 2010. 
8. 
Third, EPSTEIN inappropriately characterizes Plaintiff's assertions of the 
protections afforded to her under the applicable rules of procedure and case law with 
respect to unreasonably invasive and irrelevant discovery propounded by EPSTEIN as 
an attempt to conceal evidence from EPSTEIN and delay the discovery of same. 
Defendant's allegations in this regard are flat out wrong. Plaintiff, just like EPSTEIN, 
has certain rights and privileges with respect to the scope of permissible discovery. 
Plaintiff has every right to avail herself of the protections available to her under the rules 
of discovery without fear of claims from EPSTEIN that she is concealing or delaying 
anything. Indeed, it is ironic that EPSTEIN takes issue with a litigant invoking the 
protections available to her with regards to inappropriate and unreasonable discovery 
EFTA00182956

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 147 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 
Page 7 of 9 
when he himself has failed to respond to any discovery propounded to him by Plaintiff, 
but instead has invoked his 5th Amendment privilege. 
9. 
Fourth, in the event that the Court rules that Plaintiff can recover the 
statutory damage floor established in 18 U.S.C. §2255 for each proven incident of 
abuse committed by EPSTEIN upon her, the discovery which EPSTEIN presently seeks 
will not be relevant or material in any way given Plaintiff's Conditional Notice of Intent to 
Exclusively Rely on Statutory Damages Provided by 18 U.S.C. §2255. 
10. 
Defendant asserts as justification for continuing this case what can fairly 
be characterized as routine and ordinary discovery disputes. Nothing contained in 
either his motion or supporting affidavit rises to the level of "exceptional circumstances" 
required by Local Rule 7.6 to continue a trial setting. Any issues related to discovery 
can certainly be cured by extending the trial deadlines as proposed by EPSTEIN. 
Delaying the trial of this case is simply not necessary nor justified. 
EFTA00182957

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 147 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 
Page 8 of 9 
WHEREFORE, in light of the foregoing, the Plaintiff respectfully requests this 
Court enter an order denying Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Strike Cases From 
Current Trial Docket And Motion to Continue Case And/Or Alternative Motion to Modify 
Trial and Scheduling Order. 
Respectfully submitted, 
/.s/.lack P Hill 
JACK SCARO 
Florida Bar NolMil 
JACK P. HILL 
Florida Bar No.: 
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard 
West Palm Beach. 
09 
Phone: 
Fax: 
Attorneys for Plaintiff 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 8th, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing 
document with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing 
document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified above via 
transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF. 
/.s/lank P Hill 
JACK SCAROLA 
Florida Bar No. 
JACK P. HILL 
Florida Bar No.: 
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard 
West Palm Beach, Fl i 
409 
Phone: 
Fax: 
Attorneys for Plaintiff 
EFTA00182958

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 147 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 
Page 9 of 9 
COUNSEL LIST 
Robert Critton, Esquire 
Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman LLP 
515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400 
West Palm B 
Phone: 
II
Fax: 
Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire 
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 
250 Australian Avenue S. 
West Palm B  ach. FL 33401 
Phone: 
Richard H. Willits, Esquire 
Richard H. Willits, P.A. 
2290 10th Avenue North 
Suite 404 
Lake Worth, F 
Phone: 
Fax: 
Bruce E. Reinhart, Esquire 
Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. 
250 South Australian Avenue 
Suite 1400 
West Palm B 
Phone: 
Fax: 
EFTA00182959

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 147-2 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 
Page 1 of 20 
#281849/clw 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-
MARRA/JOHNSON 
Plaintiff(s), 
vs. 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN and 
Defendant(s). 
NOTICE OF SERVING 
ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES 
COMES NOW the Plaintiff, 
by and through undersigned counsel, and hereby 
files this Notice with the Court that Answers to Interrogatories propounded by the Defendant, 
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, on January 16, 2009, have been furnished to the attorney for the 
Defendant. 
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished by mail this 
(Tr- day of February, 2009, to: See attac ed list of counsel. 
Cc 
JACK SCA OLA 
Florida Bar No. 
JACK P. HILL 
Florida Bar No.: 
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard 
West P 
da 33409 
Phone: 
Fax: 
Attorney for Plaint:1gs) 
[
PLAINTIFF'S 
EXHIBIT 
EFTA00182960

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 147-2 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 
Page 2 of 20 
vs. Epstein, et al. 
sa 
08-CV-80811-C1V-MARRA/JOHNSON 
Plaintiffs Answers to Defendant's First interrogatories 
ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES 
1. 
What is the name and address of all persons answering or assisting in answering 
these interrogatories, and, if applicable, the person's official position or 
relationship with the party to whom the interrogatories are directed? 
ANSWER 
c/o her attorneys: 
Jack Scarola, Esq. and Jack P. Hill, Esq. 
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard 
West Palm Beach, FL 33409 
With the assistance of her counsel, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & 
Shipley, P.A. and Richard Willits, P.A. 
2. 
List the names, business addresses, telephone and cell phone numbers, dates of 
employment, immediate supervisor (name and address) and rates of pay 
regarding all employers, including self-employment, for whom you have worked 
in the past 10 years; this includes listing all sources of income you have received. 
Answer this question by year, i.e. 1998-2009. 
ANSWER 
Objection. Irrelevant, immaterial and not reasonably calculated to lead to 
.discovery of admissible evidence. 
3. 
List all former names and when you were known by those names. State all 
addresses where you have lived for the past 10 years, the dates you lived at 
each address, your Social Security number, your date of birth, and, if you are or 
have ever been married, the name of your spouse or spouses. List any children 
by name, date of birth and the father's name and address. List the names and 
address of your parents and any brother or sister. 
ANSWER 
Nickname= 
2 
EFTA00182961

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 147-2 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 
Page 3 of 20 
El
vs. Epstein, et al. 
o.: 08-CV-801311-C1V-MARRA/JOHNSON 
Plaintiff's Answers to Defendant's First Interrogatories 
I have never been marriea. 
Children: 
Parents: 
Siblings: 
3 
EFTA00182962

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 147-2 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 
Page 4 of 20 
vs. Epstein, ct al. 
Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON 
Plaintiff's Answers to Defendant's First Interrogatories 
4. 
Have you ever been convicted of a crime, other than any juvenile adjudication, 
which under the law under which you were convicted was punishable by death or 
imprisonment in excess of 1 year, or that involved dishonesty or a false 
statement regardless of the punishment? If so, state as to each conviction the 
specific crime and the date and place of conviction. 
• ANSWER 
No 
5. 
Please provide the name, address, telephone number, place of employment and 
Job title of any person who has, claims to have or whom you believe may have 
knowledge or information pertaining to any fact alleged in the pleadings (as 
defined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7(a) filed in this action, or any fact 
underlying the subject matter of this action). 
ANSWER 
1. 
c/o her attorneys: 
Jack Scarola, Esq. and Jack P. Hill, Esq. 
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard 
West Palm Beach. FL 33409 
Tel: 
Richard Willits, Esq. 
Richard H. Willits, P.A. 
2290 10th Avenue North, Suite 404 
Lako Worth. FL 33461 
Tel: 
Subject matter: 
Plaintiff. 
2. 
Jeffrey Epstein 
do his attorneys: 
Robert Critton, Esquire 
Burman Critton Luther & Coleman LLP 
4 
EFTA00182963

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 147-2 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 
Page 5 of 20 
C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. 
Case No.: 08-CV-8081 I-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON 
Plaintiff's Answers to Defendant's First Interrogatories 
516 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33414 
Tel: 
Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire 
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 
250 Australian Avenue South 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Tel: 
Bruce E. Reinhart, Esquire 
Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. 
250 South Australian Avenue 
Suite 1400 
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 
Tel: 
Subject matter: 
Defendant 
3. 
a 
mother 
clo 
s attorneys: 
Jack Scarola, Esq. and Jack P. Hill, Esq. 
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard 
West Palm Beach, FL 33409 
Tel: 
Richard Willits, Esq. 
Richard H. Willits, P.A. 
2290 10th Avenue North, Suite 404 
Lake Worth, FL 33461 
Tel: 
4. 
Subject matter: 
ress un nown) 
a
s involvement with Epstein. 
Subject matter: 
Defendant. 
EFTA00182964

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 147-2 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 
Page 6 of 20 
C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. 
Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRAJJOIINSON 
Plaintiff's Answers to Defendant's First Interrogatories 
5. 
Jane Doe (Case No.: 1:93-ev-01109-KAM) 
c/o her attorney: 
Theodore Leopold, Esquire 
Leopold, Kuvin, P.A. 
2925 P.G.A. Boulevard, Suite 200 
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 
Tel: 
Subject matter: 
Victim of Epstein. 
6. 
Jane Doe (Case No.: 502008CA020614) 
c/o her attorney: 
Isidro M. Garcia, Esquire 
The Law Office of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC 
2028 Harrison Street, Suite 202 
HoII wood, FL 33020 
Tel: 
Subject matter: 
Victim of Epstein. 
7. 
Jane Doe #2 (Case No.: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) 
c/o her attorney: 
Jeffrey M. Herman, Esquire 
Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 
18205 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218 
Miami, FL 33160 
Tel: 
Subject matter: 
Victim of Epstein. 
8. 
Jane Doe #3 (Case No.: 9:08-cv-80232-KAM) 
c/o her attorney: 
Jeffrey M. Herman, Esquire 
Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 
18205 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218 
Miami, FL 33160 
Tel: 
6 
EFTA00182965

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 147-2 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 
Page 7 of 20 
vs. Epstein, et al. 
asc 
08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRABOHNSON 
Plaintiff's Answers to Defendant's First Interrogatories 
Subject matter: 
Victim of Epstein. 
9. 
Jane Doe #5 (Case No.: 9:08-cv-80381-KAM) 
c/o her attorney: 
Jeffrey M. Herman, Esquire 
Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 
18205 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218 
Miami, FL 33160 
Tel: 
Subject matter: 
Victim of Epstein. 
10. 
Jane Doe #4 (Case No.: 9:08-cv-80380-KAM) 
c/o her attorney: 
Jeffrey M. Herman, Esquire 
Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 
18205 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218 
Miami, FL 33160 
Tel: 
Subject matter: 
Victim of Epstein. 
11. 
Jane Doe (Case No.: 9:08-cv-80804-KAM) 
c/o her attorney: 
Theodore Leopold, Esquire 
Leopold, Kuvin, P.A. 
2925 P.G.A. Boulevard, Suite 200 
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 
Tel: 
Subject matter: 
Victim of Epstein. 
12. 
Jane Doe #7 (Case No.: 9:08-cv-80993-KAM) 
cto her attorney: 
Jeffrey ht Herman, Esquire 
Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 
7 
EFTA00182966

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM 
Document 147-2 
Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 
Page 8 of 20 
1.5. 
vs. Epstein, et al. 
Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRALIOHNSON 
Plaintiff's Answers to Defendant's First Interrogatories 
18205 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218 
Miami Fl 33160 
Tel: 
Subject matter: Victim of Epstein. 
13. 
(Case No.: 502008CA025129)OOO01/3 Al 
c/o her attorneys: 
Jack Scarola, Esquire 
Jack P. Hill, Esquire 
Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard 
Tel:
West Painfleach, FL 33409 
Subject matter: 
Victim of Epstein. 
14. 
Jose Alessi 
(Address unknown at this time) 
Subject matter: 
Jeffrey Epstein's Butler. 
15. 
16. 
Palm Beach Police Department 
345 South County Road 
Palm Beach FL 33480
Tel: 
Subject matter: 
Investigator. 
Palm Beach County Prosecutors Office 
401 North Dixie Highway 
West Palm Beach  FL 33401 
Tel: 
Subject matter: 
17. 
Detective 
Prosecutor. 
, lead investigator 
8 
EFTA00182967